Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy

Joshua J. Morigi, Phillip D. Stricker, Pim J. van Leeuwen, Reuben Tang, Bao Ho, Quoc Nguyen, George Hruby, Gerald Fogarty, Raj Jagavkar, Andrew Kneebone, Adam Hickey, Stefano Fanti, Lisa Tarlinton and Louise Emmett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2015, 56 (8) 1185-1190; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.160382
Joshua J. Morigi
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent’s Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia
2Nuclear Medicine Operative Unit, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phillip D. Stricker
3St. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, St. Vincent’s Clinic, Sydney, Australia
4Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research/Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pim J. van Leeuwen
3St. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, St. Vincent’s Clinic, Sydney, Australia
4Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research/Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reuben Tang
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent’s Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia
5University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bao Ho
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent’s Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Quoc Nguyen
3St. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, St. Vincent’s Clinic, Sydney, Australia
4Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research/Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Hruby
6University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerald Fogarty
3St. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, St. Vincent’s Clinic, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raj Jagavkar
3St. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, St. Vincent’s Clinic, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Kneebone
6University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Hickey
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent’s Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefano Fanti
2Nuclear Medicine Operative Unit, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Tarlinton
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent’s Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise Emmett
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent’s Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia
5University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Total number of lesions detected for each patient with 18F-fluoromethylcholine (FMC) and 68Ga-PSMA, ranked by ascending PSA value.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Total number of 18F-fluoromethylcholine (FMC) and 68Ga-PSMA–positive lesions per anatomic site, including prostate bed or seminal vesicles (local), bone, or lymph nodes.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    A 70-y-old man with Gleason 7 prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy who presented with rising PSA level (8.9) and PSA doubling time of 9.5 mo. 18F-fluoromethylcholine (FMC) scan was negative, whereas 68Ga-PSMA scan demonstrated intense uptake in prostate (maximum standardized uptake value, 4.5). Subsequent biopsy confirmed local recurrence.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Impact on management. FMC = 18F-fluoromethylcholine.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    A 62-y-old man with Gleason 7 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy and salvage radiation who presented with rising PSA level (0.4) and PSA doubling time of 8 mo. 18F-fluoromethylcholine (FMC) PET/CT findings were negative, whereas 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan demonstrated single positive left obturator lymph node (maximum standardized uptake value, 3.7). Subsequent biopsy confirmed prostate cancer recurrence.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    A 70-y-old man with Gleason 7 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy who presented with rising PSA (12.0) and PSA doubling time of 5.8 mo. Both 18F-fluoromethylcholine (FMC) PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were positive for nodal disease (4 lesions positive on 18F-fluoromethylcholine imaging and 9 on 68Ga-PSMA). However, TBR was higher for 68Ga-PSMA than for 18F-fluoromethylcholine (25.0 vs. 7.0 in this image of positive paracaval lymph node). Biopsy confirmed nodal recurrence of prostate cancer.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Characteristics and Preimaging Data

    CharacteristicData
    Age (y)
     Mean68
     Range54–81
    PSA at time of scan (ng/dL)
     Mean ± SD1.72 ± 2.54
     Range0.04–12.0
    PSA doubling time (mo)
     Mean ± SD15.6 ± 22.1
     Range2.6–111.2
    Initial treatment (n)
     Radical prostatectomy34/38 (89%)
     Radiotherapy*4/38 (11%)
     Surgery + salvage radiotherapy12/38 (32%)
     PSA at diagnosis (ng/dL)
      Mean ± SD9.7 ± 4.9
      Range2.8–20.2
     Years since diagnosis
     Mean7
     Range1–18
    Gleason score (n)
     6–723/38 (61%)
     8–915/38 (39%)
    Risk group† (n)
     Intermediate11/38 (24%)
     High27/38 (76%)
    • ↵* External-beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy.

    • ↵† According to European Association of Urology guidelines.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Detection Rates of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine and 68Ga-PSMA

    PSA level (ng/mL)18F-fluoromethylcholine68Ga-PSMAP
    <0.512.5% (2/16)50% (8/16)0.03
    0.5–2.036% (5/14)71% (10/14)0.02
    >2.063% (5/8)88% (7/8)0.18
    Total32% (12/38)66% (25/38)<0.001
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 8
August 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy
Joshua J. Morigi, Phillip D. Stricker, Pim J. van Leeuwen, Reuben Tang, Bao Ho, Quoc Nguyen, George Hruby, Gerald Fogarty, Raj Jagavkar, Andrew Kneebone, Adam Hickey, Stefano Fanti, Lisa Tarlinton, Louise Emmett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2015, 56 (8) 1185-1190; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160382

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy
Joshua J. Morigi, Phillip D. Stricker, Pim J. van Leeuwen, Reuben Tang, Bao Ho, Quoc Nguyen, George Hruby, Gerald Fogarty, Raj Jagavkar, Andrew Kneebone, Adam Hickey, Stefano Fanti, Lisa Tarlinton, Louise Emmett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2015, 56 (8) 1185-1190; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160382
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Diagnostic Efficacy of Various Imaging Modalities Across Different Stages of Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies
  • Prospective Comparison of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
  • Strong Correlation Between SUVmax on PSMA PET/CT and Numeric Drop-In {gamma}-Probe Signal for Intraoperative Identification of Prostate Cancer Lesions
  • An Analysis of the Distribution of PSMA PET/CT-Positive Lymph Nodes and Their Coverage by Different Elective Nodal Radiation Volumes in Postoperative Prostate Cancer Patients
  • Phase III Study of 18F-PSMA-1007 Versus 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT for Localization of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Multicenter Study
  • Biology of Cancer and PET Imaging: Pictorial Review
  • Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging in Early Relapsed Prostate Cancer After Radical Therapy: A Prospective Multicenter Study (IAEA-PSMA Study)
  • Detection Efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET/CT and Impact on Management in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy and Before Potential Salvage Treatment
  • Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer
  • Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET on the Management of Recurrent Prostate Cancer in a Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial
  • 11C-Choline PET/CT in Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Retrospective Analysis in a Large U.S. Patient Series
  • 3-Year Freedom from Progression After 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-Triaged Management in Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Trial
  • [18F]DCFPyL PET-MRI/CT for unveiling a molecularly defined oligorecurrent prostate cancer state amenable for curative-intent ablative therapy: study protocol for a phase II trial
  • Appropriate Use Criteria for Imaging Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Primary Treatment
  • Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Staging Prostate Cancer Using Histopathology and Immunohistochemical Analysis as a Reference Standard
  • Detection Rate and Localization of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in Patients with Low PSA Values <= 0.5 ng/mL
  • Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Guided Surgery
  • Prospective Evaluation of PSMA-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Men with Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
  • Thyroid and androgen receptor signaling are antagonized by CRYM in prostate cancer
  • Healthy Tissue Uptake of 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen, 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-Fluoromethylcholine, and 18F-Dihydrotestosterone
  • Phase I Study of CTT1057, an 18F-Labeled Imaging Agent with Phosphoramidate Core Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Prostate Cancer
  • Detection Rate of 18F-Choline PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT for Prostate Cancer Lymph Node Metastases with Direct Link from PET to Histopathology: Dependence on the Size of Tumor Deposits in Lymph Nodes
  • Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on the Radiotherapeutic Approach to Prostate Cancer in Comparison to CT: A Retrospective Analysis
  • Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Validated by Histopathology
  • Proceedings: Pathways for Successful Translation of New Imaging Agents and Modalities--Phase III Studies
  • Prospective, Multisite, International Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine PET/CT, Multiparametric MRI, and 68Ga-HBED-CC PSMA-11 PET/CT in Men with High-Risk Features and Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Performance and Patient Outcomes
  • Follow-up of Lesions with Equivocal Radiotracer Uptake on PSMA-Targeted PET in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Predictive Values of the PSMA-RADS-3A and PSMA-RADS-3B Categories
  • Dosimetry of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Correlations Between Pretherapeutic Imaging and Whole-Body Tumor Dosimetry with Treatment Outcomes
  • Detection Efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
  • 68Gallium-labelled PSMA-PET/CT as a diagnostic and clinical decision-making tool in Asian prostate cancer patients following prostatectomy
  • Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Initial Results with [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT
  • 64CuCl2 PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Relapse
  • Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on the Management of Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence
  • Proposal for a Structured Reporting System for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted PET Imaging: PSMA-RADS Version 1.0
  • 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Mapping of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in 270 Patients with a PSA Level of Less Than 1.0 ng/mL: Impact on Salvage Radiotherapy Planning
  • Impact of 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT on Prostate Cancer Management
  • The Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on Management Intent in Prostate Cancer: Results of an Australian Prospective Multicenter Study
  • Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET on Management in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
  • Treatment Outcomes from 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-Informed Salvage Radiation Treatment in Men with Rising PSA After Radical Prostatectomy: Prognostic Value of a Negative PSMA PET
  • Seduction by Sensitivity: Reality, Illusion, or Delusion? The Challenge of Assessing Outcomes after PSMA Imaging Selection of Patients for Treatment
  • PSMA Ligands for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer
  • Molecular radiotheragnostics in prostate cancer
  • 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Cancer Assessments: An International Multicenter Prospective Study
  • Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligands for Imaging and Therapy
  • Acceleration of PSMA-Targeted Theranostics to the Clinic: Can Common Sense Prevail?
  • Detection Efficacy of Hybrid 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Primary Radiation Therapy Defined by Phoenix Criteria
  • 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT Has a Role in Detecting Prostate Cancer Lesions in Patients with Recurrent Disease
  • The Clinical Impact of Additional Late PET/CT Imaging with 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
  • 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Imaging of Response to Androgen Receptor Inhibition: First Human Experience
  • The Rise of PSMA Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy of Prostate Cancer
  • What Medical, Urologic, and Radiation Oncologists Want from Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer
  • Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radiohalogenated PET and Therapeutic Agents for Prostate Cancer
  • Pilot Comparison of 68Ga-RM2 PET and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
  • 18F-Fluoride PET in the Assessment of Malignant Bone Disease
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Left Ventricular Strain from Myocardial Perfusion PET Imaging: Method Development and Comparison to 2-Dimensional Echocardiography
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-fluoromethylcholine
  • 68Ga-PSMA
  • molecular imaging
  • PET/CT
  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire