HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Koepfli, P. Articles by Kaufmann, P. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Koepfli, P. Articles by Kaufmann, P. A.

CT Attenuation Correction for Myocardial Perfusion Quantification Using a PET/CT Hybrid Scanner

¹ Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
² Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
In routine PET, a 10- to 20-min transmission scan with a rotating ⁶⁸Ge source is commonly obtained for attenuation correction (AC). AC is time-consuming using this procedure and could considerably be shortened by instead using a rapid CT scan. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of CT AC in quantitative myocardial perfusion PET using a hybrid PET/CT scanner. Methods: ¹³N-labeled NH₃ and PET were used to measure myocardial blood flow (MBF) (mL/min/g) at rest and during standard adenosine stress. In group 1 (n = 7), CT scans (0.5 s) of the heart area with different tube currents (10, 40, 80, and 120 mA) were compared with a standard ⁶⁸Ge transmission (20 min) and with no AC. In group 2 (n = 3), the repeatability of 8 consecutive CT scans at a tube current of 10 mA was assessed. In group 3 (n = 4), emission was preceded and followed by 3 CT scans (10 mA) and 1 ⁶⁸Ge scan for each patient. For reconstruction, filtered backprojection (FBP) was compared with iterative reconstruction (IT). Results: For group 1, no significant difference in mean MBF for resting and hyperemic scans was found when emission reconstructed with ⁶⁸Ge AC was compared with emission reconstructed with CT AC at any of the different tube currents. Only emission without any correction differed significantly from ⁶⁸Ge AC. For group 2, repeated measurements revealed a coefficient of variance ranging from 2% to 5% and from 2% to 6% at rest and at stress, respectively. For group 3, similar reproducibility coefficients (RC) for MBF were obtained when ⁶⁸Ge AC_FBP was compared with ⁶⁸Ge AC_IT (RC = 0.218) and when CT AC_FBP was compared with CT AC_IT (RC = 0.227). Even better reproducibility (lower RC) was found when ⁶⁸Ge AC_FBP was compared with CT AC_FBP (RC = 0.130) and when ⁶⁸Ge AC_IT was compared with CT AC_IT (RC = 0.146). Conclusion: Our study shows that for the assessment of qualitative and quantitative MBF with a hybrid PET/CT scanner, the use of CT AC (with a tube current of 10 mA) instead of ⁶⁸Ge AC provides accurate results.

Key Words: hybrid PET/CT scanner • CT attenuation correction • myocardial blood flow

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
PET is currently the accepted gold standard in noninvasive imaging of coronary perfusion in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). Its main advantage over SPECT is its better spatial resolution and the fact that perfusion values can be not only estimated qualitatively but calculated quantitatively, using a dynamic scanning protocol with appropriate tracers such as ¹³N-labeled NH₃ or ¹⁵O-labeled H₂O (1). To accurately quantify tracer uptake, photon attenuation correction (AC) is crucial. At present, a rotating ⁶⁸Ge source is commonly used for photon AC in oncology studies and in cardiac viability studies and perfusion scanning. ⁶⁸Ge sources have only a low photon flux, which necessitates long acquisition times of up to 20 min (2,3), although with current methods transmission times of much less than 20 min can be used. The result is an increased chance of motion artifacts and poor anatomic image quality, as well as patient discomfort and economic losses because of lower patient throughput (4). Introduction of hybrid PET/CT systems using the CT scan for AC is expected to improve these limitations, since a high-end CT scanner can acquire images with a far higher spatial resolution in a much shorter time than can a conventional ⁶⁸Ge transmission scan. Our group has already shown the feasibility of obtaining adequate photon AC with a CT scan in static ¹⁸F-FDG PET scans (5,6). However, it remains unclear whether a CT scan provides adequate photon AC for calculating myocardial blood flow (MBF) in a standardized non–electrocardiography (ECG)-gated dynamic cardiac perfusion PET scan using ¹³N-labeled NH₃. Because of physiologic cardiac motion and the short duration of a CT scan of the heart (3.9 s), compared with a conventional ⁶⁸Ge transmission scan of the heart, the need for ECG gating of the heart cycle has to be investigated. The required CT tube currents must also be considered, since high currents mean increased radiation to the patient. For reconstruction of emission data of dynamic cardiac PET, filtered backprojection (FBP) is a widely accepted standard, but iterativereconstruction (IT) (i.e., ordered-subset expectation maximization [OSEM]) is considered an established alternative, particularly in static PET (7). Whether this alternative also applies to CT AC in dynamic cardiac PET remains unclear.

The aim of the present study was, therefore, to determine the lowest possible adequate CT energy dose for CT AC, compare the accuracy and repeatability of nongated CT AC and routine ⁶⁸Ge AC for dynamic cardiac perfusion measurements, and find the most appropriate reconstruction parameters.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
Study Population
Fourteen consecutive patients (12 men and 2 women; mean age, 62 y; range, 45–76 y) were included in the study. All participants had angiographically documented CAD defined as one or more vessels with >50% diameter reduction (3 patients had 1-vessel disease, 1 had 2-vessel disease, and 10 had 3-vessel disease). All patients were clinically stable, and the scans were obtained primarily for clinical purposes. According to clinical indications, a perfusion scan was obtained for all patients at rest and was repeated for 7 patients during adenosine stress. The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all participants gave informed written consent.

Study Design
In group 1 (n = 7), emission was preceded by 4 CT AC scans with different CT tube currents (10, 40, 80, and 120 mA) and was followed by 1 ⁶⁸Ge AC scan. In 4 patients of this group, MBF was also assessed during standard pharmacologic stress, that is, a 7-min infusion of adenosine at 0.14 mg/min/kg of body weight (8,9).

In group 2 (n = 3), each emission (resting and hyperemic MBF) was preceded by 8 CT AC scans using a constant CT tube current of 10 mA. The CT scans were obtained at random times during the heart cycle to test the repeatability of CT AC regardless of the motion of the beating heart.

In group 3 (n = 4), emission (resting MBF only) was preceded and followed by 3 CT AC scans at a CT tube current of 10 mA each. Additionally, 2 ⁶⁸Ge AC scans were obtained, one before and another after emission for each patient. These scans were used to compare CT AC and ⁶⁸Ge AC with different reconstruction algorithms.

Image Acquisition
Imaging was performed on a Discovery LS PET/CT scanner (General Electric Medical Systems). This scanner integrates the Advance PET system, with a 7-mm reconstructed in-plane resolution, and a 4-row helical CT scanner (LightSpeed Plus). First, a CT scout scan providing an anteroposterior and lateral view of the chest area was acquired. This scan was used to localize the field of view for the following emission and transmission scans. All patients received a 700- to 900-MBq injection of ¹³N-labeled NH₃ into a peripheral vein before the start of serial transaxial tomographic imaging of the heart. Ammonia was injected during 10 s with a dynamic imaging sequence, which was previously designed to get a sampling rate sufficient to measure the tracer bolus (10) and consisted of nine 10-s, six 15-s, three 20-s, two 30-s, and one 900-s frames (Fig. 1). Transmission data for photon AC were acquired in a 20-min transmission scan with external ⁶⁸Ge and in a nongated CT transmission scan of the chest area, using the following parameters: scan length, 15 cm; rotation time, 0.5 s; total scan time, 3.9 s; 140 kV; and slice thickness, 5 mm. AC was performed using the standard reconstruction software of the Discovery LS. For CT-based AC, this software performs a bilinear conversion of the CT Hounsfield units into linear attenuation coefficients at the PET energy, as outlined previously in detail (5). To achieve accurate image fusion, the same landmarks were used for repeated scans.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 1. (A) Time–activity curves of left ventricular blood pool () (input function) and left ventricular myocardium (). (B) ROIs for left ventricular cavity and myocardial tissue drawn on a short-axis cut of the heart.

Visual Assessment
We studied the effect of the different attenuation approaches on regional ¹³N-labeled NH₃ concentration when only static images were obtained. For this purpose, we qualitatively assessed the 900-s frames of all group-1 resting and hyperemic perfusion scans reconstructed with ⁶⁸Ge AC as well as with the lowest (10 mA) and the highest (120 mA) CT tube current AC. The 16-segment model was applied (14), and each segment was graded as normal or abnormal by an experienced reader who was unaware of the study condition.

Statistical Analysis
Values are given as mean ± SD. MBF values were compared using ANOVA for repeated measurements; P values of <0.05 were considered significant. Agreement between 2 methods was estimated according to the method of Bland and Altman (15) by reporting a reproducibility coefficient (RC) of 1.96 x the SD as absolute values and as a percentage. The coefficient of variation was reported as a percentage. For the visual assessment, a ² test was performed and the -value was calculated.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
Group 1
No significant differences in mean MBF (mL/min/g) for resting and hyperemic scans were found when emission reconstructed with ⁶⁸Ge AC was compared with emission reconstructed with CT AC of various tube currents: 0.80 ± 0.24 (⁶⁸Ge AC), 0.83 ± 0.32 (CT AC, 10 mA), 0.78 ± 0.30 (CT AC, 40 mA), 0.82 ± 0.30 (CT AC, 80 mA), and 0.75 ± 0.32 (CT AC, 120 mA) (P = not statistically significant). Mean MBF derived from uncorrected emission data (1.62 ± 1.06) was significantly different from all corrected data (P < 0.005) (Fig. 2). The quality of the CT scan with 10 mA was clearly worse than that of the CT scan with 80 or 120 mA. However, after degradation with a gaussian filter of 8 mm in full width at half maximum, both scans looked similar and demonstrated still higher resolution than the ⁶⁸Ge transmission scan. This finding is in agreement with the findings of our previous study (6) that extensively evaluated the impact of lowering the CT tube current on CT AC. The applied acquisition parameters in this setting lead to an estimated effective irradiation dose of 0.05 mSv for a 10-mA CT scan (dose length product = 7.57 mGy x cm), compared with 0.38 mSv for an 80-mA CT scan (dose length product = 60.6 mGy x cm).

View larger version (8K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 2. Percentage difference of CT AC at different tube currents vs. standard 68Ge AC.

Group 2
Global MBF and coefficients of variance are shown in Figure 3. Regional values are given in Table 1. Coronary angiography revealed severe, moderate, and mild CAD in patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively, as reflected by the small, intermediate, and large differences between resting and hyperemic MBF in each patient.

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 3. Repeated MBF measurements using CT AC (10 mA). Coefficients of variance (COV) are given as percentages.

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 4. Bland–Altman plots of MBF (mL/min/g) in group 3. (A) Comparison of reconstruction algorithms: FBP vs. IT. Top graph shows 68Ge AC (RC = 0.22 mL/min/g [29%]). Bottom graph shows CT AC (RC = 0.23 mL/min/g [29%]). (B) Comparison of AC sources: 68Ge vs. CT. Top graph shows FBP (RC = 0.13 mL/min/g [17%]). Bottom graph shows IT (RC = 0.15 mL/min/g [19%]).

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

The results for group 1 showed that different tube currents for CT AC do not lead to significant differences in MBF and that CT AC with each tube current is highly comparable to ⁶⁸Ge AC. Therefore, a 10-mA CT scan seems sufficient for CT AC. These results are in line with those of Kamel et al. (6), who found that lowering of the CT tube current to 10 mA did not affect tumor ¹⁸F-FDG uptake or detectable lesion size. High currents improve image quality but also increase radiation dose to the patient. Because high-quality anatomic information is not mandatory in dynamic PET of myocardial perfusion, there is no need to elevate the radiation dose for this purpose. The CT current could possibly have been reduced even more without compromising the attenuation map. For technical reasons, however, our system did not allow this option. Because further current reduction may be possible in the future without compromising the accuracy of the AC, but possibly reducing image quality, we recommend that the ROI for quantification continue to be drawn directly on images obtained from the 900-s frame of the PET scan.

Registration of a ⁶⁸Ge AC scan of the beating heart over an interval of up to 20 min results in blurring of all cardiac cycles. Additional body-motion artifacts often further decrease image quality, because many patients, particularly those with back pain or with congestive heart failure and dyspnea, find it challenging to remain still throughout a PET examination.

In group 2, however, we found highly reproducible MBF values, as shown by the low coefficients of variance (Table 1), for the 8 consecutive nongated CT attenuation scans at a tube current of 10 mA. Because the scan duration is 3.9 s, the relative contribution of the systolic and diastolic phases may approximate one third to two thirds—similar to the 20-min ⁶⁸Ge AC scan but not exactly predictable for each slice. The substantially shortened acquisition time of the transmission scan with CT AC may have reduced the likelihood of noncardiac motion artifacts and thus contributed to the excellent repeatability of the MBF results, suggesting no need for ECG gating for CT AC. Determining whether repeatability could be further improved through use of breathing protocols, as suggested by Goerres et al. for patients with lung cancer (16), was beyond the scope of the present study.

MBF values calculated using 10-mA CT AC showed excellent agreement with those calculated using ⁶⁸Ge AC (Fig. 4) as long as the same reconstruction algorithm, that is, either FBP or IT, was used for both AC scans. Differences in MBF values were greater between the 2 reconstruction algorithms (FBP and IT) than between the 2 methods of AC (⁶⁸Ge AC and CT AC) (Fig. 4). Thus, ⁶⁸Ge AC and CT AC are interchangeable, but the same reconstruction algorithm must always be chosen. We use FBP because it has been established at our institution as the standard reconstruction algorithm in those experimental animal studies that have validated myocardial PET perfusion against the microsphere gold standard (17–19).

Our results may have implications for future cardiac PET/CT protocols. First, for tracers with a short half-life, such as ⁸²Rb or H₂¹⁵O, a short CT AC will increase patient throughput. Second, combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy with hybrid PET/CT will allow use of the CT scan for AC of the PET scan, improving the efficiency of the scan protocol.

	CONCLUSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 
Our study shows that for the assessment of qualitative and quantitative MBF with a hybrid PET/CT scanner, the use of CT AC, with a tube current of 10 mA, instead of ⁶⁸Ge AC provides accurate results.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
This study was supported by an SNSF Professorship grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation, by a grant from EMDO STIFTUNG Zurich and Radiumfonds Zürich, and by General Electric Medical Systems.

	FOOTNOTES

 
Received Sep. 8, 2003; revision accepted Nov. 21, 2003.

For correspondence or reprints contact: Philipp A. Kaufmann, MD, Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital C NUK 32, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

E-mail: pak{at}usz.ch

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION REFERENCES

 

1. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Yap JT, Rimoldi O, Camici PG. Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with ¹⁵O-labeled water and PET. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1848–1856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Hermansen F, Rosen SD, Fath-Ourdubadi F, et al. Measurement of myocardial blood flow with ¹⁵O labeled water: comparison of different administration protocols. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:751–759.[Medline]
3. Nagamachi S, Czernin J, Kim AS, et al. Reproducibility of measurements of regional resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow assessed with PET. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1626–1631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. von Schulthess GK. Cost considerations regarding an integrated PET/CT system. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(suppl 3):S377–S380.
5. Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AH, Von Schulthess GK. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:922–927.[Medline]
6. Kamel E, Hany TF, Burger C, et al. CT versus ⁶⁸Ge attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT system: evaluation of the effect of lowering the CT tube current. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:346–350.[Medline]
7. Boellaard R, van Lingen A, Lammertsma AA. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:808–817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Cerqueira MD, Verain MS, Schwaiger M, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan multicenter trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:384–389.[Abstract]
9. Wyss CA, Koepfli P, Mikolajczyk K, Burger C, von Schulthess GK, Kaufmann PA. Bicycle exercise stress in PET for assessment of coronary flow reserve: repeatability and comparison with adenosine stress. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:146–154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Jenni R, Wyss CA, Oechslin EN, Kaufmann PA. Isolated ventricular noncompaction is associated with coronary microcirculatory dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:450–454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Muzik O, Beanlands RS, Hutchins GD, Manger TJ, Nguyen N, Schwaiger M. Validation of nitrogen-13-ammonia tracer kinetic model for quantification of myocardial blood flow using PET. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:83–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M, Rosenspire KC, Krivokapich J, Schelbert H, Kuhl DE. Noninvasive quantification of regional blood flow in the human heart using N-13 ammonia and dynamic PET imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:1032–1042.[Abstract]
13. Hutchins GD, Caraher JM, Raylman RR. A region of interest strategy for minimizing resolution distortions in quantitative myocardial PET studies. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1243–1250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539–542.[Free Full Text]
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between 2 methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307–310.
16. Goerres GW, Kamel E, Heidelberg TN, Schwitter MR, Burger C, von Schulthess GK. PET/CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:351–360.[Medline]
17. Lammertsma AA, De Silva R, Araujo LI, Jones T. Measurement of regional myocardial blood flow using C¹⁵O₂ and PET: comparison of tracer models. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1992;13:1–20.
18. Ahn JY, Lee DS, Lee JS, et al. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using dynamic H₂¹⁵O PET and factor analysis. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:782–787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Schafers KP, Spinks TJ, Camici PG, et al. Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow with H₂¹⁵O and 3-dimensional PET: an experimental validation. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1031–1040.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. A. Herzog, L. Husmann, I. Valenta, O. Gaemperli, P. T. Siegrist, F. M. Tay, N. Burkhard, C. A. Wyss, and P. A. Kaufmann Long-Term Prognostic Value of (13)N-Ammonia Myocardial Perfusion Positron Emission Tomography Added Value of Coronary Flow Reserve. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2009; 54(2): 150 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Slomka, L. Le Meunier, S. W. Hayes, W. Acampa, M. Oba, G. G. Haemer, D. S. Berman, and G. Germano Comparison of Myocardial Perfusion 82Rb PET Performed with CT- and Transmission CT-Based Attenuation Correction J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2008; 49(12): 1992 - 1998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Buck, S. Nekolla, S. Ziegler, A. Beer, B. J. Krause, K. Herrmann, K. Scheidhauer, H.-J. Wester, E. J. Rummeny, M. Schwaiger, et al. SPECT/CT J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1305 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Gaemperli, T. Schepis, I. Valenta, P. Koepfli, L. Husmann, H. Scheffel, S. Leschka, F. R. Eberli, T. F. Luscher, H. Alkadhi, et al. Functionally Relevant Coronary Artery Disease: Comparison of 64-Section CT Angiography with Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 414 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, and S. Sdringola Reducing Radiation Dose in Rest-Stress Cardiac PET/CT by Single Poststress Cine CT for Attenuation Correction: Quantitative Validation J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 738 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Schepis, O. Gaemperli, V. Treyer, I. Valenta, C. Burger, P. Koepfli, M. Namdar, I. Adachi, H. Alkadhi, and P. A. Kaufmann Absolute Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow with 13N-Ammonia and 3-Dimensional PET J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1783 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Einstein, K. W. Moser, R. C. Thompson, M. D. Cerqueira, and M. J. Henzlova Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11): 1290 - 1305. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Schepis, O. Gaemperli, P. Koepfli, M. Namdar, I. Valenta, H. Scheffel, S. Leschka, L. Husmann, F. R. Eberli, T. F. Luscher, et al. Added Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score as an Adjunct to Gated SPECT for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease in an Intermediate-Risk Population J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1424 - 1430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, A. Guha, and S. Sdringola Frequent Diagnostic Errors in Cardiac PET/CT Due to Misregistration of CT Attenuation and Emission PET Images: A Definitive Analysis of Causes, Consequences, and Corrections J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1112 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Bacharach PET/CT Attenuation Correction: Breathing Lessons J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 677 - 679. [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Gaemperli, T. Schepis, I. Valenta, L. Husmann, H. Scheffel, V. Duerst, F. R. Eberli, T. F. Luscher, H. Alkadhi, and P. A. Kaufmann Cardiac Image Fusion from Stand-Alone SPECT and CT: Clinical Experience J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 696 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A.H. Cook, G. Carnes, T.-Y. Lee, and R. G. Wells Respiration-Averaged CT for Attenuation Correction in Canine Cardiac PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 811 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Martinez-Moller, M. Souvatzoglou, N. Navab, M. Schwaiger, and S. G. Nekolla Artifacts from Misaligned CT in Cardiac Perfusion PET/CT Studies: Frequency, Effects, and Potential Solutions J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 188 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Wagner, M. Anton, S. G. Nekolla, S. Reder, J. Henke, S. Seidl, R. Hegenloh, M. Miyagawa, R. Haubner, M. Schwaiger, et al. Noninvasive Characterization of Myocardial Molecular Interventions by Integrated Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2107 - 2115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Schepis, O. Gaemperli, P. Koepfli, I. Valenta, K. Strobel, A. Brunner, S. Leschka, L. Desbiolles, L. Husmann, H. Alkadhi, et al. Comparison of 64-Slice CT with Gated SPECT for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1288 - 1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Matter, M. T. Wyss, P. Meier, N. Spath, T. von Lukowicz, C. Lohmann, B. Weber, A. R. de Molina, J. C. Lacal, S. M. Ametamey, et al. 18F-Choline Images Murine Atherosclerotic Plaques Ex Vivo Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 26(3): 584 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Namdar, P. Koepfli, R. Grathwohl, P. T. Siegrist, M. Klainguti, T. Schepis, R. Delaloye, C. A. Wyss, S. P. Fleischmann, O. Gaemperli, et al. Caffeine Decreases Exercise-Induced Myocardial Flow Reserve J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 405 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schwaiger, S. Ziegler, and S. G. Nekolla PET/CT: Challenge for Nuclear Cardiology J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 1664 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Kaufmann, M. Namdar, F. Matthew, M. Roffi, S. V. Aschkenasy, B. van der Loo, G. Sutsch, T. F. Luscher, and R. Jenni Novel Doppler Assessment of Intracoronary Volumetric Flow Reserve: Validation Against PET in Patients With or Without Flow-Dependent Vasodilation J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1272 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Namdar, T. F. Hany, P. Koepfli, P. T. Siegrist, C. Burger, C. A. Wyss, T. F. Luscher, G. K. von Schulthess, and P. A. Kaufmann Integrated PET/CT for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: A Feasibility Study J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 930 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Kaufmann and P. G. Camici Myocardial Blood Flow Measurement by PET: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 75 - 88. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Koepfli, C. A. Wyss, M. Namdar, M. Klainguti, G. K. von Schulthess, T. F. Luscher, and P. A. Kaufmann {beta}-Adrenergic Blockade and Myocardial Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease: Differential Effects in Stenotic Versus Remote Myocardial Segments J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 1626 - 1631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Koepfli, P. Articles by Kaufmann, P. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Koepfli, P. Articles by Kaufmann, P. A.