Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleHuman Studies

Positron Tomographic Assessment of Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer: Comparison with FDG-PET and In Vitro Receptor Assays

Farrokh Dehdashti, Joanne E. Mortimer, Barry A. Siegel, Landis K. Griffeth, Thomas J. Bonasera, Maureen J. Fusselman, Diana D. Detert, P. Duffy Cutler, John A. Katzenellenbogen and Michael J. Welch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 1995, 36 (10) 1766-1774;
Farrokh Dehdashti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne E. Mortimer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry A. Siegel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Landis K. Griffeth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas J. Bonasera
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maureen J. Fusselman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diana D. Detert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Duffy Cutler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John A. Katzenellenbogen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Welch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
PDF extract preview

This is a PDF-only article. The first page of the PDF of this article appears above.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 36, Issue 10
October 1, 1995
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Positron Tomographic Assessment of Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer: Comparison with FDG-PET and In Vitro Receptor Assays
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Positron Tomographic Assessment of Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer: Comparison with FDG-PET and In Vitro Receptor Assays
Farrokh Dehdashti, Joanne E. Mortimer, Barry A. Siegel, Landis K. Griffeth, Thomas J. Bonasera, Maureen J. Fusselman, Diana D. Detert, P. Duffy Cutler, John A. Katzenellenbogen, Michael J. Welch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 1995, 36 (10) 1766-1774;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Positron Tomographic Assessment of Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer: Comparison with FDG-PET and In Vitro Receptor Assays
Farrokh Dehdashti, Joanne E. Mortimer, Barry A. Siegel, Landis K. Griffeth, Thomas J. Bonasera, Maureen J. Fusselman, Diana D. Detert, P. Duffy Cutler, John A. Katzenellenbogen, Michael J. Welch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 1995, 36 (10) 1766-1774;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Breast Cancer: Evaluating Tumor Estrogen Receptor Status with Molecular Imaging to Increase Response to Therapy and Improve Patient Outcomes
  • 18F-FES PET/CT Influences the Staging and Management of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Study with 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Improved Estrogen Receptor Assessment by PET Using the Novel Radiotracer 18F-4FMFES in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: An Ongoing Phase II Clinical Trial
  • Functional Estrogen Receptor Imaging Before Neoadjuvant Therapy for Primary Breast Cancer
  • 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET: Current Status and Potential Future Clinical Applications
  • Imaging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets: Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer
  • Translation of New Molecular Imaging Approaches to the Clinical Setting: Bridging the Gap to Implementation
  • Pharmacodynamic Imaging Guides Dosing of a Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader
  • Assessment of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients Using 16{alpha}-18F-Fluoro-17{beta}-Estradiol PET/CT
  • Feasibility and Predictability of Perioperative PET and Estrogen Receptor Ligand in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer
  • 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET for Differential Diagnosis and Quantitative Evaluation of Mesenchymal Uterine Tumors: Correlation with Immunohistochemical Analysis
  • Oestrogen-related tumour phenotype: positron emission tomography characterisation with 18F-FDG and 18F-FES
  • Small-Animal PET of Steroid Hormone Receptors Predicts Tumor Response to Endocrine Therapy Using a Preclinical Model of Breast Cancer
  • PET Imaging of Estrogen Receptors as a Diagnostic Tool for Breast Cancer Patients Presenting with a Clinical Dilemma
  • 18F-FDG PET of Locally Invasive Breast Cancer and Association of Estrogen Receptor Status with Standardized Uptake Value: Microarray and Immunohistochemical Analysis
  • Imaging Tumor Phenotype: 1 Plus 1 Is More Than 2
  • The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 2--Response to Therapy, Other Indications, and Future Directions
  • Radiopharmaceuticals in Preclinical and Clinical Development for Monitoring of Therapy with PET
  • Tumor Receptor Imaging
  • 7{alpha}-18F-Fluoromethyl-Dihydrotestosterone and 7{alpha}-18F-Fluoromethyl-Nortestosterone: Ligands to Determine the Role of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin for Steroidal Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and 18F-Fluoroestradiol
  • Biodistribution and Predictive Value of 18F-Fluorocyclophosphamide in Mice Bearing Human Breast Cancer Xenografts
  • The Effects of Estrogen, Progesterone, and C-erbB-2 Receptor States on 18F-FDG Uptake of Primary Breast Cancer Lesions
  • Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond
  • Quantitative Fluoroestradiol Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Predicts Response to Endocrine Treatment in Breast Cancer
  • The Progress and Promise of Molecular Imaging Probes in Oncologic Drug Development
  • Receptor Imaging in Oncology by Means of Nuclear Medicine: Current Status
  • Monitoring of Therapy in Androgen-Dependent Prostate Tumor Model by Measuring Tumor Proliferation
  • In Vivo Prediction of Response to Antiestrogen Treatment in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
  • New Technologies in Breast Imaging
  • [18F]Fluoroestradiol Radiation Dosimetry in Human PET Studies
  • Glucose Metabolism of Breast Cancer Assessed by 18F-FDG PET: Histologic and Immunohistochemical Tissue Analysis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PET with L-[1-Carbon-11]-Tyro sine to Visualize Tumors and Measure Protein Synthesis Rates
  • Scintigraphic Assessment of Therapeutic Success in Aldosteronomas Treated by Transcatheter Arterial Embolization Using Absolute Ethanol
  • Incremental Prognostic Value of Thallium Reinjection after Stress-Redistribution Imaging in Patients with Previous Myocardial Infarction and Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Show more Human Studies

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire