Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleHuman Studies

Positron Tomographic Assessment of Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer: Comparison with FDG-PET and In Vitro Receptor Assays

Farrokh Dehdashti, Joanne E. Mortimer, Barry A. Siegel, Landis K. Griffeth, Thomas J. Bonasera, Maureen J. Fusselman, Diana D. Detert, P. Duffy Cutler, John A. Katzenellenbogen and Michael J. Welch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 1995, 36 (10) 1766-1774;
Farrokh Dehdashti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne E. Mortimer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry A. Siegel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Landis K. Griffeth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas J. Bonasera
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maureen J. Fusselman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diana D. Detert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Duffy Cutler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John A. Katzenellenbogen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Welch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 36 no. 10 1766-1774
PubMed 
7562040

Published By 
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Print ISSN 
0161-5505
Online ISSN 
2159-662X

Copyright & Usage 
COPYRIGHT© 1995 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Author Information

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cited By...

  • 271 Citations
  • Citations
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Article usage

Article usage: February 2001 to April 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Feb 2001100
Mar 2001200
Apr 2001200
May 2001100
Jul 2001100
Oct 2001100
Nov 2001300
Jan 2002100
Feb 2002100
Mar 2002400
May 2002100
Aug 2002200
Sep 2002100
Oct 2002300
Nov 2002100
Dec 2002100
Jan 2003300
Feb 2003200
Mar 2003300
Apr 2003100
Jun 2003300
Jul 2003700
Aug 2003800
Sep 2003500
Oct 20031500
Nov 2003800
Dec 2003600
Jan 20041200
Feb 2004800
Mar 2004500
Apr 20041200
May 2004700
Jun 20041800
Jul 20041800
Aug 2004800
Sep 2004200
Oct 2004500
Nov 2004600
Dec 2004600
Jan 2005600
Feb 2005500
Mar 2005600
Apr 20051200
May 2005300
Jun 2005500
Jul 2005100
Aug 2005100
Sep 2005300
Oct 2005200
Nov 2005100
Dec 2005400
Jan 2006800
Mar 2006800
Apr 2006100
May 20061100
Jun 2006400
Jul 2006200
Aug 2006500
Sep 2006800
Oct 20061200
Jan 2007806
Feb 2007507
Mar 20076011
Apr 20073013
May 20076011
Jun 20079011
Jul 2007507
Aug 200711016
Sep 20078015
Oct 20078010
Nov 200713031
Dec 200714012
Jan 20088013
Feb 200810019
Mar 20088013
Apr 2008905
May 2008606
Jun 200810017
Jul 2008804
Aug 200811011
Sep 20081504
Oct 200813013
Nov 200814012
Dec 2008807
Jan 200920015
Feb 200919014
Mar 20098013
Apr 20097012
May 20099010
Jun 2009409
Jul 2009906
Aug 2009407
Sep 20095011
Oct 20095013
Nov 2009706
Dec 2009706
Jan 201010014
Feb 2010404
Mar 201012015
Apr 2010905
May 201011015
Jun 201010012
Jul 201015015
Aug 2010606
Sep 20106011
Oct 20109017
Nov 20109023
Dec 20104015
Jan 20117010
Feb 201112026
Mar 20119012
Apr 201112025
May 201110019
Jun 20110012
Jul 20110026
Aug 20110019
Sep 20110013
Oct 20110020
Nov 20110014
Dec 20110025
Jan 20120016
Feb 20120015
Mar 20120017
Apr 20120013
May 20120018
Jun 20120018
Jul 20120013
Aug 2012005
Sep 20120010
Oct 20120014
Nov 20120015
Dec 2012004
Jan 2013007
Feb 20130022
Mar 2013005
Apr 2013008
May 20130017
Jun 2013004
Jul 2013005
Aug 2013003
Sep 2013009
Oct 2013007
Nov 2013005
Dec 2013003
Jan 20140011
Feb 20140013
Mar 20140011
Apr 20140018
May 2014006
Jun 20140014
Jul 2014006
Aug 2014004
Sep 2014004
Oct 20140012
Nov 20140015
Dec 2014007
Jan 2015009
Feb 20150113
Mar 20150020
Apr 20150013
May 2015003
Jun 20150013
Jul 20150114
Aug 2015016
Sep 20150415
Oct 20150117
Nov 20150016
Dec 20150015
Jan 2016019
Feb 20160011
Mar 20160017
Apr 20160011
May 20160016
Jun 20160011
Jul 20160014
Aug 20160016
Sep 20160014
Oct 2016019
Nov 20160115
Dec 20160013
Jan 2017009
Feb 2017007
Mar 2017007
Apr 2017005
May 2017004
Jun 2017003
Jul 2017005
Aug 20170011
Sep 2017003
Nov 2017003
Dec 2017039
Jan 2018001
Feb 2018007
Mar 2018008
May 2018003
Jun 2018006
Jul 2018002
Sep 2018005
Oct 20180019
Nov 2018005
Dec 2018002
Jan 2019003
Feb 2019004
Mar 2019003
Apr 2019008
May 20190014
Jun 2019009
Jul 2019005
Aug 2019008
Sep 2019006
Oct 20190010
Nov 2019006
Dec 2019006
Jan 2020008
Feb 2020006
Mar 2020004
Apr 2020007
May 20200012
Jun 20200015
Jul 2020001
Aug 2020005
Sep 2020007
Oct 2020007
Nov 2020003
Dec 2020005
Jan 2021009
Feb 20210010
Mar 2021009
Apr 20210012
May 2021503
Jun 2021003
Jul 2021009
Aug 2021007
Sep 2021005
Oct 2021208
Nov 20210023
Dec 20214010
Jan 2022207
Feb 20220013
Mar 2022001
Apr 2022003
May 2022004
Jun 2022106
Jul 2022004
Aug 2022006
Oct 20221012
Nov 2022009
Dec 2022008
Jan 2023008
Feb 2023008
Mar 20230019
Apr 2023008
May 2023007
Jun 2023105
Jul 20231012
Aug 2023005
Sep 2023102
Oct 2023008
Nov 2023005
Dec 2023007
Jan 2024101
Feb 20243020
Mar 2024102
Apr 20241016
May 20240011
Jun 2024005
Jul 20241010
Aug 20240017
Sep 20240042
Oct 20240035
Nov 20240014
Dec 2024006
Jan 20250011
Feb 20251023
Mar 2025007
Apr 20250025
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 36, Issue 10
October 1, 1995
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Positron Tomographic Assessment of Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer: Comparison with FDG-PET and In Vitro Receptor Assays
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Positron Tomographic Assessment of Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer: Comparison with FDG-PET and In Vitro Receptor Assays
Farrokh Dehdashti, Joanne E. Mortimer, Barry A. Siegel, Landis K. Griffeth, Thomas J. Bonasera, Maureen J. Fusselman, Diana D. Detert, P. Duffy Cutler, John A. Katzenellenbogen, Michael J. Welch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 1995, 36 (10) 1766-1774;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Positron Tomographic Assessment of Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer: Comparison with FDG-PET and In Vitro Receptor Assays
Farrokh Dehdashti, Joanne E. Mortimer, Barry A. Siegel, Landis K. Griffeth, Thomas J. Bonasera, Maureen J. Fusselman, Diana D. Detert, P. Duffy Cutler, John A. Katzenellenbogen, Michael J. Welch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 1995, 36 (10) 1766-1774;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Breast Cancer: Evaluating Tumor Estrogen Receptor Status with Molecular Imaging to Increase Response to Therapy and Improve Patient Outcomes
  • 18F-FES PET/CT Influences the Staging and Management of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Study with 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Improved Estrogen Receptor Assessment by PET Using the Novel Radiotracer 18F-4FMFES in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: An Ongoing Phase II Clinical Trial
  • Functional Estrogen Receptor Imaging Before Neoadjuvant Therapy for Primary Breast Cancer
  • 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET: Current Status and Potential Future Clinical Applications
  • Translation of New Molecular Imaging Approaches to the Clinical Setting: Bridging the Gap to Implementation
  • Imaging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets: Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer
  • Pharmacodynamic Imaging Guides Dosing of a Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader
  • Assessment of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients Using 16{alpha}-18F-Fluoro-17{beta}-Estradiol PET/CT
  • Feasibility and Predictability of Perioperative PET and Estrogen Receptor Ligand in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer
  • 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET for Differential Diagnosis and Quantitative Evaluation of Mesenchymal Uterine Tumors: Correlation with Immunohistochemical Analysis
  • Oestrogen-related tumour phenotype: positron emission tomography characterisation with 18F-FDG and 18F-FES
  • Small-Animal PET of Steroid Hormone Receptors Predicts Tumor Response to Endocrine Therapy Using a Preclinical Model of Breast Cancer
  • PET Imaging of Estrogen Receptors as a Diagnostic Tool for Breast Cancer Patients Presenting with a Clinical Dilemma
  • 18F-FDG PET of Locally Invasive Breast Cancer and Association of Estrogen Receptor Status with Standardized Uptake Value: Microarray and Immunohistochemical Analysis
  • Imaging Tumor Phenotype: 1 Plus 1 Is More Than 2
  • The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 2--Response to Therapy, Other Indications, and Future Directions
  • Radiopharmaceuticals in Preclinical and Clinical Development for Monitoring of Therapy with PET
  • Tumor Receptor Imaging
  • 7{alpha}-18F-Fluoromethyl-Dihydrotestosterone and 7{alpha}-18F-Fluoromethyl-Nortestosterone: Ligands to Determine the Role of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin for Steroidal Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and 18F-Fluoroestradiol
  • Biodistribution and Predictive Value of 18F-Fluorocyclophosphamide in Mice Bearing Human Breast Cancer Xenografts
  • The Effects of Estrogen, Progesterone, and C-erbB-2 Receptor States on 18F-FDG Uptake of Primary Breast Cancer Lesions
  • Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond
  • Quantitative Fluoroestradiol Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Predicts Response to Endocrine Treatment in Breast Cancer
  • The Progress and Promise of Molecular Imaging Probes in Oncologic Drug Development
  • Receptor Imaging in Oncology by Means of Nuclear Medicine: Current Status
  • Monitoring of Therapy in Androgen-Dependent Prostate Tumor Model by Measuring Tumor Proliferation
  • In Vivo Prediction of Response to Antiestrogen Treatment in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
  • New Technologies in Breast Imaging
  • [18F]Fluoroestradiol Radiation Dosimetry in Human PET Studies
  • Glucose Metabolism of Breast Cancer Assessed by 18F-FDG PET: Histologic and Immunohistochemical Tissue Analysis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Regional Cerebral Blood Flow and Negative/Positive Symptoms in 24 Drug-Naive Schizophrenics
  • Technetium-99m-Sestamibi Scanning in Recurrent Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma
  • Asymmetry of Basal Ganglia Perfusion in Tourette's Syndrome Shown by Technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT
Show more Human Studies

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire