Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleCLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a Multicenter Phase I Study of Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Linda M. Velasquez, Ronald Boellaard, Georgia Kollia, Wendy Hayes, Otto S. Hoekstra, Adriaan A. Lammertsma and Susan M. Galbraith
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2009, 50 (10) 1646-1654; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.063347
Linda M. Velasquez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Boellaard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georgia Kollia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wendy Hayes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Otto S. Hoekstra
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adriaan A. Lammertsma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan M. Galbraith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 50 no. 10 1646-1654
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.063347
PubMed 
19759105

Published By 
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Print ISSN 
0161-5505
Online ISSN 
2159-662X
History 
  • Received for publication March 8, 2009
  • Accepted for publication July 10, 2009
  • Published online September 29, 2009.

Article Versions

  • previous version (September 16, 2009 - 06:38).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine

Author Information

  1. Linda M. Velasquez 1 ,
  2. Ronald Boellaard 2 ,
  3. Georgia Kollia 1 ,
  4. Wendy Hayes 1 ,
  5. Otto S. Hoekstra 2 ,
  6. Adriaan A. Lammertsma 2 and
  7. Susan M. Galbraith 1
  1. 1Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Princeton, New Jersey; and 2Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. For correspondence or reprints contact: Linda M. Velasquez, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Room E1335, P.O. Box 4000, Princeton, NJ 08543. E-mail: linda.velasquez{at}bms.com
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cited By...

  • 122 Citations
  • 120 Citations
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • A Systematic Review of the Factors Affecting Accuracy of SUV Measurements
    Michael C. Adams, Timothy G. Turkington, Joshua M. Wilson, Terence Z. Wong
    American Journal of Roentgenology 2010 195 2
  • Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Standardized Uptake Values in Clinical Practice and Assessing Response to Therapy
    Paul E. Kinahan, James W. Fletcher
    Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2010 31 6
  • A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images
    Brent Foster, Ulas Bagci, Awais Mansoor, Ziyue Xu, Daniel J. Mollura
    Computers in Biology and Medicine 2014 50
  • Quantitative imaging biomarkers: A review of statistical methods for technical performance assessment
    David L Raunig, Lisa M McShane, Gene Pennello, Constantine Gatsonis, Paul L Carson, James T Voyvodic, Richard L Wahl, Brenda F Kurland, Adam J Schwarz, Mithat Gönen, Gudrun Zahlmann, Marina V Kondratovich, Kevin O’Donnell, Nicholas Petrick, Patricia E Cole, Brian Garra, Daniel C Sullivan
    Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2015 24 1
  • Noise Considerations for PET Quantification Using Maximum and Peak Standardized Uptake Value
    Martin A. Lodge, Muhammad A. Chaudhry, Richard L. Wahl
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2012 53 7
  • Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET
    Martin A. Lodge
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2017 58 4
  • Repeatability of 18F-FDG Uptake Measurements in Tumors: A Metaanalysis
    Adrianus J. de Langen, Andrew Vincent, Linda M. Velasquez, Harm van Tinteren, Ronald Boellaard, Lalitha K. Shankar, Maarten Boers, Egbert F. Smit, Sigrid Stroobants, Wolfgang A. Weber, Otto S. Hoekstra
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2012 53 5
  • Quantitative imaging biomarkers: A review of statistical methods for computer algorithm comparisons
    Nancy A Obuchowski, Anthony P Reeves, Erich P Huang, Xiao-Feng Wang, Andrew J Buckler, Hyun J (Grace) Kim, Huiman X Barnhart, Edward F Jackson, Maryellen L Giger, Gene Pennello, Alicia Y Toledano, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Tatiyana V Apanasovich, Paul E Kinahan, Kyle J Myers, Dmitry B Goldgof, Daniel P Barboriak, Robert J Gillies, Lawrence H Schwartz, Daniel C Sullivan
    Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2015 24 1
  • Evaluating tumor response with FDG PET: updates on PERCIST, comparison with EORTC criteria and clues to future developments
    Katja Pinker, Christopher Riedl, Wolfgang A. Weber
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2017 44 S1
  • Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments
    Ronald Boellaard
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2011 52 Supplement 2

Article usage

Article usage: September 2009 to April 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Sep 200948440
Oct 20098745127
Nov 2009482039
Dec 2009321213
Jan 2010201315
Feb 2010141117
Mar 201040921
Apr 2010152320
May 2010142214
Jun 201016814
Jul 201091722
Aug 2010172128
Sep 2010122118
Oct 2010153123
Nov 2010203534
Dec 2010101717
Jan 2011142128
Feb 2011101413
Mar 201192118
Apr 2011141911
May 2011131513
Jun 2011402413
Jul 2011361222
Aug 2011442532
Sep 2011451619
Oct 2011682026
Nov 2011401914
Dec 2011403427
Jan 2012321724
Feb 2012282726
Mar 2012513228
Apr 2012324131
May 2012522328
Jun 2012442725
Jul 2012362534
Aug 2012321416
Sep 2012472223
Oct 2012492031
Nov 2012502820
Dec 2012431715
Jan 2013472230
Feb 2013292225
Mar 2013391717
Apr 2013451623
May 2013532513
Jun 2013221316
Jul 201381113
Aug 2013412016
Sep 201319107
Oct 2013341112
Nov 2013421931
Dec 2013241212
Jan 201417917
Feb 201419716
Mar 201424913
Apr 2014351430
May 2014271723
Jun 2014261211
Jul 20141259
Aug 201414109
Sep 2014281112
Oct 2014161428
Nov 201423613
Dec 201413219
Jan 201512513
Feb 201525915
Mar 201522117
Apr 201527511
May 20151955
Jun 2015767
Jul 20157913
Aug 2015996
Sep 201530912
Oct 20151484
Nov 2015211012
Dec 2015482012
Jan 2016381414
Feb 2016181715
Mar 201617158
Apr 2016321411
May 2016371014
Jun 2016181214
Jul 201633823
Aug 201638619
Sep 2016271328
Oct 2016151918
Nov 2016251016
Dec 20162566
Jan 2017221110
Feb 20171683
Mar 2017161310
Apr 2017944
May 201718134
Jun 201718910
Jul 201714109
Aug 201713117
Sep 201714106
Oct 201727179
Nov 201720910
Dec 20172984
Jan 201825721
Feb 20181612
Mar 20182479
Apr 20182346
May 20181543
Jun 20181134
Jul 20181042
Aug 2018653
Sep 2018823
Oct 20181585
Nov 20181774
Dec 20181075
Jan 20191171
Feb 20191055
Mar 20191269
Apr 201916612
May 201914418
Jun 20197313
Jul 201913713
Aug 20191567
Sep 20191524
Oct 20191559
Nov 20191452
Dec 20191166
Jan 20202054
Feb 20201326
Mar 202010148
Apr 20201023
May 202012411
Jun 20201057
Jul 2020948
Aug 2020945
Sep 202021159
Oct 202030714
Nov 2020171317
Dec 2020775
Jan 2021487
Feb 202141412
Mar 202102313
Apr 20216267
May 202144913
Jun 20219249
Jul 202132217
Aug 202132514
Sep 20214226
Oct 202133130
Nov 202171416
Dec 20216348
Jan 202262414
Feb 20223344
Mar 202292213
Apr 20221319
May 202242212
Jun 20223235
Jul 20220268
Aug 20222177
Sep 202234311
Oct 20223229
Nov 20221187
Dec 20226173
Jan 202345412
Feb 20235384
Mar 202334610
Apr 202331910
May 20232614
Jun 20233360
Jul 202302112
Aug 20233189
Sep 20232184
Oct 202331310
Nov 20235189
Dec 20230653
Jan 20249324
Feb 20241288
Mar 202451732
Apr 202426520
May 202438916
Jun 20244468
Jul 202454015
Aug 202431084
Sep 202448815
Oct 202424515
Nov 202452410
Dec 202414410
Jan 202545315
Feb 202511279
Mar 2025610912
Apr 2025415535
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 50 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue 10
October 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a Multicenter Phase I Study of Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a Multicenter Phase I Study of Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies
Linda M. Velasquez, Ronald Boellaard, Georgia Kollia, Wendy Hayes, Otto S. Hoekstra, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Susan M. Galbraith
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2009, 50 (10) 1646-1654; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063347

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET in a Multicenter Phase I Study of Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies
Linda M. Velasquez, Ronald Boellaard, Georgia Kollia, Wendy Hayes, Otto S. Hoekstra, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Susan M. Galbraith
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2009, 50 (10) 1646-1654; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063347
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Hot Spot Imaging in Cardiovascular Diseases: An Information Statement from SNMMI, ASNC, and EANM
  • Standardized Uptake Value for 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Is a Marker of Inflammatory State and Immune Infiltrate in Cervical Cancer
  • Performance of Digital PET Compared with High-Resolution Conventional PET in Patients with Cancer
  • Quantitative Test-Retest Measurement of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC in Tumor and Normal Tissue
  • Test-Retest Reproducibility of 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake in Cancer Patients Within a Qualified and Calibrated Local Network
  • Variability and Repeatability of Quantitative Uptake Metrics in 18F-FDG PET/CT of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Impact of Segmentation Method, Uptake Interval, and Reconstruction Protocol
  • Use of a Qualification Phantom for PET Brain Imaging in a Multicenter Consortium: A Collaboration Between the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium and the SNMMI Clinical Trials Network
  • The Influence of Minimal Misalignment on the Repeatability of PET Images Examined by the Repositioning of Point Sources
  • Reproducibility of MR-Based Attenuation Maps in PET/MRI and the Impact on PET Quantification in Lung Cancer
  • Novel Method to Detect and Characterize 18F-FDG Infiltration at the Injection Site: A Single-Institution Experience
  • Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET
  • Quantitative Accuracy and Lesion Detectability of Low-Dose 18F-FDG PET for Lung Cancer Screening
  • Repeatability of 18F-FLT PET in a Multicenter Study of Patients with High-Grade Glioma
  • Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-NaF PET: A Multicenter Study
  • Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
  • A Method to Improve the Semiquantification of 18F-FDG Uptake: Reliability of the Estimated Lean Body Mass Using the Conventional, Low-Dose CT from PET/CT
  • Molecular Imaging to Plan Radiotherapy and Evaluate Its Efficacy
  • The Value of Establishing the Quantitative Accuracy of PET/CT Imaging
  • Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prospective Assessment in 2 Multicenter Trials
  • Repeatability of Quantitative FDG-PET/CT and Contrast-Enhanced CT in Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma: Test-Retest Measurements for Tumor FDG Uptake, Diameter, and Volume
  • Using FDG-PET to Measure Early Treatment Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Quantifying Intrinsic Variability in Order to Understand Treatment-Induced Change
  • Differences in the Biologic Activity of 2 Novel MEK Inhibitors Revealed by 18F-FDG PET: Analysis of Imaging Data from 2 Phase I Trials
  • Prognostic PET 18F-FDG Uptake Imaging Features Are Associated with Major Oncogenomic Alterations in Patients with Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Noise Considerations for PET Quantification Using Maximum and Peak Standardized Uptake Value
  • Repeatability of 18F-FDG Uptake Measurements in Tumors: A Metaanalysis
  • Prospective Trial of Synchronous Bevacizumab, Erlotinib, and Concurrent Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
  • Computerized Method for Automatic Evaluation of Lean Body Mass from PET/CT: Comparison with Predictive Equations
  • Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments
  • Quantifying and Reducing the Effect of Calibration Error on Variability of PET/CT Standardized Uptake Value Measurements
  • Reproducibility of 18F-FDG and 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F-Fluorothymidine PET Tumor Volume Measurements
  • Nonlaxative PET/CT Colonography: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Pilot Performance in Patients at Higher Risk of Colonic Neoplasia
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire