Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations

Impact of Patient Weight and Emission Scan Duration on PET/CT Image Quality and Lesion Detectability

Benjamin S. Halpern, Magnus Dahlbom, Andrew Quon, Christian Schiepers, Christian Waldherr, Daniel H. Silverman, Osman Ratib and Johannes Czernin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2004, 45 (5) 797-801;
Benjamin S. Halpern
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Magnus Dahlbom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Quon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Schiepers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Waldherr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel H. Silverman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Osman Ratib
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Czernin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 45 no. 5 797-801
PubMed 
15136629

Published By 
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Print ISSN 
0161-5505
Online ISSN 
2159-662X
History 
  • Published online May 10, 2004.

Copyright & Usage 
THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE

Author Information

  1. Benjamin S. Halpern, MD1,
  2. Magnus Dahlbom, PhD1,
  3. Andrew Quon, MD1,
  4. Christian Schiepers, MD, PhD1,
  5. Christian Waldherr, MD1,
  6. Daniel H. Silverman, MD, PhD1,
  7. Osman Ratib, MD, PhD2 and
  8. Johannes Czernin, MD1
  1. 1Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Biological Imaging Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  2. 2Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cited By...

  • Citations
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Article usage

Article usage: May 2004 to April 2025

AbstractFullPdf
May 2004265248155
Jun 20048814647
Jul 20047111432
Aug 20048018544
Sep 20044212333
Oct 2004467418
Nov 2004205622
Dec 2004155218
Jan 20051236229
Feb 20051816031
Mar 20052186114
Apr 2005186729
May 2005134823
Jun 2005137919
Jul 2005134022
Aug 2005124617
Sep 200594015
Oct 2005273924
Nov 2005394217
Dec 2005283615
Jan 2006181210
Feb 200628157
Mar 2006261711
Apr 20062255
May 200612107
Jun 20062269
Jul 20061286
Aug 200616247
Sep 200691916
Oct 200672220
Nov 2006102721
Dec 2006212816
Jan 2007132317
Feb 200761118
Mar 200781926
Apr 200792114
May 2007142424
Jun 200771510
Jul 200762515
Aug 20077157
Sep 20074108
Oct 200792420
Nov 2007121710
Dec 200711159
Jan 2008285
Feb 200891616
Mar 200831413
Apr 2008181914
May 200810209
Jun 2008111710
Jul 2008131417
Aug 200871510
Sep 2008152112
Oct 2008101212
Nov 200814912
Dec 20088118
Jan 200971411
Feb 200961011
Mar 2009111411
Apr 2009132126
May 200961421
Jun 200942312
Jul 200953110
Aug 200963418
Sep 20092229
Oct 200972613
Nov 2009201516
Dec 20096917
Jan 201012158
Feb 2010121312
Mar 201081210
Apr 201010187
May 201062116
Jun 20105103
Jul 201031410
Aug 2010152011
Sep 201081414
Oct 2010112111
Nov 201082013
Dec 201013208
Jan 201111239
Feb 201113276
Mar 2011153021
Apr 2011151815
May 201191917
Jun 201120189
Jul 2011211320
Aug 2011171312
Sep 2011341524
Oct 201122816
Nov 2011191216
Dec 2011351619
Jan 2012321522
Feb 2012261812
Mar 2012472818
Apr 2012232213
May 2012301625
Jun 2012182621
Jul 2012202116
Aug 2012171512
Sep 2012182417
Oct 2012161611
Nov 201221169
Dec 201223910
Jan 2013232113
Feb 2013411423
Mar 2013162118
Apr 2013251316
May 2013182317
Jun 2013201911
Jul 201312713
Aug 2013251314
Sep 2013221921
Oct 2013141434
Nov 2013131117
Dec 201310918
Jan 20149519
Feb 201424721
Mar 2014171328
Apr 201491930
May 201427535
Jun 2014211122
Jul 201410610
Aug 201412936
Sep 2014131512
Oct 2014241413
Nov 2014251513
Dec 2014211418
Jan 201518811
Feb 2015241318
Mar 2015292316
Apr 20152487
May 2015321311
Jun 20151379
Jul 201541223
Aug 2015651316
Sep 201515711
Oct 20159310
Nov 2015211113
Dec 2015281419
Jan 2016271314
Feb 201623515
Mar 201625517
Apr 201613522
May 2016161314
Jun 2016141418
Jul 20167424
Aug 20169521
Sep 201618927
Oct 201619530
Nov 2016211731
Dec 201618819
Jan 201711911
Feb 2017111716
Mar 2017211617
Apr 2017161011
May 2017161312
Jun 201712119
Jul 201713313
Aug 201716315
Sep 201714715
Oct 201716416
Nov 2017111313
Dec 2017141111
Jan 20183417
Feb 20189425
Mar 20185517
Apr 201891240
May 201851420
Jun 2018546
Jul 2018402
Aug 2018465
Sep 20184130
Oct 201816469
Nov 2018111241
Dec 20184824
Jan 20194031
Feb 20193242
Mar 20197028
Apr 20199134
May 201911726
Jun 20196431
Jul 201961026
Aug 20194222
Sep 201913526
Oct 20198426
Nov 201910738
Dec 20192635
Jan 20203332
Feb 202051131
Mar 202017717
Apr 20205522
May 202051124
Jun 20209336
Jul 2020929
Aug 20206219
Sep 20208411
Oct 20207623
Nov 20202522
Dec 202051225
Jan 2021142525
Feb 202184627
Mar 2021113423
Apr 202186724
May 202183714
Jun 202162115
Jul 20217816
Aug 202121711
Sep 202161115
Oct 202191125
Nov 202151245
Dec 2021151837
Jan 2022101846
Feb 202274330
Mar 202281414
Apr 202291814
May 20224925
Jun 2022111623
Jul 20223434
Aug 202241915
Sep 2022342023
Oct 202251623
Nov 20229726
Dec 202261117
Jan 202391612
Feb 202322721
Mar 202362820
Apr 202311511
May 202361019
Jun 202323616
Jul 202381820
Aug 202351017
Sep 202351627
Oct 20236920
Nov 202332820
Dec 2023105517
Jan 2024142816
Feb 202441819
Mar 202461518
Apr 202453615
May 202456427
Jun 202444718
Jul 2024124515
Aug 202479441
Sep 202446225
Oct 202451721
Nov 202471511
Dec 202453214
Jan 202545731
Feb 2025811122
Mar 2025310013
Apr 2025511944
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 45 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 45, Issue 5
May 1, 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Patient Weight and Emission Scan Duration on PET/CT Image Quality and Lesion Detectability
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Impact of Patient Weight and Emission Scan Duration on PET/CT Image Quality and Lesion Detectability
Benjamin S. Halpern, Magnus Dahlbom, Andrew Quon, Christian Schiepers, Christian Waldherr, Daniel H. Silverman, Osman Ratib, Johannes Czernin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2004, 45 (5) 797-801;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of Patient Weight and Emission Scan Duration on PET/CT Image Quality and Lesion Detectability
Benjamin S. Halpern, Magnus Dahlbom, Andrew Quon, Christian Schiepers, Christian Waldherr, Daniel H. Silverman, Osman Ratib, Johannes Czernin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2004, 45 (5) 797-801;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Acquisition Duration Optimization Using Visual Grading Regression in [68Ga]FAPI-46 PET Imaging of Oncologic Patients
  • 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-Based Atlas for Prostate Bed Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Implications for Salvage Radiation Therapy Contouring Guidelines
  • Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI with a Histopathology Gold Standard in the Detection, Intraprostatic Localization, and Determination of Local Extension of Primary Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Single-Center Imaging Trial
  • Measuring PET Spatial Resolution Using a Cylinder Phantom Positioned at an Oblique Angle
  • Assessment of Minimum 124I Activity Required in Uptake Measurements Before Radioiodine Therapy for Benign Thyroid Diseases
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI Perform Equally Well in Cancer: Evidence from Studies on More Than 2,300 Patients
  • Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study
  • Impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT on the Management of Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Referring Physician's Perspective
  • Improvement in PET/CT Image Quality with a Combination of Point-Spread Function and Time-of-Flight in Relation to Reconstruction Parameters
  • Noise Considerations for PET Quantification Using Maximum and Peak Standardized Uptake Value
  • 18F-FDG-PET/CT Imaging as an Early Survival Predictor in Patients with Primary High-Grade Soft Tissue Sarcomas Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring Treatment Responses to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Erlotinib
  • Evaluation of Optimal Acquisition Duration or Injected Activity for Pediatric 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Patient Weight-Based Acquisition Protocols to Optimize18F-FDG PET/CT Image Quality
  • Imaging of CTLA4 Blockade-Induced Cell Replication with 18F-FLT PET in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Tremelimumab
  • Radiation Dosimetry of 89Zr-Labeled Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody U36 as Used for Immuno-PET in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
  • Comparison of Imaging Protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in Overweight Patients: Optimizing Scan Duration Versus Administered Dose
  • FDG-PET/CT Imaging Predicts Histopathologic Treatment Responses after the Initial Cycle of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcomas
  • 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT Accurately Localize Pheochromocytomas
  • Combined Assessment of Metabolic and Volumetric Changes for Assessment of Tumor Response in Patients with Soft-Tissue Sarcomas
  • Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold PET/CT of Lung Cancer: Maximum Standardized Uptake Value Analysis of 108 Patients
  • Treatment Monitoring by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Sarcomas: Interobserver Variability of Quantitative Parameters in Treatment-Induced Changes in Histopathologically Responding and Nonresponding Tumors
  • Reduction of Glucose Metabolic Activity Is More Accurate than Change in Size at Predicting Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcomas
  • Accuracy of PET/CT in Characterization of Solitary Pulmonary Lesions
  • Forced Diuresis Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in Abdominopelvic Malignancies
  • Standard PET/CT of the Chest During Shallow Breathing Is Inadequate for Comprehensive Staging of Lung Cancer
  • Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) tumour staging with integrated PET/CT colonography: technical feasibility and first experiences in patients with colorectal cancer
  • Optimizing Injected Dose in Clinical PET by Accurately Modeling the Counting-Rate Response Functions Specific to Individual Patient Scans
  • PET/CT: Challenge for Nuclear Cardiology
  • On the Use of Positioning Aids to Reduce Misregistration in the Head and Neck in Whole-Body PET/CT Studies
  • Comparison Between 18F-FDG PET, In-Line PET/CT, and Software Fusion for Restaging of Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
  • Optimizing Imaging Protocols for Overweight and Obese Patients: A Lutetium Orthosilicate PET/CT Study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire