Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleThe State of the Art
Open Access

Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine: Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities Toward a Trustworthy Ecosystem

Babak Saboury, Tyler Bradshaw, Ronald Boellaard, Irène Buvat, Joyita Dutta, Mathieu Hatt, Abhinav K. Jha, Quanzheng Li, Chi Liu, Helena McMeekin, Michael A. Morris, Peter J.H. Scott, Eliot Siegel, John J. Sunderland, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Richard L. Wahl, Sven Zuehlsdorff and Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2023, 64 (2) 188-196; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.263703
Babak Saboury
1Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tyler Bradshaw
2Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Boellaard
3Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irène Buvat
4Institut Curie, Université PSL, INSERM, Université Paris–Saclay, Orsay, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joyita Dutta
5Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mathieu Hatt
6LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, Brest, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abhinav K. Jha
7Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Quanzheng Li
8Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chi Liu
9Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helena McMeekin
10Department of Clinical Physics, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Morris
1Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter J.H. Scott
11Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eliot Siegel
12Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John J. Sunderland
13Departments of Radiology and Physics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neeta Pandit-Taskar
14Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Wahl
15Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven Zuehlsdorff
16Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Hoffman Estates, Illinois; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arman Rahmim
17Departments of Radiology and Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    New technologies in medicine have coincided with each phase of industrial revolution. First industrial revolution was mechanization, with mechanical loom invented in 1784. The stethoscope was invented by René Laennec in 1816 and improved by Arthur Leared (1851) and George Philip Cammann (1852). Second industrial revolution was driven by advent of electricity, with the commercial light bulb (patented by Thomas Edison in 1879), telegram, and modern factory production line. Electrocardiogram was invented by Augustus Waller in 1887 by projecting the heartbeat captured by Lippmann capillary electrometer onto photographic plate, allowing heartbeat to be recorded in real time. Willem Einthoven (1895) assigned letters P, Q, R, S, and T to the theoretic waveform. Third industrial revolution, known as digital revolution, brought computing technology and refined it to personal computer. In 1960s, Kuhl and Edwards developed cross-sectional CT and implemented this in the SPECT scanner, which was later applied to CT scanner by Sir Godfrey Hounsfield and Allan Cormack in 1972. Fourth industrial revolution is that of modern day, with big data, hyperconnectivity, and neural networks, resulting in ability to propel self-driving cars and development of AI in nuclear medicine. CNN = convolutional neural network; IoT = Internet of things.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    From patient to image creation and back to physician, there are opportunities for AI systems to act at nearly any step in medical imaging pipeline to improve our ability to care for patients and understand disease (3).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Dosimetry as major frontier supported by AI toward personalization of therapy: various contributions by AI to image acquisition, generation, and processing, followed by automated dose calculations, can enable routine deployment and clinical decision support. TIAM = Time Integrated Activity Map.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    AI ecosystem is a complex environment in which AI system development occurs. The ecosystem connects stakeholders from industry to regulatory agencies, physicians, patients, health systems, and payers. Proposed SNMMI AI Center of Excellence can serve as an honest broker to empower the AI ecosystem from a neutral standpoint with focus on solutions. ACE = SNMMI AI Center of Excellence; RIS = radiology information system.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Twelve core concepts critical to trustworthy AI ecosystems.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Opportunities and Challenges Ahead for Nuclear Medicine Toward Achieving Trustworthy AI

    CategoryDomainSubdomain
    OpportunitiesDiagnostic imagingEmerging nuclear imaging approaches
    RPTsAI-driven theranostic drug discovery and labeling
    Precision dosimetry
    Predictive dosimetry and digital twins
    Clinical workflow: increasing throughput while maintaining excellence
    ChallengesDevelopment of AI applications/medical devicesData
    Optimal network architecture
    Measurement and communication of uncertainty
    Clinically impactful use cases
    Team science
    Evaluation (verification of performance)Performance profiling through task-based evaluations
    Guidelines for validation
    Multicenter clinical trial network
    Ethical, regulatory, and legal ambiguitiesEthical aspects
    Regulatory and legal aspects
    Implementation of clinical AI solutions and postimplementation monitoringAI platform
    Barriers of dissemination and implementation of AI technology in medicine
    Postdeployment: change management and performance
    Trust and trustworthiness

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 2
February 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine: Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities Toward a Trustworthy Ecosystem
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine: Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities Toward a Trustworthy Ecosystem
Babak Saboury, Tyler Bradshaw, Ronald Boellaard, Irène Buvat, Joyita Dutta, Mathieu Hatt, Abhinav K. Jha, Quanzheng Li, Chi Liu, Helena McMeekin, Michael A. Morris, Peter J.H. Scott, Eliot Siegel, John J. Sunderland, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Richard L. Wahl, Sven Zuehlsdorff, Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2023, 64 (2) 188-196; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263703

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine: Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities Toward a Trustworthy Ecosystem
Babak Saboury, Tyler Bradshaw, Ronald Boellaard, Irène Buvat, Joyita Dutta, Mathieu Hatt, Abhinav K. Jha, Quanzheng Li, Chi Liu, Helena McMeekin, Michael A. Morris, Peter J.H. Scott, Eliot Siegel, John J. Sunderland, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Richard L. Wahl, Sven Zuehlsdorff, Arman Rahmim
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2023, 64 (2) 188-196; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263703
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • OPPORTUNITIES
    • AI ECOSYSTEM
    • CHALLENGES FOR DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION, DEPLOYMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION
    • TRUST AND TRUSTWORTHINESS
    • RESPONSIBILITIES: TOWARD TRUSTWORTHY AI
    • STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Green Nuclear Medicine and Radiotheranostics
  • Is the Clinical Implementation of In-House Artificial Intelligence-Developed Algorithms Happening?
  • Navigating the Future of Prostate Cancer Care: AI-Driven Imaging and Theranostics Through the Lens of RELAINCE
  • Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: Deployment and Governance
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Role of PSMA PET Parameters as Biomarkers for Response to PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Rethinking Dosimetry: A European Perspective
  • A Vision for Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Targeting for Imaging and Therapy: Perspective from Academia and Industry
Show more The State of the Art

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • trustworthy
  • nuclear medicine
  • ecosystem
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire