Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleTheranostics

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Mapping of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in 270 Patients with a PSA Level of Less Than 1.0 ng/mL: Impact on Salvage Radiotherapy Planning

Jeremie Calais, Johannes Czernin, Minsong Cao, Amar U. Kishan, John V. Hegde, Narek Shaverdian, Kiri Sandler, Fang-I Chu, Chris R. King, Michael L. Steinberg, Isabel Rauscher, Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann, Thorsten Poeppel, Philipp Hetkamp, Francesco Ceci, Ken Herrmann, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Matthias Eiber and Nicholas G. Nickols
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2018, 59 (2) 230-237; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.201749
Jeremie Calais
1Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Czernin
1Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Minsong Cao
2Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amar U. Kishan
2Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John V. Hegde
2Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Narek Shaverdian
2Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kiri Sandler
2Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fang-I Chu
2Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris R. King
2Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael L. Steinberg
2Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabel Rauscher
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann
4Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thorsten Poeppel
5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp Hetkamp
5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Ceci
1Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Herrmann
1Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang P. Fendler
1Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
6Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
1Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas G. Nickols
2Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
7Department of Radiation Oncology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Study methodology. (A) Experienced radiation oncologist masked to PET findings contoured RTOG CTVs onto CT dataset of PET/CT scan for all 270 patients (prostate bed CTV in orange and pelvic LN CTV in green). (B) All 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT images were analyzed by an experienced nuclear medicine physician. (C) PSMA-11–positive lesions were contoured in yellow on CT images. (D) Consensus CTVs were coregistered with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT images and PSMA-11–positive lesion contours (yellow) to assess, for each patient, whether PSMA-11–positive lesions were localized inside or outside consensus CTVs.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    A 3-dimensional map of the PSMA-11–positive lesions (yellow) of all 52 patients with recurrence outside consensus CTVs (23 patients with recurrence outside only and 29 patients with recurrence outside and inside consensus CTVs), created by rigid registration of each patient’s CT image to template patient’s CT image, followed by transfer of each PSMA-11–positive lesion contour to template patient CT image (MIM, version 6.7.5; MIM Software Inc.). On right side, 3-dimensional prostate bed consensus CTV is shown in orange and 3-dimensional pelvic LN consensus CTV in green.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    PSMA-11–positive lesions (yellow contours) inside prostate bed CTV (gold contours) and nodal CTV (green contours).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Examples of PSMA-11–positive lesions outside consensus CTVs: perirectal LN (A), inguinal LN (B), lumboaortic LN (C), bone (D), and lung (E).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of the 270 Patients

    CharacteristicData
    Age at PET/CT, median (y)68 (range, 43–90)
    Initial PSA level before surgery, median (ng/mL)8.3 (range, 0.4–200)
     10130 (48%)
     ≥10 < 2046 (17%)
     ≥2038 (14%)
     Unknown56 (21%)
    Gleason score
     ≤633 (12%)
     7135 (50%)
     ≥886 (32%)
     Unknown16 (6%)
    Pathologic primary tumor stage
     pT299 (36.5%)
     pT3142 (52.5%)
     pT42 (0.7%)
     Unknown27 (10%)
    Pathologic regional LN stage
     pN0166 (61.5%)
     pN154 (20%)
     pNx50 (18.5%)
    Positive margin
     R0152 (56.5%)
     R167 (25%)
     Unknown51 (19%)
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk group
     Low4 (1.5%)
     Intermediate36 (13.5%)
     High163 (60.5%)
     N154 (20%)
     Unknown13 (5%)
    Androgen deprivation therapy within 6 mo before imaging33 (12.5%)
    Time between surgery and PET/CT, median (mo)25 (range, 2–272)
    Last PSA value before PET/CT, median (ng/mL)0.44 (range, 0.03–1)
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Patterns of Relapse

    PatternNumber of patients
    PSMA-11 PET/CT+132 (49%)
    Prostate bed (T+)47 (17.5%)
    Pelvic LN (N1)83 (30.5%)
    Extrapelvic LN (M1a)9 (3.5%)
    Bone (M1b)23 (8.5%)
    Visceral (M1c)3 (1%)
    PSMA-11 T+ N0 M032 (12%)
    PSMA-11 T0 N1 M059 (22%)
    PSMA-11 T+ N1 M08 (3%)
    PSMA-11 T+ N0 M12 (0.7%)
    PSMA-11 T0 N0 M115 (5.5%)
    PSMA-11 T0 N1 M111 (4%)
    PSMA-11 T+ N1 M15 (2%)
    • Total population = 270. Percentages do not add up to 100 because multiple disease localizations per patient were possible.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Anatomic Repartition of 68Ga-PSMA-11–Positive Findings and Outside Planning Volumes Based on RTOG Consensus CTVs

    SitePSMA-11–positive patients (n)Outside CTV patients (n)PSMA-11–positive lesions (n)Outside CTV lesions (n)Median size (mm)*Median SUVmax*
    Overall132 (49%)52 (19.5%)3041196.0 (3.0–23.0)5.7 (0.5–86.9)
    Prostate bed (T+)47 (17.5%)1 (0.003%)5217.0 (4.0–23.0)6.4 (2.2–86.9)
    Pelvic LN (N+)83 (30.5%)30 (11%)174396.0 (3.0–17.0)5.8 (1.5–69.7)
     Internal iliac27 (10%)2 (0.7%)3226.0 (3.0–10.0)7.3 (2.3–55.0)
     External Iliac38 (14%)9 (3.5%)4597.0 (3.5–15.0)5.9 (1.5–69.7)
     Obturator19 (7%)2 (0.7%)2426.0 (4.0–17.0)3.5 (2.1–17.4)
     Perirectal18 (6.5%)16 (6%)25195.0 (4.0–10.0)5.2 (1.50–57.7)
     Presacral13 (5%)3 (1%)2246.0 (4.0–10.0)7.5 (1.5–45.7)
     Common iliac16 (6%)2 (0.7%)2636.0 (3.0–15.0)5.9 (2.0–33.3)
     Extrapelvic LN (M1a)9 (3.5%)9 (3.5%)28288.0 (3.0–12.0)13.6 (2.7–38.9)
     Inguinal2 (0.7%)2 (0.7%)77——
     Retroperitoneal6 (2%)6 (2.2%)1515——
     Upper diaphragm2 (0.7%)2 (0.7%)66——
    Bone (M1b)23 (8.5%)23 (8.5%)3939—5.3 (2.7–28.8)
    Lung (M1c)3 (1%)3 (1%)11115.0 (4.0–7.0)1.0 (0.5–2.6)
    • ↵* Data in parentheses are range.

    • Percentages do not add up to 100 because multiple disease localizations per patient were possible.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Potential Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging on SRT Planning for Early BCR After Primary Prostatectomy

    ImpactData
    Major impact on SRT planning—outside RTOG CTV recurrence52 (19%)
     Extension of pelvic consensus CTVs19 (7%)
     Superior extension to cover paraaortic LNs5 (2%)
     Oligometastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (≤5 M1a or M1b)22 (9.5%)
     Radiotherapy futile because of polymetastatic or visceral disease (>5 M1a, M1b, or M1c)6 (2.5%)
    Minor impact on SRT planning—covered by planning based on consensus CTVs; dose escalation to gross disease (68Ga-PSMA-11–positive disease)80 (29.5%)
    No impact on SRT planning—negative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results138 (51%)
    • Total population = 270.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 59 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue 2
February 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Mapping of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in 270 Patients with a PSA Level of Less Than 1.0 ng/mL: Impact on Salvage Radiotherapy Planning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Mapping of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in 270 Patients with a PSA Level of Less Than 1.0 ng/mL: Impact on Salvage Radiotherapy Planning
Jeremie Calais, Johannes Czernin, Minsong Cao, Amar U. Kishan, John V. Hegde, Narek Shaverdian, Kiri Sandler, Fang-I Chu, Chris R. King, Michael L. Steinberg, Isabel Rauscher, Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann, Thorsten Poeppel, Philipp Hetkamp, Francesco Ceci, Ken Herrmann, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Matthias Eiber, Nicholas G. Nickols
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2018, 59 (2) 230-237; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.201749

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Mapping of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in 270 Patients with a PSA Level of Less Than 1.0 ng/mL: Impact on Salvage Radiotherapy Planning
Jeremie Calais, Johannes Czernin, Minsong Cao, Amar U. Kishan, John V. Hegde, Narek Shaverdian, Kiri Sandler, Fang-I Chu, Chris R. King, Michael L. Steinberg, Isabel Rauscher, Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann, Thorsten Poeppel, Philipp Hetkamp, Francesco Ceci, Ken Herrmann, Wolfgang P. Fendler, Matthias Eiber, Nicholas G. Nickols
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2018, 59 (2) 230-237; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.201749
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PSMA PET: Transformational Change in Prostate Cancer Management?
  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical, Pathologic, and Imaging Variables Associated with Prostate Cancer Detection by PSMA PET/CT and Multiparametric MRI
  • 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-Based Atlas for Prostate Bed Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Implications for Salvage Radiation Therapy Contouring Guidelines
  • An Analysis of the Distribution of PSMA PET/CT-Positive Lymph Nodes and Their Coverage by Different Elective Nodal Radiation Volumes in Postoperative Prostate Cancer Patients
  • Changes in Management After 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET in Patients Undergoing Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy, with Early Biochemical Response Outcomes
  • Predictors of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Positivity in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Local Therapy
  • aPROMISE: A Novel Automated PROMISE Platform to Standardize Evaluation of Tumor Burden in 18F-DCFPyL Images of Veterans with Prostate Cancer
  • Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging in Early Relapsed Prostate Cancer After Radical Therapy: A Prospective Multicenter Study (IAEA-PSMA Study)
  • Matched-Pair Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 240 Prostate Cancer Patients: Interreader Agreement and Lesion Detection Rate of Suspected Lesions
  • Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer
  • 11C-Choline PET/CT in Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Retrospective Analysis in a Large U.S. Patient Series
  • 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Primary Local Therapy
  • Appropriate Use Criteria for Imaging Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Primary Treatment
  • Detection Rate and Localization of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in Patients with Low PSA Values <= 0.5 ng/mL
  • The Future of Nuclear Medicine as an Independent Specialty
  • Toward Independent Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Theranostic Programs
  • Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on the Radiotherapeutic Approach to Prostate Cancer in Comparison to CT: A Retrospective Analysis
  • Prospective, Multisite, International Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine PET/CT, Multiparametric MRI, and 68Ga-HBED-CC PSMA-11 PET/CT in Men with High-Risk Features and Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Performance and Patient Outcomes
  • 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma: Implications for Radiotherapeutic Management in 121 Patients
  • Outcome After PSMA PET/CT-Based Salvage Radiotherapy in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: A 2-Institution Retrospective Analysis
  • 68Gallium-labelled PSMA-PET/CT as a diagnostic and clinical decision-making tool in Asian prostate cancer patients following prostatectomy
  • Interobserver Agreement for the Standardized Reporting System PSMA-RADS 1.0 on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Imaging
  • Potential Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on the Planning of Definitive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
  • The Utility of PET/CT in the Planning of External Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
  • PSMA PET: Transformational Change in Prostate Cancer Management?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • Determination of the Intralesional Distribution of Theranostic 124I-Omburtamab Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data
  • 177Lu-Labeled Anticlaudin 6 Monoclonal Antibody for Targeted Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
Show more Theranostics

Clinical

  • Determination of the Intralesional Distribution of Theranostic 124I-Omburtamab Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data
  • 177Lu-Labeled Anticlaudin 6 Monoclonal Antibody for Targeted Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • PSMA
  • PET/CT
  • recurrence
  • salvage radiotherapy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire