Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Quantitative oncology molecular analysis suite: ACCURATE

Ronald Boellaard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1753;
Ronald Boellaard
1Radiology and Nuclear Medicine VU University Medical Center Amsterdam Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1753

Aim: Quantitative analysis of PET studies requires standardized and advanced image processing and analysis tools. The aim of this work was to develop a software tool that provides the user with a series of (semi-)automated image analysis and PET based segmentation methods to quantitatively analyse tracer uptake in oncology and lymphoma PET/CT studies. Methods and results: ACCURATE is developed in IDL version 8.4 (Harris Geospatial Solutions, Bloomfield, USA) and runs under the IDL virtual machine, which is freely available. ACCURATE allows for DICOM input of both PET and CT data. It includes several image processing steps such as rebinning/resampling, cropping and smoothing. After loading and processing PET/CT images, lesions can be delineated using a range of segmentation

Methods: fixed sized segmentations (squares, cubes, circles, spheres), manual free hand segmentation, fixed SUV thresholds; % of SUVmax or SUVpeak isocontours with or without local contrast correction; a gradient based method and 2 majority vote based implementations. During the extraction of quantitative uptake features, such as SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, metabolic volume and total lesion glycolysis and various other 1st order statistics, 4 different partial volume correction methods can be applied. Moreover the tool can provide the user with more than 250 radiomics output features, with either relative and/or fixed SUV binning. In addition, optimized semi-automated workflows for quickly and easily assessing total tumor burden are available. The tool has also functionality to extract time activity curves from dynamic PET studies which can be used for full quantitative kinetic analysis. Finally, the tool can deal with correct SUV calculations for long-lived isotopes, i.e. it allows for decay correction over multiple days. Several data sanity checks have been incorporated, such as swapping of weight and height and other data plausibility checks. Liver uptake can be quickly previewed and verified. Results obtained with ACCURATE have been verified using simulations, phantom studies and a head-to-head comparison with other (commercially available) image analysis tools using clinical datasets. Conclusions: ACCURATE allows for quick and reliable analysis of (FDG) PET/CT studies using state of the art segmentation and image processing methods. The tool is particularly suited for exploring the effects of image processing, segmentation strategies and partial volume corrections on the quantitative evaluation of oncology or lymphoma PET studies. New functionality beyond state the art will be continuously added. The tools will be made freely available (r.boellaard@vumc.nl)

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantitative oncology molecular analysis suite: ACCURATE
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Quantitative oncology molecular analysis suite: ACCURATE
Ronald Boellaard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1753;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Quantitative oncology molecular analysis suite: ACCURATE
Ronald Boellaard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1753;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Measuring Total Metabolic Tumor Volume from 18F-FDG PET: A Reality Check
  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long-Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction Model Using 5 External PET/CT Datasets of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
  • Ultrashort Oncologic Whole-Body [18F]FDG Patlak Imaging Using LAFOV PET
  • Circulating T cell status and molecular imaging may predict clinical benefit of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in oral cancer
  • First exploration of the on-treatment changes in tumor and organ uptake of a radiolabeled anti PD-L1 antibody during chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using whole body PET
  • Long Versus Short Axial Field of View Immuno-PET/CT: Semiquantitative Evaluation for 89Zr-Trastuzumab
  • 89Zr-DFO-Durvalumab PET/CT Before Durvalumab Treatment in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer
  • 18F-FDG PET Improves Baseline Clinical Predictors of Response in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The HOVON-84 Study
  • Biodistribution of 18F-FES in Patients with Metastatic ER+ Breast Cancer Undergoing Treatment with Rintodestrant (G1T48), a Novel Selective ER Degrader
  • Quantitative Radiomics Features in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Does Segmentation Method Matter?
  • Interobserver Agreement on Automated Metabolic Tumor Volume Measurements of Deauville Score 4 and 5 Lesions at Interim 18F-FDG PET in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
  • Automated Segmentation of Baseline Metabolic Total Tumor Burden in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Which Method Is Most Successful? A Study on Behalf of the PETRA Consortium
  • Quantification of PD-L1 Expression with 18F-BMS-986192 PET/CT in Patients with Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Repeatability of Quantitative 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Measurements in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
  • Image Quality and Activity Optimization in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET Using the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT System
  • Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements on the Biograph Vision PET/CT System: Initial Experiences and Comparison with the Biograph mCT
  • Healthy Tissue Uptake of 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen, 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-Fluoromethylcholine, and 18F-Dihydrotestosterone
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

  • Deep Learning Based Kidney Segmentation for Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement Using Quantitative SPECT/CT
  • The Benefit of Time-of-Flight in Digital Photon Counting PET Imaging: Physics and Clinical Evaluation
  • Preclinical validation of a single-scan rest/stress imaging technique for 13NH3 cardiac perfusion studies
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Data Analysis & Management Posters

  • Evaluation of Quantitative Whole Body Dynamic FDG-PET Using Block Sequence Regularized Expectation Maximization (BSREM) Reconstruction
  • Feasibility of 18F-THK5351 PET quantitation using the Centiloid scale
  • NaF-PET/CT for assessment of temporomandibular joint osseous activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy subjects
Show more Data Analysis & Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire