Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigations

99mTc-Labeled Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer

Shawn M. Hillier, Kevin P. Maresca, Genliang Lu, Ross D. Merkin, John C. Marquis, Craig N. Zimmerman, William C. Eckelman, John L. Joyal and John W. Babich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2013, 54 (8) 1369-1376; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.116624
Shawn M. Hillier
Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin P. Maresca
Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Genliang Lu
Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ross D. Merkin
Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John C. Marquis
Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Craig N. Zimmerman
Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William C. Eckelman
Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John L. Joyal
Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John W. Babich
Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed in prostate cancer, and small-molecule radiopharmaceuticals targeting PSMA rapidly detect the location and extent of disease. Here we evaluated preclinically 4 novel 99mTc-labeled small-molecule inhibitors of PSMA with the potential for clinical translation for molecular imaging of prostate cancer in humans. Methods: Four PSMA inhibitors derived from the glutamate-urea-glutamate or glutamate-urea-lysine pharmacophores conjugated to CIM or TIM chelators were radiolabeled with 99mTc and evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Results: High-affinity, saturable binding to PSMA on LNCaP cells was observed with Kd values of 0.64 ± 0.46 nM for 99mTc-MIP-1427, 1.07 ± 0.89 nM for 99mTc-MIP-1404, 1.75 ± 0.32 nM for 99mTc-MIP-1428, and 4.35 ± 0.35 nM for 99mTc-MIP-1405. 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors did not bind human prostate cancer PC3 cells, which lack PSMA, demonstrating specificity, and binding was abolished with 2-(phosphonomethyl)pentanedioic acid (PMPA), a structurally unrelated PSMA inhibitor. 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors were shown to internalize at 37°C. Uptake in LNCaP xenografts ranged from 9.3% to 12.4% injected dose per gram at 1 h after injection and from 7.2% to 11.0% at 4 h, with tumor-to-blood ratios ranging from 29:1 to 550:1 and tumor–to–skeletal muscle ratios ranging from 31:1 to 157:1 at 4 h. 99mTc-MIP-1404 exhibited the best combination of high tumor uptake and rapid clearance from kidney and nontarget tissues. 99mTc-MIP-1404 specifically bound to PSMA in vivo as demonstrated by the absence of uptake in PC3 xenografts and by competition with PMPA. SPECT/CT imaging corroborated the tissue distribution results, demonstrating uptake only in PSMA-expressing kidney and tumor tissue and clearance through the urinary bladder. Conclusion: These 99mTc-labeled radiopharmaceuticals targeting PSMA may provide a SPECT molecular imaging option to assist in the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer and the management of patient care by monitoring disease progression.

  • prostate cancer
  • PSMA
  • imaging
  • SPECT

Management of prostate cancer is challenging because of the many clinical factors and treatment options to be considered in deciding on the optimal therapy for a given patient. Because early detection is allowing men to live much longer with the disease, clinical decision making may have long-term consequences. Accurately defining the extent and location of disease burden and the aggressiveness of the disease at initial diagnosis are important factors in treatment selection. Hence, the ability to visualize disease throughout the body is increasingly important for informing therapeutic selection and treatment planning. Current imaging techniques including MR imaging, CT, and bone scanning offer some opportunity to visualize disease in various parts of the body, but none provides both highly specific and highly sensitive detection of metastatic prostate cancer (1–3). New imaging agents that provide a sensitive and specific means of imaging tumor burden throughout the body, in both soft tissue and bone, to more accurately detect and stage disease and monitor response to therapy will improve disease management, patient outcomes, and quality of life.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), an attractive molecular target for the detection of primary and metastatic prostate cancer, is expressed primarily in normal human prostate epithelium and is upregulated in prostate cancer, including metastatic disease (4–6). Reports indicate that overexpression of PSMA in primary prostate cancer correlates with other adverse traditional prognostic factors and independently predicts disease outcome (7,8). Because PSMA is expressed by virtually all prostate cancers and its expression is further increased in poorly differentiated, metastatic, and hormone-refractory carcinomas (5), it is an attractive target for developing radiopharmaceuticals for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of the disease.

PSMA is highly homologous to N-acetylated α-linked acidic dipeptidase (NAALADase), a neuropeptidase that produces the neurotransmitter glutamate and N-acetylaspartate through hydrolysis of N-acetylaspartylglutamate (9,10). Analysis of the crystal structure of PSMA has aided in understanding of the critical interactions of potent inhibitors within the active site of the enzyme and has led to the design and synthesis of several classes of NAALADase inhibitors that are substrate or transition state analogs (11,12).

We recently synthesized and evaluated a series of PSMA inhibitors, which resulted in the identification of several lead iodine-containing molecules that may be applicable for radioimaging and radiotherapy of prostate cancer (13). These radioiodinated glutamate-urea heterodimers demonstrated high affinity for PSMA and the ability to detect prostate tumors in mice (14), thereby establishing their potential for imaging prostate cancer in humans. Lead compounds have entered clinical development for monitoring disease recurrence after biochemical failure in prostate cancer patients and in early clinical trials have been shown to detect metastatic prostate tumors in bone and lymph nodes (15).

99mTc has become the mainstay of diagnostic nuclear medicine using SPECT and in some chemical form is used in more than 85% of the diagnostic scans performed each year in hospitals. The preferential use of 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals reflects the ideal nuclear properties of the radionuclide, as well as its convenient availability from commercial generators. 99mTc emits a 140-keV γ-ray with 89% abundance, which is optimal for imaging with commercial γ-cameras. The lack of β-particles and particulate radiation allows the injection of activities of more than 1.11 GBq (30 mCi) with low radiation exposure to the patient. The 6-h half-life is sufficiently long for pharmaceutical preparation and in vivo accumulation in the target, yet short enough to minimize radiation exposure to the patient and environmental repercussions. In addition, the advent of technetium tricarbonyl chemistry (16) allowed for the possibility of an in situ kit-formulated product with potential clinical translation (17).

99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors have been previously reported (18–20). However, it is challenging to avoid high liver uptake and slow gastrointestinal clearance, which will confound their use for prostate cancer imaging as most often the cancer metastasizes to the lower spine, pelvis, and lymph nodes within the abdominal cavity. Thus, the development of 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors that are not rapidly excreted into the intestines is a priority.

We recently designed, synthesized, and evaluated a series of novel second-generation single-amino-acid chelators (SAACs) containing functionalized polar imidazole rings to reduce lipophilicity which, either alone or when conjugated to small molecules and peptides, dramatically diminish hepatobiliary uptake and promote renal clearance (21). Here we describe the biologic evaluation of 4 PSMA inhibitors derived from the glutamate-urea-glutamate or glutamate-urea-lysine pharmacophores incorporating our second-generation SAAC chelators CIM (2,2′-(2,2′-(azanediylbis(methylene))bis(1H-imidazole-2,1-diyl))diacetic acid) or TIM (2,2′,2″,2″′-((2,2′-(2,2′-(azanediylbis(methylene))bis(1H-imidazole-2,1-diyl))bis(acetyl))bis(azanetriyl))tetraacetic acid) and radiolabeled with 99mTc via technetium tricarbonyl chemistry (16). We demonstrate that these compounds bind with high affinity to PSMA and have diminished hepatobiliary clearance. These novel molecule-targeted radiopharmaceuticals may be exploited for the diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and—by switching metals to 186/188Re—potential treatment of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Synthesis and Radiolabeling of 99mTc PSMA Inhibitors

The synthesis of MIP-1404 ((7S,12S,16S)-1-(1-(2-(bis(carboxymethyl)amino)-2-oxoethyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-((1-(2-(bis(carboxymethyl)amino)-2-oxoethyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)methyl)-9,14-dioxo-2,8,13,15-tetraazaoctadecane-7,12,16,18-tetracarboxylic acid), MIP-1405 ((7S,14S,18S)-7-amino-1-(1-(carboxymethyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-((1-(carboxymethyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)methyl)-8,16-dioxo-2,9,15,17-tetraazaicosane-14,18,20-tricarboxylic acid), MIP-1427 ((7S,12S,16S)-1-(1-(carboxymethyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-((1-(carboxymethyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)methyl)-9,14-dioxo-2,8,13,15-tetraazaoctadecane-7,12,16,18-tetracarboxylic acid), and MIP-1428 ((7S,14S,18S)-7-amino-1-(1-(2-(bis(carboxymethyl)amino)-2-oxoethyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-((1-(2-(bis(carboxymethyl)amino)-2-oxoethyl)-1H-imidazol-2-yl)methyl)-8,16-dioxo-2,9,15,17-tetraazaicosane-14,18,20-tricarboxylic acid) along with the radiolabeling with 99mTc were described previously (22). The structures of MIP-1405 and MIP-1427, incorporating the CIM chelate, as well as the structures of MIP-1404 and MIP-1428, which incorporate the TIM chelate, are shown in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Structures of MIP-1404, MIP-1405, MIP-1427, and MIP-1428.

Briefly, the 99mTc(CO)3+ radiolabeling to form the desired 99mTc metal complexes (99mTc(CO)3-MIP-1404, MIP-1405, MIP-1427, and MIP-1428) was accomplished using standard methodology (16) and commercially available IsoLink kits (Covidien) in a volume of 1 mL to form the [99mTc(CO)3(H2O)3]+ intermediate, 1.48 GBq (40 mCi), which was subsequently neutralized with 0.2 mL of 1N HCl and reacted with 0.1 mg of compound (MIP-1404, MIP-1405, MIP-1427, and MIP-1428) at a concentration of 10−4 M in an equal-volume mixture of acetonitrile and water in a sealed vial. The sealed vial was heated at 100°C for 30 min. After cooling and evaporation of the solvent, the tert-butyl ester protecting groups were removed by treatment with 2 mL of 50% trifluoroacetic acid in dichloromethane for 45 min at room temperature. On completion of the deprotection, the reactions were concentrated on a rotary evaporator and purified by high-performance liquid chromatography using a Vydac C18 reverse-phase column (250 mm × 4.6 mm × 5 μm) and a gradient method of 5%–50% buffer B over 30 min (buffer A = water + 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, buffer B = acetonitrile + 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid). The final 99mTc-labeled complexes were dried under a stream of nitrogen and reconstituted in 0.9% sodium chloride solution (pH 5), resulting in no-carrier-added products. The excess chelating agent was separated from the final 99mTc-labeled products to the extent that less than 5% of the original 10−4 M chelate remained). The radiochemical purity was determined via high-performance liquid chromatography using the method above and shown to be consistently at least 95% pure with 70% radiochemical yield and specific activity greater than 37 TBq (1,000 Ci)/mmol (22).

Cell Culture

The human prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP (PSMA-positive) and PC3 (PSMA-negative) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Cell culture supplies were from Invitrogen unless otherwise noted. LNCaP cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), 4 mM l-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES (N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic acid), d-glucose (2.5 mg/mL), and gentamicin (50 μg/mL) in a humidified incubator at 37°C/5% CO2. PC3 cells were maintained in F-12K nutrient mixture Kaighn modification medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM l-glutamine, and gentamicin (50 μg/mL) in a humidified incubator at 37°C/5% CO2. Cells were removed from flasks for passage or for transfer to 12-well assay plates by incubating them with 0.25% trypsin/ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.

Affinity Measurements

The affinity constant (Kd) of 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors was determined by saturation binding analysis. LNCaP cells (4 × 105 cells per well in 12-well plates in triplicate) were incubated for 1 h with 0.003–1,000 nM 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors supplemented with the nonradiolabeled rhenium analogs in HEPES buffered saline (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.9% sodium chloride) at 4°C. Nonspecific binding was determined by adding 30 μM nonradiolabeled rhenium analogs and subtracted from total binding. The cells were then washed, and the amount of radioactivity was measured on a γ-counter. Specific binding was calculated as the difference between total binding and nonspecific binding. The Kd was determined by nonlinear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism software.

Binding Specificity

LNCaP cells and PC3 cells (4 × 105 cells per well in 12-well plates in duplicate) were incubated in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature with 3 nM 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors or in the presence of 10 μM nonradiolabeled rhenium test compound or 10 μM 2-(phosphonomethyl)-pentanedioic acid (PMPA) (Axxora), a structurally unrelated NAALADase inhibitor. The cells were washed and counted in an LKB Wallac Model 1282 automated γ-counter (Perkin Elmer).

Internalization

LNCaP cells (4 × 105 cells per well in 12-well plates in duplicates) were incubated in HEPES buffered saline with 100 nM 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors for 0–2 h at 4°C and 37°C. At the indicated time, the medium was removed and the cells were washed twice and then incubated with a mild acid buffer (50 mM glycine, 150 mM NaCl, pH 3.0) at 4°C for 5 min. The cells were then centrifuged at 20,000g for 5 min. The supernatant (containing cell surface–bound radioactivity) and the cell pellet (containing internalized radioactivity) were counted on a γ-counter (23).

Inoculation of Mice with Xenografts

All animal studies were approved by the Institute for Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (24). The mice were housed under standard conditions in approved facilities with 12-h light/dark cycles and given food and water ad libitum throughout the duration of the studies. Male athymic NCr-nu/nu mice were purchased from Taconic. For inoculation in mice, LNCaP or PC3 cells were resuspended at 2 × 107 cells/mL in a 1:1 mixture of phosphate-buffered saline:Matrigel (BD Biosciences). Each mouse was injected in the right flank with 0.25 mL of the cell suspension. The mice were used for tissue distribution studies when the tumors reached approximately 100–400 mm3.

Mouse Tissue Distribution

A quantitative analysis of the tissue distribution of 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors was performed on separate groups of male NCr-nu/nu mice bearing LNCaP or PC3 cell xenografts administered via the tail vein as a bolus injection of approximately 74 kBq (2 μCi)/mouse at a specific activity of more than 37 TBq (1,000 Ci)/mmol in a constant volume of 0.05 mL. The animals (n = 5/time point) were euthanized by asphyxiation with carbon dioxide at 0.25, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after injection. To examine specificity, other mice (n = 5) were coinjected with 10 mg of PMPA per kilogram of body weight and sacrificed at 1 h. Tissues were dissected, excised, weighed wet, and counted in an automated γ-counter. Tissue time–radioactivity levels expressed as percentage injected dose (%ID) per gram of tissue were determined. With an average mouse body mass of 25 g in these studies, and assuming a homogeneous distribution of 99mTc, %ID/g can be converted to standardized uptake value by dividing %ID/g values by 4 (%ID/g/100%/25 g).

SPECT/CT Imaging

All in vivo experimental procedures were undertaken in compliance with U.S. laws governing animal experimentation and were approved by the Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University institutional animal care and utilization committee. Male BALB/c-nu/nu mice were implanted subcutaneously with 5 × 106 LNCaP cells. When the tumors reached approximately 5–7 mm in diameter, the mice were anesthetized using a mixture of ketamine and xylene before radiopharmaceutical injection and during acquisition of the SPECT scan. Mice were injected via the tail vein with 37 MBq (1 mCi) of 99mTc-MIP-1404 at a specific activity of more than 37 TBq (1,000 Ci)/mmol. Mice bearing LNCaP tumors were imaged for 2 h after injection. A micro-SPECT/CT scanner (Inveon; Siemens Medical Solutions, Inc) equipped with 5 low-energy 0.5-mm aperture pinhole collimators and CT was used for all scans. The mice were scanned using 20 bed locations, 9°/step and 10 s/view with a total acquisition time of approximately 20 min. A CT scan was obtained before scintigraphy for both anatomic coregistration and attenuation correction. Data were reconstructed and fused using commercial Inveon software from the vendor, which includes a 3-dimensional ordered-subsets expectation maximization algorithm with 8 iterations and 4 subsets per iteration.

RESULTS

Binding and Internalization

Saturation binding analysis was conducted to determine the affinity of 99mTc-MIP-1404, 99mTc-MIP-1405, 99mTc-MIP-1427, and 99mTc-MIP-1428 for PSMA expressed on LNCaP cells. The cells were incubated with 0.003–1,000 nM 99mTc-PSMA inhibitor to determine the Kd (Fig. 2). Consistent with the order of potency of these compounds in a competitive inhibition assay (22), the affinity for PSMA (Kd) followed the same rank order: 99mTc-MIP-1427 (0.64 ± 0.46 nM) > 99mTc-MIP-1404 (1.07 ± 0.89 nM) > 99mTc-MIP-1428 (1.75 ± 0.32 nM) > 99mTc-MIP-1405 (4.35 ± 0.35 nM).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Affinity measurements of 99mTc-MIP-1404, 99mTc-MIP-1405, 99mTc-MIP-1427, and 99mTc-MIP-1428. LNCaP cells were incubated with 0.003–1,000 nM 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitor for 1 h at 4°C. Kd and Bmax were determined by nonlinear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism software.

LNCaP and PC3 cells were incubated with 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors to examine the specificity for PSMA-expressing prostate cancer cells. The compounds bound to the PSMA-expressing LNCaP cells but not to the PSMA-deficient PC3 cells. Furthermore, the binding to LNCaP cells was abrogated with 10 μM nonradiolabeled rhenium analogs or with the structurally unrelated PSMA inhibitor, PMPA. The results using 99mTc-MIP-1404 as an example are shown in Figure 3A.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

(A) Binding of 99mTc-MIP-1404 to LNCaP and PC3 cells. Cells were incubated for 1 h in presence or absence of unlabeled 10 μM Re-MIP-1404 or PMPA. (B) Cellular internalization of 99mTc-MIP-1404 in LNCaP cells. LNCaP cells were incubated at 37°C (red lines) or 4°C (blue lines) with 100 nM 99mTc-MIP-1404 for indicated time, washed, and treated with mild acid buffer to separate total bound material (dashed lines) from internalized (solid lines).

LNCaP cells were also incubated with 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors for up to 2 h at 4°C and 37°C to determine whether the compounds are internalized by endocytosis. The cells were then washed with a mild acid buffer to remove extracellularly bound compound. The total binding of 99mTc-MIP-1404 and the acid-insensitive binding, or internalized compound, to LNCaP cells is depicted in Figure 3B, as a representative example. The results show a time-dependent increase in radioactivity associated with the cellular pellet at 37°C but not at 4°C, indicating internalization in a temperature-dependent manner. At 4°C, a temperature at which internalization does not occur, nearly all the radioactivity is removed by the acid wash, indicating that it is surface-bound. Cells incubated for 2 h at 37°C demonstrated internalization of 99mTc-MIP-1404 (699 ± 85 fmol), 99mTc-MIP-1405 (231 ± 148 fmol), 99mTc-MIP-1427 (351 ± 61 fmol), and 99mTc-MIP-1428 (794 ± 138 fmol). These results were confirmed by affinity measurements at 37°C showing an elevation in the apparent Bmax, further indicating internalization.

Tissue Distribution and Tumor Uptake

The tissue distribution of 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors was assessed in NCr-nu/nu mice bearing LNCaP xenografts, and the results are illustrated in Table 1. The radiolabel was detected at varying levels in all tissues examined and decreased from the 1-h to the 4-h time point in all nontarget tissues. As anticipated, uptake and exposure of the 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors was greatest in the kidney, which expresses high levels of NAALADase (5), and in the PSMA-expressing LNCaP xenograft tumors. Tumor uptake ranged from 9.3 to 12.4 percentage injected dose (%ID) per gram at the 1-h time point and 7.2–11.0 %ID/g at the 4-h time point, with tumor-to-blood ratios ranging from 29:1 to 550:1 and tumor–to–skeletal muscle ratios ranging from 31:1 to 157:1 at 4 h. Liver and intestinal uptake was less than 1 %ID/g for all compounds at both time points, indicating that these compounds were preferentially excreted via the renal system rather than the hepatobiliary route. Little uptake was detected in the brain, which exhibits high NAALADase activity (25), indicating that the highly charged 99mTc-labeled PSMA inhibitors do not cross the blood–brain barrier.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Tissue Distribution of 99mTc-Labeled PSMA Inhibitors in NCr Nude Mice Bearing LNCaP Xenografts (1 and 4 Hours)

99mTc-MIP-1404 exhibited the best tissue distribution profile of the 4 PSMA inhibitors tested: tumor uptake was among the highest at 1 and 4 h, clearance from the kidneys was rapid, liver and intestinal uptake was among the lowest at 1 and 4 h, and the ratios of tumor to blood and tumor to skeletal muscle were the highest at both time points. Therefore, we examined tissue distribution over an extended time course to better examine the pharmacokinetic profile of 99mTc-MIP-1404 (Fig. 4). At 24 h, blood and nontarget tissues were at or below the limit of detection. Kidney uptake peaked at the 15-min time point (113 ± 5 %ID/g), remained steady through the 2-h time point, and then was more than 90% cleared by the 4-h time point. Peak LNCaP xenograft tumor uptake was observed at the 2-h time point (13.9 ± 8.5 %ID/g), but no clearance was observed throughout the duration of the study. There was no statistical difference in tumor uptake at any of the time points examined (P > 0.2), likely a result of the high affinity for PSMA. SPECT/CT imaging from 0 to 2 h was consistent with the tissue distribution results (Fig. 5). Uptake was high in PSMA-expressing kidney and LNCaP xenograft tissue. Also evident was renal excretion through the bladder.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Tissue distribution of 99mTc-MIP-1404. 99mTc-MIP-1404 was injected into mice bearing LNCaP tumor xenografts, and at indicated time points, tissues were excised, weighed wet, and counted on automated γ-counter. Data are expressed as %ID/g. With average mouse body mass of 25 g in these studies, and assuming homogeneous distribution of 99mTc, %ID/g can be converted to standardized uptake value by dividing %ID/g values by 4 (%ID/g/100%/25 g). Sk. = skeletal.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Targeting of PSMA in vivo with 99mTc-MIP-1404. Mice bearing LNCaP tumor xenografts were injected with 37 MBq (1 mCi) of 99mTc-MIP-1404 at specific activity of more than 37 TBq/mmol (1,000 Ci/mmol)) and imaged by SPECT/CT at 2 h with Inveon camera (Siemens).

NCr-nu/nu mice bearing either LNCaP or PC3 xenograft tumors were injected with 99mTc-MIP-1404 alone or along with PMPA (10 mg/kg), a structurally unrelated PSMA inhibitor, to demonstrate that binding to LNCaP tumors was specific to PSMA. 99mTc-MIP-1404 localized to the PSMA-expressing LNCaP tumor but not to the PSMA-deficient PC3 tumor. Further, binding was abrogated by more than 90% in the LNCaP tumor and kidney tissue when a 10 mg/kg dose of PMPA was coinjected, indicating that binding was indeed saturable and specific to PSMA (Fig. 6).

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Specific binding of 99mTc-MIP-1404 to PSMA in vivo. 99mTc-MIP-1404, 37 kBq (2 μCi)/mouse, at specific activity of more than 37 TBq (1,000 Ci)/mmol was injected alone (LNCaP tumor, Embedded Image; PC3 tumor, Embedded Image) or coinjected with 10 mg/kg dose of PMPA (LNCaP tumor, Embedded Image; PC3 tumor, Embedded Image) via tail vein. Data are expressed as %ID/g. Sk. = skeletal.

DISCUSSION

Initial diagnosis, monitoring of disease progression, and evaluation of the recurrence of prostate cancer rely mainly on serum prostate-specific antigen testing. Although the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer showed that initial diagnosis of prostate cancer using PSA screening moderately reduced mortality from prostate cancer (26), the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial showed no benefit (27). As a result of these 2 large clinical trials, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recently recommended against PSA screening for asymptomatic men, regardless of their age, family history, and ethnicity, because of the harm related to false-positive test results, subsequent evaluation, and therapy, including overdiagnosis and overtreatment (28). In addition, since PSA testing is a blood test, it does not inform on disease location and provides little information about the extent of disease.

Molecular imaging with 18F-FDG is an efficient means to diagnose and monitor disease progression and recurrence for most solid tumors because of the hypermetabolic rate of cancer cells (29). However, prostate cancer and its metastases generally have a low glycolytic rate, making 18F-FDG imaging essentially ineffective (30). Currently, the only Food and Drug Administration–approved imaging agent for prostate cancer is the 7E11-C5 monoclonal antibody 111In-capromab pendetide, but it is not in widespread use in part because it binds to the intracellular domain of PSMA and therefore is thought to bind to mostly necrotic portions of prostate tumors and not to viable cells with intact membranes (31,32). CT for detecting soft-tissue and lymph node metastases, and bone scans for detecting bone lesions, are presently the standard imaging techniques for evaluation of prostate cancer but lack sensitivity and specificity, respectively (2,33,34). Therefore, a clear need exists for a means of accurately detecting prostate cancer so that men can be better informed on treatment options. Several metabolic intermediates labeled with PET isotopes including choline, acetate, and 1-amino-3-fluorocyclobutyl-1-carboxylic acid have been tested clinically, with promising results (35). However, given the widespread availability of 99mTc and the presence of SPECT cameras in most hospitals throughout the world, the development of a 99mTc-labeled agent targeting a cell surface protein that is upregulated in prostate cancer may be advantageous.

To improve prostate cancer detection for staging disease and to better monitor therapy and disease recurrence, we and others have attempted to image prostate cancer by targeting PSMA using small molecules (13–15,18–20,36–49) and antibodies that target the extracellular domain (41). Our previous work focused on using the glutamate-urea-lysine pharmacophore radiolabeled with an isotope of iodine that exhibited high affinity for PSMA and was found to localize to prostate cancer in animal models and in clinical trials (13–15). The current work uses the same glutamate-urea-lysine pharmacophore as well as a novel glutamate-urea-glutamate pharmacophore to target PSMA, conjugated to either the CIM or TIM second-generation SAAC chelators for 99mTc. The affinity measurements demonstrated slightly better PSMA affinity with the glutamate-urea-glutamate–containing compounds, 99mTc-MIP-1404 and 99mTc-MIP-1427.

The chelators used here are derivatives of lysine that can be incorporated into a variety of small molecules and peptides. They maintain the same robust and stabile coordination of 99mTc(CO)3 as do first-generation SAAC chelates but incorporate carboxylic acid–substituted imidazoles to facilitate rapid renal clearance and diminished hepatobiliary uptake either alone or when conjugated to small molecules (20) and peptides, such as octreotide (21). 99mTc-MIP-1405 and 99mTc-MIP-1427 used the CIM chelate, whereas the chelate used for 99mTc-MIP-1404 and 99mTc-MIP-1428 was further derivatized by adding an extra carboxylic acid group to the CIM chelate and was designated TIM. This additional acid group did not negatively impact the affinity for PSMA. All 4 compounds exhibited high affinity and specificity for PSMA and internalized on binding to PSMA in LNCaP cells, as did previously described small molecules (14,40) and antibodies (10).

The TIM chelate was synthesized with the intention to further decrease nontarget tissue uptake and enhance renal clearance. As is evident in Table 1, this indeed was the case: both 99mTc-MIP-1404 and 99mTc-MIP-1428 displayed lower uptake and more rapid clearance from the blood, liver, intestines, and most other nontarget tissues than did 99mTc-MIP-1405 and 99mTc-MIP-1427, the compounds containing the CIM chelate. Furthermore, the TIM chelate did not diminish uptake or retention in the LNCaP xenograft tumor, as there was no statistical difference between the tumor uptake of any of the compounds at either the 1-h or the 4-h time points.

Of the 4 compounds examined, 99mTc-MIP-1404 displayed the fastest clearance from kidney and nontarget tissue while retaining binding to the LNCaP tumor over 4 h. 99mTc-MIP-1404 also displayed the highest tumor-to-blood and tumor–to–skeletal muscle ratios at both time points. Because of these results, 99mTc-MIP-1404 was further examined in an extended time-course tissue distribution study. The results were comparable to the abbreviated tissue distribution study, with rapid clearance from kidney and nontarget tissue. Interestingly, the difference in LNCaP tumor uptake was not statistically significant at any time during the study (P > 0.2), indicating that this compound accumulates and is retained preferentially by the tumor. As anticipated from the tissue distribution results, SPECT/CT imaging from 0 to 2 h depicted a clear abdominal cavity with uptake confined to the kidneys, tumor, and urinary bladder.

Interestingly, whereas kidney uptake of 99mTc-MIP-1404 competed with PMPA, demonstrating that the uptake is mediated by PSMA, clearance of 99mTc-MIP-1404 from the kidneys was rapid compared with retention in the tumor. The reason for this apparent yet fortuitous discrepancy is under investigation to determine whether it is perhaps the result of differences in PSMA affinity or cellular internalization between these 2 tissues. In our investigational new drug–enabling preclinical studies in rats, no metabolites of 99mTc-MIP-1404 were detected in the urine, ruling out renal metabolism as an explanation for the difference. The combination of prolonged tumor retention and rapid clearance from kidney and nontarget tissues is especially important in imaging prostate cancer, as most locoregional metastases are in the pelvic region and abdominal cavity. These compounds are unlikely to interfere with the physiologic NAALADase activity of glutamatergic neurotransmission, as none of the compounds accumulated in the brain to an appreciable extent, indicating that they do not cross the blood–brain barrier.

Although the tert-butyl ester protected precursor molecules were used for radiolabeling for these preclinical studies, efficient radiolabeling of the fully deprotected precursors has since been accomplished in a rapid and simple kit formulation (17), thereby facilitating the translation of these compounds to the clinic for imaging patients with metastatic prostate cancer. 99mTc-MIP-1404 is currently under clinical investigation in a phase II trial (http://clinicaltrials.gov NCT01667536).

CONCLUSION

New modalities for the diagnosis, staging, and subsequent monitoring of therapeutic interventions are still an urgent medical need for prostate cancer patients. Small-molecule radiopharmaceuticals such as 99mTc-MIP-1404, that can potentially be manufactured on demand in a local radiopharmacy, may be capable of detecting both primary prostate cancer and soft-tissue and bone metastases. These agents, designed to specifically track the extent and location of prostate cancer through PSMA expression, could significantly improve patient management and enhance a clinician’s ability to select the most beneficial therapeutic intervention.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Shankar Vallabhajosula for performing the SPECT imaging.

Footnotes

  • Published online Jun. 3, 2013.

  • © 2013 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kelloff GJ,
    2. Sullivan DC,
    3. Baker H,
    4. et al
    . Workshop on imaging science development for cancer prevention and preemption. Cancer Biomark. 2007;3:1–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hricak H,
    2. Choyke PL,
    3. Eberhardt SC,
    4. Leibel SA,
    5. Scardino PT
    . Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary approach. Radiology. 2007;243:28–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Briganti A,
    2. Abdollah F,
    3. Nini A,
    4. et al
    . Performance characteristics of computed tomography in detecting lymph node metastases in contemporary patients with prostate cancer treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Eur Urol. 2012;61:1132–1138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Israeli RS,
    2. Powell CT,
    3. Fair WR,
    4. Heston WD
    . Molecular cloning of a complementary DNA encoding prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res. 1993;53:227–230.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Silver DA,
    2. Pellicer I,
    3. Fair WR,
    4. et al
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:81–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  6. 6.↵
    1. Horoszewicz JS,
    2. Kawinski E,
    3. Murphy GP
    . Monoclonal antibodies to a new antigenic marker in epithelial prostatic cells and serum of prostatic cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 1987;7:927–935.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Perner S,
    2. Hofer MD,
    3. Kim R,
    4. et al
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression as a predictor of prostate cancer progression. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:696–701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Marchal C,
    2. Redondo M,
    3. Padilla M,
    4. et al
    . Expression of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in prostatic adenocarcinoma and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Histol Histopathol. 2004;19:715–718.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pinto JT,
    2. Suffoletto BP,
    3. Bergin TM
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen: a novel folate hydrolase in human prostatic carcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2:1445–1451.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  10. 10.↵
    1. Smith-Jones PM,
    2. Vallabahajosula S,
    3. Goldsmith SJ,
    4. et al
    . In vitro characterization of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies specific for the extracellular domain of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5237–5243.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mesters JR,
    2. Henning K,
    3. Hilgenfeld R
    . Human glutamate carboxypeptidase II inhibition: structures of GCPII in complex with two potent inhibitors, quisqualate and 2-PMPA. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2007;63:508–513.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Barinka C,
    2. Byun Y,
    3. Dusich CL,
    4. et al
    . Interactions between human glutamate carboxypeptiase II and urea-based inhibitors:structural characterization. J Med Chem. 2008;51:7737–7743.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Maresca KP,
    2. Hillier SM,
    3. Femia FJ,
    4. et al
    . A series of halogenated heterodimeric inhibitors of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as radiolabeled probes for targeting prostate cancer. J Med Chem. 2009;52:347–357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hillier SM,
    2. Maresca KP,
    3. Femia FJ,
    4. et al
    . Preclinical evaluation of novel glutamate-urea-lysine analogues that target prostate-specific membrane antigen as molecular imaging pharmaceuticals for prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6932–6940.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Barrett JA,
    2. LaFrance N,
    3. Coleman R,
    4. et al
    . Targeting metastatic prostate cancer [PCa] in patients with 123I-MIP1072 and 123I-MIP1095 [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(suppl):522P.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Alberto R,
    2. Schibli R,
    3. Waibel R,
    4. Abram U,
    5. Schubiger AP
    . Basic aqueous chemistry of [M(OH2)3(CO)3]+ (M=Re, Tc) directed towards radiopharmaceutical application. Coord Chem Rev. 1999;190–192:901–919.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Maresca KM,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Hillier SH,
    4. et al
    . Development of a simple kit for Tc-99m-MIP-1404, a single amino acid chelate (SAAC II) derived small molecule inhibitor of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for imaging prostate cancer [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(suppl 1):159P.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Banerjee SR,
    2. Foss CA,
    3. Castanares M,
    4. et al
    . Synthesis and evaluation of technetium-99m- and rhenium-labeled inhibitors of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). J Med Chem. 2008;51:4504–4517.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Kularatne SA,
    2. Zhou Z,
    3. Yang J,
    4. Post CB,
    5. Low PS
    . Design, synthesis, and preclinical evaluation of prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted 99mTc-radioimaging agents. Mol Pharm. 2009;6:790–800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Maresca KP,
    2. Hillier SM,
    3. Lu G,
    4. et al
    . Small molecule inhibitors of PSMA incorporating technetium-99m for imaging prostate cancer: effects of chelate design on pharmacokinetics. Inorg Chim Acta. 2012;389:168–175.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Maresca KP,
    2. Marquis JC,
    3. Hillier SM,
    4. et al
    . Novel polar single amino acid chelates for technetium-99m tricarbonyl-based radiopharmaceuticals with enhanced renal clearance: application to octreotide. Bioconjug Chem. 2010;21:1032–1042.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lu G,
    2. Maresca KP,
    3. Hillier SM,
    4. et al
    . Application of novel polar single amino acid chelates to 99mTc/Re-labeled small molecule prostate specific membrane antigen inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. In press.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ascoli M
    . Internalization and degradation of receptor-bound choriogonadotropin in Leydig tumor cells. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:13306–13311.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Institutes of Health Web site. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/OLAW%20/references/phspol.htm. Published 2002. Accessed May 15, 2013.
  25. 25.↵
    1. Tiffany CW,
    2. Lapidus RG,
    3. Merion A,
    4. Calvin DC,
    5. Slusher BS
    . Characterization of the enzymatic activity of PSM: comparison with brain NAALADase. Prostate. 1999;39:28–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Schröder FH,
    2. Hugosson J,
    3. Roobol MJ,
    4. et al
    . Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1320–1328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Andriole GL,
    2. Grubb RL III.,
    3. Buys SS,
    4. et al
    . Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1310–1319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Web site. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/prostatecancerscreening/prostateart.htm. Published October 2011. Accessed May 13, 2013.
  29. 29.↵
    1. Delbeke D
    . Oncological applications of FDG PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1706–1715.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hain SF,
    2. Maisey MN
    . Positron emission tomography in urological tumours. BJU Int. 2003;92:159–164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Troyer JK,
    2. Beckett ML,
    3. Wright GL
    . Location of prostate-specific membrane antigen in the LNCaP prostate carcinoma cell line. Prostate. 1997;30:232–242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Troyer JK,
    2. Feng Q,
    3. Beckett ML,
    4. Wright GL
    . Biochemical characterization and mapping of the 7E11-C5.3 epitope of the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Urol Oncol. 1995;1:29–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hövels AM,
    2. Heesakkers RA,
    3. Adang EM,
    4. et al
    . The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MR in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:387–395.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Seabold JE,
    2. Ferlic RJ,
    3. Marsh JL,
    4. Nepola JV
    . Periarticular bone sites associated with traumatic injury: false positive findings with 111In-white blood cells and 99mTc MDP scintigraphy. Radiology. 1993;186:845–849.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Bouchelouche K,
    2. Tagawa ST,
    3. Goldsmith SJ,
    4. Turkbey B,
    5. Capala J,
    6. Choyke P
    . PET/CT imaging and radioimmunotherapy of prostate cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41:29–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Guilarte TR,
    2. McGlothan JL,
    3. Foss CA,
    4. et al
    . Glutamate carboxypeptidase II levels in rodent brain using [125I]DCIT quantitative autoradiography. Neurosci Lett. 2005;387:141–144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.
    1. Mease RC,
    2. Dusich CL,
    3. Foss CA,
    4. et al
    . N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-[18F]fluorobenzyl-L-cysteine, [18F]DCFBC: a new imaging probe for prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3036–3043.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.
    1. Foss CA,
    2. Mease RC,
    3. Fan H,
    4. et al
    . Radiolabeled small-molecule ligands for prostate-specific membrane antigen: in vivo imaging in experimental models of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:4022–4028.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Foss CA,
    3. Byun Y,
    4. et al
    . Radiohalogenated prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based ureas as imaging agents for prostate cancer. J Med Chem. 2008;51:7933–7943.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Liu T,
    2. Wu LY,
    3. Kazak M,
    4. Berkman CE
    . Cell surface labeling and internalization by a fluorescent inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Prostate. 2008;68:955–964.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Bander NH,
    2. Milowsky MI,
    3. Nanus DM,
    4. Kostakoglu L,
    5. Vallabhajosula S,
    6. Goldsmith SJ
    . Phase I trial of 177lutetium-labeled J591, a monoclonal antibody to prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4591–4601.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication October 31, 2012.
  • Accepted for publication February 11, 2013.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 54 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue 8
August 1, 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
99mTc-Labeled Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
99mTc-Labeled Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer
Shawn M. Hillier, Kevin P. Maresca, Genliang Lu, Ross D. Merkin, John C. Marquis, Craig N. Zimmerman, William C. Eckelman, John L. Joyal, John W. Babich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2013, 54 (8) 1369-1376; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.116624

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
99mTc-Labeled Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer
Shawn M. Hillier, Kevin P. Maresca, Genliang Lu, Ross D. Merkin, John C. Marquis, Craig N. Zimmerman, William C. Eckelman, John L. Joyal, John W. Babich
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2013, 54 (8) 1369-1376; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.116624
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A New Labelling Method of 99mTc-PSMA-HBED-CC
  • Receptor-Targeted Peptide Conjugates Based on Diphosphines Enable Preparation of 99mTc and 188Re Theranostic Agents for Prostate Cancer
  • Eligibility for 177Lu-PSMA Therapy Depends on the Choice of Companion Diagnostic Tracer: A Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 99mTc-MIP-1404 in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • Radiation Dosimetry of 99mTc-PSMA I&S: A Single-Center Prospective Study
  • Preclinical Evaluation and Pilot Clinical Study of Al18F-PSMA-BCH for Prostate Cancer PET Imaging
  • Albumin-Binding PSMA Ligands: Implications for Expanding the Therapeutic Window
  • A Single Dose of 225Ac-RPS-074 Induces a Complete Tumor Response in an LNCaP Xenograft Model
  • Near-Infrared Dye-Labeled Anti-Prostate Stem Cell Antigen Minibody Enables Real-Time Fluorescence Imaging and Targeted Surgery in Translational Mouse Models
  • Intraindividual Comparison of 99mTc-Methylene Diphosphonate and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand 99mTc-MIP-1427 in Patients with Osseous Metastasized Prostate Cancer
  • Enhanced Therapeutic Activity of Non-Internalizing Small-Molecule-Drug Conjugates Targeting Carbonic Anhydrase IX in Combination with Targeted Interleukin-2
  • Intraindividual Comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, Multiparametric MRI, and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective, Proof-of-Concept Study
  • Phase 2 Study of 99mTc-Trofolastat SPECT/CT to Identify and Localize Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic LN Dissection
  • Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligands for Imaging and Therapy
  • 68Ga-THP-PSMA: A PET Imaging Agent for Prostate Cancer Offering Rapid, Room-Temperature, 1-Step Kit-Based Radiolabeling
  • Acceleration of PSMA-Targeted Theranostics to the Clinic: Can Common Sense Prevail?
  • Optimization of Labeling PSMAHBED with Ethanol-Postprocessed 68Ga and Its Quality Control Systems
  • Preclinical Evaluation and First Patient Application of 99mTc-PSMA-I&S for SPECT Imaging and Radioguided Surgery in Prostate Cancer
  • Acetazolamide Serves as Selective Delivery Vehicle for Dipeptide-Linked Drugs to Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • The Rise of PSMA Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy of Prostate Cancer
  • Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radiohalogenated PET and Therapeutic Agents for Prostate Cancer
  • New Strategies in Prostate Cancer: Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy
  • The Theranostic PSMA Ligand PSMA-617 in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by PET/CT: Biodistribution in Humans, Radiation Dosimetry, and First Evaluation of Tumor Lesions
  • 68Ga- and 177Lu-Labeled PSMA I&T: Optimization of a PSMA-Targeted Theranostic Concept and First Proof-of-Concept Human Studies
  • PMPA for Nephroprotection in PSMA-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate Cancer
  • 99mTc-Labeled Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution Studies in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
  • Development of Targeted Near-Infrared Imaging Agents for Prostate Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
  • Synthesis and Biologic Evaluation of Novel 18F-Labeled Probes Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for PET of Prostate Cancer
  • Tumor-Specific Binding of Radiolabeled PEGylated GIRLRG Peptide: A Novel Agent for Targeting Cancers
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • PSMA
  • imaging
  • SPECT
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire