Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleTheranostics

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Imaging of Response to Androgen Receptor Inhibition: First Human Experience

Thomas A. Hope, Charles Truillet, Eric C. Ehman, Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Rahul Aggarwal, Charles J. Ryan, Peter R. Carroll, Eric J. Small and Michael J. Evans
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2017, 58 (1) 81-84; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.181800
Thomas A. Hope
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
2Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California
3Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Truillet
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric C. Ehman
4Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali Afshar-Oromieh
5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rahul Aggarwal
3Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
6Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles J. Ryan
3Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
6Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter R. Carroll
3Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
7Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric J. Small
3Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
6Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Evans
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effect of androgen receptor (AR) inhibition on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake imaged using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in a mouse xenograft model and in a patient with castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Methods: We imaged 3 groups of 4 mice bearing LNCaP-AR xenografts before and 7 d after treatment with ARN-509, orchiectomy, or control vehicle. Additionally, we imaged one patient with castration-sensitive prostate cancer before and 4 wk after treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Uptake on pre- and posttreatment imaging was measured and compared. Results: PSMA uptake increased 1.5- to 2.0-fold in the xenograft mouse model after treatment with both orchiectomy and ARN-509 but not with vehicle. Patient imaging demonstrated a 7-fold increase in PSMA uptake after the initiation of ADT. Thirteen of 22 lesions in the imaged patient were visualized on PSMA PET only after treatment with ADT. Conclusion: Inhibition of the AR can increase PSMA expression in prostate cancer metastases and increase the number of lesions visualized using PSMA PET. The effect seen in cell and animal models can be recapitulated in humans. A better understanding of the temporal changes in PSMA expression is needed to leverage this effect for both improved diagnosis and improved therapy.

  • oncology: GU
  • PET
  • androgen receptor
  • PSMA PET
  • prostate cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a 100-kD transmembrane glycoprotein that is overexpressed on nearly all prostate cancers, particularly poorly differentiated and metastatic lesions (1–3). During the past 2 y, there have been literature reports of more than 1,000 patients imaged using PSMA ligands in studies that focused on the ability to detect metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence and demonstrated an improved detection rate compared with choline PET or other conventional imaging modalities (4–9).

Unlike 18F-FDG, PSMA expression does not correlate positively with disease progression. In fact, cellular PSMA expression is regulated by the androgen receptor (AR), which is frequently targeted during prostate cancer treatments and can therefore confound interpretation. As opposed to prostate-specific antigen levels, PSMA expression on the cell surface increases with AR inhibition (10–12). Previous work by Evans et al. in mice bearing PSMA-expressing xenografts demonstrated that PSMA expression is increased with both orchiectomy and enzalutamide (11), a finding that has recently been reproduced in multiple prostate cancer cell lines and circulating tumor cells (13,14).

We hypothesized that inhibition of the AR will result in a transient increase in PSMA expression on prostate cancer cells. First, using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET, we evaluated the effect of AR-targeted therapies in a xenograft model. Second, since over 90% of patients initially respond to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), we chose a patient with castration-sensitive metastatic disease for an in vivo test of our hypothesis that AR inhibition will increase PSMA expression (15).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

68Ga-PSMA-11 Labeling Procedure

68Ga was obtained by eluting a 68Ge/68Ga generator (iTG) yielding radioactivity in the range of 555–1,110 MBq (15–30 mCi) during synthesis. The syntheses were conducting using an iQS 68Ga fluidic labeling module (RadioMedix Inc.). Precursor (DKFZ-PSMA-11) or Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lyx(Ahx)-HBED-CC, where HBED-CC is N,N′-bis[2-hydroxy-5-(carboxyethyl)-benzyl]ethylenediamine-N,N′-diacetic acid, was purchased from ABX Advanced Biochemical Compounds. All reagents for formulating the final product were provided in a kit from ABX.

The precursor was dispensed into 5-μg aliquots dissolved in 100 μL of 0.25 M sodium acetate buffer and stored at −20°C until use. The precursor (made up to a total of 1 mL with sodium acetate buffer) was added to the preheated reaction vessel (100°C–110°C), and the generator was immediately eluted into the reaction vessel. The contents were heated for 5 min, after which they were pushed through an activated C18 Sep-Pak Light cartridge (Waters) and directed to a waste vial. The reaction vessel was further washed with 5 mL of saline, which was directed to a waste vial. The product was then eluted with 1 mL of 60% ethanol in water followed by 10 mL of saline and passed through a sterilizing filter. Typical yields are based on the total 68Ga eluted and range from 85% to 90%.

Animal Experiment

Our prior data showing that upregulation of PSMA can be quantified with PET were acquired with 64Cu-labeled J591. Because J591 is a full-sized monoclonal antibody with a long residence time in blood, it was not obvious whether changes in PSMA could be measured with a more rapidly clearing agent such as 68Ga-PSMA-11. Therefore, we measured relative changes in PSMA expression with 68Ga-PSMA-11 in mice bearing LNCaP-AR xenografts. Twelve 3- to 5-wk-old male nu/nu mice obtained from Charles River were studied: 4 treated with vehicle, 4 with orchiectomy, and 4 with apalutamide (ARN-509), which is a nonsteroidal competitive AR inhibitor. LnCAP-AR cells (5 × 107) in a 1:1 mixture (v/v) of medium and Matrigel (Corning) were subcutaneously inoculated into one flank. Tumors were palpable within 20–30 d after injection. Surgical castration was performed according to our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee–approved protocol under anesthesia with isoflurane. Separate arms were treated with daily oral gavage of vehicle or ARN-509 (10 mg/kg/d) for 7 d.

PET imaging was conducted using an Inveon small-animal PET/CT scanner (Siemens) at 2 time points, once before treatment and once 7 d after treatment. The mice were injected with approximately 7.4 MBq of 68Ga-PSMA via the tail vein. One hour after injection, they were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane and imaged for 10–20 min to acquire approximately 20 million coincident events. In the ARN-509–treated cohort, the PET acquisitions took place approximately 6 h after the final gavage within an energy window of 350–650 keV and a coincidence-timing window of 3.432 ns. The data were converted into 2-dimensional histograms, and images were reconstructed by filtered backprojection. After the PET acquisition, a coregistered CT scan was acquired within approximately 10 min. SUVmean was calculated for each xenograft using manually segmented regions of interest, and the ratio of SUVmean after treatment to SUVmean before treatment was calculated for each animal.

Human Experiment

The local institutional review board approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from the patient, a 51-y-old man who had castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 10. He had received no treatment of any kind before the first PSMA PET study. For ADT, he received a single 7.5-mg intragluteal injection of leuprolide acetate (Lupron; AbbVie). He also received 50 mg of bicalutamide (Casodex; AstraZeneca) daily for 30 d.

The patient was imaged on a 3.0-T Signa PET/MRI scanner (GE Healthcare) at two time points, once before initiation of ADT and again 4 wk (29 d) after initiation. Imaging began an average of 97 minutes after injection of 207 ± 22 MBq (mean ± SD) of 68Ga-PSMA-11. A 6-bed-position whole-body acquisition was performed from the mid thighs to the vertex for 3 min at each bed position. The PET data were reconstructed using time-of-flight information, ordered-subset expectation maximization with 2 iterations and 28 subsets, and a matrix size of 256 × 256. The PET transaxial and z-axis fields of view were 600 and 250 mm, resulting in a voxel size of 2.3 × 2.3 mm. Axial slices were reconstructed at a 2.78-mm thickness. Attenuation was corrected using a 2-echo Dixon fat–water separation algorithm for the body, whereas the lung was segmented using a region-growing algorithm provided with the scanner (16).

All lesions capable of segmentation at both time points were segmented using a semiautomated method. SUVmax was calculated for each lesion. If a lesion was seen on only the pretherapy images or only the posttherapy images, the volume of interest was placed in the same location on both sets of images and the SUVmax was recorded. SUVpeak and SUVmean were not calculated, because many lesions were seen at only one time point, and therefore comparing SUVpeak and SUVmean across two imaging studies was not feasible. All measurements were performed using an Advantage Workstation (version 5.0; GE Healthcare).

Statistical Analysis

A paired Student t test was used to compare SUVmax before and after ADT in the patient and in the mouse xenografts. An unpaired Student t test was used to compare the change in mouse xenograft SUVmean between the treatment groups and the vehicle group.

RESULTS

Animal Experiment

No change in tumor SUVmean was observed in the group treated with vehicle (Fig. 1: ratio, 0.90 ± 0.14; P = 0.85). Castration using orchiectomy resulted in an increase in SUVmean (ratio, 1.55 ± 0.57; P = 0.007). Treatment with ARN-509 resulted in a larger increase in SUVmean (ratio, 1.85 ± 0.44; P = 0.013).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET demonstrates increased PSMA expression in prostate cancer xenografts with inhibition of AR. (A) Ratio of SUVmean at day 7 to day 0 increased an average of 72% with orchiectomy and 105% with ARN-509 compared with vehicle. (B) Visual assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET demonstrates clear increase in uptake in xenografts in response to ARN-509 (middle row) and orchiectomy (bottom row), compared with controls treated with vehicle (top row). *P = 0.007. **P = 0.013. ID = injected dose; ROI = region of interest; RX = treatment.

Human Experiment

At 4 wk after the initiation of ADT, the patient’s prostate-specific antigen level had decreased from 66.8 to 9.0 ng/mL. Imaging demonstrated a post-ADT increase in 68Ga-PSMA-11 SUVmax from 2.9 ± 3.0 to 11.8 ± 6.9 (707% ± 689%) across 22 measurable lesions (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). Of these 22 lesions, 13 that were thought to be visible on only the post-ADT PET images were found, in retrospect, to also be visible on the pre-ADT MR images (Fig. 3).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

(A and B) Coronal maximum-intensity projections of patient with castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer imaged using 68Ga-PSMA-11 before ADT (A) and after ADT (B) demonstrate marked increase in uptake in lesions. (C) Each visualized lesion demonstrated increased uptake, averaging more than 7 times the initial uptake. (D and E) Numerous lesions (13 of 22) were visualized only on posttreatment imaging, as exemplified by the upper thoracic osseous metastasis seen on these axial PET images. (F and G) Other lesions increased in size and had increased uptake on posttreatment imaging, as exemplified by the lesion seen on these axial PET images.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Examples of lesions seen only on post-ADT PSMA PET. (A) Pretreatment PET image demonstrates single lesion (circled) in right acetabulum. (B) Additional non–PSMA-avid right acetabular lesion (arrow) is seen just lateral to larger lesion on MR image of same location. (C) On post-ADT PET image, numerous additional lesions are seen, including adjacent acetabular lesion (arrow). (D) This lesion (arrow) is again demonstrated on enhanced T1-weighted MR image.

DISCUSSION

We have reconfirmed that AR inhibition can increase PSMA expression on PSMA PET in a mouse xenograft model, and for the first time, to our knowledge, we have shown that such an effect can also be demonstrated in humans.

Uptake in the patient was 7-fold higher at the post-ADT imaging time point than before treatment. This finding suggests that determining the post–AR inhibition imaging time point when PSMA expression is highest will be critical. Two processes are likely going on. The first is an increase in PSMA expression due to AR inhibition, as exhibited in our patient and as suggested recently by a study using 99mTc-MIP-1404 PSMA (17). The second is therapeutically induced cell death, which decreases the cell mass in the tumors and thus reduces their overall PSMA uptake. Previous work showed that a decrease in tumor mass can be seen on PSMA PET 4 mo after treatment with ADT (18). Although over 80% of patients respond to ADT, and chemical castration is typically achieved in 3–4 wk (15,19–21), the precise temporal relationship between initiation of ADT and PSMA expression remains unknown, as does the variation in this relationship between individual patients. Serial 68Ga-PSMA-11 imaging of patients after AR inhibition is needed.

The temporal relationship between PSMA expression and initiation of ADT may explain the different detection sensitivities found for 68Ga-PSMA-11 in patients with biochemical recurrence. Afshar-Oromieh et al. initially reported that detection sensitivity was increased in patients being treated with ADT (8), whereas Eiber et al. did not find a difference in detection sensitivity (7). A third study looked at a subpopulation of 4 patients who, like our patient, had castration-sensitive disease with falling prostate-specific antigen levels after treatment with ADT; all four demonstrated PSMA PET–positive disease (5).

These findings have several important implications. If PSMA expression in patients with prostate cancer can be upregulated by inhibiting the AR, then it should be possible to use PSMA PET to increase the sensitivity with which metastases are detected in biochemical recurrence patients. This possibility is supported by our finding that 13 additional lesions could be visualized on PSMA PET only after pretreatment with ADT. Additionally, one might be able to increase the uptake of PSMA in patients being treated with 177Lu-PSMA (22–24). Groups have already demonstrated that the efficacy of PSMA-targeted therapies can increase when they are paired with AR-targeted therapies (25). One might also be able to use changes in PSMA expression to interrogate the efficacy of second- and third-generation AR-targeted therapies.

CONCLUSION

Inhibition of the AR can markedly change PSMA expression both in a mouse xenograft model and in clinical patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer when imaged using 68Ga-PSMA-11.

DISCLOSURE

Dr. Hope receives grant support, is on the speaker’s bureau for GE Healthcare, and was supported by the Radiological Society of North America and the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSF. Dr. Evans receives consulting fees, owns shares in ORIC Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and was supported by the 2013 David H. Koch Young Investigator Award from the Prostate Cancer Foundation, the National Institutes of Health (R00CA172695, 1R01CA17661), a Department of Defense Idea Development Award (PC140107), the UCSF Academic Senate, and GE Healthcare. Dr. Truillet was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program (PC151060). Research from UCSF reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award P30CA082103. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online Sep. 22, 2016.

  • © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Israeli RS,
    2. Powell CT,
    3. Corr JG,
    4. Fair WR,
    5. Heston WD
    . Expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res. 1994;54:1807–1811.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.
    1. Silver DA,
    2. Pellicer I,
    3. Fair WR,
    4. Heston WD,
    5. Cordon-Cardo C
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:81–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  3. 3.↵
    1. Osborne JR,
    2. Akhtar NH,
    3. Vallabhajosula S,
    4. Anand A,
    5. Deh K,
    6. Tagawa ST
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based imaging. Urol Oncol. 2013;31:144–154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hijazi S,
    2. Meller B,
    3. Leitsmann C,
    4. et al
    . Pelvic lymph node dissection for nodal oligometastatic prostate cancer detected by 68Ga-PSMA-positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. Prostate. 2015;75:1934–1940.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ceci F,
    2. Uprimny C,
    3. Nilica B,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging recurrent prostate cancer: which factors are associated with PET/CT detection rate? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1284–1294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.
    1. Morigi JJ,
    2. Stricker PD,
    3. van Leeuwen PJ,
    4. et al
    . Prospective comparison of 18F-fluoromethylcholine versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients who have rising PSA after curative treatment and are being considered for targeted therapy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1185–1190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Maurer T,
    3. Souvatzoglou M,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–674.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Avtzi E,
    3. Giesel FL,
    4. et al
    . The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:197–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Malcher A,
    3. Eder M,
    4. et al
    . PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:486–495.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Evans MJ
    . Measuring oncogenic signaling pathways in cancer with PET: an emerging paradigm from studies in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:985–994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Evans MJ,
    2. Smith-Jones PM,
    3. Wongvipat J,
    4. et al
    . Noninvasive measurement of androgen receptor signaling with a positron-emitting radiopharmaceutical that targets prostate-specific membrane antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:9578–9582.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Wright GL,
    2. Grob BM,
    3. Haley C,
    4. et al
    . Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy. Urology. 1996;48:326–334.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Meller B,
    2. Bremmer F,
    3. Sahlmann CO,
    4. et al
    . Alterations in androgen deprivation enhanced prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate cancer cells as a target for diagnostics and therapy. EJNMMI Res. 2015;5:66.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Miyamoto DT,
    2. Lee RJ,
    3. Stott SL,
    4. et al
    . Androgen receptor signaling in circulating tumor cells as a marker of hormonally responsive prostate cancer. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:995–1003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hussain M,
    2. Tangen CM,
    3. Higano C,
    4. et al
    . Absolute prostate-specific antigen value after androgen deprivation is a strong independent predictor of survival in new metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT-0162). J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3984–3990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Wollenweber SD,
    2. Ambwani S
    . Comparison of 4-class and continuous fat/water methods for whole-body, MR-based PET attenuation correction. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2013;60:3391–3398.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Vallabhajosula S,
    2. Jhanwar Y,
    3. Tagawa S,
    4. et al
    . 99mTc-MIP-1404 planar and SPECT scan: imaging biomarker of androgen receptor (AR) signaling and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(suppl 2):1541.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Schlenkhoff CD,
    2. Gaertner F,
    3. Essler M,
    4. Hauser S,
    5. Ahmadzadehfar H
    . 68Ga-labeled anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen peptide as marker for androgen deprivation therapy response in prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2016;41:423–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Seidenfeld J,
    2. Samson DJ,
    3. Hasselblad V,
    4. et al
    . Single-therapy androgen suppression in men with advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:566–577.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    1. Miyamoto H,
    2. Messing EM,
    3. Chang C
    . Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: current status and future prospects. Prostate. 2004;61:332–353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Sharifi N,
    2. Gulley JL,
    3. Dahut WL
    . Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. JAMA. 2005;294:238–244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Baum RP,
    2. Kulkarni HR,
    3. Schuchardt C,
    4. et al
    . 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and efficacy. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1006–1013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.
    1. Zechmann CM,
    2. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    3. Armor T,
    4. et al
    . Radiation dosimetry and first therapy results with a 124I/131I-labeled small molecule (MIP-1095) targeting PSMA for prostate cancer therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1280–1292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kratochwil C,
    2. Giesel FL,
    3. Stefanova M,
    4. et al
    . PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with 177Lu-labeled PSMA-617. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1170–1176.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. DiPippo VA,
    2. Nguyen HM,
    3. Brown LG,
    4. Olson WC,
    5. Vessella RL,
    6. Corey E
    . Addition of PSMA ADC to enzalutamide therapy significantly improves survival in in vivo model of castration resistant prostate cancer. Prostate. 2016;76:325–334.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication July 28, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication August 28, 2016.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 1
January 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Imaging of Response to Androgen Receptor Inhibition: First Human Experience
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Imaging of Response to Androgen Receptor Inhibition: First Human Experience
Thomas A. Hope, Charles Truillet, Eric C. Ehman, Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Rahul Aggarwal, Charles J. Ryan, Peter R. Carroll, Eric J. Small, Michael J. Evans
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2017, 58 (1) 81-84; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.181800

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Imaging of Response to Androgen Receptor Inhibition: First Human Experience
Thomas A. Hope, Charles Truillet, Eric C. Ehman, Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Rahul Aggarwal, Charles J. Ryan, Peter R. Carroll, Eric J. Small, Michael J. Evans
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2017, 58 (1) 81-84; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.181800
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Exploring the Flare Phenomenon in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Enzalutamide-Induced PSMA Upregulation Observed on PSMA PET
  • Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Imaging and Its Correlation with HOXB13 Expression
  • Antihormonal-Treatment Status Affects 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET Biodistribution in Patients with Prostate Cancer
  • Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging
  • Prospective, Single-Arm Trial Evaluating Changes in Uptake Patterns on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Starting Abiraterone or Enzalutamide
  • Detection of Early Progression with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Bipolar Androgen Therapy
  • Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer
  • PSA-Targeted Alpha-, Beta-, and Positron-Emitting Immunotheranostics in Murine Prostate Cancer Models and Nonhuman Primates
  • Genetic signature of prostate cancer mouse models resistant to optimized hK2 targeted {alpha}-particle therapy
  • Investigating PSMA-Targeted Radioligand Therapy Efficacy as a Function of Cellular PSMA Levels and Intratumoral PSMA Heterogeneity
  • 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the Detection of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
  • Proposal for Systemic-Therapy Response-Assessment Criteria at the Time of PSMA PET/CT Imaging: The PSMA PET Progression Criteria
  • Detection Rate and Localization of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in Patients with Low PSA Values <= 0.5 ng/mL
  • Genetic signature of prostate cancer resistant to optimized hK2 targeted alpha-particle therapy
  • Healthy Tissue Uptake of 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen, 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-Fluoromethylcholine, and 18F-Dihydrotestosterone
  • Rapid Modulation of PSMA Expression by Androgen Deprivation: Serial 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Men with Hormone-Sensitive and Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer Commencing Androgen Blockade
  • 11C-Choline Pharmacokinetics in Recurrent Prostate Cancer
  • 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed Carcinoma of the Prostate: Correlation of Intraprostatic PSMA Uptake with Several Clinical Parameters
  • More {alpha} Than {beta} for Prostate Cancer?
  • Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligands for Imaging and Therapy
  • Phase 2 Study of 99mTc-Trofolastat SPECT/CT to Identify and Localize Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic LN Dissection
  • 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy for Prostate Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • Determination of the Intralesional Distribution of Theranostic 124I-Omburtamab Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data
  • 177Lu-Labeled Anticlaudin 6 Monoclonal Antibody for Targeted Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
Show more Theranostics

Translational Science

  • Strategies to Inhibit ABCB1- and ABCG2-Mediated Efflux Transport of Erlotinib at the Blood–Brain Barrier: A PET Study on Nonhuman Primates
  • Red Marrow–Absorbed Dose for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Treated with 177Lu-Lilotomab Satetraxetan, a Novel Anti-CD37 Antibody–Radionuclide Conjugate
Show more Translational Science

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Oncology: GU
  • PET
  • androgen receptor
  • PSMA PET
  • prostate cancer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire