Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticlePhysics and Instrumentation
Open Access

PennPET Explorer: Design and Preliminary Performance of a Whole-Body Imager

Joel S. Karp, Varsha Viswanath, Michael J. Geagan, Gerd Muehllehner, Austin R. Pantel, Michael J. Parma, Amy E. Perkins, Jeffrey P. Schmall, Matthew E. Werner and Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2020, 61 (1) 136-143; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229997
Joel S. Karp
1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Varsha Viswanath
2Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Geagan
1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerd Muehllehner
3KAGE Medical, Wayne, Pennsylvania; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Austin R. Pantel
1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Parma
1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy E. Perkins
4Philips Healthcare, Highland Heights, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey P. Schmall
1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew E. Werner
1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon
1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    PennPET Explorer in its prototype configuration with 3 ring segments, housed in dry, cool enclosure. View of back of gantry shows modular detector and electronic bays. Also shown is couch with flat pallet installed for human studies.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    NEMA NU-2 count-rate performance with 70-cm line source inside 20-cm-diameter polyethylene scatter cylinder. Count-rate results were acquired up to 40 kBq/mL, although clinical 18F-FDG studies are typically performed with activity concentrations of less than 5 kBq/mL.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    (A) NEMA image-quality phantom shown with standard spheres and half-sized spheres. Body activity concentration is 2 kBq/mL, sphere contrast is 9.7:1, and scan duration is 7.5 min. (B) CRCs as per NEMA guidelines for both standard and half-sized spheres. (C) Background variability as per NEMA guidelines for half-sized spheres.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    (A) Clinical Trials Network torso phantom with activity concentration of 5.9 kBq/mL and lesion contrast of 4.2:1. (B) CRC of representative lesions as function of scan duration. (C) SD of CRC, determined from replicates of data.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    (A) Representative sagittal (left), axial (middle), and coronal (right) views of 20-min PennPET Explorer image of subject 1 at 1.5 h after injection of 555-MBq dose of 18F-FDG. All are 2-mm sections. (B) PennPET Explorer image, subsampled (⅛ data) to represent 2.5-min scan. (C) Clinical scan acquired with Philips Ingenuity TF PET/CT scanner at 1 h after injection, using clinical protocol with 10 bed positions for total of 20 min. These data were reconstructed off-line with same reconstruction method as for PennPET Explorer data.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Sagittal (left), axial (middle), and coronal (right) views of PennPET Explorer images of subject 2 positioned with head near edge of AFOV (A) and at center of AFOV (B). These scans were acquired starting at 1.5 h after injection of 18F-FDG for 10 min each. All are 1-mm sections.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Dynamic 18F-FDG study of subject 7 acquired for 60 min after 555-MBq dose of 18F-FDG. Representative maximum-intensity projections are shown from 0 to 60 min after injection.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Transverse Spatial Resolution of PennPET Explorer Whole-Body Imager

    ParameterRadius (cm)Rings (n)AlgorithmRadial (mm)Tangential (mm)Axial (mm)
    FWHM11Analytic4.2 ± 0.33.9 ± 0.44.1 ± 0.2
    11Iterative3.9 ± 0.33.8 ± 0.33.6 ± 0.2
    13Iterative3.9 ± 0.23.9 ± 0.33.9 ± 0.3
    103Iterative4.2 ± 0.23.9 ± 0.23.9 ± 0.3
    203Iterative5.6 ± 0.23.9 ± 0.43.7 ± 0.3
    FWTM11Analytic8.5 ± 0.88.4 ± 0.97.9 ± 0.2
    11Iterative7.2 ± 0.47.1 ± 0.26.8 ± 0.2
    13Iterative7.4 ± 0.67.3 ± 0.27.8 ± 1.2
    103Iterative8.1 ± 0.27.2 ± 0.27.6 ± 0.8
    203Iterative10.4 ± 0.37.2 ± 0.27.3 ± 0.7
    • FWHM = full width at half maximum; FWTM = full width at tenth maximum.

    • Uncertainties are SD of replicate measurements.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Axial Spatial Resolution of PennPET Explorer Whole-Body Imager

    ParameterRadius (cm)Rings (n)AlgorithmCenter (mm)Gap (mm)Edge (mm)
    FWHM1–201Iterative——3.5 ± 0.2
    1–203Iterative4.0 ± 0.24.2 ± 0.13.6 ± 0.1
    FWTM1–201Iterative——6.8 ± 0.1
    1–203Iterative8.5 ± 0.68.2 ± 0.16.9 ± 0.2
    • FWHM = full width at half maximum; FWTM = full width at tenth maximum.

    • Uncertainties are SD of replicate measurements.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue 1
January 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PennPET Explorer: Design and Preliminary Performance of a Whole-Body Imager
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PennPET Explorer: Design and Preliminary Performance of a Whole-Body Imager
Joel S. Karp, Varsha Viswanath, Michael J. Geagan, Gerd Muehllehner, Austin R. Pantel, Michael J. Parma, Amy E. Perkins, Jeffrey P. Schmall, Matthew E. Werner, Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2020, 61 (1) 136-143; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.229997

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PennPET Explorer: Design and Preliminary Performance of a Whole-Body Imager
Joel S. Karp, Varsha Viswanath, Michael J. Geagan, Gerd Muehllehner, Austin R. Pantel, Michael J. Parma, Amy E. Perkins, Jeffrey P. Schmall, Matthew E. Werner, Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2020, 61 (1) 136-143; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.229997
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • KEY POINTS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Feasibility of an Ultra-Low-Dose PET Scan Protocol with CT-Based and LSO-TX-Based Attenuation Correction Using a Long-Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT Scanner
  • Is Long-Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT Cost-Effective? An International Health-Economic Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of {mu}-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
  • Total-Body PET System Designs with Axial and Transverse Gaps: A Study of Lesion Quantification and Detectability
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of Mu-Opioid Receptors: A First In-Human Study
  • Performance Characteristics of a New Generation 148-cm Axial Field-of-View uMI Panorama GS PET/CT System with Extended NEMA NU 2-2018 and EARL Standards
  • Dose Reduction in Pediatric Oncology Patients with Delayed Total-Body [18F]FDG PET/CT
  • Whole-Body PET Imaging: A Catalyst for Whole-Person Research?
  • Fully Automated, Semantic Segmentation of Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Images Based on Data-Centric Artificial Intelligence
  • Total-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT in Autoimmune Inflammatory Arthritis at Ultra-Low Dose: Initial Observations
  • Radioembolization Dosimetry with Total-Body 90Y PET
  • 3D melanoma spheroid model for the development of positronium biomarker
  • Principles of Tracer Kinetic Analysis in Oncology, Part II: Examples and Future Directions
  • Performance Characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT System with a Long Axial Field of View Using the NEMA NU 2-2018 Standard
  • Developing a Novel Positronium Biomarker for Cardiac Myxoma Imaging
  • Performance Evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanner Based on NEMA NU 2-2018 with Additional Tests to Characterize PET Scanners with a Long Axial Field of View
  • Investigating Low-Dose Image Quality in Whole-Body Pediatric 18F-FDG Scans Using Time-of-Flight PET/MRI
  • Benefit of Improved Performance with State-of-the Art Digital PET/CT for Lesion Detection in Oncology
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Physics and Instrumentation

  • Performance Evaluation of the uMI Panorama PET/CT System in Accordance with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2018 Standard
  • A Multicenter Study on Observed Discrepancies Between Vendor-Stated and PET-Measured 90Y Activities for Both Glass and Resin Microsphere Devices
  • Ultra-Fast List-Mode Reconstruction of Short PET Frames and Example Applications
Show more Physics and Instrumentation

Translational

  • Quantitative Total-Body Imaging of Blood Flow with High-Temporal-Resolution Early Dynamic 18F-FDG PET Kinetic Modeling
  • [99mTc]Tc-MY6349 Probe for Trop2-Targeted SPECT Imaging: From Preclinical to Pilot Clinical Study
  • Imaging Diverse Pathogenic Bacteria In Vivo with 18F-Fluoromannitol PET
Show more Translational

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PET
  • Whole-body imager
  • NEMA performance
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire