Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
Research ArticleTheranostics
Open Access

Detection Efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

Frederik L. Giesel, Karina Knorr, Fabian Spohn, Leon Will, Tobias Maurer, Paul Flechsig, Oliver Neels, Kilian Schiller, Horacio Amaral, Wolfgang A. Weber, Uwe Haberkorn, Markus Schwaiger, Clemens Kratochwil, Peter Choyke, Vasko Kramer, Klaus Kopka and Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2019, 60 (3) 362-368; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.212233
Frederik L. Giesel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
3CCU Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karina Knorr
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabian Spohn
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leon Will
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Maurer
5Department of Urology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Flechsig
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver Neels
2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
6Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kilian Schiller
7Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Horacio Amaral
8Center of Nuclear Medicine, PositronMed, FALP, Santiago, Chile; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang A. Weber
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Haberkorn
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
3CCU Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Schwaiger
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemens Kratochwil
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Choyke
9Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vasko Kramer
8Center of Nuclear Medicine, PositronMed, FALP, Santiago, Chile; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Kopka
2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
6Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
2German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Overall rate of detection for 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT (A) and relative number of lesions grouped by different regions (B) in relation to PSA levels. LNM = lymph node metastases.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Images from 57-y-old patient after radical prostatectomy (2010; Gleason score of 8; pT3b; pN0), after salvage radiation therapy to prostate bed, and with PSA level rising to 0.43 ng/mL (August 2017). (A) Maximum-intensity projection of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET shows 2 intense tracer-associated lesions in left pelvic region (arrows). (B–D) Transaxial PET (C) and fused PET/CT (D) images show high 18F-PSMA-1007 uptake in subcentimeter (7-mm) lesions (arrows), as determined by corresponding CT (B). Subsequent radioguided salvage surgery proved malignant nature of lesions.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Images from 64-y-old patient after radical prostatectomy (August 2012; Gleason score of 9; pT3b; pN0) and with PSA level rising to 3.9 ng/mL (October 2017). (A) Maximum-intensity projection of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET shows intense tracer-associated uptake in lesion (arrow) below bladder. (C and D) It could be localized (arrows) in region of urethral anastomosis using transaxial PET (C) and fused PET/CT (D) images. (B) Corresponding CT image. Postimaging salvage radiation to prostatic fossa was performed in combination with single injection of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog in October 2017 and resulted in drop in PSA level to below detection threshold (<0.07 ng/mL; last measurement in February 2018).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Images from 76-y-old patient after radical prostatectomy (2006; Gleason score of 7b; pT3a; pN0) and with PSA level slowly rising to 0.78 ng/mL (October 2017). (A and B) Patient underwent primarily 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, which resulted in suggestion of local recurrence (arrows). No definite diagnosis could be made on basis of adjacent high activity retention in urinary bladder. (C and D) Subsequent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT 3 mo later clearly depicted PSMA ligand uptake in left seminal vesicle (arrows) with high contrast and very low retention in bladder.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Comparison of rates of detection for 18F-PSMA-1007 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 derived from different studies.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of 251 Patients

    CharacteristicNo. of patientsRangePercentage of patients
    Median age at PET/CT (y)7048–86
    Further treatment
     External radiation after radical prostatectomy11043.8
     Antihormonal treatment7429.5
    ADT within 6 mo before imaging6023.9
    Gleason score
     ≤6135.2
     712549.8
     ≥88533.1
     Unknown2811.2
    Pathologic primary tumor staging (pT)
     pT27429.5
     pT39236.7
     pT472.8
     Unknown7831.1
    Pathologic regional lymph node staging (pN)
     pN012349.0
     pN14116.3
     pNx8734.7
    Positive margin
     R08031.8
     R15321.1
     Unknown11847.0
    Median initial PSA level (ng/mL)10.90.6–250
    Salvage radiation therapy before PET/CT11043.8
    Median time between surgery and PET/CT (mo)571–321
    Median last PSA level before PET/CT (ng/mL)1.20.2–228
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Detection of Different Regions Involved by Recurrent Prostate Cancer

    RegionNo. of patientsPercentage of patients
    Local recurrence6224.7
    Lymph node  metastases
     Pelvic10240.6
     Retroperitoneal4919.5
     Supradiaphragmatic3012.0
    Bone metastases10140.2
    Other (lung, liver) metastases93.6
    • More than 1 region could be involved per patient.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 60 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue 3
March 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detection Efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Detection Efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
Frederik L. Giesel, Karina Knorr, Fabian Spohn, Leon Will, Tobias Maurer, Paul Flechsig, Oliver Neels, Kilian Schiller, Horacio Amaral, Wolfgang A. Weber, Uwe Haberkorn, Markus Schwaiger, Clemens Kratochwil, Peter Choyke, Vasko Kramer, Klaus Kopka, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2019, 60 (3) 362-368; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.212233

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Detection Efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
Frederik L. Giesel, Karina Knorr, Fabian Spohn, Leon Will, Tobias Maurer, Paul Flechsig, Oliver Neels, Kilian Schiller, Horacio Amaral, Wolfgang A. Weber, Uwe Haberkorn, Markus Schwaiger, Clemens Kratochwil, Peter Choyke, Vasko Kramer, Klaus Kopka, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2019, 60 (3) 362-368; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.212233
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Primary Local Therapy
  • 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the Detection of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
  • Intraindividual Comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 with Renally Excreted PSMA Ligands for PSMA PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer
  • Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses of Biodistribution and PET Image Quality of a Novel Radiohybrid PSMA, 18F-rhPSMA-7, in Patients with Prostate Cancer
  • Appropriate Use Criteria for Imaging Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Primary Treatment
  • Prospective Evaluation of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer in an Academic Center: A Focus on Disease Localization and Changes in Management
  • Theranostics Targeting Fibroblast Activation Protein in the Tumor Stroma: 64Cu- and 225Ac-Labeled FAPI-04 in Pancreatic Cancer Xenograft Mouse Models
  • Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Staging Prostate Cancer Using Histopathology and Immunohistochemical Analysis as a Reference Standard
  • Detection Rate and Localization of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in Patients with Low PSA Values <= 0.5 ng/mL
  • Prospective Evaluation of PSMA-Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Men with Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
  • Multimodality Imaging of Prostate Cancer
  • The Future of Nuclear Medicine as an Independent Specialty
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • First-in-human study of novel SSTR antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: dosimetry, safety and efficacy
  • Dissimilar DNA Damage to Blood Lymphocytes After 177Lu-Labeled DOTATOC or Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Therapy
  • Multimodal Imaging of 2-Cycle PRRT with 177Lu-DOTA-JR11 and 177Lu-DOTATOC in an Orthotopic Neuroendocrine Xenograft Tumor Mouse Model
Show more Theranostics

Clinical

  • Fluorescence-Guided Visualization of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas by Targeting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A: A Phase 1 Single-Center Clinical Trial
  • Diagnostic Performance of Pulmonary Embolism Imaging in Patients with History of Asthma
  • Head-to-Head Evaluation of 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-PSMA-1007
  • PET/CT
  • hybrid imaging
  • prostate cancer
  • Biochemical recurrence
SNMMI

© 2021 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire