Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleEditor’s Page

The Annual Journal Impact Factor Saga

Johannes Czernin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2021, 62 (9) 1177; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.262860
Johannes Czernin
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Johannes Czernin

The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Journal Impact Factor (JIF) has reached a new milestone at 10.057 and now ranks #3 among all imaging journals. This achievement should not be overhyped, but it does provide evidence for the high visibility of the published work. We are aware that the calculation of the JIF has changed. Clarivate Analytics announced that it was moving toward a future that calculated the JIF based on the date of electronic publication and not the date of print publication (1). Thus, citations of early content were included in the calculation of the JIF for 2020, and drops in JIF will invariably follow in 2021. However, the overall JNM ranking improved, and JNM is the #1 publication among all nuclear medicine and molecular imaging journals (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

JIF: top 10 in medical imaging (June 30, 2021).

This is a tribute to the great contributions of diverse scientists from all areas of the field. Three of the top 10 articles contributing to the JIF calculation describe advances in imaging instrumentation (2–4), with the remaining 7 introducing various important aspects of theranostics (standardization of image interpretation (5), new targets and probes (6–8), translational or clinical PSMA-targeting diagnostic studies (9,10), and therapeutic approaches (11)).

It is thus evident that theranostics and the search for novel and relevant targets remain at the forefront of nuclear medicine research. However, revolutionary advances in instrumentation will open new and exciting research opportunities. Similarly, artificial intelligence will find its way into the clinic through solidly designed clinical studies (12). The high JIF, with the associated high visibility of the journal, will continue to attract leading basic and clinical scientists from oncology, neurology, cardiology, endocrinology, infectious diseases, and other fields. Continuation of scientific growth and advances is a condition for the sustainable success of nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, and theranostics (13). With significant industry buy-in (14), we expect further clinical translation into powerful theranostic approaches that we will publish in our flagship journal.

I am grateful for the support of SNMMI and its publications committee, the invaluable contributions of our staff, the critical input from our editorial board members, and the hard work and creativity of the team of national and international associate editors who made this success possible.

Footnotes

  • Published online July 8, 2021.

  • © 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Quaderi N.
    The JCR reload and a look ahead to the introduction of early access content in 2021. Clarivate website. https://clarivate.com/blog/the-jcr-reload-and-a-look-ahead-to-the-introduction-of-early-access-content-in-2021/. Published October 26, 2020. Accessed July 2, 2021.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cherry SR,
    2. Jones T,
    3. Karp JS,
    4. Qi J,
    5. Moses WW,
    6. Badawi RD.
    Total-body PET: maximizing sensitivity to create new opportunities for clinical research and patient care. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:3–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.
    1. Badawi RD,
    2. Shi H,
    3. Hu P,
    4. et al
    . First human imaging studies with the EXPLORER total-body PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:299–303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. van Sluis J,
    2. de Jong J,
    3. Schaar J,
    4. et al
    . Performance characteristics of the digital Biograph Vision PET/CT system. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1031–1036.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Herrmann K,
    3. Calais J,
    4. et al
    . Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): proposed miTNM classification for the interpretation of PSMA-ligand PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:469–478.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kratochwil C,
    2. Flechsig P,
    3. Lindner T,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:801–805.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    1. Lindner T,
    2. Loktev A,
    3. Altmann A,
    4. et al
    . Development of quinoline-based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1415–1422.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Loktev A,
    2. Lindner T,
    3. Mier W,
    4. et al
    . A tumor-imaging method targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1423–1429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Roach PJ,
    2. Francis R,
    3. Emmett L,
    4. et al
    . The impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on management intent in prostate cancer: results of an Australian prospective multicenter study. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:82–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Giesel FL,
    2. Knorr K,
    3. Spohn F,
    4. et al
    . Detection efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:362–368.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Giesel FL,
    2. Kratochwil C,
    3. Lindner T,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: biodistribution and preliminary dosimetry estimate of 2 DOTA-containing FAP-targeting agents in patients with various cancers. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:386–392.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Buvat I,
    2. Orlhac F.
    The T.R.U.E. checklist for identifying impactful artificial intelligence-based findings in nuclear medicine: is it true? Is it reproducible? Is it useful? Is it explainable? J Nucl Med. 2021;62:752–754.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Weber WA,
    2. Czernin J,
    3. Anderson CJ,
    4. et al
    . The future of nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, and theranostics. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(suppl 2):263S–272S.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Calais J.
    FAP: The next billion dollar nuclear theranostics target? J Nucl Med. 2020;61:163–165.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 62 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue 9
September 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Annual Journal Impact Factor Saga
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Annual Journal Impact Factor Saga
Johannes Czernin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2021, 62 (9) 1177; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.262860

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Annual Journal Impact Factor Saga
Johannes Czernin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2021, 62 (9) 1177; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.262860
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Reflections on the Demand for PSMA- and SSTR-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapies: Why We Were Wrong (and Why We Will Be Right Eventually)
  • The Costs to Our Patients
  • Is ChatGPT a Reliable Ghostwriter?
Show more Editor’s Page

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire