Article Information
PubMed
Published By
Print ISSN
Online ISSN
History
- Received for publication June 24, 2016
- Accepted for publication July 18, 2016
- Published online January 3, 2017.
Article Versions
- previous version (August 4, 2016 - 05:57).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage
© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
Author Information
- 1Nuclear Physics Enterprises, Marlton, New Jersey
- 2NAC International (retired), Norcross, Georgia, and executive nuclear energy consultant, Alpharetta, Georgia; and
- 3U.S. Food and Drug Administration (retired), Green Valley, Arizona
- For correspondence contact: Jeffry A. Siegel, Nuclear Physics Enterprises, 4 Wedgewood Dr., Marlton, NJ 08053. E-mail: nukephysics{at}comcast.net
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Cited By...
Article usage
Jump to section
- Article
- Abstract
- FAILURE OF THE LNTH GOLD STANDARD
- CONTRARY TO THE LNTH, BIOLOGY RESPONDS ADAPTIVELY
- ABSENCE OF ACUTE, LOW-DOSE RADIATION CARCINOGENESIS IS EVIDENCE
- EVALUATION OF THE PRESENTED EVIDENCE
- A NON SEQUITUR: MEDICAL IMAGING SHOULD BE INFLUENCED BY THE LNTH
- MEDICAL IMAGING AND THE FAILURE OF LNTH ORTHODOXY
- Footnotes
- REFERENCES
- Info & Metrics
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Update on the Elimination of Fetal and Gonadal Shielding During Abdominopelvic Radiography
- Reducing Radiation Exposure from PET Patients
- Patient Size-Dependent Dosimetry Methodology Applied to 18F-FDG Using New ICRP Mesh Phantoms
- PET/MRI Versus PET/CT for Whole-Body Staging
- Development of Simple Methods to Reduce the Exposure of the Public to Radiation from Patients Who Have Undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT
- Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
- Radiation Dose Does Indeed Matter: Proof That Invalidates The Linear No-Threshold Model
- Challenges to the Paper "Radiation Dose Does Matter: Mechanistic Insights into DNA Damage and Repair Support the Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks"
- Nuclear Medicine Procedures Do Not Pose Cancer Risks in Women--Unappreciated or Otherwise
- Radiation Dose Does Matter: Mechanistic Insights into DNA Damage and Repair Support the Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks
- The BEIR VII Estimates of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks Are Based on Faulty Assumptions and Data Analyses: A Call for Reassessment
- How Should the FDA Review Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals?
- Reply: DNA Repair After Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Is Not Error-Free
- Regarding "Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion"
- Operational and Dosimetric Aspects of Pediatric PET/CT
- Acceleration of PSMA-Targeted Theranostics to the Clinic: Can Common Sense Prevail?
- Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur!
- Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis at the Hospital: When Radioprotection Becomes a Nosocomial Hazard
- Eliminating Use of the Linear No-Threshold Assumption in Medical Imaging
- Eliminating Use of the Linear No-Threshold Assumption in Medical Imaging
- Reply: Eliminating Use of the Linear No-Threshold Assumption in Medical Imaging
- Dose Optimization to Minimize Radiation Risk for Children Undergoing CT and Nuclear Medicine Imaging Is Misguided and Detrimental
- Regarding "Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion"
- Regarding "Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion"
- Regarding "Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion"
- Regarding "Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion"
- Regarding "Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion"
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy with a Purpose: A Renaissance of Nuclear Medicine
- The Controversial Linear No-Threshold Model