Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
LetterLetters to the Editor

Regarding “Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion”

Ronald E. Fisher
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2017, 58 (9) 1529-1530; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.193920
Ronald E. Fisher
Houston Methodist Hospital 6565 Fannin St. Houston, Texas 77030 E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rfisher@bcm.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

TO THE EDITOR: I applaud the authors of the recent article by Siegel et al., “Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion” (1), and The Journal of Nuclear Medicine for publishing this important review in such a prominent journal. The authors condense an enormous amount of scientific data and rigorous interpretation into a relatively small space. I hope this paper will help slow the disheartening impact of radiophobia that is sweeping our country and reducing the quality and use of radiologic imaging and consequently of medical care, as described so clearly in the article. The authors have raised the level of scientific discussion regarding the health effects of radiation. Any rebuttal to their cogent arguments needs to be on that same high scientific level. I think part of the wide acceptance of the linear, no-threshold theory is the unfamiliarity of most people with the widespread biologic phenomenon of the J-shaped curve, namely, that many things that are harmful at high doses are harmless, or even helpful, at low doses. The classic and best-studied example is that of alcohol on all-cause human mortality, nicely summarized in Figure 1 modified from Di Castelnuovo et al. (2), a metaanalysis involving more than 1 million subjects. The data in the red circle in Figure 1A are shown larger in Figure 1B, and clearly demonstrate the strikingly nonlinear relationship between alcohol and mortality at low doses. This corresponds to the area of contention in the radiation–cancer relationship (equivalent to several whole-body CT scans), for which there are no data—or rather, the data at such low radiation doses are so noisy that no reliable signal can be discerned above background. The data are much better for alcohol and show a relationship that could never be predicted from the high-dose data.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Relative risk of mortality with increasing alcohol consumption. Note that the relationship is nonlinear at low doses, and that alcohol is beneficial at low doses, while harmful at high doses. (Reprinted with permission of (2)).

Footnotes

  • Published online Apr. 27, 2017.

  • © 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Siegel JA,
    2. Pennington CW,
    3. Sacks B
    . Subjecting radiologic imaging to the linear no-threshold hypothesis: a non sequitur of non-trivial proportion. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Di Castelnuovo A,
    2. Costanzo S,
    3. Bagnardi V,
    4. Donati MB,
    5. Iacoviello L,
    6. de Gaetano G
    . Alcohol dosing and total mortality in men and women: an updated meta-analysis of 34 prospective studies. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2437–2445.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 9
September 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regarding “Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion”
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Regarding “Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion”
Ronald E. Fisher
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2017, 58 (9) 1529-1530; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193920

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Regarding “Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion”
Ronald E. Fisher
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2017, 58 (9) 1529-1530; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.193920
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 176Lu Radiation in Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET Scanners: A Nonissue for Patient Safety
  • Business Model Beats Science and Logic: Dosimetry and Paucity of Its Use
  • Reply to “Routine Dosimetry: Proceed with Caution”
Show more Letters to the Editor

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire