Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Gerbrand Maria Kramer, Virginie Frings, Nikie Hoetjes, Otto S. Hoekstra, Egbert F. Smit, Adrianus Johannes de Langen and Ronald Boellaard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2016, 57 (9) 1343-1349; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.170225
Gerbrand Maria Kramer
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Virginie Frings
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikie Hoetjes
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Otto S. Hoekstra
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Egbert F. Smit
2Department of Pulmonology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
3Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrianus Johannes de Langen
2Department of Pulmonology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Boellaard
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    SUVpeak values of test scan plotted against those of retest scan (A and D), corresponding Bland–Altman plots for all lesions (B and E), and for averaged PERCIST target lesions per patient (C and F) are shown. Upper and lower plots represent 60-min data (A–C) and 90-min data (D–F), respectively. B and E also show influence of PERCIST lesion selection criteria on repeatability. PERCIST target lesions = 5 hottest lesions per patient; maximum 2 per organ; SUVmax > 1.5 × mean liver SUV + 2 SDs.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Box plots of percentage differences between test and retest scans as obtained from 60- (dark) and 90- (light) min data. Effect of lesion selection and averaging on different 18F-FDG uptake metrics is shown.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    SUVpeak (A) and MATV (B) values of data obtained 60 min after injection plotted against data obtained 90 min after injection.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Different uptake time corrections applied on SUVpeak of 90-min data plotted against 60-min data of the test scan.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Descriptive Statistics of Study Population

    CharacteristicMedianScan 1Scan 2P
    Age (y)61 (45–66)
    Patients11
    Tumor type
     Adenocarcinoma8
     Squamous cell carcinoma3
    Tumor stage
     IIIb4
     IV7
    Lesions (n)
     Intrathoracal41
     Extrathoracal19
    Time between scans (d)1 (1–2)
    Length (cm)173 (162–197)
    Weight (kg)75 (57–110)74 (57–114)0.60
    Glucose (mmol/L)5.6 (4.9–6.5)5.9 (4.5–7.1)0.62
    Uptake time target 60 min60 (60–67)60 (60–63)0.35
    Uptake time target 90 min93 (90–97)90 (90–95)0.15
    Injected activity (MBq)252 (194–377)238 (192–329)0.86
    Residual dose (MBq)0.16 (0.07–1.7)0.3 (0.02–3.22)0.33
    • Data are median, with range in parentheses, P values from Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Descriptive Statistics of Uptake Measures for Several Tissues

    PET/CT 60 min after injectionPET/CT 90 min after injection
    TissueTestRetestTestRetest
    Aorta
     SUVmean1.29 ± 0.201.24 ± 0.151.10 ± 0.171.03 ± 0.19
    Liver
     SUVmean1.69 ± 0.281.69 ± 0.241.64 ± 0.281.60 ± 0.26
    Tumor
     SUVmax8.52 ± 5.408.54 ± 5.509.87 ± 6.439.88 ± 6.54
     SUVpeak6.09 ± 4.536.11 ± 4.536.96 ± 5.297.00 ± 5.38
     SUVmean5.03 ± 3.295.08 ± 3.365.76 ± 3.915.77 ± 4.00
     TLG175.29 ± 628.50179.29 ± 642.73202.51 ± 728.88202.84 ± 731.88
     MATV21.12 ± 56.9420.92 ± 54.7721.00 ± 56.4020.60 ± 54.21
    • Data are mean ± SD.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Mean Relative Differences and RCs for Several Uptake Metrics and Influence of Different Uptake Times and Lesion Selection

    All lesionsPERCISTPERCIST-averaged
    Uptake timeMean difference (%)RC (%)Mean difference (%)RC (%)Mean difference (%)RC (%)
    60 min after injection2.226.6−1.813.8−1.57.3
     SUVmax
     SUVmean0.718.1−1.713.7−1.36.6
     SUVpeak0.819.9−1.615.6−0.77.5
     TLG−1.529.0−1.619.1−0.114.7
     MATV−2.230.90.021.4−0.214.9
    90 min after injection−0.623.3−1.116.0−1.28.4
     SUVmax
     SUVmean−0.317.8−1.011.9−1.36.9
     SUVpeak−0.615.8−0.411.4−0.57.6
     TLG−1.123.7−0.315.10.99.6
     MATV−0.830.70.620.70.112.9
    • PERCIST = 5 hottest lesions, maximum 2 per organ and minimum SUV > 1.5 × mean liver SUV + 2 SDs.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 9
September 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Gerbrand Maria Kramer, Virginie Frings, Nikie Hoetjes, Otto S. Hoekstra, Egbert F. Smit, Adrianus Johannes de Langen, Ronald Boellaard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2016, 57 (9) 1343-1349; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170225

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Gerbrand Maria Kramer, Virginie Frings, Nikie Hoetjes, Otto S. Hoekstra, Egbert F. Smit, Adrianus Johannes de Langen, Ronald Boellaard
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2016, 57 (9) 1343-1349; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170225
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Quantitative Assessments of Tumor Activity in a General Oncologic PET/CT Population: Which Metric Minimizes Tracer Uptake Time Dependence?
  • Effects of Tracer Uptake Time in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 18F-FDG PET Radiomics
  • Repeatability of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT-Derived Total Molecular Tumor Volume
  • Quantification of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Whole-Body Tumor Burden with 18F-FDG PET Parameters and Associations with Overall Survival After First-Line Abiraterone or Enzalutamide: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Performance of Digital PET Compared with High-Resolution Conventional PET in Patients with Cancer
  • Assessment of Simplified Methods for Quantification of 18F-FDHT Uptake in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • Use of a Qualification Phantom for PET Brain Imaging in a Multicenter Consortium: A Collaboration Between the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium and the SNMMI Clinical Trials Network
  • The Influence of Minimal Misalignment on the Repeatability of PET Images Examined by the Repositioning of Point Sources
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT for Very Early Response Evaluation Predicts CT Response in Erlotinib-Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Comparison of Assessment Methods
  • Test-Retest Variability in Lesion SUV and Lesion SUR in 18F-FDG PET: An Analysis of Data from Two Prospective Multicenter Trials
  • Reply: Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Dynamic Versus Test-Retest Design
  • Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Dynamic Versus Test-Retest Design
  • Need for Glucose Correction for 18F-FDG PET Influenced by Glucose Sensitivities to Types of Tissue and Random Factors
  • Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • repeatability
  • 18F-FDG
  • PET/CT
  • NSCLC
  • Uptake time correction
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire