Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleCLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET Imaging Detects Breast Cancer with High Sensitivity and Correlates Well with Histologic Subtypes

Ayse Mavi, Muammer Urhan, Jian Q. Yu, Hongming Zhuang, Mohamed Houseni, Tevfik F. Cermik, Dhurairaj Thiruvenkatasamy, Brian Czerniecki, Mitchell Schnall and Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2006, 47 (9) 1440-1446;
Ayse Mavi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muammer Urhan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jian Q. Yu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongming Zhuang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohamed Houseni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tevfik F. Cermik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dhurairaj Thiruvenkatasamy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Czerniecki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitchell Schnall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abass Alavi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Patient with history of invasive ductal cancer of right breast had dual time point PET. (A) Coronal slices in top row were obtained at first time point. (B) Corresponding scans in bottom row were acquired at second time point. Measured SUVmax1 of lesion in first image set was 4.3 (thin arrow), whereas that of second set was 4.8 (thick arrow). Percent increase in SUV of the lesion was 11.6%. Measured SUVmax1 of normal contralateral glandular breast tissue was 1.1 in first image set, whereas that of second set was 0.9. Therefore, increase in T/B ratios between first image set and second image set was 36.4%. Surgical pathology confirmed 2-cm invasive ductal cancer.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Patient with invasive ductal carcinoma of right breast was examined with dual time point PET. (A) Coronal slices in top row were obtained at first time point. (B) Corresponding images in bottom row were acquired at second time point. Images in both sets clearly show primary lesion. However, intensity of uptake was substantially higher on delayed images. In addition, axillary lymph node metastasis was faintly visualized on first set but was clearly demonstrated on second set. Measured SUVmax1 of lesion in first image set was 2.2 (thin black arrow), whereas that of second set was 2.6 (thick black arrow). Percent increase in SUV of the lesion was 18.2%. SUVmax1 of metastatic right axillary lymph node was 1.0 in first set (open arrow in A) and increased to 1.1 in second set (open arrow in B). Surgical pathology confirmed 2.5-cm invasive ductal carcinoma with axillary metastasis.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    Patient with history of noninvasive carcinoma of right breast underwent dual time point 18F-FDG PET for preoperative staging. (A) Coronal slices in top row were obtained at first time point. (B) Corresponding scans in bottom row were acquired at second time point. Lesion is questionable in first set, whereas it is clearly visualized in second set. Measured SUVmax1 of lesion in first image set (thin arrow) was 1.4, whereas that of second set was 1.9 (thick arrow). Percent change from first to second time point of this measurement was 35.7%. Surgical pathology confirmed noninvasive breast tumor.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    SUVmax Measurements and Changes over Time in Normal Breast, Invasive Cancer, Noninvasive Cancer, and T/B Ratios

    HistopathologySUVmax1SUVmax2Δ%SUVmaxΔ% in ratio 1 and ratio 2 (T/B ratio)
    Group A (n = 82)3.9 ± 3.74.3 ± 4.08.3 ± 11.522.0 ± 26.8
    Group B (n = 24)2.0 ± 0.62.1 ± 0.63.4 ± 13.015.7 ± 18.6
    Group C (n = 120)1.2 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.2−10.0 ± 10.8
    • Group A = invasive cancer; group B = noninvasive cancer; group C = contralateral breast; ratio 1 = T/B ratios of SUVmax at first time point; ratio 2 = T/B ratios of SUVmax at second time point; Δ% = percent change.

    • Data are presented as mean ± SD.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    SUVmax Measurements and Changes over Time in Invasive Cancers According to Subtypes

    Group A (n = 82)SUVmax1SUVmax2Δ% SUVmax
    Invasive ductal (n = 66)4.3 ± 3.9*4.7 ± 4.3*8.1 ± 10.6*
    Invasive lobular (n = 7)2.7 ± 1.8*3.1 ± 2.3*10.5 ± 14.0*
    Invasive mixed (n = 7)2.0 ± 0.9*2.2 ± 1.1*9.3 ± 14.6*
    Medullary (n = 1)7.28.619.4
    Mucinous (n = 1)1.01.00
    • ↵* Data are presented as mean ± SD.

    • Group A = invasive cancers; Δ% = percent change.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    SUVmax Measurements and Changes over Time According to Tumor Size in Invasive Cancers with Increase in T/B Ratios

    Group A (n = 82)SUVmax1SUVmax2Δ%SUVmaxΔ% in ratio 1 and ratio 2 (T/B ratio)
    Tumors >10 mm (n = 57)4.8 ± 4.15.3 ± 4.48.6 ± 12.223.1 ± 28.5
    Tumors 4−10 mm (n = 25)1.9 ± 0.82.0 ± 0.76.5 ± 9.918.8 ± 23.5
    • Group A = invasive cancer; ratio 1 = T/B ratios of SUVmax at first time point; ratio 2 = T/B ratios of SUVmax at second time point; Δ% = percent change.

    • Data are presented as mean ± SD.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 47 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 47, Issue 9
September 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET Imaging Detects Breast Cancer with High Sensitivity and Correlates Well with Histologic Subtypes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET Imaging Detects Breast Cancer with High Sensitivity and Correlates Well with Histologic Subtypes
Ayse Mavi, Muammer Urhan, Jian Q. Yu, Hongming Zhuang, Mohamed Houseni, Tevfik F. Cermik, Dhurairaj Thiruvenkatasamy, Brian Czerniecki, Mitchell Schnall, Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2006, 47 (9) 1440-1446;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET Imaging Detects Breast Cancer with High Sensitivity and Correlates Well with Histologic Subtypes
Ayse Mavi, Muammer Urhan, Jian Q. Yu, Hongming Zhuang, Mohamed Houseni, Tevfik F. Cermik, Dhurairaj Thiruvenkatasamy, Brian Czerniecki, Mitchell Schnall, Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2006, 47 (9) 1440-1446;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Assessing PET Parameters in Oncologic 18F-FDG Studies
  • Multicenter Clinical Trials Using 18F-FDG PET to Measure Early Response to Oncologic Therapy: Effects of Injection-to-Acquisition Time Variability on Required Sample Size
  • Voxel-Based Analysis of Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET Images for Brain Tumor Identification and Delineation
  • PET Tumor Metabolism in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Value of Static versus Kinetic Measures of Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake
  • 18F-FDG PET of Locally Invasive Breast Cancer and Association of Estrogen Receptor Status with Standardized Uptake Value: Microarray and Immunohistochemical Analysis
  • The Effect of Age, Menopausal State, and Breast Density on 18F-FDG Uptake in Normal Glandular Breast Tissue
  • 18F-FDG Uptake in Lung, Breast, and Colon Cancers: Molecular Biology Correlates and Disease Characterization
  • Reproducibility of Standardized Uptake Value Measurements Determined by 18F-FDG PET in Malignant Tumors
  • Time and Again, Children Resemble Their Parents
  • Breast Cancer Staging in a Single Session: Whole-Body PET/CT Mammography
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire