Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations

Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules

Alexander Matthies, Marc Hickeson, Andrew Cuchiara and Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2002, 43 (7) 871-875;
Alexander Matthies
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Hickeson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Cuchiara
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abass Alavi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    A 72-y-old woman presented with right lower lobe nodule measuring 1.8 × 1.0 cm. SUV increased from 1.45 on scan 1 at 65 min after injection (A) to 1.72 on scan 2 at 123 min after injection (B). Biopsy of lesion revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    A 69-y-old woman presented with 0.8-cm density in left upper lobe. SUV was not significantly different between scan 1 at 54 min after injection (A), where SUV was 1.54, and scan 2 at 100 min after injection (B), where SUV was 1.50. Excised lesion was granuloma.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patients with Malignant Lesions

    Lesion no.Patient’s age (y)Patient’s sexLesion size (cm)/locationFollow-up/pathologySUV1*SUV2†% Change‡
    178F2.5/RLLAdenocarcinoma (Bx)3.104.0029.0
    271M2.0/LULAdenocarcinoma (Res)1.121.3318.8
    379M4.2/RULAdenocarcinoma (Res)4.645.5619.1
    475M3.0/RULAdenocarcinoma (Bx)4.725.3814.0
    573F2.4 × 2.1/LLL§SCC (Bx)8.3410.5326.3
    61.8/LLL|SCC (Bx)4.585.9730.3
    769F1.5/RULAdenocarcinoma (Bx)1.692.1829.0
    875M2.0/LULAdenocarcinoma (Res)1.221.3611.5
    963F1.8 × 1.0/RLLAdenocarcinoma (Bx)1.451.7218.6
    1088F3.5 × 5.0/LLLAdenocarcinoma (Bx)7.068.2416.7
    1183M3.4 × 2.7/RULAdenocarcinoma (Res)3.094.2738.2
    1254F0.6/LULProbable lung cancer: no Bx, but response to XRT2.803.2114.6
    1373F1.7 × 1.4/RULSCC (Res)2.602.8710.4
    1470F6.0/RULSCC (Res)5.235.9313.4
    1571M3.5 × 2.5/LULMetastasis from prostate cancer (Bx)2.572.9012.8
    1667M2.5/RMLAdenocarcinoma (Bx)2.543.0821.3
    1768M4.0 × 3.0/LULAdenocarcinoma (Bx)3.354.3630.1
    1871F1.9 × 1.2/RULSCC (Bx)3.634.0812.4
    1983F2.8 × 2.7/LULAdenocarcinoma (Bx)3.123.5614.1
    2067F3.0 × 3.0/RULAdenocarcinoma (Res)6.258.0428.6
    • ↵* Mean ± SD of SUV1 = 3.66 ± 1.95.

    • ↵† Mean ± SD of SUV2 = 4.43 ± 2.43.

    • ↵‡ Mean = 20.5%.

    • ↵§ Lesion 1.

    • ↵| Lesion 2.

    • RLL = right lower lobe; Bx = biopsy; LUL = left upper lobe; Res = surgical resection; RUL = right upper lobe; LLL = left lower lobe; SCC = squamous cell carcinoma; XRT = x-ray therapy; RML = right middle lobe.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Patients with Benign Lesions

    Lesion no.Patient’s age (y)Patient’s sexLesion size (cm)/locationFollow-up: period of stability on CXR/CT or result of resectionSUV1*SUV2†% Change‡
    2169M1.8 × 1.2/RUL24 mo1.120.73−39.0
    2244F1.3/RMLResection: inflammatory cells0.430.41−4.7
    2351F1.5/LUL30 mo1.581.43−9.5
    2452M0.8/RUL24 mo0.830.46−44.6
    2556M0.9/LUL28 mo0.990.95−4.0
    2657F1.7 × 1.2/RUL20 mo0.680.737.4
    2751F1.0/LLL23 mo0.430.479.3
    2864M0.9/LUL25 mo0.630.7112.7
    2969F0.8/LULResection: granuloma1.541.50−2.6
    3036F0.5/RUL28 mo1.331.416.0
    3148F1.1/RLL24 mo1.471.41−4.1
    3262M1.2/RLL22 mo0.530.49−7.5
    3373F2.0/LUL23 mo1.051.00−4.8
    3451F0.9/RUL22 mo0.790.63−20.3
    3572F0.9/RUL23 mo0.750.9729.3
    3647M1.0/RULResolved 5 mo after PET scan1.321.11−15.9
    3754M1.0/RML§22 mo2.482.646.5
    380.5/RLL|22 mo2.652.857.5
    • ↵* Mean ± SD of SUV1 = 1.14 ± 0.64.

    • ↵† Mean ± SD of SUV2 = 1.11 ± 0.70.

    • ↵‡ Mean = −4.3%.

    • ↵§ Lesion 1.

    • ↵| Lesion 2.

    • CXR/CT = chest x-ray or CT; RUL = right upper lobe; RML = right middle lobe; LUL = left upper lobe; LLL = left lower lobe; RLL = right lower lobe.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 43, Issue 7
July 1, 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules
Alexander Matthies, Marc Hickeson, Andrew Cuchiara, Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2002, 43 (7) 871-875;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules
Alexander Matthies, Marc Hickeson, Andrew Cuchiara, Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2002, 43 (7) 871-875;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • PET/CT in nononcological lung diseases: current applications and future perspectives
  • British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules: accredited by NICE
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MR Imaging in Clinical Practice
  • The value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients
  • Voxel-Based Analysis of Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET Images for Brain Tumor Identification and Delineation
  • Time and Again, Children Resemble Their Parents
  • Evaluation of Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET for Staging in Patients with Lung Cancer
  • Dual Time Point 18F-FDG PET Imaging Detects Breast Cancer with High Sensitivity and Correlates Well with Histologic Subtypes
  • 18F-FDG PET After Radiofrequency Ablation: Is Timing Everything?
  • Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET for the Evaluation of Gallbladder Carcinoma
  • PET Evaluation of Lung Cancer
  • Potential of Dual-Time-Point Imaging to Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis with 18F-FDG PET
  • Comparison of Different Methods for Delineation of 18F-FDG PET-Positive Tissue for Target Volume Definition in Radiotherapy of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Detection of Klatskin's Tumor in Extrahepatic Bile Duct Strictures Using Delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT: Preliminary Results for 22 Patient Studies
  • 18F-FDG PET of Gliomas at Delayed Intervals: Improved Distinction Between Tumor and Normal Gray Matter
  • Metabolic significance of the pattern, intensity and kinetics of 18F-FDG uptake in malignant pleural mesothelioma
  • Shortened PET Data Acquisition Protocol for the Quantification of 18F-FDG Kinetics
  • Delayed 18F-FDG PET for Detection of Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastases in Cervical Cancer Patients
  • Value of Dual-Phase 2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Cervical Cancer
  • SUV Varies with Time After Injection in 18F-FDG PET of Breast Cancer: Characterization and Method to Adjust for Time Differences
  • 18F-FDG Accumulation with PET for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions in the Thorax
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire