Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation
Open Access

Renal and Multiorgan Safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in the VISION Dosimetry Substudy

Ken Herrmann, Kambiz Rahbar, Matthias Eiber, Richard Sparks, Nicholas Baca, Bernd J. Krause, Michael Lassmann, Walter Jentzen, Jun Tang, Daniela Chicco, Patrick Klein, Lars Blumenstein, Jean-René Basque and Jens Kurth
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2023, jnumed.123.265448; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265448
Ken Herrmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kambiz Rahbar
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
3Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Sparks
4CDE Dosimetry Services, Knoxville, Tennessee;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Baca
4CDE Dosimetry Services, Knoxville, Tennessee;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernd J. Krause
5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Lassmann
6Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Walter Jentzen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun Tang
7Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Chicco
8Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company, Turin, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Klein
9Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, East Hanover, New Jersey;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Blumenstein
10Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-René Basque
11Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Kurth
5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Study design and assessments. Asterisk shows that blood pressure was measured before each electrocardiogram (ECG). Dagger symbol is blood pharmacokinetic (PK) samples that were collected after ECGs when time points overlapped. Double dagger shows whole urine collection that was required between end of dose and 2 h after dose before first image. HPLC = high-performance liquid chromatography.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Representative SPECT/CT images show kidneys of a patient at various times during cycle 1 of 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. SPECT images (black/red/yellow scale) show uptake of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in kidneys (axial and coronal orientations) at 2, 24, 48, and 168 h during cycle 1. Underlaid CT images (gray) are scaled equally. Both image types are maximum-intensity projections.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Predicted versus observed cumulative absorbed doses per cycle in at-risk organs. Injected activity: cycle 2, 14.8 GBq; cycle 3, 22.2 GBq; cycle 4, 29.6 GBq; cycle 5, 37.0 GBq; cycle 6, 44.4 GBq.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Absorbed Doses per Unit Activity per Cycle

    Cycle 1*Cycles 2–6*
    Organ or tissueMeanSDMeanSD
    Lacrimal glands2.1 (1.2–3.2)0.471.8 (0.70–3.9)0.61
    Salivary glands0.63 (0.22–1.5)0.360.63 (0.23–1.4)0.30
    Left colon0.58 (0.33–1.0)0.140.58 (0.32–0.73)0.11
    Rectum0.56 (0.32–1.1)0.140.55 (0.31–0.70)0.10
    Kidneys0.43 (0.22–0.83)0.160.44 (0.17–1.0)0.21
    Right colon0.32 (0.18–0.60)0.080.31 (0.18–0.40)0.06
    Urinary bladder wall0.32 (0.29–0.43)0.030.33 (0.29–0.43)0.03
    Thyroid0.26 (0.09–1.69)0.370.21 (0.06–1.6)0.25
    Heart wall0.17 (0.03–0.52)0.120.15 (0.05–0.37)0.08
    Lungs0.11 (0.03–0.57)0.110.06 (0.02–0.17)0.03
    Liver0.090 (0.043–0.220)0.0440.11 (0.037–0.26)0.054
    Small intestine0.071 (0.043–0.220)0.0310.065 (0.043–0.083)0.010
    Spleen0.067 (0.031–0.140)0.0270.095 (0.028–0.32)0.056
    Osteogenic cells0.036 (0.02–0.170)0.0280.030 (0.016–0.062)0.009
    Red marrow0.035 (0.020–0.13)0.0200.031 (0.021–0.051)0.007
    Adrenal glands0.033 (0.016–0.15)0.0250.028 (0.014–0.060)0.009
    Gallbladder wall0.028 (0.013–0.15)0.0260.023 (0.012–0.055)0.008
    Pancreas0.027 (0.012–0.15)0.0260.021 (0.008–0.051)0.008
    Prostate0.027 (0.013–0.15)0.0260.021 (0.007–0.050)0.008
    Esophagus0.025 (0.010–0.15)0.0260.019 (0.006–0.050)0.008
    Stomach wall0.025 (0.011–0.15)0.0260.019 (0.006–0.050)0.008
    Thymus0.025 (0.010–0.15)0.0260.018 (0.004–0.049)0.008
    Testes0.023 (0.010–0.14)0.0250.017 (0.003–0.046)0.008
    Eyes0.022 (0.009–0.14)0.0240.016 (0.003–0.045)0.008
    Brain0.007 (0.002–0.025)0.0050.006 (0.003–0.028)0.003
    Whole body0.037 (0.019–0.170)0.0270.031 (0.018–0.065)0.009
    • ↵* Dosimetry data were available for 29 patients at cycle 1, 21 patients at cycles 2 and 3, 19 patients at cycle 4, 13 patients at cycle 5, and 10 patients at cycle 6.

    • Bold font indicates organs considered to be at particular risk of radiotoxicity. Data are Gy/GBq.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Cumulative Absorbed Doses Over 6 Cycles

    Predicted from cycle 1 data (n = 29)Observed (n = 10)
    Organ or tissueMeanSDMeanSDRelative difference
    Lacrimal glands92 (54–140)2177 (53–115)23+19.5%
    Salivary glands28 (10–68)1630 (11–58)15−6.7%
    Left colon26 (15–45)6.024 (14–29)4.8+8.3%
    Rectum25 (14–47)6.223 (13–28)4.6+8.7%
    Kidneys19 (10–37)7.315 (9.1–29)5.8+26.7%
    Right colon14 (8.1–27)3.413 (8.0–16)2.5+7.7%
    Urinary bladder wall14 (13–19)1.114 (13–15)0.580.0%
    Thyroid11 (3.8–75)169.8 (3.3–48)14+12.2%
    Heart wall7.8 (1.4–23)5.25.7 (2.8–11)3.0+36.8%
    Lungs4.7 (1.3–25)4.92.5 (1.2–5.4)1.3+88.0%
    Liver4.0 (1.9–9.6)2.04.0 (2.1–9.3)2.10.0%
    Small intestine3.1 (1.9–9.9)1.42.7 (2.2–3.1)0.36+14.8%
    Spleen3.0 (1.4–6.0)1.23.4 (1.4–8.0)2.3−11.8%
    Osteogenic cells1.6 (0.88–7.6)1.31.3 (0.85–2.2)0.44+23.1%
    Adrenal glands1.5 (0.70–6.8)1.11.1 (0.62–2.0)0.41+36.4%
    Red marrow*1.5 (0.87–5.9)0.91.3 (0.93–1.8)0.33+15.4%
    Gallbladder wall1.2 (0.56–6.7)1.10.96 (0.52–1.8)0.40+25.0%
    Pancreas1.2 (0.55–6.7)1.10.90 (0.50–1.8)0.38+33.3%
    Prostate1.2 (0.59–6.7)1.10.91 (0.54–1.8)0.36+31.9%
    Esophagus1.1 (0.46–6.5)1.10.81 (0.42–1.7)0.39+35.8%
    Stomach wall1.1 (0.48–6.6)1.10.83 (0.44–1.7)0.38+32.5%
    Thymus1.1 (0.45–6.5)1.10.78 (0.41–1.7)0.39+41.0%
    Testes1.0 (0.43–6.3)1.10.74 (0.39–1.6)0.36+35.1%
    Eyes1.0 (0.40–6.1)1.10.72 (0.36–1.6)0.36+38.9%
    Brain0.3 (0.08–1.1)0.20.27 (0.17–0.41)0.08+11.1%
    Whole body1.6 (0.86–7.3)1.21.3 (0.79–2.2)0.42+23.1%
    • ↵* Cycles 2–6 observed data were based on blood samples and remainder-of-body activity from cycle 1 scaled according to respective imaging data. For cycle 6, total injected activity was 44.4 GBq.

    • Data are Gy. Bold font indicates organs considered to be at particular risk of radiotoxicity.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    TEAEs Grouped as Safety Topics of Interest in the Substudy

    177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SoC (n = 30)
    Safety topicAll gradesGrade ≥ 3 (%)
    Bone marrow suppression11 (36.7)6 (20.0)
    Nausea and vomiting11 (36.7)0 (0.0)
    Fatigue6 (20.0)2 (6.7)
    Dry mouth5 (16.7)0 (0.0)
    Renal toxicity5 (16.7)0 (0.0)
    Hepatotoxicity2 (6.7)0 (0.0)
    Intracranial hemorrhage0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    QT prolongation0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    Reproductive toxicity0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    Second primary malignancies0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    • Toxicity was assessed using CTCAE version 5.0. Safety topics occurred on or after start of treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus standard of care (SoC) up to 30 d after last administration or before initiation of subsequent anticancer treatment. Patient with multiple grades for safety topic is counted only under maximum grade. Data in parentheses are percentages.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Renal and Multiorgan Safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in the VISION Dosimetry Substudy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Renal and Multiorgan Safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in the VISION Dosimetry Substudy
Ken Herrmann, Kambiz Rahbar, Matthias Eiber, Richard Sparks, Nicholas Baca, Bernd J. Krause, Michael Lassmann, Walter Jentzen, Jun Tang, Daniela Chicco, Patrick Klein, Lars Blumenstein, Jean-René Basque, Jens Kurth
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2023, jnumed.123.265448; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265448

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Renal and Multiorgan Safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in the VISION Dosimetry Substudy
Ken Herrmann, Kambiz Rahbar, Matthias Eiber, Richard Sparks, Nicholas Baca, Bernd J. Krause, Michael Lassmann, Walter Jentzen, Jun Tang, Daniela Chicco, Patrick Klein, Lars Blumenstein, Jean-René Basque, Jens Kurth
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2023, jnumed.123.265448; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265448
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Preclinical Evaluation of 177Lu-rhPSMA-10.1, a Radiopharmaceutical for Prostate Cancer: Biodistribution and Therapeutic Efficacy
  • Safety, Dosimetry, and Feasibility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-R2 as an Imaging Agent in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence or Metastatic Prostate Cancer
  • Mathematic Modeling of Tumor Growth During [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Therapy: Insights into Treatment Optimization
  • Challenges with 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Clinical Practice
  • First-Strike Rapid Predictive Dosimetry and Dose Response for 177Lu-PSMA Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • Dosimetry of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapies in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 177Lu-PSMA-617 Consolidation Therapy After Docetaxel in Patients with Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial
  • Transarterial Radioembolization in the TACOME Trial: Dosimetric Analysis and Clinical Features in Predicting Response and Overall Survival
  • Retreatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients with 223Ra Therapy in Daily Practice
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 177Lu
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen
  • metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
  • radioligand therapy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire