Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation
Open Access

Safety, Dosimetry, and Feasibility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-R2 as an Imaging Agent in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence or Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Liza Lindenberg, Thomas A. Hope, Frank I. Lin, Steven P. Rowe, Darko Pucar, Noella Gilbert, Daniela Chicco, Beilei He, Benedikt Feuerecker, Elena Castaldi and Lilja B. Solnes
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2025, 66 (3) 359-365; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268318
Liza Lindenberg
1Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas A. Hope
2University of California, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank I. Lin
1Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven P. Rowe
3Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darko Pucar
4Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noella Gilbert
5Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Chicco
6Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company, Turin, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beilei He
7Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benedikt Feuerecker
7Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland;
8Department of Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Castaldi
6Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis Company, Turin, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lilja B. Solnes
9Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed in most prostate cancers (PCs). PET and CT imaging studies using 68Ga-labeled PSMA ligands demonstrated the specific localization of 68Ga in PC lesions and distant metastatic lesions. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-R2 (68Ga-PSMA-R2) is a PSMA-targeted PET/CT radiotracer with potential diagnostic applications. Methods: PROfind (NCT03490032) was a phase 1/2, open-label, multicenter study of administration of 3 MBq/kg of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 (from >150 to ≤250 MBq) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) or metastatic PC (mPC). Participants underwent baseline conventional imaging (CT/MRI or bone scan) and PET/CT. Whole-body PET/CT imaging sequences were obtained between 20 min and 4 h after injection. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included biodistribution, potential lesion identification, pharmacokinetics, and dosimetry. Potential lesions were identified by 2 masked expert panels; a third panel evaluated the identified lesions. Results: Six patients with BCR were enrolled into phase 1, and 24 patients with BCR or mPC (n = 12 each) into phase 2. Thirteen treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, including 1 serious adverse event (ileus), unrelated to drug administration. All adverse events were mild or moderate and deemed not related to 68Ga-PSMA-R2. Peak blood concentration of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 was typically observed approximately 5 min after injection, steadily decreasing over 6 h. Mean absorbed radiation dose was highest in the urinary bladder wall (0.120 mGy/MBq) and kidney (0.061 mGy/MBq). No other organ mean absorbed radiation dose exceeded 0.020 mGy/MBq. Mean absorbed radiation doses in the salivary and lacrimal glands were 0.016 and 0.008 mGy/MBq, respectively. Mean total body absorbed radiation dose was 0.014 mGy/MBq. Mean effective total body dose was 0.015 mSv/MBq (range, 0.012–0.018 mSv/MBq). 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/CT detected 85 lesions in 22 participants at 1 h after injection and 103 lesions in 22 participants at 2 h after injection. Conventional imaging detected 49 lesions in 8 participants with mPC but none in participants with BCR. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA-R2 was well tolerated, with no drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events. Safety and preliminary imaging performance data support further development of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 as a diagnostic agent in patients with PC.

  • 68Ga-PSMA-R2
  • PET
  • dosimetry
  • prostate cancer
  • PSMA

Metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) has a poor 5-y survival rate (32.3%) compared with localized disease (>99%) (1,2), underlining the importance of early detection and need for improved diagnostic and therapeutic options for mPC. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is weakly expressed in normal tissue but highly expressed on prostate cancer (PC) cells, correlating with tumor aggressiveness and grade (3). Therefore, PSMA is an actionable theranostic target.

Imaging for staging, restaging, and treatment selection is recommended for newly diagnosed, intermediate-risk, and high-risk PC, as well as for biochemical recurrence (BCR) and mPC (4–6). Conventional imaging technologies (MRI, CT, and bone scans) have limited sensitivity to detect early regional or mPC lesions, particularly in patients with BCR or occult mPC (7–9). PET imaging with radionuclide-labeled small-molecule PSMA ligands is highly sensitive for detection of local, regional, and mPC lesions (10). To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved several PSMA-targeted PET imaging agents for the imaging of PSMA-positive lesions in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent PC at risk for metastases (11–13). [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 has additionally been approved for selection of patients with PSMA-positive mPC for treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical therapy (14).

Biodistribution of PSMA PET tracers can vary (15), but high uptake in the lacrimal and salivary glands is common. This can lead to undesirable off-target effects, such as xerostomia, when PSMA ligands are labeled with therapeutic radionuclides such as 177Lu or 225Ac (16,17). New PSMA PET tracers with favorable biodistributions, including low uptake in at-risk organs and high tumor uptake, are needed.

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-R2 (68Ga-PSMA-R2) is a systemically delivered, PSMA-targeted PET/CT radiotracer with potential theranostic applications (18,19). PROfind was a phase 1/2 study to assess the safety, tolerability, and dosimetry of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 in patients with BCR or mPC. The diagnostic value of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 compared with conventional anatomic imaging was also assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

PROfind was a phase 1/2, first-in-human, open-label, single-dose study conducted at 5 sites in the United States to evaluate the primary objective of safety and tolerability of 3 MBq/kg (≥150 MBq and ≤250 MBq) of 68Ga-PSMA-R2. In phase 1, patients with BCR were enrolled. In phase 2, patients with either BCR or mPC were enrolled. Secondary objectives, including pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 68Ga-PSMA-R2, were investigated in phase 1. Imaging of PC using 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/CT versus conventional anatomic imaging was investigated in both phases.

Primary endpoints were incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs and absolute changes and changes from baseline in clinical laboratory parameters, vital signs, and electrocardiograms. Secondary endpoints included absorbed radiation dose in organs and tumor lesions, pharmacokinetic parameters, SUVs, and burden and location of tumor lesions detected by 68Ga-PSMA-R2 compared with conventional imaging.

Patient Populations

PROfind (NCT03490032) was conducted in accordance with the principles of the International Council for Harmonisation E6 Guidance for Good Clinical Practice, the Declaration of Helsinki, and all national, state, and local laws. Study documents were approved by the site or central Institutional Review Board. All participants provided written informed consent before entering the study.

Eligible patients were adults with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate and either BCR (prostate-specific antigen ≥0.2 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy or prostate-specific antigen nadir plus 2 ng/mL after radiation therapy) or mPC (castration-sensitive or castration-resistant PC with ≥1 lymph node, visceral, or bone metastasis). Supplemental Table 1 provides the complete eligibility criteria (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org).

Interventions and Assessments

Preparation and Administration of 68Ga-PSMA-R2

Details of the preparation of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 are available in the supplemental materials.

Participants received a single 3 MBq/kg intravenous injection of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 (≥150 MBq and ≤250 MBq total administered activity) on day 1 (Fig. 1) and were then monitored for 6 h. Safety follow-up visits were conducted on days 7 (±2 d) and 28 (±3 d).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

(A) Representative maximum-intensity projection and selected PET/CT images (fused, PET and CT only) of patient with mPC at 1 h after injection. (B and C) Low uptake of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 in salivary and submandibular glands is also demonstrated. (D) Images show heterogeneous uptake of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 with varying degrees of intensity in multiple spine bone lesions (vertebral sclerotic lesion with intense PSMA-R2 expression at its periphery indicated with red arrow). HU = Houndsfield unit; SUVbw = body-weight SUV.

Imaging

A detailed PET/CT image acquisition protocol is available in the supplemental materials.

Whole-body PET/CT imaging sequences (from the vertex to the proximal thighs) were obtained from participants in phase 1 at 20–30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3–4 h after 68Ga-PSMA-R2 injection (after urine collection; Fig. 1). On the basis of preliminary phase 1 data, participants in phase 2 underwent 2 PET/CT scans at 1 and 2 h after injection (Supplemental Fig. 1).

Imaging performance was evaluated against conventional imaging used in standard clinical practice by 3 panels of experts (supplemental materials).

Quantification of 68Ga radioactivity used serial PET/CT images. Visually identified focal regions of abnormal uptake of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 had higher SUVmax than background (gluteal or thigh muscle) (20). Details and other parameters recorded are available in the supplemental materials.

Safety

Blood and urine samples were collected, and vital signs and electrocardiograms were recorded for safety monitoring (Supplemental Fig. 1). AEs were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 23.0 (details are in the supplemental materials).

Pharmacokinetics

In phase 1, blood and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetics and dosimetry (Supplemental Fig. 1). Additional details are in the supplemental materials.

Dosimetry

Dosimetry analysis was performed using OLINDA/EXM version 2.0 (Hermes Medical Solutions) and calculated for organs receiving the highest dose of 68Ga-PSMA-R2, assessed visually from PET/CT images. Up to 10 lesions with the highest tumor-to-background ratio were analyzed per patient. Mono- and biexponential curves were fit to time–activity curves to yield time-integrated activity coefficients.

Baseline Conventional Imaging

CT and MR image acquisition protocols are available in the supplemental materials.

Statistical Analyses

Sample size was based on feasibility rather than formal sample size calculation because of the early phase of the study and the use of ionizing radiation. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 or higher (SAS Institute Inc.), and the results were presented descriptively. Pharmacokinetics and dosimetry were assessed using phase 1 data. All other data are presented on the basis of the full analysis set.

Patient-level percent agreement calculations were performed to assess the level of agreement between 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/CT results and conventional imaging results (supplemental materials).

RESULTS

Patients

Of 32 patients screened, 30 were enrolled into the study and received 68Ga-PSMA-R2. Two patients without BCR or mPC were not enrolled. In phase 1, 6 patients with BCR were enrolled; in phase 2, 24 patients with BCR or mPC (n = 12 each) were enrolled (Supplemental Table 2). All participants completed the imaging assessment on day 1.

Most participants were White (90%, 27/30) with a median age of 70.5 y (range, 53–86 y) (Table 1). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status was 0 in 21 participants and at least 1 in 9 participants. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 2.05 ng/mL (range, 0.1–210.9 ng/mL) (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Patient Demographics and Baseline Characteristics

Safety and Tolerability

The mean total administered activity of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 was 218.95 MBq (range, 167.2–259.0 MBq). There were 13 treatment-emergent AEs in 7 participants, all classified as mild or moderate severity (Table 2). One participant with BCR experienced 1 serious AE of ileus 25 d after administration of 68Ga-PSMA-R2, related to the general anesthesia and pain medication administered for an elective procedure (embolization). There were no deaths and no treatment-emergent AEs related to 68Ga-PSMA-R2. One participant experienced a treatment-emergent AE of headache considered related to the study procedure. Fatigue (10.0%, 3/30) and rash (6.7%, 2/30) were the only AEs observed in more than 5% of participants.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Summary of Adverse Events

Changes in hematology and urinalysis were rare and not clinically significant, except for 1 event of elevated whole blood and neutrophil counts and 1 event of blood in urine; both were assessed as nonserious. No clinically significant changes in blood chemistry, vital signs, or electrocardiograms were recorded.

Pharmacokinetic Analyses

68Ga-PSMA-R2 was detected in the blood 0.083–6 h after injection. Peak blood concentration was typically approximately 5 min after injection followed by a steady decrease over 6 h. Urinary excretion of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 over 6 h after injection varied from 44% to 81% of the total administered activity. The terminal half-life was approximately 2–4 h based on total systemic clearance of 3,730–8,330 mL/h and apparent volume of distribution of 18,300–25,200 mL.

Dosimetry (Phase 1)

The mean absorbed radiation dose was highest in the urinary bladder wall (0.120 mGy/MBq; range, 0.048–0.198 mGy/MBq), followed by the kidney (0.061 mGy/MBq; range, 0.041–0.093 mGy/MBq). The mean absorbed radiation dose of any other organ did not exceed 0.02 mGy/MBq (Table 3). Mean absorbed radiation doses in the salivary and lacrimal glands were 0.016 mGy/MBq (range, 0.013–0.022 mGy/MBq) and 0.008 mGy/MBq (range, 0.006–0.011 mGy/MBq), respectively (Table 3; Fig. 1). The mean effective whole-body dose was 0.015 mSv/MBq (range, 0.012–0.018 mSv/MBq) (Table 3). The mean non–decay-corrected tissue activity from 68Ga-PSMA-R2 was higher in the liver and kidneys than it was in other organs (Supplemental Table 3). In all participants, non–decay-corrected tissue time–activity curves for the brain, heart wall, kidneys, liver, lungs, salivary glands, and spleen showed exponential decrease in percentage injected activity with time. The trend was similar for the brain in 4 participants and for the lacrimal glands in 3 participants.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Dosimetry by Organ (Phase 1)

Lesion Detection

At 1 h after injection, the mean lesion SUVmax was 5.83 and the mean lesion tumor-to-background ratio was 9.58 (Supplemental Tables 4–7). In participants positive for BCR by PET/CT at 1 h, prostate-specific antigen levels were no more than 1 ng/mL in 5 participants and greater than 1 ng/mL in 6 participants. Results were similar at 2 h after injection. Patient-level positive percent agreement was 87.5% (95% CI, 47.4–99.7%), negative percent agreement was 31.8% (95% CI, 13.9–54.9%), and overall percent agreement was 46.7% (95% CI, 28.3–65.7%).

Using PET/CT, 85 potential lesions in 22 participants were detected at 1 h after injection: 33 in participants with BCR and 52 in participants with mPC. At 2 h, 103 potential lesions in 22 participants were detected using PET/CT: 45 in participants with BCR and 58 in participants with mPC. Using conventional imaging, 49 potential lesions were detected in 8 participants with mPC but none in participants with BCR (Table 4; Supplemental Table 8).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Summary of Patient Level Agreement of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/CT with Conventional Imaging

Overall, 7 participants were positive by both PET/CT and conventional imaging (all mPC), 15 participants were positive by PET/CT only, 1 was positive by conventional imaging only (mPC), and 7 were negative by both PET/CT and conventional imaging (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

PROfind was a phase 1/2, first-in-human study of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 in 30 adults with BCR or mPC. A single dose of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 was generally well tolerated, with no safety concerns raised, and a safety profile consistent with other PSMA-targeted PET agents (21–23).

Absorbed radiation doses were highest in the urinary bladder wall and kidney, reflecting the urinary excretion of 68Ga-PSMA-R2. These absorbed radiation doses and the mean effective whole-body absorbed radiation dose are consistent with other 68Ga- and 18F-labeled imaging agents (24–26) and with The Radioactive Drug Research Committee recommendations. Mean absorbed radiation doses in other at-risk organs were low, including in the salivary (0.016 mGy/MBq) and lacrimal (0.008 mGy/MBq) glands, which have high expression of PSMA (27) and in which high uptake of PSMA ligands has been previously observed (28). Previous studies have reported mean absorbed radiation doses of 0.089–2.1 and 0.11–3.8 mGy/MBq in the salivary and lacrimal glands, respectively (25,29–31), but direct comparisons between studies are difficult because of variations in study designs, PSMA agents, and volumes used for dose estimation. The pharmacokinetic and biodistribution profiles support the use of the PSMA-R2 scaffold as a PSMA-targeted imaging agent. The relatively low absorbed radiation doses in the lacrimal and salivary glands may also support its use in selection of patients for PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy.

Overall, more participants with potential tumor lesions and more potential lesions were detected with 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/CT than with conventional imaging. This underlines the need to correlate conventional imaging with additional methods such as PET/CT for PC diagnosis. Potential lesions identified only by PET/CT may represent earlier-stage or smaller lesions not detectable by conventional imaging. Conversely, potential lesions identified only by conventional imaging may represent PSMA-negative tumors (27,32), sclerotic lesions that would not readily take up 68Ga-PSMA-R2, or scar tissue from previously treated lesions. Lesions detected only by conventional imaging were predominantly bone, and more bone lesions were detected by conventional imaging than by PET/CT. It is possible that this may be a result of persistent osteoblastic reaction at the sites of nonviable tumors from treated or inactive metastatic disease.

68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/CT findings and SUVmax were similar at 1 and 2 h after injection. Imaging at 1 h was considered optimal because of the rapid clearance of 68Ga-PSMA-R2. Imaging at 2 h may be useful for designing targeted treatment plans in special cases of BCR when no lesions are identified in conventional or 1-h PET/CT images.

The biodistribution and dosimetry data of PSMA-R2 also indicate its potential use as a therapeutic agent when coupled with β-emitting (e.g., 177Lu) or α-emitting (e.g., 225Ac) radionuclides. After the VISION study, PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy for the treatment of PC has drawn increasing attention, with several trials under way (33). Compared with other PSMA-targeting scaffolds, PSMA-R2 has the distinct advantage of having relatively low absorbed radiation doses in at-risk organs and tissues (kidney, bone marrow, and salivary and lacrimal glands) (25,34). A randomized phase 1/2 study aimed at characterizing the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-R2 is ongoing (SatisfACtion, NCT05983198) (35).

A limitation of the study is that no corroborative immunohistochemistry or other data were collected to assess PSMA positivity, so it is possible that some patients were false positives. Furthermore, no approved reference standard for PET/CT data was available at the time of the study; instead, the imaging performance was evaluated against conventional imaging used in standard clinical practice by 3 panels of experts. Although the sample size was small, we believe it was adequate to assess the study objectives and was similar to or higher than that in other published studies investigating PSMA agents in PC (25,30,31).

CONCLUSION

The safety and imaging performance of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 for detecting potential PSMA-positive lesions in patients with BCR or mPC supports the use of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 as an imaging agent for patients with PC. Very low salivary and lacrimal absorbed radiation doses could be a particular advantage of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 for the selection of patients for PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy.

DISCLOSURE

Thomas Hope receives grant funding from Clovis Oncology, GE HealthCare, Janssen, Lantheus, Novartis, Telix Pharmaceuticals, the National Cancer Institute (R01CA235741 and R01CA212148), and the Prostate Cancer Foundation; receives personal fees from Bayer, BlueEarth Diagnostics, Cardinal Health, Lantheus, and RayzeBio; and receives fees from and has an equity interest in AdvanCell and Curium. Frank Lin has waived registration fees for attending the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging annual meetings. Steven Rowe receives grants, contracts, and consulting fees and holds stock or stock options from Precision Molecular, Inc.; receives grants or contracts from PlenaryAI; and receives payment or honoraria from Lantheus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Benedikt Feuerecker receives grants from the Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany, was a previous consultant for and is currently employed by Novartis Pharma AG, and works part-time at Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Noella Gilbert is a current employee of Novartis. Daniela Chicco and Beilei He were former employees of Novartis and held Novartis stock options. Daniela Chicco holds patents for PSMA ligands and uses thereof under International Publication Number WO 2021/001360 A1. Lilja Solnes receives funding from Cellectar, Lantheus, Novartis, Precision Molecular Imaging, and Viewpoint; receives royalties from Elsevier; and receives consulting fees for serving on the Safety Review Board Progenics Steering Committee for Novartis. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Can 68Ga-PSMA-R2 be used as a PET/CT imaging agent for the detection of PC lesions?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: In this study of 30 adults with BCR or mPC, 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/CT showed increased sensitivity for detection of potential PC lesions versus conventional imaging modalities. The safety, dosimetry, and biodistribution of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 was also consistent with other PSMA-targeted PET agents.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: These findings support further clinical development of PSMA-R2 as a theranostic scaffold.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Katie Willetts, PhD, and Shufei Song, PhD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, U.K., funded by Novartis, for providing medical writing assistance. We thank the participants and staff involved in the study.

Footnotes

  • Published online Feb. 6, 2025.

  • © 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: https://jnm.snmjournals.org/page/permissions.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Siegel DA,
    2. O’Neil ME,
    3. Richards TB,
    4. Dowling NF,
    5. Weir HK
    . Prostate cancer incidence and survival, by stage and race/ethnicity: United States, 2001–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:1473–1480.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    American Cancer Society. Survival rates for prostate cancer. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html. Accessed August 5, 2024.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wright GL Jr.,
    2. Haley C,
    3. Beckett ML,
    4. Schellhammer PF
    . Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in normal, benign, and malignant prostate tissues. Urol Oncol. 1995;1:18–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Seifert R,
    2. Emmett L,
    3. Rowe SP,
    4. et al
    . Second version of the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation framework including response evaluation for clinical trials (PROMISE V2). Eur Urol. 2023;83:405–412.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Seifert R,
    2. Gafita A,
    3. Telli T,
    4. et al
    . Standardized PSMA-PET imaging of advanced prostate cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2024;54:60–68.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fizazi K,
    2. Gillessen S
    , ESMO Guidelines Committee. Updated treatment recommendations for prostate cancer from the ESMO clinical practice guideline considering treatment intensification and use of novel systemic agents. Ann Oncol. 2023;34:557–563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hofman MS,
    2. Lawrentschuk N,
    3. Francis RJ,
    4. et al
    .; proPSMA Study Group Collaborators. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (ProPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395:1208–1216.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Fendler WP,
    2. Weber M,
    3. Iravani A,
    4. et al
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:7448–7454.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pyka T,
    2. Okamoto S,
    3. Dahlbender M,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of bone scintigraphy and 68Ga-PSMA PET for skeletal staging in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:2114–2121.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hofman MS,
    2. Hicks RJ,
    3. Maurer T,
    4. Eiber M
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET: clinical utility in prostate cancer, normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 2018;38:200–217.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Highlights of prescribing information: Posluma (flotufolastat F 18) injection, for intravenous use. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2023/216023s000lbl.pdf. Revised May 3, 2024. Accessed January 16, 2025.
  12. 12.
    FDA approves second PSMA-targeted PET imaging drug for men with prostate cancer. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/fda-approves-second-PSMA-targeted-pet-imaging-drug-men-prostate-cancer. Updated May 27, 2021. Accessed January 16, 2025.
  13. 13.↵
    FDA approves first PSMA-targeted PET imaging drug for men with prostate cancer. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-psma-targeted-pet-imaging-drug-men-prostate-cancer. Updated December 1, 2020. Accessed January 16, 2025.
  14. 14.↵
    FDA approves Pluvicto/Locametz for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:13N.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Werner RA,
    2. Derlin T,
    3. Lapa C,
    4. et al
    . 18F-labeled, PSMA-targeted radiotracers: leveraging the advantages of radiofluorination for prostate cancer molecular imaging. Theranostics. 2020;10:1–16.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kratochwil C,
    2. Bruchertseifer F,
    3. Giesel FL,
    4. et al
    . 225Ac-PSMA-617 for PSMA-targeted α-radiation therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1941–1944.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Feuerecker B,
    2. Tauber R,
    3. Knorr K,
    4. et al
    . Activity and adverse events of actinium-225-PSMA-617 in advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after failure of lutetium-177-PSMA. Eur Urol. 2021;79:343–350.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Muzio VRL,
    2. Sacchetti L,
    3. Fugazza L,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of in vivo biodistribution and treatment efficacy of 177Lu PSMA-R2 and 177Lu-PSMA-617 on mice bearing prostate cancer tumors. Paper presented at: European Association of Nuclear Medicine Annual Meeting. EJNMMI; 2019;46.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lindenberg ML,
    2. Hope T,
    3. Lin F,
    4. et al
    . Safety and tolerability of 68Ga-PSMA-R2 as an imaging agent in patients with biochemical recurrence or metastatic prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(suppl 1):1319.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Behr SC,
    2. Aggarwal R,
    3. VanBrocklin HF,
    4. et al
    . Phase I study of ctt1057, an 18F-labeled imaging agent with phosphoramidate core targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen in prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:910–916.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Morris MJ,
    2. Rowe SP,
    3. Gorin MA,
    4. et al
    .; CONDOR Study Group. Diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: results from the CONDOR phase III, multicenter study. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:3674–3682.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.
    1. Jani AB,
    2. Ravizzini GC,
    3. Gartrell BA,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic performance and safety of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 positron emission tomography in men with suspected prostate cancer recurrence: results from a phase 3, prospective, multicenter study (SPOTLIGHT). J Urol. 2023;210:411–412.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sartor O,
    2. de Bono J,
    3. Chi KN,
    4. et al
    .; VISION Investigators. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1091–1103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Szabo Z,
    2. Mena E,
    3. Rowe SP,
    4. et al
    . Initial evaluation of [18F]DCFPyL for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging of prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:565–574.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Sandgren K,
    2. Johansson L,
    3. Axelsson J,
    4. et al
    . Radiation dosimetry of [68Ga]PSMA-11 in low-risk prostate cancer patients. EJNMMI Phys. 2019;6:2.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kaushik A,
    2. Jaimini A,
    3. Tripathi M,
    4. et al
    . Estimation of radiation dose to patients from 18FDG whole body PET/CT investigations using dynamic PET scan protocol. Indian J Med Res. 2015;142:721–731.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Paschalis A,
    2. Sheehan B,
    3. Riisnaes R,
    4. et al
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen heterogeneity and DNA repair defects in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76:469–478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Klein Nulent TJW,
    2. Valstar MH,
    3. de Keizer B,
    4. et al
    . Physiologic distribution of PSMA-ligand in salivary glands and seromucous glands of the head and neck on PET/CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125:478–486.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Herrmann K,
    2. Rahbar K,
    3. Eiber M,
    4. et al
    . Renal and multiorgan safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the VISION dosimetry substudy. J Nucl Med. 2024;65:71–78.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kamaldeep,
    2. Wanage G,
    3. Sahu SK,
    4. et al
    . Examining absorbed doses of indigenously developed 177Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients at baseline and during course of peptide receptor radioligand therapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2021;36:292–304.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Okamoto S,
    2. Thieme A,
    3. Allmann J,
    4. et al
    . Radiation dosimetry for 177Lu-PSMA I&T in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: absorbed dose in normal organs and tumor lesions. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:445–450.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Bravaccini S,
    2. Puccetti M,
    3. Bocchini M,
    4. et al
    . PSMA expression: a potential ally for the pathologist in prostate cancer diagnosis. Sci Rep. 2018;8:4254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Almeida LS,
    2. Etchebehere E,
    3. Garcia Megias I,
    4. et al
    . PSMA radioligand therapy in prostate cancer: where are we and where are we heading? Clin Nucl Med. 2024;49:45–55.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Piron S,
    2. De Man K,
    3. Van Laeken N,
    4. et al
    . Radiation dosimetry and biodistribution of 18F-PSMA-11 for PET imaging of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1736–1742.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Satapathy S,
    2. Sood A,
    3. Das CK,
    4. Mittal BR
    . Evolving role of 225Ac-PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021;24:880–890.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  • Received for publication August 27, 2024.
  • Accepted for publication December 16, 2024.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 3
March 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety, Dosimetry, and Feasibility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-R2 as an Imaging Agent in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence or Metastatic Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Safety, Dosimetry, and Feasibility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-R2 as an Imaging Agent in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence or Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Liza Lindenberg, Thomas A. Hope, Frank I. Lin, Steven P. Rowe, Darko Pucar, Noella Gilbert, Daniela Chicco, Beilei He, Benedikt Feuerecker, Elena Castaldi, Lilja B. Solnes
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2025, 66 (3) 359-365; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268318

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Safety, Dosimetry, and Feasibility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-R2 as an Imaging Agent in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence or Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Liza Lindenberg, Thomas A. Hope, Frank I. Lin, Steven P. Rowe, Darko Pucar, Noella Gilbert, Daniela Chicco, Beilei He, Benedikt Feuerecker, Elena Castaldi, Lilja B. Solnes
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2025, 66 (3) 359-365; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268318
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 68Ga-PSMA-R2
  • PET
  • dosimetry
  • prostate cancer
  • PSMA
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire