Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Correlation of 68Ga-RM2 PET with Postsurgery Histopathology Findings in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Heying Duan, Lucia Baratto, Richard E. Fan, Simon John Christoph Soerensen, Tie Liang, Benjamin Inbeh Chung, Alan Eih Chih Thong, Harcharan Gill, Christian Kunder, Tanya Stoyanova, Mirabela Rusu, Andreas M. Loening, Pejman Ghanouni, Guido A. Davidzon, Farshad Moradi, Geoffrey A. Sonn and Andrei Iagaru
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2022, 63 (12) 1829-1835; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.263971
Heying Duan
1Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucia Baratto
1Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard E. Fan
2Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon John Christoph Soerensen
2Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
3Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tie Liang
1Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Inbeh Chung
2Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Eih Chih Thong
2Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harcharan Gill
2Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Kunder
4Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tanya Stoyanova
5Radiology, Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mirabela Rusu
6Division of Integrative Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas M. Loening
7Division of Body MRI, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pejman Ghanouni
7Division of Body MRI, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guido A. Davidzon
1Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Farshad Moradi
1Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey A. Sonn
2Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrei Iagaru
1Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

68Ga-RM2 targets gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs), which are overexpressed in prostate cancer (PC). Here, we compared preoperative 68Ga-RM2 PET to postsurgery histopathology in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate- or high-risk PC. Methods: Forty-one men, 64.0 ± 6.7 y old, were prospectively enrolled. PET images were acquired 42–72 min (median ± SD, 52.5 ± 6.5 min) after injection of 118.4–247.9 MBq (median ± SD, 138.0 ± 22.2 MBq) of 68Ga-RM2. PET findings were compared with preoperative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) (n = 36) and 68Ga-PSMA11 PET (n = 17) and correlated to postprostatectomy whole-mount histopathology (n = 32) and time to biochemical recurrence. Nine participants decided to undergo radiation therapy after study enrollment. Results: All participants had intermediate- (n = 17) or high-risk (n = 24) PC and were scheduled for prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen was 8.8 ± 77.4 (range, 2.5–504) and 7.6 ± 5.3 ng/mL (range, 2.5–28.0 ng/mL) when participants who ultimately underwent radiation treatment were excluded. Preoperative 68Ga-RM2 PET identified 70 intraprostatic foci of uptake in 40 of 41 patients. Postprostatectomy histopathology was available in 32 patients in which 68Ga-RM2 PET identified 50 of 54 intraprostatic lesions (detection rate = 93%). 68Ga-RM2 uptake was recorded in 19 nonenlarged pelvic lymph nodes in 6 patients. Pathology confirmed lymph node metastases in 16 lesions, and follow-up imaging confirmed nodal metastases in 2 lesions. 68Ga-PSMA11 and 68Ga-RM2 PET identified 27 and 26 intraprostatic lesions, respectively, and 5 pelvic lymph nodes each in 17 patients. Concordance between 68Ga-RM2 and 68Ga-PSMA11 PET was found in 18 prostatic lesions in 11 patients and 4 lymph nodes in 2 patients. Noncongruent findings were observed in 6 patients (intraprostatic lesions in 4 patients and nodal lesions in 2 patients). Sensitivity and accuracy rates for 68Ga-RM2 and 68Ga-PSMA11 (98% and 89% for 68Ga-RM2 and 95% and 89% for 68Ga-PSMA11) were higher than those for mpMRI (77% and 77%, respectively). Specificity was highest for mpMRI with 75% followed by 68Ga-PSMA11 (67%) and 68Ga-RM2 (65%). Conclusion: 68Ga-RM2 PET accurately detects intermediate- and high-risk primary PC, with a detection rate of 93%. In addition, 68Ga-RM2 PET showed significantly higher specificity and accuracy than mpMRI and a performance similar to 68Ga-PSMA11 PET. These findings need to be confirmed in larger studies to identify which patients will benefit from one or the other or both radiopharmaceuticals.

  • 68Ga-RM2
  • 68Ga-PSMA11
  • PET
  • prostate cancer
  • histopathology

Footnotes

  • Published online May. 12, 2022.

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 12
December 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Correlation of 68Ga-RM2 PET with Postsurgery Histopathology Findings in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Correlation of 68Ga-RM2 PET with Postsurgery Histopathology Findings in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer
Heying Duan, Lucia Baratto, Richard E. Fan, Simon John Christoph Soerensen, Tie Liang, Benjamin Inbeh Chung, Alan Eih Chih Thong, Harcharan Gill, Christian Kunder, Tanya Stoyanova, Mirabela Rusu, Andreas M. Loening, Pejman Ghanouni, Guido A. Davidzon, Farshad Moradi, Geoffrey A. Sonn, Andrei Iagaru
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2022, 63 (12) 1829-1835; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.263971

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Correlation of 68Ga-RM2 PET with Postsurgery Histopathology Findings in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer
Heying Duan, Lucia Baratto, Richard E. Fan, Simon John Christoph Soerensen, Tie Liang, Benjamin Inbeh Chung, Alan Eih Chih Thong, Harcharan Gill, Christian Kunder, Tanya Stoyanova, Mirabela Rusu, Andreas M. Loening, Pejman Ghanouni, Guido A. Davidzon, Farshad Moradi, Geoffrey A. Sonn, Andrei Iagaru
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2022, 63 (12) 1829-1835; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.263971
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Fetal Dose from PET and CT in Pregnant Patients
  • Longitudinal Tau PET Using 18F-Flortaucipir: The Effect of Relative Cerebral Blood Flow on Quantitative and Semiquantitative Parameters
  • Differential Effects of Tau Stage, Lewy Body Pathology, and Substantia Nigra Degeneration on 18F-FDG PET Patterns in Clinical Alzheimer Disease
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 68Ga-RM2
  • 68Ga-PSMA11
  • PET
  • prostate cancer
  • histopathology
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire