Research ArticleTheranostics
Open Access

Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Imaging for Lymph Node Staging of Prostate Carcinoma in Primary and Biochemical Recurrence

Katharina Sprute, Vasko Kramer, Stefan A. Koerber, Manuel Meneses, Rene Fernandez, Cristian Soza-Ried, Mathias Eiber, Wolfgang A. Weber, Isabel Rauscher, Kambiz Rahbar, Michael Schaefers, Tadashi Watabe, Motohide Uemura, Sadahiro Naka, Norio Nonomura, Jun Hatazawa, Constantin Schwab, Viktoria Schütz, Markus Hohenfellner, Tim Holland-Letz, Juergen Debus, Clemens Kratochwil, Horacio Amaral, Pete L. Choyke, Uwe Haberkorn, Camilo Sandoval and Frederik L. Giesel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2021, 62 (2) 208-213; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.246363

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–ligand PET/CT is performed on patients with prostate cancer to stage the disease initially or to identify sites of recurrence after definitive therapy. On the basis of clinical results, 18F-PSMA-1007 is a promising PSMA PET tracer, but detailed histologic confirmation has been lacking. Methods: Ninety-six patients with prostate cancer underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT followed by either radical prostatectomy with lymphadenectomy or salvage lymphadenectomy. The histologic findings of PSMA PET–positive nodes were analyzed retrospectively. A lesion-based and patient-based analysis was performed comparing all positive lesions and only lesions larger than 3 mm on histopathology. Results: Of the patients, 90.6% received 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for staging before the primary treatment, whereas 9.4% underwent imaging for biochemical recurrence. In 34.4% of the cohort, positive lymph nodes were present on imaging. In total, 1,746 lymph nodes were dissected in 96 patients. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET had a lesion-based sensitivity of 81.7%, a specificity of 99.6%, a positive predictive value of 92.4%, and a negative predictive value of 98.9% for detecting positive lymph nodes larger than 3 mm. In the analysis of all malignant nodes regardless of size, the overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value on lesion-based analysis were 71.2%, 99.5%, 91.3%, and 97.9%, respectively. The patient-based analysis showed a sensitivity of 85.9% and a specificity of 99.5% for lymph nodes larger than 3 mm. Conclusion: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT reliably detects malignant lymph nodes and has an exceptional specificity of more than 99% for nodal metastases.

Prostate cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide, and the number of newly diagnosed patients is increasing commensurate with an aging population (1) Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–ligand PET/CT is increasingly used in the initial staging of high-risk tumors and in identifying sites of recurrence. Several tracers have been developed for PSMA PET/CT. A study that compared conventional imaging and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT found PSMA PET/CT to be superior (2). For the most studied tracer, 68Ga-PSMA-11, high rates of detection have been reported on the basis of clinical and histologic data (3–5). 18F-PSMA-1007 offers a lower urinary clearance and a longer half-life. The decreased activity in the bladder facilitates the detection of local recurrence. In a direct comparison between 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, the latter was superior in the detection of lesions close to the bladder and ureter (6). Moreover, 18F-PSMA-1007, with its longer-lived radioisotope and higher positron yield, promises advantages in imaging quality and sensitivity (7). However, since its recent introduction, only a few studies with 18F-PSMA-1007 have validated this tracer with histopathology. In a recent study involving 8 patients with 18F-PSMA-1007 imaging and histopathology, a sensitivity of 94.7% was reported for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended lymphadenectomy (8). A different study of 10 patients with 18F-PSMA-1007 reported a sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 81%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 68%, with an accuracy of 75% for total agreement (9).

The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging for N-staging of prostate cancer initially and for the assessment of nodal recurrence using histopathology as the gold standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design and Patient Population

From the databases of 5 institutions, we identified patients who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging followed by surgery with histopathologic evaluation of surgical specimens. The PET/CT, followed by either radical prostatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy or salvage lymphadenectomy, was performed between July 2016 and November 2019. The mean time between PET/CT and surgery was 47.65 ± 35.87 d (range, 1–165 d).

Patients for whom data were available only for prostate biopsies, prostatectomies without lymphadenectomies, or bone biopsies were not considered in this study. Only patients for whom an imaging report and a histopathology report were available were selected. Finally, 96 patients were included in this retrospective analysis (43 from Fundación Arturo Lopez Perez, 33 from the University of Heidelberg, 15 from the University of Munich, 4 from the University of Muenster, and 1 from Osaka University Hospital). Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
TABLE 1

Patient Characteristics

This retrospective study was approved by every local institutional review board, and all subjects gave written informed consent to anonymized evaluation and publication of their data. All reported investigations were conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and local regulations.

Radiochemistry

18F-PSMA-1007 was produced in compliance with current good-manufacturing-practice guidelines as described preciously (10). Reagent kits, precursor, and reference standard were obtained from ABX. The radiosynthesis was performed as a single-step radiofluorination on a modified nuclear interface 18F-FDG synthesis module (TracerLab FX FN analog; GE Healthcare), a Neptis plug synthesis module (ORA), or a Synthera V2 synthesis module (IBA) using 1.6 mg of PSMA-1007 precursor in dimethyl sulfoxide for 10 min at 80°C, followed by purification on 2 stacked solid-phase extraction cartridges (PS-H+, C18ec; Macherey-Nagel) and final dilution with phosphate-buffered saline containing ascorbate to obtain 18F-PSMA-1007 after sterile filtration as a solution ready for injection. At Osaka University Hospital, 18F-PSMA-1007 was produced under optimized conditions on a MPS200 cassette-type synthesizer (Sumitomo). High-performance liquid chromatography and thin-layer chromatography were performed to test the radiochemical and chemical purity; residual solvents were tested using gas chromatography, and the presence of tetrabutylammonium was determined using a thin-layer chromatography spot test. Further quality control (radionuclide purity, appearance, pH, endotoxins, sterility, filter integrity) was performed in compliance with current pharmacopeias.

18F-PSMA-1007 was obtained in radiochemical yields of 50% ± 10% after a total synthesis time of 25–62 min. The radiochemical purity was at least 95% (high-performance liquid chromatography and thin-layer chromatography). The PSMA-1007 content was less than 10 μg/mL, and all other radiopharmaceutical specifications were in accordance with current pharmacopeias.

Imaging Protocol

Patients were injected with 270 MBq, on average, of 18F-PSMA-1007, and images were acquired at an average of 90 min (range, 47–169 min) after injection on either a Biograph mCT (Siemens) or a Discovery 710 (GE Healthcare) PET scanner with similar imaging protocols. A detailed description can be found in Supplemental Table 1 (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org).

Image and Histopathologic Analysis

Extended lymph node (LN) dissection was performed for nearly all patients who received surgery as the primary treatment (86/87), and the extent of the LN dissection was described in the pathology report. In cases of biochemical recurrence, the surgery was PSMA-based. In general, dissected regions and findings were categorized as in the left or right iliac external LNs or the left or right iliac internal LNs. The total number of LNs and the number of histologically tumor–positive LNs were described for each region and then correlated with the PET findings.

Interpretation of all imaging data and their histopathologic correlations were done by each individual center. When there was discordance between imaging findings and histopathology, the data were reevaluated by the team at Heidelberg University Hospital, using a consensus reading by 2 board-certified nuclear medicine physicians with more than 10 y of experience in PET imaging diagnostics.

All lesions suspected of representing prostate cancer or affected LNs on imaging were noted, along with the corresponding side and localization. Focal uptake of 18F-PSMA-1007 higher than the surrounding background and not associated with physiologic uptake was considered suggestive of malignancy. Typical pitfalls in PSMA-ligand PET imaging (e.g., celiac and other ganglia, fractures, or degenerative changes) were considered (11).

Statistical Analysis

Data were tabulated using Excel (Microsoft). On the basis of the PET imaging and histopathology results, patients and LNs were defined as true-positive (positive on PET and histopathology), false-positive (positive on PET, negative on histopathology), true-negative (negative on PET and histopathology), or false-negative (negative on PET, positive on histopathology).

A lesion-based and patient-based analysis was performed to calculate sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy as follows: sensitivity was defined as true-positives divided by true-positives plus false-negatives. Specificity was defined as true-negatives divided by true-negatives plus false-positives. PPV was defined as true-positives divided by true-positives plus false-positives. NPV was defined as true-negatives divided by true-negatives plus false-negatives. Accuracy was defined as true-positives plus true-negatives divided by the total population.

In one approach, every LN seen on histopathology was counted; in a different approach, only LNs larger than 3 mm were considered, according to the detection rates of the PET/CT.

RESULTS

Lesion-Based Analysis

Lymphadenectomy was performed on all 96 patients, yielding 1,746 LNs. Histology was set as the gold standard. Diagnostic imaging findings were compared with histopathology findings to determine the descriptive statistics. In total, 92 positive LNs were detected on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. Detailed findings for individual patients are listed in Supplemental Tables 2 and 3.

Overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV on lesion-based analysis were 71.2%, 99.5%, 91.3%, and 97.9%, respectively (Table 2). In total, 104 of 1,746 (6.0%) resected LNs were larger than 3 mm and positive on histopathology, and of these 104 LNs, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT correctly detected 85 (81.7%). For LNs larger than 3 mm, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV on lesion-based analysis were 81.7%, 99.6%, 92.4%, and 98.9%, respectively (Table 3). Cases of correctly staged patients are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Cases of mismatch between imaging and histopathology are shown in Figures 3 and 4.

View this table:
TABLE 2

Lesion-Based Analysis of PET Findings and Histopathology for All Malignant Nodes

View this table:
TABLE 3

Lesion-Based Analysis of PET Findings and Histopathology for Nodes Larger Than 3 mm in Histopathology

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

(A–C) Axial 18F-PSMA-1007 PET (A), CT (B), and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT (C) images of 73-y-old patient with prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score, 4 + 3; T3bN1M0; correlation between PET/CT and histopathology for exemplary LN). (D) Confirmed histopathologic staining (hematoxylin and eosin, ×10) of acinar structures of prostate adenocarcinoma (dashed outline) adjacent to normal LN structures. Quantitative gray scale and color scale represent SUV from 0.00 to 5.00.

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.

(A–C) Axial 18F-PSMA-1007 PET (A), CT (B), and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT (C) images of 67-year old patient with prostate adenocarcinoma (prostate-specific antigen level, 21.0 ng/mL; Gleason score, 3 + 4; T3bN1M0). (D) Confirmed histopathologic staining (hematoxylin and eosin, ×10) of acinar structures of prostate adenocarcinoma (dashed outline) adjacent to normal LN structures. Quantitative gray scale and color scale represent SUV from 0.00 to 5.00.

FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.

Axial CT (A), 18F-PSMA-1007 PET (B), and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT (C) images of 65-y-old patient with prostate adenocarcinoma (initial PSA, 23.8 ng/mL). There is 1 positive LN (arrowhead) close to plexus sacralis that was not removed during surgery. Patient’s prostate-specific antigen level continued to rise after surgery, indicating that retained node was malignant.

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.

Axial CT (A), 18F-PSMA-1007 PET (B), and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT (C) images of suspected lesion (arrowhead) in left iliac chain with SUV of 20.8. Histopathology revealed LN conglomerate of 3 positive LNs.

Patient-Based Analysis

A patient-based analysis was performed (Supplemental Tables 2 and 3). The fraction of detected positive and negative nodes per patient was calculated. Of the 96 patients in the study, 31 (32.3%) had proven LN metastasis based on a histopathologic size larger than 3 mm (N+); 65 patients were categorized as N0.

The patient-based analysis showed a sensitivity of 85.9% (SE, 4.38%) for detecting LNs larger than 3 mm and a specificity of 99.5% (SE, 0.25%). The patient-based sensitivity for detecting LNs regardless of size was 73.5% (SE, 5.82%), and the specificity was 99.4% (SE, 0.28%).

Moreover, a rather strict analysis was performed for agreement between histopathology and PET/CT with regard to the exact number of positive nodes. True-positives and true-negatives were defined as the exact consensus for the number of positive and negative nodes. A false-positive was noted if PET/CT detected more LNs than histopathology. A false-negative was counted when there were more positive nodes on histopathology. Results for LNs larger than 3 mm for this strict analysis were as follows: sensitivity, 64.3% (SE, 11.29%); specificity, 91.2% (SE, 3.60%); PPV, 75%; and NPV, 86.1%. For all LNs regardless of size, sensitivity was 50% (SE, 13.36%), specificity was 89.7% (SE, 3.89%), PPV was 66.7%, and NPV was 81.3%.

Diagnostic Accuracy in Biochemical Recurrence

Nine patients with biochemical recurrence were included. In total, 143 LNs were resected from those patients. For LNs larger than 3 mm, the correlation between imaging and histopathology showed a sensitivity of 78.6%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, and a NPV of 97.7% in a lesion-based analysis. When all lesions regardless of size were included, sensitivity was 57.9%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 93.9%.

DISCUSSION

Staging and restaging of prostate cancer are essential to determine the most appropriate treatment modality. It is vital that any imaging test used for staging be reliable to avoid any unnecessary or harmful intervention. This study demonstrated that the tracer 18F-PSMA-1007 has high sensitivity and extraordinary specificity for LN metastases in prostate cancer patients undergoing lymphadenectomy.

Table 4 gives an overview of the detected rates for 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007. These rates equal or are even higher than those in comparative reports. Of note, specificity was nearly perfect and PPV very high, indicating that false-positives are rare.

View this table:
TABLE 4

Results After Comparison Between PET/CT and Histopathology

In a prospective evaluation, the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA for N-staging in the setting of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy was evaluated. The sensitivity of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI was 72%–100% and the specificity 96%–100% in a regional analysis (12). In a systematic review and metaanalysis by Kimura et al. (13), 14 studies were included, looking at the performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence. The lesion-based sensitivity was 84% and the specificity 97%. Those results are comparable to the numbers published in this study for biochemical recurrence.

Correlating imaging and histopathologic findings in LNs is challenging. To accurately account for nodes, the imaging must be reviewed with the surgeon since it is technically not possible to remove every node safely. Positive PET/CT findings outside the surgical area (e.g., perilous location close to other organs or vessels) were excluded from the evaluation. Moreover, there may be difficulties colocalizing imaging findings to specific histologic findings. A typical example of such difficulties is shown in Figure 3.

In 2 patients, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT detected lesions with extremely high SUVs. In these cases, histopathology demonstrated the confluence of 2 or more nodes directly adjacent to each other. Therefore, imaging showed a LN conglomerate and not a single suggestive node (Fig.4).

Other limitations of this study are the retrospective design, with an inherent selection bias; the lack of standardization of the imaging protocols among the different centers; and a long interval between imaging and surgery.

Additionally, some nodes contained only small amounts of cancer, likely below the detection threshold of PET/CT; therefore, 2 approaches were used. In the first, all nodes positive on histopathology were considered. In the second, only LN metastases larger than 3 mm were considered.

In a study of LN size, lesions between 2 and 3 mm were detected with a sensitivity of only 13.3%, whereas those measuring 5–6 mm were seen in 57.4% of the cases (14). Maurer et al. revealed that most of the LNs that were missed on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT measured 3 ± 1 mm (15). In a recent study, the median size of the LNs that were not detected by18F-radiohybrid-PSMA PET was 4.5 mm (range, 0.3–15 mm) (16).

CONCLUSION

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT demonstrates a high sensitivity and extraordinary specificity in detecting affected LNs in prostate cancer. The results are at least comparable to existing data for 68Ga-labeled PSMA tracers on a per-lesion basis.

DISCLOSURE

A patent application has been filed for PSMA-1007 by Uwe Haberkorn and Frederik Giesel. Frederik Giesel is medical advisor for ABX advanced biochemical compound, Telix Pharmaceuticals and Sofie Biosciences. Matthias Eiber received research and travel support from ABX and Blue Earth Diagnostics and holds patent rights on rhPSMA. Kambiz Rhabar has received consultant fees from Bayer and ABX and lectureship fees from Janssen Cilag, Amgen, AAA and SIRTEX, and travel expenses from Endocyte as unpaid member of the VISION Trial Steering Committee. Dr. Juergen Debus reports grants from Viewray Inc., grants from CRI The Clinical Research Institute GmbH, grants from Accuray International Sari, grants from RaySearch Laboratories AB, grants from Vision RT Limited, grants from Merck Serono GmbH, grants from Astellas Pharma GmbH, grants from Astra Zeneca GmbH, grants from Siemens Healthcare GmbH, grants from Solution Akademie GmbH, grants from Egomed PLC Surrey Research Park, grants from Quintiles GmbH, grants from Pharmaceutical Research Associates GmbH, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH&CoKG, grants from PTW-Freiburg Dr. Pychlau GmbH, and grants from Nanobiotix S.A, outside the submitted work. Travel support was provided from ABX. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

  • QUESTION: Can 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT reliably detect malignant LNs?

  • PERTINENT FINDINGS: In this investigation assembling over 1,700 LNs in 96 patients from 5 centers around the globe, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT demonstrated a high sensitivity and extraordinary specificity in detecting affected LNs in prostate cancer.

  • IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT can be used for staging and restaging in prostate cancer and reliably detects positive LNs.

Acknowledgments

We would like to kindly express our great appreciation to the departments of pathology situated in Heidelberg, Munich, Osaka, and Santiago.

Footnotes

  • Published online Aug. 17, 2020.

Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Torre LA,
    2. Siegel RL,
    3. Ward EM,
    4. et al
    . Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends: an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25:16–27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hofman MS,
    2. Lawrentschuk N,
    3. Francis R,
    4. et al
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395:1208–1216.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Avtzi E,
    3. Giesel FL,
    4. et al
    . The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:197–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    1. Perera M,
    2. Papa N,
    3. Christidis D,
    4. et al
    . Sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of positive 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70:926–937.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Woythal N,
    2. Arsenic R,
    3. Kempkensteffen C,
    4. et al
    . Immunohistochemical validation of PSMA expression measured by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:238–243.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Rahbar K,
    2. Weckesser M,
    3. Ahmadzadehfar H,
    4. et al
    . Advantage of 18F-PSMA-1007 over 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging for differentiation of local recurrence vs. urinary tracer excretion. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1076–1077.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sanchez-Crespo A
    . Comparison of gallium-68 and fluorine-18 imaging characteristics in positron emission tomography. Appl Radiat Isot. 2013;76:55–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Giesel FL,
    2. Hadaschik B,
    3. Cardinale J,
    4. et al
    . F-18 labelled PSMA-1007: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and histopathological validation of tumor lesions in prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:678–688.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kesch C,
    2. Vinsensia M,
    3. Radtke JP,
    4. et al
    . Intraindividual comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, multiparametric MRI, and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with primary prostate cancer: a retrospective, proof-of-concept study. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1805–1810.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Cardinale J,
    2. Martin R,
    3. Remde Y,
    4. et al
    . Procedures for the GMP-compliant production and quality control of [18F]PSMA-1007: a next generation radiofluorinated tracer for the detection of prostate cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2017;10:77.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hofman MS,
    2. Hicks RJ,
    3. Maurer T,
    4. et al
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET: clinical utility in prostate cancer, normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 2018;38:200–217.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Abufaraj M,
    2. Grubmuller B,
    3. Zeitlinger M,
    4. et al
    . Prospective evaluation of the performance of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) for lymph node staging in patients undergoing superextended salvage lymph node dissection after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2169–2177.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kimura S,
    2. Abufaraj M,
    3. Janisch F,
    4. et al
    . Performance of [68Ga] Ga-PSMA 11 PET for detecting prostate cancer in the lymph nodes before salvage lymph node dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020;23:1–10.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Jilg CA,
    2. Schultze-Seemann W,
    3. Drendel V,
    4. et al
    . Detection of lymph node metastasis in patients with nodal prostate cancer relapse using 18F/11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. J Urol. 2014;192:103–110.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Maurer T,
    2. Gschwend JE,
    3. Rauscher I,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic efficacy of 68gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;195:1436–1443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kroenke M,
    2. Wurzer A,
    3. Schwamborn K,
    4. et al
    . Histologically confirmed diagnostic efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for N-staging of patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:710–715.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    1. Hope TA,
    2. Goodman JZ,
    3. Allen IE,
    4. et al
    . Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy for the detection of prostate cancer validated by histopathology. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:786–793.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.
    1. Kuten J,
    2. Fahoum I,
    3. Savin Z,
    4. et al
    . Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in staging prostate cancer using histopathology and immunohistochemical analysis as a reference standard J Nucl Med. 2020;61:527–532.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication April 3, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication June 4, 2020.
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords