Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleTheranostics

Patients Resistant Against PSMA-Targeting α-Radiation Therapy Often Harbor Mutations in DNA Damage-Repair–Associated Genes

Clemens Kratochwil, Frederik L. Giesel, Claus-Peter Heussel, Daniel Kazdal, Volker Endris, Cathleen Nientiedt, Frank Bruchertseifer, Maximilian Kippenberger, Hendrik Rathke, Jonas Leichsenring, Markus Hohenfellner, Alfred Morgenstern, Uwe Haberkorn, Stefan Duensing and Albrecht Stenzinger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (5) 683-688; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.234559
Clemens Kratochwil
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederik L. Giesel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claus-Peter Heussel
2Thorax Centre, Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Kazdal
3Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Volker Endris
3Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cathleen Nientiedt
4Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
5Section of Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Bruchertseifer
6Directorate for Nuclear Safety and Security, European Commission–Joint Research Centre, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maximilian Kippenberger
5Section of Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hendrik Rathke
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonas Leichsenring
3Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Hohenfellner
7Department of Urology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfred Morgenstern
6Directorate for Nuclear Safety and Security, European Commission–Joint Research Centre, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Haberkorn
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
8Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Duensing
5Section of Molecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
7Department of Urology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albrecht Stenzinger
3Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    (Left) Flowchart of patient selection. Biopsies were taken only from tumor lesions with nonresponse despite high uptake in PSMA PET scans. (Right) Patient with several 18F-FDG–positive (viable) and visually concordant PSMA-positive lesions (green arrows) at baseline. After 3 cycles of PSMA-targeted therapy, residual lesions (18F-FDG–positive) were demasked to be PSMA-negative (red arrows). MIP = maximum-intensity projection.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    (A) In PSMA PET/CT, residual lymph node metastasis with SUV of 37.7 remained after PSMA-targeted α-therapy. (B) In contrast-enhanced CT, location of metastasis was clearly delineated (encircled). (C and D) CT-guided biopsy was performed (C), and histopathologic validation of tumor lesion was obtained, for example, per PSMA immunohistochemistry (D).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Intrapatient tumor heterogeneity makes tissue sampling of the most appropriate index lesion challenging. (A) Baseline PSMA PET/CT demonstrated group of 3 lymph nodes with homogeneously intense uptake with SUVs of 29.7–35.5 (arrows). (B) After 225Ac-PSMA therapy, 2 lesions with SUVs of 29.7 and 32.0 showed morphologic response (green arrows), but index lesion with highest initial uptake (SUV, 35.5) had increased size (red arrow) and persisting PSMA uptake (SUV, 30.0). (C) This lesion (encircled) was chosen for imaging-guided biopsy.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    (A and B) Baseline PSMA PET demonstrated intense uptake of PSMA ligand in axillary lymph node bulk. (C) Planar emission scan of 225Ac-PSMA validated positive tumor targeting during therapy. (D and E) Restaging PSMA PET revealed morphologic progression and even increased PSMA expression of lesion. (F) Consequently, lesion was chosen for CT-guided biopsy.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Characteristics

    Patient no.PSA (ng/mL)Location of metastasesPrevious pharmacotherapyPrevious radiotherapyPrevious radioactive drugs
    1227LN, bone, liver, adrenalAbi, Doce, EnzaRTx, bone177Lu (27.9 GBq)
    2239Bone, LN, lung, skinKeto, Estra, Doce, Abi, Trial, EnzaRTx, local and bone90Y (7.4 GBq)
    3697LN, bone, adrenalAbi, Doce, Trial, CabaziRTx, pelvic and boneNone
    4111LN, boneAbi, Enza, DoceRTx, pelvic and bone177Lu (16 GBq)
    5481LiverAbi, Enza, Doce, CabaziRTx, local and pelvicNone
    6759LN, boneAbi, Enza, Doce, CabaziRTx, local, pelvic, and bone177Lu (44.4 GBq)
    71,658LN, boneAbi, Doce, Cabazi, Estra, EnzaRTx, local and pelvicNone
    • PSA = prostate-specific antigene; LN = lymph node; Abi = abiraterone; Doce = docetaxel; Enza = enzalutamide; RTx = radiotherapy; Keto = ketoconazole; Estra = estramustine; Trial = Phase-1 trial of BAY2010112 (NCT01723475); Cabazi = cabazitaxel.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Summary of Observed Gene Defects and Previous Exposure to 225Ac-PSMA617

    Patient no.225Ac dose (MBq), cumulativeProbable deleterious mutationWhole-gene deletionLow-level amplificationVariants of unknown significance
    112 (fractions, 6/6)ATMTP53—FAM175A
    214 (fractions, 6/8)BRCA1, PMS1, ×2 TP53——ATM, BARD1, 3xERCC2, ERCC4, FANCB, FANCG
    314 (fractions, 6/8)CHEK2FANCB, NBN, ATMATR, BRIP1 SLX4FANCL, RECQL4
    422 (fractions, 6/6/6/4)———MSH2
    520 (fractions, 8/6/6)PALB2——SLX4
    618 (fractions, 6/6/6)TP53, CHEK2MSH2, MSH6—BRCA1
    718 (fractions, 8/6/4)—BRCA2—ERCC2, SLX4, RAD50
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue 5
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patients Resistant Against PSMA-Targeting α-Radiation Therapy Often Harbor Mutations in DNA Damage-Repair–Associated Genes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Patients Resistant Against PSMA-Targeting α-Radiation Therapy Often Harbor Mutations in DNA Damage-Repair–Associated Genes
Clemens Kratochwil, Frederik L. Giesel, Claus-Peter Heussel, Daniel Kazdal, Volker Endris, Cathleen Nientiedt, Frank Bruchertseifer, Maximilian Kippenberger, Hendrik Rathke, Jonas Leichsenring, Markus Hohenfellner, Alfred Morgenstern, Uwe Haberkorn, Stefan Duensing, Albrecht Stenzinger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (5) 683-688; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.234559

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patients Resistant Against PSMA-Targeting α-Radiation Therapy Often Harbor Mutations in DNA Damage-Repair–Associated Genes
Clemens Kratochwil, Frederik L. Giesel, Claus-Peter Heussel, Daniel Kazdal, Volker Endris, Cathleen Nientiedt, Frank Bruchertseifer, Maximilian Kippenberger, Hendrik Rathke, Jonas Leichsenring, Markus Hohenfellner, Alfred Morgenstern, Uwe Haberkorn, Stefan Duensing, Albrecht Stenzinger
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (5) 683-688; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.234559
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • mCRPC Patients Receiving 225Ac-PSMA-617 Therapy in the Post-Androgen Deprivation Therapy Setting: Response to Treatment and Survival Analysis
  • Pharmacogenomics in Radionuclide Therapy: Impact on Response to Theranostics
  • Mechanisms of Resistance to Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radioligand Therapy in a Mouse Model of Prostate Cancer
  • The PSMA-targeting Half-life Extended BiTE Therapy AMG 160 has Potent Antitumor Activity in Preclinical Models of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • Determination of the Intralesional Distribution of Theranostic 124I-Omburtamab Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data
  • 177Lu-Labeled Anticlaudin 6 Monoclonal Antibody for Targeted Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
Show more Theranostics

Clinical

  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Ac-225
  • next-generation sequencing
  • tumor genome
  • PSMA-617
  • 225Ac
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire