Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleTheranostics

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma: Implications for Radiotherapeutic Management in 121 Patients

Stefan A. Koerber, Leon Will, Clemens Kratochwil, Matthias F. Haefner, Hendrik Rathke, Christophe Kremer, Jonas Merkle, Klaus Herfarth, Klaus Kopka, Peter L. Choyke, Tim Holland-Letz, Uwe Haberkorn, Juergen Debus and Frederik L. Giesel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2019, 60 (2) 234-240; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.211086
Stefan A. Koerber
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
3National Center of Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leon Will
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemens Kratochwil
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
5Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias F. Haefner
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
3National Center of Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hendrik Rathke
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christophe Kremer
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonas Merkle
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Herfarth
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
3National Center of Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Kopka
6Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
7German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter L. Choyke
8Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim Holland-Letz
9Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Haberkorn
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
5Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juergen Debus
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
3National Center of Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederik L. Giesel
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
5Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
7German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging on radiotherapeutic management. RT = radiation therapy.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (C and D) guided radiotherapy (E and F) with simultaneous integrated boost of 2 lymph node metastases for a high-risk prostate cancer patient with negative CT scan (A and B).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT–guided radiotherapy de-escalated after 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Whereas MRI and CT demonstrated suspicious nodes (A and B), 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT showed no increased activity in nodes (C). Thus, treatment could be planned for prostate itself with reduced doses to pelvic side walls.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Characteristics

    CharacteristicAll patientsInitial diagnosisPSA persistence after surgeryPSA recurrence
    No. of patients121501160
    Median age (y)71 (50–84)72 (50–84)67 (53–75)69 (50–84)
    Gleason score (n)
     ≤66 (5.0%)4 (8.0%)—2 (3.3%)
     759 (48.8%)18 (36.0%)2 (18.2%)39 (65.0%)
     ≥855 (45.5%)28 (56.0%)9 (81.8%)18 (30.0%)
     Unknown1 (0.8%)——1 (1.7%)
    Median iPSA (ng/mL)9.95 (1.40–520.00)11.9 (3.50–313.13)18.58 (5.20–87.55)9.14 (1.40–520.00)
    Nadir PSA (ng/mL)0.09 (<0.01–9.70)—1.36 (0.53–9.70)0.07 (<0.01–3.00)
    PSA at PET (ng/mL)3.06 (0.03–41.24)9.76 (0.06–37.10)1.27 (0.03–9.70)1.10 (0.10–41–24)
    Risk group according  to D’Amico (n)
     Low3 (2.5%)3 (6.0%)——
     Intermediate12 (9.9%)9 (18.0%)—3 (5.0%)
     High106 (87.6%)38 (76.0%)11 (100.0%)57 (95.0%)
    Ongoing ADT (n)
     Yes26 (21.5%)12 (24.0%)5 (45.5%)9 (15.0%)
     No95 (78.5%)38 (76.0%)6 (54.5%)51 (85.0%)
    Prior RP only34 (28.1%)—11 (100.0%)23 (38.3%)
    Prior RT only5 (4.1%)——5 (8.3%)
    Prior RP and RT32 (26.4%)——32 (53.3%)
    Surgery margin
     R040 (33.1%)—2 (18.2%)38 (69.1%)
     R124 (19.8%)—9 (81.8%)15 (27.3%)
     Rx2 (1.7%)——2 (3.6%)
    • iPSA = initial prostate-specific antigen serum level; ADT = androgen deprivation therapy; RP = radical prostatectomy; RT = radiotherapy.

    • Data in parentheses are ranges unless otherwise indicated.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Comparison of Conventional and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging

    CharacteristicConventional imaging68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CTChangeP
    Local relapse (n)
     PSA recurrence/persistence30/71 (42.3%)<0.001
      Total
      rcTx33/71 (46.5%)8/71 (11.3%)
      rcT033/71 (46.5%)53/71 (74.6%)
      rcT+5/71 (7.0%)10/71 (14.1%)
    Lymph node spread (n)
     All patients15/121 (12.4%)39/121 (32.2%)25/121 (20.7%)*<0.001
     Initial diagnosis5/50 (10.0%)8/50 (16.0%)5/50 (10.0%)
      Intern iliac vessels—2/50 (4.0%)†
      Extern iliac vessels5/50 (10.0%)†5/50 (10.0%)†
      Presacral1/50 (2.0%)†2/50 (4.0%)†
      Obturatoric vessels—2/50 (4.0%)†
      Other—1/50 (2.0%)†
     PSA recurrence/persistence10/71 (14.1%)31/71 (43.7%)20/71 (28.2%)
      Intern iliac vessels3/71 (4.2%)†10/71 (14.1%)†
      Extern iliac vessels3/71 (4.2%)†13/71 (18.3%)†
      Presacral3/71 (4.2%)†12/71 (16.9%)†
      Obturatoric vessels—2/71 (2.8%)*
      Other2/71 (2.8%)†8/71 (11.3%)†
    Distant metastases (n)
     All patients26/121 (21.5%)41/121 (33.9%)23/121 (19.0%)*<0.001
     Initial diagnosis3/50 (6.0%)5/50 (10.0%)7/50 (14.0%)
      Lymph nodes2/50 (4.0%)3/50 (6.0%)†
      Bone1/50 (2.0%)3/50 (6.0%)†
      Other——
     PSA recurrence/persistence23/71 (32.4%)36/71 (50.7%)16/71 (22.5%)
      Lymph nodes2/71 (2.8%)8/71 (11.3%)†
      Bone18/71 (25.4%)27/71 (38.0%)†
      Other3/71 (4.2%)3/71 (4.2%)†
    • ↵* Also, some patients with change in T staging.

    • ↵† Some patients with multiple forms of lymphatic/distant spread.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Overview of Changes in Radiotherapeutic Management According to 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT

    CharacteristicAll patientsInitial diagnosisPSA persistence/recurrence
    Individual RT concept (n)5/22 (22.7%)37/40 (92.5%)
    SIB lymph node26/62 (41.9%)4/22 (18.2%)22/40 (55.0%)
    SBRT lymph node5/62 (8.1%)1/22 (4.6%)4/40 (10.0%)
    SBRT bone lesion6/62 (9.7%)—6/40 (15.0%)
    Other5/62 (8.1%)—5/40 (12.5%)
    RT de-escalation (n)16/62 (25.8%)15/22 (68.2%)1/40 (2.5%)
    Palliative treatment (n)4/62 (6.5%)2/22 (9.1%)2/40 (5.0%)
    • RT = radiotherapy; SIB = simultaneous integrated boost; SBRT = stereotactic body irradiation.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Changes in Radiotherapeutic Management After Additional 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging in Detail [n, (%)]

    RT after 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging
    Planned RT before 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imagingRT prostate onlyRT prostate and pLNRT prostate, pLN and SIBSBRT onlyADTOther, individual RT conceptRT pLN and SIBSystemic chemotherapy
    RT prostate onlyX—4/62 (6.5%)2/62 (3.2%)1/62 (1.6%)1/62 (1.6%)——
    RT prostate and pLN15/62 (24.2%)X8/62 (12.9%)——1/62 (1.6%)——
    RT prostate, pLN, and SIB—1/62 (1.6%)X1/62 (1.6%)2/62 (3.2%)3/62 (4.8%)——
    SBRT only———X—3/62 (4.8%)1/62 (1.6%)1/62 (1.6%)
    ADT———5/62 (8.1%)X4/62 (6.5%)6/62 (9.7%)—
    Individual RT concept—————X2/62 (3.2%)—
    BSC———1/62 (1.6%)————
    • RT = radiotherapy; pLN = pelvic lymph nodes; SIB = simultaneous integrated boost; SBRT = stereotactic body radiotherapy, ADT = androgen deprivation therapy; BSC = best supportive care.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 60 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue 2
February 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma: Implications for Radiotherapeutic Management in 121 Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma: Implications for Radiotherapeutic Management in 121 Patients
Stefan A. Koerber, Leon Will, Clemens Kratochwil, Matthias F. Haefner, Hendrik Rathke, Christophe Kremer, Jonas Merkle, Klaus Herfarth, Klaus Kopka, Peter L. Choyke, Tim Holland-Letz, Uwe Haberkorn, Juergen Debus, Frederik L. Giesel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2019, 60 (2) 234-240; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.211086

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma: Implications for Radiotherapeutic Management in 121 Patients
Stefan A. Koerber, Leon Will, Clemens Kratochwil, Matthias F. Haefner, Hendrik Rathke, Christophe Kremer, Jonas Merkle, Klaus Herfarth, Klaus Kopka, Peter L. Choyke, Tim Holland-Letz, Uwe Haberkorn, Juergen Debus, Frederik L. Giesel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2019, 60 (2) 234-240; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.211086
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impact of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT on Staging and Oncologic Management in a Cohort of 226 Patients with Various Cancers
  • A 2022 International Survey on the Status of Prostate Cancer Theranostics
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • Determination of the Intralesional Distribution of Theranostic 124I-Omburtamab Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data
  • 177Lu-Labeled Anticlaudin 6 Monoclonal Antibody for Targeted Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
Show more Theranostics

Clinical

  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • PSMA
  • PET/CT
  • radiotherapy
  • staging
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire