Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleCardiology

Quantification and Determination of Normal 123I-Meta Iodobenzylguanidine Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio (HMR) from Cardiac SPECT/CT and Correlation with Planar HMR

Raza Alvi, Edward J. Miller, Taraneh Hashemi Zonouz, Veronica Sandoval, Noor Tariq, Rachel Lampert, Albert J. Sinusas and Yi-Hwa Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2018, 59 (4) 652-658; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.197152
Raza Alvi
1Nuclear Cardiology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
2Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward J. Miller
1Nuclear Cardiology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
2Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
3Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taraneh Hashemi Zonouz
2Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Veronica Sandoval
1Nuclear Cardiology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noor Tariq
2Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Lampert
2Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert J. Sinusas
1Nuclear Cardiology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
2Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
3Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi-Hwa Liu
1Nuclear Cardiology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
2Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
4Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Flowchart of patient study, 123I-mIBG planar and SPECT imaging, and data analyses.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Planar-HMR quantification methods: planar images with heart and mediastinal ROIs (A–C) and schematics showing relative positions of heart and mediastinal regions in 2D (D). SPECT HMR quantification methods from fused SPECT/CT images: coregistered central SPECT and CT slices of heart and mediastinal regions (E–G) and schematics showing relative positions of heart and 2 different mediastinal regions in 3D (H).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Correlations between planar HMR quantified using region-growing ROI and SPECT HMRs calculated on basis of 3 background (BKG) regions: HMRBKG-LM (A), HMRBKG-CL (B), and HMRBKG-UM (C), and correlation between planar and SPECT mean counts in heart ROI (D).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Correlations of SPECT HMRBKG-UM at 180 min versus (A) 120 min, (B) 90 min, and (C) 30 min, after 123I-mIBG injection.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Early and Delayed Planar HMR for Intra- and Interobserver Analysis

    Traditional methodElliptic methodRegion-growing method
    ReproducibilityEarly HMRDelayed HMREarly HMRDelayed HMREarly HMRDelayed HMR
    Intraobserver
     First measurement2.01 ± 0.182.12 ± 0.251.97 ± 0.172.09 ± 0.221.99 ± 0.192.14 ± 0.25
     Second measurement1.98 ± 0.192.08 ± 0.261.95 ± 0.162.07 ± 0.211.97 ± 0.172.12 ± 0.23
     ICC0.890.870.940.930.970.97
     95% confidence interval0.67−0.960.66–0.970.72−0.990.74−0.980.92−0.990.82–0.99
    Interobserver
     First observer2.01 ± 0.202.12 ± 0.251.97 ± 0.172.13 ± 0.231.99 ± 0.192.14 ± 0.25
     Second observer1.97 ± 0.232.09 ± 0.261.98 ± 0.192.12 ± 0.252.00 ± 0.202.11 ± 0.25
     ICC0.800.860.950.950.980.98
     95% confidence interval0.52−0.920.62–0.950.92−0.990.91−0.990.95−0.990.94−0.99
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Washout Rates for Intra- and Interobserver Analysis

    Traditional methodElliptic methodRegion-growing method
    ReproducibilityWRWRBKG-correctedWRWRBKG-correctedWRWRBKG-corrected
    Intraobserver
     First measurement20.7 ± 5.115.0 ± 9.921.6 ± 4.517.0 ± 8.921.8 ± 4.617.6 ± 9.1
     Second measurement21.5 ± 4.916.5 ± 9.522.6 ± 5.119.9 ± 8.322.8 ± 5.320.2 ± 8.7
     ICC0.840.800.920.820.940.86
     95% confidence interval−0.16−0.96−0.18−0.940.76−0.960.55−0.930.79−0.970.64−0.94
    Interobserver
     First observer20.7 ± 5.115.0 ± 9.921.6 ± 4.517.0 ± 8.921.8 ± 4.617.6 ± 9.1
     Second observer21.5 ± 4.618.1 ± 8.121.3 ± 5.017.4 ± 9.021.6 ± 5.018.0 ± 9.1
     ICC0.860.750.940.800.960.85
     95% confidence interval0.60−0.970.50−0.920.84−0.970.51−0.920.88−0.980.60−0.94
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    SPECT HMR and Intra- and Interobserver Analysis

    ReproducibilityHMRBKG-UMHMRBKG-LMHMRBKG-CL
    Intraobserver
     First measurement8.0 ± 1.25.7 ± 1.33.9 ± 1.3
     Second measurement7.9 ± 1.25.6 ± 1.34.0 ± 1.3
     Mean LLN(5.6 + 5.6)/2 = 5.6(3.0 + 3.0)/2 = 3.0(1.4 + 1.4)/2 = 1.4
     ICC0.960.960.95
     95% confidence interval0.909–0.9850.911–0.9950.893–0.985
    Interobserver
     First observer8.0 ± 1.25.7 ± 1.33.9 ± 1.3
     Second observer8.0 ± 1.35.5 ± 1.34.0 ± 1.25
     Mean LLN(5.6 + 5.4)/2 = 5.5(3.0 + 3.0)/2 = 3.0(1.4 + 1.5)/2 = 1.45
     ICC0.950.970.95
     95% confidence interval0.903–0.9890.941–0.9940.894–0.983
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    LLN for SPECT HMRBKG-UM

    Time after injectiont = 180 mint = 120 mint = 90 mint = 30 min
    Mean ± SD8.0 ± 1.27.3 ± 1.16.8 ± 1.15.5 ± 1.1
    LLN5.65.14.63.3

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 59 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue 4
April 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantification and Determination of Normal 123I-Meta Iodobenzylguanidine Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio (HMR) from Cardiac SPECT/CT and Correlation with Planar HMR
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Quantification and Determination of Normal 123I-Meta Iodobenzylguanidine Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio (HMR) from Cardiac SPECT/CT and Correlation with Planar HMR
Raza Alvi, Edward J. Miller, Taraneh Hashemi Zonouz, Veronica Sandoval, Noor Tariq, Rachel Lampert, Albert J. Sinusas, Yi-Hwa Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2018, 59 (4) 652-658; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.197152

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Quantification and Determination of Normal 123I-Meta Iodobenzylguanidine Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio (HMR) from Cardiac SPECT/CT and Correlation with Planar HMR
Raza Alvi, Edward J. Miller, Taraneh Hashemi Zonouz, Veronica Sandoval, Noor Tariq, Rachel Lampert, Albert J. Sinusas, Yi-Hwa Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2018, 59 (4) 652-658; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.197152
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Cardiology

  • Evaluating the Effect of Performing Adjunct Low-Level Exercise During Injection of Regadenoson
  • Time from Tc-99m Sestamibi Injection to Imaging Scan for Rest and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Use of Conventional Late Imaging Protocol for Dynamic SPECT Imaging
Show more Cardiology

Clinical

  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 123I labeled meta-iodobenzyl guanidine
  • SPECT
  • planar
  • heart-to-mediastinum ratio
  • mIBG quantification
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire