Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportCardiology

Time from Tc-99m Sestamibi Injection to Imaging Scan for Rest and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Daminik Patel, Ewelina Bobak, Michelle Coppens, Scott Leonard, Richard Weinberg and Ryan Avery
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2023, 64 (supplement 1) TS11;
Daminik Patel
1Northwestern Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ewelina Bobak
2Northwestern Memorial Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Coppens
2Northwestern Memorial Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Leonard
2Northwestern Memorial Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Weinberg
3Northwestern University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Avery
4Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

TS11

Introduction: The 2016 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC) Imaging Guidelines for SPECT Nuclear Cardiology Procedures recommend the times between injection and imaging using Tc-99m Sestamibi are as follows: minimum delay for a rest study is 45 to 60 minutes, 15 to 20 minutes for an exercise stress study, and 60 minutes for pharmacologic stress exam. After a recent review within our Nuclear Cardiology Department at Northwestern Memorial Hospital (NMH), our physicians were unsure if the department was following published guidelines. The purpose of this project was to evaluate rest and stress injection times vs. imaging time to see if NMH was following published ASNC guidelines for Tc-99m Sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging.

Methods: Data from 210 Nuclear Cardiology patient studies were collected using Visage Imaging software from October to November 2022. Injection time, scan time and the type of stress test were recorded for each patient. The injection times were compared along with the scan times for both rest and stress studies. Based on the aforementioned times from injection to imaging, it was noted whether the study adhered to published recommendations.

Results: Based on the data collection, the average uptake time for rest studies was 39.7 minutes with a standard deviation of 12.6 minutes. The average uptake time for an exercise stress study was 41.2 minutes with a standard deviation of 21.2 minutes. The average uptake time for pharmacologic stress study was 73.2 minutes with a standard deviation of 19.8 minutes.

Conclusions: The results revealed that rest and exercise stress studies at NMH were not within range of ASNC’s published guidelines. In particular, the average time from rest injection to imaging was shorter than the recommended minimum uptake time. Shorter uptake time from rest injection to imaging may adversely impact image quality due to increased subdiaphragmatic activity, and merits further investigation. Many factors may be affecting these results, such as camera availability and patient stability after stress testing. However, the results revealed that the average pharmacologic stress uptake times were within range of the published guidelines. In order to establish compliance with ASNC’s SPECT Nuclear Cardiology Guidelines, NMH may need to increase their patient appointment times to allow for appropriate timing on the cameras and educate the nuclear cardiology staff members on the ASNC recommendations.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue supplement 1
June 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Time from Tc-99m Sestamibi Injection to Imaging Scan for Rest and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Time from Tc-99m Sestamibi Injection to Imaging Scan for Rest and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Daminik Patel, Ewelina Bobak, Michelle Coppens, Scott Leonard, Richard Weinberg, Ryan Avery
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) TS11;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Time from Tc-99m Sestamibi Injection to Imaging Scan for Rest and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
Daminik Patel, Ewelina Bobak, Michelle Coppens, Scott Leonard, Richard Weinberg, Ryan Avery
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) TS11;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Effect of Performing Adjunct Low-Level Exercise During Injection of Regadenoson
  • Use of Conventional Late Imaging Protocol for Dynamic SPECT Imaging
Show more Cardiology

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire