Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Iterative factor analysis : Strategy for estimating input function in dynamic 18F-FDG brain PET

Chietsugu Katoh, Yuuki Tomiyama, Kenji Hirata, Tohru Shiga and Nagara Tamaki
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1932;
Chietsugu Katoh
1Health Sciences Hokkaido University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuuki Tomiyama
2Nuclear Medicine Hokkaido University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenji Hirata
2Nuclear Medicine Hokkaido University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tohru Shiga
2Nuclear Medicine Hokkaido University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nagara Tamaki
2Nuclear Medicine Hokkaido University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1932

Objectives We developed a new algorithm of iterative factor analysis, which enabled to estimate non-invasive measure of the input function in dynamic image data. Factor analysis has been tried to estimate input function and tissue component curve in the dynamic image data, however, it is hard to extract more than two independent factors robustly. Then we developed the iterative two-factor analysis to estimate the input function robustly. To evaluate the algorithm, dynamic 18F-FDG brain PET data were adopted, cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRGlc) was calculated using input functions both from sampled blood data and from estimated curve with iterative factor analysis.

Methods Ten patients (36.8±13.8 years old, male 5, female 5 ) with neurological diseases underwent 18F-FDG dynamic brain PET study for 60 minutes and serial blood sampling. CMRGlc were calculated on 100 ROIs in each patient's brain image with three compartment model analysis using time-activity plasma data. CMRGlc were recalculated on the same ROIs using the input function estimate d from the iterative two-factor analysis. The program of iterative two-factor analysis was developed by ourselves using Microsoft Visual C#. The first two-factor analysis was performed in the 32x16 pixels (5x2cm) rectangular ROI, which was set manually between the bilateral temporal bases, enclosing bilateral internal carotid arteries, cavernous sinuses and cerebral temporal lobes. The first factor analysis extracted the independent two factor curves and factor images which corresponded to the cerebral cortical component and blood component. The second two-factor analysis was performed only in the ROI data of the blood component image, the second factor analysis yielded the independent two factor curves and factor images which corresponded to the arterial blood component and cavernous sinus component. The third and the fourth two-factor analysis were performed only in the ROI data of the arterial blood component image, the third and fourth two-factor analysis extracted the independent two factor curves and factor images which corresponded to the arterial blood component in the internal carotid arteries and the surrounding venous blood component. Extracted arterial blood curve was multiplied by 1.1 to convert plasma curve data. The dynamic 18F-FDG brain PET data and estimated plasma curve from the second, third and fourth factor analysis were used to estimate CMRGlc on 100 ROIs in each patient's brain image with three compartment model analysis.

Results The factor curves and images which corresponded to the internal carotid artery by factor analysis with second, third and fourth iterations were estimated. They were compared with the sampled arterial blood curve, the curves from second and third iterations presented the mixed data of arterial blood, venous blood and surrounding tissue component, however, the fourth iteration yielded the carotid arterial curve which was almost same as the sampled arterial blood curve. Correlation coefficients between CMRGlc from sampled blood and from input curve by factor analysis with second, third and fourth iterations were 0.59±0.24, 0.74±0.17 and 0.92±0.03, respectively. The differences in these correlation coefficients were compared, factor analysis with fourth iteration yielded significantly high coefficient (P<0.001, ANOVA), We found that fourth iteration of factor analysis dedicated appropriate estimation of input function for dynamic 18F-FDG brain PET.

Conclusions Using iterative two-factor analysis, we established a method for estimating input function with 18F-FDG dynamic brain PET data. Two-factor analysis enabled to yield mathematically robust extraction of independent factor images and curves. And the iterative factor analysis enabled to yield the accurate factor image by taking multiple extracting steps. The iterative factor analysis will be useful method for various dynamic medical data.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Iterative factor analysis : Strategy for estimating input function in dynamic 18F-FDG brain PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Iterative factor analysis : Strategy for estimating input function in dynamic 18F-FDG brain PET
Chietsugu Katoh, Yuuki Tomiyama, Kenji Hirata, Tohru Shiga, Nagara Tamaki
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1932;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Iterative factor analysis : Strategy for estimating input function in dynamic 18F-FDG brain PET
Chietsugu Katoh, Yuuki Tomiyama, Kenji Hirata, Tohru Shiga, Nagara Tamaki
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 1932;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

  • Deep Learning Based Kidney Segmentation for Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement Using Quantitative SPECT/CT
  • Preclinical validation of a single-scan rest/stress imaging technique for 13NH3 cardiac perfusion studies
  • Comparison of 22 partial volume correction methods for amyloid PET imaging with 11C-PiB
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

MTA II: Data Analysis & Management Posters

  • Detection of dementia-related hypometabolism using two different age-adjusted reference FDG- PET databases
  • Localized Quantitative Analysis of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Lateralization and Surgical Intervention
  • An adaptive motion correction method for PET/CT Brain Imaging
Show more MTA II: Data Analysis & Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire