Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry for a Probe Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Imaging and Therapy

Ken Herrmann, Christina Bluemel, Martina Weineisen, Margret Schottelius, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Johannes Czernin, Uta Eberlein, Seval Beykan, Constantin Lapa, Hubertus Riedmiller, Markus Krebs, Saskia Kropf, Andreas Schirbel, Andreas K. Buck and Michael Lassmann
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2015, 56 (6) 855-861; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.156133
Ken Herrmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
2Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Bluemel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martina Weineisen
3Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margret Schottelius
3Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Jürgen Wester
3Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
4Scintomics GmbH, Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Czernin
2Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uta Eberlein
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seval Beykan
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Constantin Lapa
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hubertus Riedmiller
5Department of Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Krebs
5Department of Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saskia Kropf
4Scintomics GmbH, Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Schirbel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas K. Buck
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Lassmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Sequential scan of 70-y-old patient (P3; PSA level, 101.2 ng/mL) with initial diagnosis of prostate cancer (dotted arrow) showing high tumor-to-background ratio. Maximum-intensity projections (upper row) and axial slices (middle and lower rows) at different time points are displayed ([A] early rapid scan, [B] 1-h scan, [C] 2-h scan, [D] 4-h scan). Primary prostate cancer (middle row; 1-h SUVmax, 55.0) as well as numerous iliacal (lower row; 1-h SUVmax, 57.0) and mediastinal lymph node metastases (upper row; 1-h SUVmax, 31.4) can be depicted immediately after injection and up to 4 h.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Sequential patient scan (P1) of 67-y-old patient with biochemical relapse (PSA level, 6.7 ng/mL) 1.8 y after curative radiotherapy. Maximum-intensity projections (upper row) and axial slices (middle and lower row) of early rapid scan (A) and scans after 1 h (B), 2 h (C), and 4 h (D) show increased uptake in rib metastasis (A–D, arrows) and physiologic uptake in lacrimal glands, salivary glands, liver, spleen, kidneys, and slightly in bowel (A–D). Red dotted arrow in A depicts unspecific uptake in left subclavian vein.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Time–activity curves for P1 for all organs showing uptake, for whole body, and for blood. For blood, percentage of activity is given per liter of blood.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Temporal variation of SUVmax–body weight in visible lesions in P1 (red), P3 (light blue), P4 (green), and P5 (blue). P1-l1 = bone lesion; P3-l1 = lymph node mediastinal; P3-l2 = tumor tissue prostate; P3-l3 = lymph node iliacal; P4-l4 = lymph node; P5-l1 = tumor tissue prostate; P5-l2 = bone lesion.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patients’ Demographic Data

    Patient no.Age (y)Height (cm)Weight (kg)Activity (MBq)PDPET indicationPSA level (ng/mL)Gleason ScorePrevious treatmentPET findings
    166.81707414809/12Relapse6.77RTxB
    266.31789512401/13Relapse0.58RPTNone
    369.91728114607/14Staging101.27—Loc, B, LNs
    459.118511013307/11Relapse1.68RPT and RTxLNs
    563.5177709107/14Follow-up1.48ADTB, Loc
    • PD = primary diagnosis; RTx = radiotherapy; B = bone metastasis; RPT = radical prostatectomy; Loc = tumor tissue in the prostate; LN = lymph node metastasis; ADT = androgen-deprivation therapy.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Time-Integrated Activity Coefficients

    Time-integrated activity coefficients (h)
    Source organP1P2P3P4P5MeanSD
    Remainder1.0231.0290.9521.0980.9641.0130.059
    Liver0.1810.1410.1000.1420.1730.1470.032
    Right kidney0.0800.0680.0750.0780.0380.0680.018
    Left kidney0.0840.0760.0870.0730.0420.0730.018
    Kidneys, sum0.1640.1440.1630.1510.0800.1400.035
    Heart0.0210.0180.0150.0240.0170.0190.003
    Bladder contents0.0420.0290.0550.0390.0880.0510.023
    Gallbladder0.0020.0010.0010.0020.0020.0020.001
    Spleen0.0420.0100.0110.0190.0320.0230.014
    Parotid glands0.0100.0040.0050.0060.003
    Submandibular glands0.0050.0030.0040.0020.0030.0040.001
    LV2–40.0020.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.000
    Red marrow lumbar vertebrae0.0270.0130.0090.0180.0160.0170.007
    Red marrow blood0.0280.0260.0190.0240.0220.0240.003
    • Calculation methods for red marrow lumbar vertebrae and red marrow blood are presented in “Material and Methods” section.

    • P = patient; LV2–4 = lumbar vertebrae 2–4.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Absorbed Organ Dose Coefficients and Absorbed Organ Doses (150 MBq of 68Ga-PSMA)

    Target organβ (mGy/MBq)Photon (mGy/MBq)Total (mGy/MBq)Absorbed dose (mGy) (150 MBq)
    Adrenals5.87E–037.62E–031.35E–022.0
    Brain5.87E–032.43E–038.29E–031.2
    Breasts5.87E–032.58E–038.44E–031.3
    Gallbladder wall1.16E–027.99E–031.96E–022.9
    Lower large intestine wall5.87E–034.68E–031.06E–021.6
    Small intestine5.87E–035.24E–031.11E–021.7
    Stomach wall5.87E–035.24E–031.11E–021.7
    Upper large intestine wall5.87E–035.25E–031.11E–021.7
    Heart wall1.48E–025.36E–032.02E–023.0
    Kidneys1.96E–012.31E–022.20E–0133.0
    Liver3.30E–021.01E–024.31E–026.5
    Lungs5.87E–033.91E–039.78E–031.5
    Muscle5.87E–033.65E–039.52E–031.4
    Ovaries5.87E–034.94E–031.08E–021.6
    Pancreas5.87E–037.38E–031.32E–022.0
    Red marrow8.07E–034.35E–031.24E–021.9
    Osteogenic cells1.16E–024.04E–031.57E–022.4
    Skin5.87E–032.28E–038.15E–031.2
    Spleen5.26E–021.09E–026.34E–029.5
    Testes5.87E–033.28E–039.14E–031.4
    Thymus5.87E–033.62E–039.49E–031.4
    Thyroid5.87E–033.15E–039.01E–031.4
    Urinary bladder wall5.70E–021.03E–026.74E–0210.1
    Uterus5.87E–035.72E–031.16E–021.7
    Salivary glands6.07E–02—6.07E–029.1
    Total body7.88E–033.85E–031.17E–021.8
    Effective dose coefficient (mSv/MBq)1.99E–02
    Effective dose coefficient (mSv/MBq)*1.93E–02 ± 0.09E–02
    Effective dose (mSv)3.0
    • ↵* Mean effective dose coefficient of P1–P5.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Comparison of Absorbed Dose Coefficients and Absorbed Doses for Several Prostate-Specific Compounds

    124I-PSMA123I-MIP-1072123I-MIP-1095PentixaforDOTATOCDOTATATE18F-FDGPSMA-IT
    Target organUnitZechmann (33)Barrett (36)Barrett (36)Herrmann (25)Sandstrom (34)Sandstrom (34)ICRP 106 (35)This work
    KidneysmSv/MBq1.39E+005.4E–021.10E–23.50E–028.20E–029.30E–021.70E–022.20E–01
    LivermSv/MBq1.66E–002.4E–025.8E–21.75E–024.10E–025.00E–022.10E–024.31E–02
    SpleenmSv/MBq7.7E–012.3E–24.7E–25.38E–021.08E–011.09E–011.10E–026.34E–02
    Urinary bladder wallmSv/MBq5.7E–019.2E–22.1E–28.14E–021.19E–019.80E–021.30E–016.74E–02
    Effective dose coefficientmSv/MBq5.8E–012.5E–23.2E–21.56E–022.10E–022.10E–021.90E–021.99E–02
    Typical injected activityMBq67370370150185150370150
    Effective dosemSv38.99.311.82.33.93.27.03.0
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 6
June 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry for a Probe Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Imaging and Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry for a Probe Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Imaging and Therapy
Ken Herrmann, Christina Bluemel, Martina Weineisen, Margret Schottelius, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Johannes Czernin, Uta Eberlein, Seval Beykan, Constantin Lapa, Hubertus Riedmiller, Markus Krebs, Saskia Kropf, Andreas Schirbel, Andreas K. Buck, Michael Lassmann
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2015, 56 (6) 855-861; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156133

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry for a Probe Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Imaging and Therapy
Ken Herrmann, Christina Bluemel, Martina Weineisen, Margret Schottelius, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Johannes Czernin, Uta Eberlein, Seval Beykan, Constantin Lapa, Hubertus Riedmiller, Markus Krebs, Saskia Kropf, Andreas Schirbel, Andreas K. Buck, Michael Lassmann
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2015, 56 (6) 855-861; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156133
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Delayed Imaging Improves Lesion Detectability in [99mTc]Tc-PSMA-I&S SPECT/CT in Recurrent Prostate Cancer
  • Matched-Pair Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 240 Prostate Cancer Patients: Interreader Agreement and Lesion Detection Rate of Suspected Lesions
  • Diagnostic Performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results from the CONDOR Phase III, Multicenter Study
  • Therapeutic Efficacy of a Bivalent Inhibitor of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Labeled with 67Cu
  • Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer
  • Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses of Biodistribution and PET Image Quality of a Novel Radiohybrid PSMA, 18F-rhPSMA-7, in Patients with Prostate Cancer
  • Impact of 18F-PSMA-1007 Uptake in Prostate Cancer Using Different Peptide Concentrations: Preclinical PET/CT Study on Mice
  • First Clinicopathologic Evidence of a Non-PSMA-Related Uptake Mechanism for 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Salivary Glands
  • Phase I Study of CTT1057, an 18F-Labeled Imaging Agent with Phosphoramidate Core Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Prostate Cancer
  • Initial Experience with Volumetric 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for Assessment of Whole-Body Tumor Burden as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Patients with Prostate Cancer
  • Seduction by Sensitivity: Reality, Illusion, or Delusion? The Challenge of Assessing Outcomes after PSMA Imaging Selection of Patients for Treatment
  • 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in the Detection of Prostate Cancer at 60 and 120 Minutes: Detection Rate, Image Quality, Activity Kinetics, and Biodistribution
  • Glu-Ureido-Based Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: Lessons Learned During the Development of a Novel Class of Low-Molecular-Weight Theranostic Radiotracers
  • The Clinical Impact of Additional Late PET/CT Imaging with 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
  • Safety, Dosimetry, and Tumor Detection Ability of 68Ga-NOTA-AE105: First-in-Human Study of a Novel Radioligand for uPAR PET Imaging
  • 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT-based Radiotherapy for Lymph Node Relapse of Prostate Cancer After Primary Therapy Delays Initiation of Systemic Therapy
  • Evaluation of 68Ga-Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II Ligand Positron Emission Tomography for Clinical Molecular Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Neovascularization
  • The Rise of PSMA Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy of Prostate Cancer
  • 177Lu-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Safety and Efficacy
  • New Strategies in Prostate Cancer: Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Ligands for Diagnosis and Therapy
  • The Theranostic PSMA Ligand PSMA-617 in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by PET/CT: Biodistribution in Humans, Radiation Dosimetry, and First Evaluation of Tumor Lesions
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PET
  • PSMA
  • 68Ga
  • dosimetry
  • prostate cancer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire