Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBASIC SCIENCE INVESTIGATIONS

Assessment of Porcine Bone Metabolism by Dynamic [18F]Fluoride Ion PET: Correlation with Bone Histomorphometry

Morand Piert, Tilman T. Zittel, Georg A. Becker, Michael Jahn, Anke Stahlschmidt, Gerhard Maier, Hans-Jürgen Machulla and Roland Bares
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2001, 42 (7) 1091-1100;
Morand Piert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tilman T. Zittel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georg A. Becker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Jahn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anke Stahlschmidt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerhard Maier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Jürgen Machulla
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roland Bares
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Transaxial [18F]fluoride ion PET of lumbar vertebra of mini pig. Image was obtained after intravenous injection of 11.0 MBq of [18F]fluoride ion per kilogram of body weight (frame between 110 and 120 min). Oval ROI (1.1 cm2) is defined in center of vertebral body (image scale, 0–206 kBq/cm3).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Typical time courses of decay-corrected activities from 18F in arterial plasma (•) and bone tissue (◊) of ROI in Figure 1. Dotted line with ▴ represents least squares fit to measured tissue data. Dashed line with ▿ illustrates unbound tracer activity within bone tissue, and dashed line with ▪ illustrates bound tracer activity within bone tissue.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Plot of macroparameters for [18F]fluoride ion influx rates Ki and Kpat. Data represent mean of 6 ROIs with their respective SDs as error bars in both directions (x- and y-axes). Linear regression analysis yielded highly significant correlation (y = 0.003 + 0.87x; r2 = 0.92; P < 0.001).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Plot of blood flow estimates f and [18F]fluoride ion influx rate Ki. Data represent mean of 6 ROIs with their respective SDs as error bars in both directions (x- and y-axes). Linear regression analysis yielded highly significant correlation (y = 0.023 + 0.32x; r2 = 0.74; P < 0.001).

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Plot of MAR obtained from iliac crest bone biopsies versus fluoride volume flux (Kflux) in 9 mini pigs. Data represent mean of 20 sites of particular bone biopsy and 6 ROIs with their respective SDs as error bars in both directions (x- and y-axes). Linear regression analysis yielded highly significant correlation (y = −3.2 + 2.23x; r2 = 0.65; P < 0.01).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Laboratory Results, Cardiovascular Data, and Respiratory Data

    ParameterMean ± SD
    Fluoride ion in plasma (nmol/L)18.0 ± 3.4*
    Calcium (mmol/L)2.6 ± 0.2*
    Phosphate (mmol/L)1.6 ± 0.2*
    Alkaline phosphate (units/L)87.0 ± 63.0*
    Parathyroid hormone (pmol/L)6.7 ± 1.5*
    Albumin (μmol/L)548.0 ± 46.0*
    Iron (μmol/L)24.6 ± 4.1*
    Hemoglobin (mmol/L)5.4 ± 2.1†
    Arterial pCO2 (mm Hg)33.3 ± 4.7†
    Arterial pO2 (mm Hg)277.1 ± 89.3†
    Heart rate (min−1)104.0 ± 25.0†
    Mean arterial blood pressure (mm Hg)77.2 ± 10.4†
    • ↵* Data at start of PET scanning.

    • ↵† Data during PET scanning.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    PET Data

    Pig no.Age (y)f (mL/[min · cm3])EK1 (mL/[min · cm3])k2 (min−1)k3 (min−1)k4 (min−1)BV (mL/cm3)Ki (mL/[min · cm3])Kflux (μmol/[min · L])Kpat (mL/[min · cm3])Kpat120 (mL/[min · cm3])
    16.70.075 ± 0.0170.95 ± 0.320.068 ± 0.0150.096 ± 0.1080.113 ± 0.0890.005 ± 0.0030.034 ± 0.0170.040 ± 0.0040.610 ± 0.0580.036 ± 0.0020.032 ± 0.002
    23.10.132 ± 0.0390.82 ± 0.270.100 ± 0.0160.025 ± 0.0120.037 ± 0.0180.003 ± 0.0020.058 ± 0.0100.058 ± 0.0031.052 ± 0.0580.055 ± 0.0070.032 ± 0.002
    32.20.196 ± 0.0170.73 ± 0.080.142 ± 0.0060.038 ± 0.0130.044 ± 0.0170.004 ± 0.0030.030 ± 0.0290.076 ± 0.0031.031 ± 0.0460.073 ± 0.0020.051 ± 0.005
    43.30.149 ± 0.0581.00 ± 0.060.131 ± 0.0140.251 ± 0.1710.292 ± 0.1590.008 ± 0.0010.024 ± 0.0100.073 ± 0.0051.568 ± 0.1120.061 ± 0.0060.052 ± 0.004
    52.50.087 ± 0.0320.81 ± 0.010.069 ± 0.0180.053 ± 0.0410.134 ± 0.0460.021 ± 0.0480.040 ± 0.0210.049 ± 0.0030.780 ± 0.0460.050 ± 0.0060.042 ± 0.005
    63.90.122 ± 0.0190.88 ± 0.110.106 ± 0.0090.046 ± 0.0510.106 ± 0.1270.008 ± 0.0040.032 ± 0.0250.072 ± 0.0021.736 ± 0.0580.065 ± 0.0080.058 ± 0.008
    76.70.149 ± 0.0380.90 ± 0.230.126 ± 0.0100.049 ± 0.0320.076 ± 0.0450.005 ± 0.0040.008 ± 0.0100.076 ± 0.0081.255 ± 0.1260.074 ± 0.0060.064 ± 0.003
    81.50.106 ± 0.0140.88 ± 0.170.092 ± 0.0110.050 ± 0.0410.088 ± 0.0600.006 ± 0.0030.018 ± 0.0050.060 ± 0.0030.997 ± 0.0470.055 ± 0.0030.050 ± 0.003
    91.60.126 ± 0.0370.97 ± 0.360.112 ± 0.0140.127 ± 0.1190.167 ± 0.1240.009 ± 0.0060.026 ± 0.0240.066 ± 0.0061.360 ± 0.1330.058 ± 0.0050.052 ± 0.005
    All pigs3.5 ± 2.00.127 ± 0.0360.89 ± 0.100.105 ± 0.0260.081 ± 0.0710.117 ± 0.0770.008 ± 0.0050.030 ± 0.0140.063 ± 0.0121.154 ± 0.3600.058 ± 0.0110.050 ± 0.009
    • Data are for 6 vertebral bodies of each mini pig. In addition, estimates of f and E derived from K1 values using permeability surface product of 0.25 min−1 are given. [18F]fluoride ion influx rate was also estimated with Patlak graphic approach using 2 different intervals (20–60 and 40–120 min).

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Histomorphometric Data

    Pig no.MAR (μm/d)B.Pm. (μm/mm2)Tb.Wi. (μm)B.Ar. (%)O.Wi. (μm)O.Ar. (%)Osteoblasts (No./mm2)Osteoclasts (No./mm2)
    11.595,158.084.021.74.71.416.52.2
    21.446,092.086.026.24.71.724.93.2
    31.886,422.086.027.56.22.531.14.2
    42.044,027.0137.027.65.41.621.63.1
    51.786,252.095.029.74.61.122.43.9
    61.914,559.0121.027.55.51.119.62.5
    71.865,375.0111.030.05.82.738.82.2
    81.873,549.0144.026.55.11.625.82.2
    91.973,872.0108.021.05.22.127.93.7
    Mean ± SD1.84 ± 0.115,034.0 ± 1,087.2108.0 ± 22.426.4 ± 3.15.2 ± 0.51.8 ± 0.625.4 ± 6.63.1 ± 1.1
    • B.Pm. = trabecular bone perimeter; Tb.Wi. = trabecular width; B.Ar. = area of trabecular bone; O.Wi. = osteoid width; and O.Ar. = osteoid area.

    • MAR was calculated using double tetracycline labeling.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 42, Issue 7
July 1, 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of Porcine Bone Metabolism by Dynamic [18F]Fluoride Ion PET: Correlation with Bone Histomorphometry
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Assessment of Porcine Bone Metabolism by Dynamic [18F]Fluoride Ion PET: Correlation with Bone Histomorphometry
Morand Piert, Tilman T. Zittel, Georg A. Becker, Michael Jahn, Anke Stahlschmidt, Gerhard Maier, Hans-Jürgen Machulla, Roland Bares
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2001, 42 (7) 1091-1100;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of Porcine Bone Metabolism by Dynamic [18F]Fluoride Ion PET: Correlation with Bone Histomorphometry
Morand Piert, Tilman T. Zittel, Georg A. Becker, Michael Jahn, Anke Stahlschmidt, Gerhard Maier, Hans-Jürgen Machulla, Roland Bares
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2001, 42 (7) 1091-1100;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?
  • Quantification of 18F-Fluoride Kinetics: Evaluation of Simplified Methods
  • Dynamic Bone Imaging with 99mTc-Labeled Diphosphonates and 18F-NaF: Mechanisms and Applications
  • Semiautomatic Region-of-Interest Validation at the Femur in 18F-Fluoride PET/CT
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Bone 18F-NaF Deposition
  • Kinetic Analysis of 18F-Fluoride PET Images of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases
  • Effects of Alendronate on Bone Metabolism in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis Measured by 18F-Fluoride PET: A Prospective Study
  • Quantitative Radionuclide Studies of Bone
  • Long-Term Precision of 18F-Fluoride PET Skeletal Kinetic Studies in the Assessment of Bone Metabolism
  • Characterization of Osteolytic, Osteoblastic, and Mixed Lesions in a Prostate Cancer Mouse Model Using 18F-FDG and 18F-Fluoride PET/CT
  • Skeletal PET with 18F-Fluoride: Applying New Technology to an Old Tracer
  • 18F-Fluoride PET for Monitoring Therapeutic Response in Paget's Disease of Bone
  • Comparison of Different Quantitative Approaches to 18F-Fluoride PET Scans
  • PET Imaging of Osteosarcoma
  • Increased Sensitivity in Detection of a Porcine High-Turnover Osteopenia After Total Gastrectomy by Dynamic 18F-Fluoride Ion PET and Quantitative CT
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • How Sensitive Is the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract to 90Y Radioembolization? A Histologic and Dosimetric Analysis in a Porcine Model
  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire