Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBasic Science Investigations

Uptake of 18F-Fluorocholine, 18F-Fluoroethyl-l-Tyrosine, and 18F-FDG in Acute Cerebral Radiation Injury in the Rat: Implications for Separation of Radiation Necrosis from Tumor Recurrence

Nicolas Spaeth, Matthias T. Wyss, Bruno Weber, Stephan Scheidegger, Amelie Lutz, Jorn Verwey, Ivan Radovanovic, Jens Pahnke, Damian Wild, Gerrit Westera, Dominik Weishaupt, Dirk M. Hermann, Barbara Kaser-Hotz, Adriano Aguzzi and Alfred Buck
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2004, 45 (11) 1931-1938;
Nicolas Spaeth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias T. Wyss
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruno Weber
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan Scheidegger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amelie Lutz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jorn Verwey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivan Radovanovic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Pahnke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damian Wild
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerrit Westera
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominik Weishaupt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dirk M. Hermann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Kaser-Hotz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adriano Aguzzi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfred Buck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Differentiation between posttherapy radiation necrosis and recurrent tumor in humans with brain tumor is still a difficult diagnostic task. The new PET tracers 18F-fluoro-ethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) and 18F-fluorocholine (N,N-dimethyl-N-18F-fluoromethyl-2-hydroxyethylammonium [FCH]) have shown promise for improving diagnostic accuracy. This study assessed uptake of these tracers in experimental radiation injury. Methods: In a first model, circumscribed lesions were induced in the cortex of 35 rats using proton irradiation of 150 or 250 Gy. After radiation injury developed, uptake of 18F-FET, 18F-FCH, and 18F-FDG was measured using autoradiography and correlated with histology and disruption of the blood-brain barrier as determined with Evans blue. In a second model, uptake of the tracers was assessed in acute cryolesions, which are characterized by the absence of inflammatory cells. Results: Mean 18F-FET, 18F-FCH, and 18F-FDG standardized uptake values in the most active part of the radiation lesion and the contralateral normal cortex (in parentheses) were 2.27 ± 0.46 (1.42 ± 0.23), 2.52 ± 0.42 (0.61 ± 0.12), and 6.21 ± 1.19 (4.35 ± 0.47). The degree of uptake of 18F-FCH and 18F-FDG correlated with the density of macrophages. In cryolesions, 18F-FET uptake was similar to that in radiation lesions, and 18F-FCH uptake was significantly reduced. Conclusion: Comparison of tracer accumulation in cryolesions and radiation injuries demonstrates that 18F-FET uptake is most likely due to a disruption of the blood-brain barrier alone, whereas 18F-FCH is additionally trapped by macrophages. Uptake of both tracers in the radiation injuries is generally lower than the published uptake in tumors, suggesting that 18F-FET and 18F-FCH are promising tracers for separating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence. However, the comparability of our data with the literature is limited by factors such as different species and acquisition protocols and modalities. Thus, more studies are needed to settle this issue. Nevertheless, 18F-FCH and 18F-FET seem superior to 18F-FDG for this purpose.

  • radiation necrosis
  • 18F-fluorocholine
  • 18F-fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine
  • 18F-FDG
  • autoradiography

Over the last 20 y, PET has become indispensable for evaluating brain tumors. Indeed, diagnosis of brain tumors was the first oncologic application of 18F-FDG PET (1). Differentiation of posttherapy radiation necrosis from recurrent tumor remains a challenging diagnostic problem. Correct diagnosis obviously has strong implications for disease management. Attempts with 18F-FDG were only partially successful (2–5). One problem is the high intrinsic uptake of 18F-FDG in normal brain cortex, often rendering differentiation of lesions from normal brain difficult. Another is the wide range of 18F-FDG uptake in different brain tumors, leading to an overlap with the degree of uptake in radiation necrosis. Also, MRI and CT cannot reliably separate radiation necrosis from recurrent tumor (6–8).

Therefore, the development of more specific radiotracers is a major aim of nuclear medicine research. Radiolabeled choline or amino acid analogs such as 18F-fluorocholine (N,N-dimethyl-N-18F-fluoromethyl-2-hydroxyethylammonium [FCH]) and 18F-fluoro-ethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) seem promising for separating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence (9–11). The ideal tracer for this purpose would reproducibly demonstrate a different accumulation pattern in radiation necrosis from that in tumor, such as no accumulation in radiation necrosis and high accumulation in tumor—a pattern that has been demonstrated for 18F-FET and 18F-FCH.

18F-FET is an amino acid analog that is not metabolized or incorporated into proteins. A specific Na+-independent amino acid transport system, the L-system, is responsible for high 18F-FET accumulation in tumor cells (12). Wester et al. introduced this tracer to clinical research (13). Further studies have demonstrated increased uptake of 18F-FET in various brain tumors (11,14,15) and lack of uptake by inflammatory tissue (16,17). This is important, since radiation necrosis may contain inflammatory cells.

Choline is transported into mammalian cells by specific mechanisms and then phosphorylated by choline kinase. In a further step, choline is metabolized to phosphatidylcholine and incorporated into the cell membrane (18,19). The increased choline uptake in tumor cells is explained by upregulation of choline kinase (20,21). Initial studies with 11C-choline demonstrated the diagnostic potential of this substance in different tumors (22–26). Degrado et al. introduced 18F-FCH for brain tumor imaging (27). The major advantage of 18F-labeled compounds, especially in clinical use, is the longer physical half-life of 18F (110 min) than of 11C (20 min). The tumor uptake patterns of 11C-choline and 18F-substituted choline analogs are very similar (9). Contrary to 18F-FET, 18F-FCH is accumulated by inflammatory cells (28).

The purposes of this study were, first, to assess uptake of 18F-FET, 18F-FCH, and, for comparison, 18F-FDG in experimentally induced acute radiation injury in the rat brain. The tracer uptake pattern was assessed by autoradiography and correlated with histologic findings and disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) as assessed with Evans blue. A second purpose was to evaluate the effect of BBB disruption alone on uptake of 18F-FET and 18F-FCH. For this purpose, 18F-FET and 18F-FCH accumulation was determined in cryolesions, which are characterized by a heavily disrupted BBB but, in contrast to radiation injury, absence of inflammatory cells. Finally, this study assessed the pattern of blood flow in radiation injuries and cryolesions. To this end, perfusion was determined in another group of animals using 14C-iodoantipyrine autoradiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

This study used 35 male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250–400 g. All interventions were performed while the animals were under inhalation anesthesia using isoflurane (2–3 vol%, Forene; Abbott Laboratories). The experiments were approved by the local veterinary authorities of the Kanton of Zurich, Switzerland.

Radiopharmaceuticals

4-Iodo-N-methyl-14C-antipyrine was obtained from American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc. 18F-FDG was obtained from the commercial 18F-FDG production of the University Hospital Zurich. 18F-FET was produced using a method analogous to that of Wester et al. (13). 18F-Fluoride (azeotropically dried with 0.7 mL of acetonitrile) was reacted with 10 mg of ethylene glycol-1,2-ditosylate in acetonitrile in the presence of Kryptofix(2.2.2) (Merck) at 110° to give 18F-fluoroethyltosylate, which was purified by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (LiChrospher 100 RP-18 [Merck], 250 × 10 mm, MeOH/H2O = 60/40). The product fraction was trapped on a polystyrene cartridge (LiChrolut EN; Merck), dried with nitrogen, and eluted with 0.7 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide into a second vial containing 10 mg of l-tyrosine and 7.5 mg of potassium methylate, where it was reacted for 5 min at 120°. The product was purified by reversed-phase HPLC (LiChrospher 100 RP-18, 10 μm, 250 × 10 mm, EtOH/H2O/HAc = 8/89.5/2.5, 2.5 g of ammonium acetate per liter). The product peak was sterile filtered into a bottle containing 1 mL of saline and 0.1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (0.6 mol/L, pH 4). Quality control was by reversed-phase HPLC over LiChrospher 100 RP-18, 5 μm, 250 × 4 mm, eluting with EtOH/H2O/HAc = 8/89.5/2.5, with 2.5 g of ammonium acetate per liter. Radiochemical purity was >99%. In the ultraviolet trace, 18F-FET was not visible and no quantifiable impurities were visible. Enantiomeric purity was determined by chiral ligand exchange HPLC over a Luna C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) coated with l-penicillamine chiral selector, eluting with 30% methanol in 5 mmol of aqueous CuSO4 per liter. Starting from l-tyrosine as the substrate, no d-(R)-O-18F-fluoroethyltyrosine was detected.

18F-FCH was produced by the reaction of 18F-fluoromethyltriflate with diaminoethanol. 18F-Fluoride (azeotropically dried with 2 × 0.7 mL of acetonitrile) was reacted with dibromomethane in acetonitrile in the presence of Kryptofix(2.2.2) at 110° to give 18F-fluorobromomethane (29), which was purified over a series of 4 Sep-Pak Plus silica cartridges (Waters). 18F-Fluoromethyltriflate was made by passing 18F-bromofluoromethane over a silver triflate/Graphpac GC column (Alltech Associates Inc.) at 180°. 18F-Fluoromethyltriflate was then used for the N-alkylation of 2-dimethylaminoethanol immobilized on a Sep-Pak Plus C-18 cartridge (a solution of 2-dimethylaminoethanol in ethanol [200 μL in 600 μL] was put on the cartridge), to quantitatively yield the desired product. For purification, 18F-FCH was selectively trapped on a Sep-Pak Accel CM cartridge (Waters), washed with water, removed with saline, and, via a sterile filter, added to a patient bottle with 4 mL of saline, 0.5 mL of 10% NaCl, and 70 μL of NaHCO3. Quality control was by HPLC over a cation exchange column (30). Supelcosil LC-SCX (Supelco, Inc.), 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, eluting with a 0.15 mol/L concentration of NaH2PO4 in water/pyridine (1,000/0.08 v/v), was adjusted to pH 2.37 by 70% H3PO4. Radiochemical purity was >99%. In the ultraviolet trace, 18F-FCH was not visible and no quantifiable impurities were visible.

Proton Irradiation

The rats were irradiated with a thin, collimated proton beam of 3-mm diameter at the Facility for Ocular Tumor Treatment (31) of the Paul Scherrer Institute. The energy of the protons was adapted to the required penetration depth of the beams or to the Bragg peak position. This position was evaluated using radiographs and CT scans of rats that were of a size typical of the irradiated animals. To ensure that the Bragg peak was at the same location for each animal, a special holder was constructed. This holder was placed on the patient chair, which could be positioned with high precision. A laser beam, which marked the proton beam, guided the position of the irradiation point. The radiation was delivered as a single dose of 250 (n = 18) or 150 (n = 5) Gy.

MRI

Weekly sequential MRI examinations after the radiation treatment served for detection of radiation necrosis. MRI was performed on a 1.5-T system (Signa CV/i; General Electric Medical Systems). To maximize signal-to-noise ratio, animals were placed with their heads centrally located in a dedicated wrist coil. This coil was chosen because its design provides an optimal signal-to-noise ratio in relation to the relatively small diameter of a rat’s skull. The imaging protocol included the following sequences: an unenhanced transaxial T1-weighted spin-echo sequence (repetition time [TR]/echo time [TE], 300 ms/13 ms; slice thickness, 3 mm, without an interslice gap) and a transaxial T2-weighted 3-dimensional fast spin-echo sequence (TR/TE, 3,000/128; slice thickness, 1.5 mm). In addition, the T1-weighted sequence was acquired in the transaxial plane after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist [Schering AG], 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight) through a tail vein.

Cryolesions

Cryolesions (n = 12) were used as a model of pure BBB disruption without an inflammatory component. They were induced according to the method described by Hermann et al. (32,33). A liquid-nitrogen-cooled copper probe with a tip diameter of 2.5 mm and a tip temperature of −150°C was placed stereotactically through a burr hole onto the right parietal dura mater. Then, the probe was lowered another 200 μm to ensure contact with the cortical tissue and was left for 2 min. 18F-FET and 18F-FCH injections followed 30 min later.

Autoradiography with 18F-FET, 18F-FCH, and 18F-FDG

After detection of radiation injuries on MRI, autoradiography was performed (12–20 d after irradiation in the 250-Gy group, 70–80 d in the 150-Gy group). Two hours before tracer injection, Evans blue was injected into a tail vein. Catheters were then placed in the right femoral artery to monitor blood pressure and in the femoral vein to allow intravenous application of the tracers. Fifteen (18F-FCH and 18F-FET) or 45 (18F-FDG) minutes after injection of 150–200 MBq of tracer, the animals were sacrificed using an overdose of pentobarbital. The brain was removed and instantly frozen in cooled isopentane. For quantification, 10-μm brain slices (100-μm slice distance) were placed on a phosphor imaging screen together with 14C standards and left for 240 min. Tritium-sensitive screens (TR2025; Fuji) were used, as their uncoated, thin, sensitive layer yields higher-resolution 18F autoradiographs than do ordinary screens. The data were scanned (BAS 1800 II [Fuji]; pixel size, 50 μm) and converted to kBq/cm3. For this conversion, the 14C standards had previously been recalibrated using data from a 4-h exposure of 10-μm slices of brain homogenate containing a defined amount of 18F activity.

For quantitative analysis, the activities were then decay corrected to the time of injection. Dividing these values by the amount of injected activity per gram of body weight yielded standardized uptake values (SUVs). Regions of interest were subsequently placed over the areas with highest and average tracer uptake in the lesions and over contralateral cortex.

4-Iodo-N-Methyl-14C-Antipyrine Autoradiography for Evaluation of Perfusion

Two rats of each lesion model (n = 4) were injected with 1.85–2.0 MBq of 14C-iodoantipyrine in 1 mL of saline and sacrificed 1 min later. The brain was removed and instantly frozen in chilled isopentane. Brain slices of 10-μm thickness (100-μm slice distance), together with 14C standards, were placed on a phosphor-imaging screen for 24 h.

Histologic Examination and Evans Blue Fluorescence Imaging

Frozen sections 10 μm thick were fixed with 4% formalin and stained with hematoxylin-eosin for morphologic analysis. For Evans blue visualization, slices were fixed with 4% formalin and stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Molecular Probes). Images of the Evans blue distribution were then obtained using a fluorescence microscope. To assess the grade of gliosis, the brain slides were immunohistochemically stained with anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (DAKO) and developed with the EnVision horseradish peroxidase rabbit system (DAKO).

Statistics

Differences in 18F-FCH and 18F-FET uptake in radiation injury and cryolesions were assessed using the Student 2-tailed unpaired t test.

RESULTS

Animals

In the 2 radiation groups, no animal experienced systemic side effects. Only a small oblong area of alopecia on the temporal skin corresponding to the beam line was discovered during the time of observation.

Radiation Injury

Development of Radiation Injury.

Intracerebral lesions were detected on the MRI scans 12 and 70 d after irradiation in the 250- and 150-Gy groups, respectively. The diameter of the lesions ranged from 2 to 6 mm independent of the radiation dose.

Typical examples of MRI scans are demonstrated in Figure 1. The lesion was within the cortex of the right frontoparietal region and extended into white matter. It presented as a hyperintense parenchymal signal alteration on the T2-weighted image. On the enhanced T1-weighted image after intravenous administration of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Magnevist; Schering AG), the entire lesion enhanced slightly, indicating leakage of the BBB.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Axial MRI scans of rat brain clearly depict radiation lesion in frontoparietal right hemisphere. (A) T2-weighted 3-dimensional fast spin-echo sequence. (B) T1-weighted, gadolinium-enhanced spin-echo scan indicating disruption of the BBB.

Histology and Disruption of BBB.

Images of a typical radiation injury are shown in Figure 2. Most lesions were characterized by a center of colliquation necrosis (area 1) consisting of cell debris, foamy macrophages, and sometimes calcifications. This center was surrounded by a layer (area 2) consisting of macrophages, reactive astrocytosis (evaluated by GFAP staining), dilated vessels, edema, and, occasionally, small hemorrhages.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Images of radiation injury. (A–D) Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained histologic samples. The overview in panel A demonstrates the necrotic center (area 1) and the surrounding inflammatory layer (area 2). Panels B–D zoom in on layer 2, which is characterized by infiltration of macrophages and reactive astrocytosis. Panel D corresponds to the area with highest uptake of 18F-FCH (arrow in E). The dense infiltrate of macrophages is clearly visible. Panel E depicts uptake of 18F-FCH, which is concentrated in the area adjacent to the central necrosis. (F) Corresponding Evans blue fluorescent scan demonstrates disruption of the BBB.

Extravasation of Evans blue, indicating BBB disruption, was present in each case. In the example shown in Figure 2, the largest amount of Evans blue accumulated in parts of the necrotic center; smaller amounts were present in the surrounding inflammatory layer (area 2). A similar pattern is found in Figure 3B. In the 18F-FDG example (Fig. 3D), no clear necrotic center was detectable. The small circumscribed area with increased Evans blue accumulation (area 4) did not correspond to the area with highest 18F-FDG uptake (area 3 in Fig. 3C).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Uptake of 18F-FET (A) and 18F-FDG (C), together with the corresponding (B and D, respectively) Evans blue fluorescence scans.

Perfusion Pattern in Radiation Injury.

14C-Iodoantipyrine autoradiography (n = 2) demonstrated reduced perfusion in the necrotic center. In the inflammatory layer adjacent to the necrotic center, where 18F-FCH, 18F-FET, and 18F-FDG demonstrated increased uptake, perfusion was similar to that in normal cortex.

Uptake of 18F-FET, 18F-FCH, and 18F-FDG.

An autoradiograph demonstrating 18F-FCH uptake is shown in Figure 2E. The highest degree of tracer accumulation was in the inflammatory layer (area 2) surrounding the central necrosis. Examples of 18F-FET and 18F-FDG autoradiographs are shown in Figure 3. 18F-FET accumulation (Fig. 3A) was highest in the inflammatory layer (area 2). In the 18F-FDG example (Fig. 3C), histologic examination revealed no clear necrotic center. The area with the highest 18F-FDG uptake (area 3) was histologically characterized by increased macrophage density.

The SUVs of the various tracers are summarized in Table 1. 18F-FDG displayed by far the highest uptake in the lesions. The SUVs for 18F-FCH and 18F-FET were similar and considerably smaller than for 18F-FDG. The value of L/B (ratio of uptake in lesion to that in contralateral cortex) was highest for 18F-FCH, followed by 18F-FET and 18F-FDG. This ratio to a high degree reflects the differing amounts of tracer accumulation in healthy cortex: least for 18F-FCH, followed by 18F-FET and 18F-FDG.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

SUV in Animals with Induced Radiation Necrosis

Cryolesions

Histology and Disruption of BBB.

Representative photomicrographs are shown in Figure 4. Cryolesions were characterized mainly by edema. There were no inflammatory cells or reactive astrocytes. Evans blue extravasation is demonstrated in Figure 4A. BBB disruption was present in the entire lesion.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Examples of cryolesions. Extravasation of Evans blue, demonstrating disruption of the BBB, is already clearly visible on native images (A). Perfusion in the lesion is decreased relative to that in normal cortex but not absent, as is demonstrated by autoradiography with 14C-iodoantipyrine (B). In contrast, 18F-FCH (C) and 18F-FET (D) uptake is increased in the cryolesion. Hematoxylin-eosin staining (E and F) demonstrate that edema characterizes the histology. There are no signs of inflammatory infiltration.

Perfusion in Cryolesions.

An example of the perfusion pattern as assessed with 14C-iodoantipyrine is shown in Figure 4B. Perfusion in the lesion was reduced but not absent.

Uptake of 18F-FET and 18F-FCH.

Typical 18F-FCH and 18F-FET autoradiographs are shown in Figures 3C and 3D. Accumulation of both tracers was homogeneously increased in the cryolesion, compared with the adjacent and contralateral normal brain tissue.

Table 2 summarizes the SUVs of 18F-FCH and 18F-FET. In lesions, 18F-FET SUVs were on the order of 85% higher than 18F-FCH SUVs. Compared with uptake in radiation injury, 18F-FCH uptake was significantly lower in cryolesions (0.99 ± 0.18 vs. 1.50 ± 0.33, P = 0.006). In contrast, 18F-FET accumulation was similar in both types of lesions (1.85 ± 0.34 vs. 1.63 ± 0.34, P = 0.14).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

SUVs in Animals with Induced Cryolesions

DISCUSSION

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate accumulation of the investigated tracers in an acute model of radiation injury so as to assess their ability to separate radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence in humans with brain tumors. All 3 investigated tracers have demonstrated usefulness in the evaluation of brain tumors with PET. 18F-FET and 18F-FCH usually display increased uptake in tumors relative to normal gray matter. Because 18F-FDG is avidly taken up in normal gray matter, one commonly relates tumor uptake to white matter. The ideal tracer to separate tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis would show high uptake in tumors and no uptake in radiation necrosis. That ideal is clearly not met by any of the examined compounds. Three major components determine tracer uptake in lesions. The first is blood flow, which is responsible for tracer delivery. However, the normal or decreased blood flow that is found in areas with increased 18F-FET or 18F-FCH uptake indicates that blood flow is of minor importance. One can therefore concentrate on the other 2 factors: crossing of the BBB, which may be mediated by some regulated process if the BBB is intact or by pure leakage if the BBB has been disrupted, and accumulation in cellular elements. Of note with regard to the latter, a major histologic hallmark of tissue surrounding the necrotic center in radiation injury is macrophage invasion. Previous studies have shown that 18F-FET is not taken up by these cells but is taken up by tissue outside the brain. One of these previous studies addressed 18F-FET uptake in experimentally induced abscesses in the rat thigh muscle (16), and the other investigated 18F-FET uptake in murine lymph nodes (17). Because 18F-FET is not taken up by macrophages, the increased uptake in radiation injury is most likely due to leakage of the BBB. This hypothesis was tested in the cryolesions, which served as a model of severe BBB disruption without inflammatory cells. The finding that 18F-FET SUV was similar in radiation injury and cryolesions strongly supports the assumption that 18F-FET uptake in acute radiation injury is indeed driven mainly by leakage across the disturbed BBB. In this context, it is important to note that blood flow in cryolesions was decreased (Fig. 4C). Increased blood flow could have been another reason for the observed increased 18F-FET uptake.

The situation is different for 18F-FCH, which displayed significantly higher uptake in radiation injury than in cryolesions. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that 18F-FCH uptake in radiation injury is determined by leakage across the BBB and incorporation mainly in macrophages. Because macrophages are missing from cryolesions, 18F-FCH probably diffuses back from tissue into blood in cryolesions but is incorporated into macrophages in radiation injury. That 18F-FCH is indeed incorporated mainly into macrophages and not other cells is suggested by the finding that the areas with highest 18F-FCH uptake coincided with the areas of densest macrophage infiltration. Furthermore, we already demonstrated in a previous study that 18F-FCH is taken up by macrophages (28).

There remains the important question of the suitability of the investigated tracers for differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor tissue. We address this question by comparing our data with published data on uptake of 18F-FET, 18F-FCH, and 18F-FDG in brain tumors. However, a direct comparison of our data with the literature is limited by factors such as different acquisition protocols and modalities and interspecies differences.

18F-FET

A direct comparison is possible of our 18F-FET data with the tumor data of Langen et al., who inoculated F98 glioma cells into the brains of 13 CDF Fisher rats and evaluated 18F-FET uptake by autoradiography. They reported a mean L/B of 5.26 ± 1.30 (34). This L/B is markedly higher than the values for radiation injury (1.19 ± 0.29, average areas) found by our study.

Weber et al. investigated 18F-FET uptake in 16 patients with various tumors and radiation necrosis (11). SUV in the 2 patients with radiation necrosis was 1.1 and 0.8, and L/B was 1.2 and 1.1. These values are smaller than in our study. A possible reason is that radiation necrosis in the human study was of a more chronic type. Furthermore, SUVs measured with PET tend to underestimate the true values because of the limited resolution of PET. In the 14 patients with tumors, the L/B was 2.27 ± 0.65. In other studies, this value ranged from 2.0 to 3.3 (13–15,35,36). These values are higher than those found by our study, but there is some overlap. With regard to SUV, Weber et al. reported values of 2.67 ± 0.91 and 1.17 ± 0.16 in tumor lesions and normal cortex, respectively. Direct comparison of SUVs in humans and rats is limited, since the magnitude of the SUV depends on the distribution in all tissues that accumulate the tracer, and this distribution may differ between species. In addition, PET SUVs tend to be too small. These factors may be why SUVs in normal cortex were 18% smaller in the human study of Weber et al. than in our animal study. Considering all the available data, and especially the rat study by Langen et al. (34), 18F-FET seems promising for separating radiation necrosis from tumor tissue.

Radiolabeled Choline Analogs

For 18F-FCH, the comparison of our data with the literature is less conclusive, since no data are available on 18F-FCH uptake in a rat model of brain tumor. Shinoura et al. measured 11C-choline uptake in C6 glioma cells implanted under the skin of rats. Tumor uptake was 3- to 4-fold higher than brain uptake (26). This is higher than the L/B ratio of 2.50 ± 0.44 found by our study. Although Shinoura et al. used 11C-choline, the data should at least in part be comparable, since Hara described similar uptake characteristics for 11C-choline and 18F-labeled choline compounds (9). Some data are available from human studies. Degrado et al. also used 18F-FCH and reported an L/B of 10.0 in a single patient with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (27). Using another 18F-labeled choline analog, 18F-fluoroethyl-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethylammonium, Hara et al. found an L/B in the range of 12–21 for high-grade gliomas (n = 8) and 0–4.8 for grade II astrocytomas (n = 2) (10). Ohtani et al. investigated 11C-choline uptake in 20 patients with different brain tumors and calculated tumor-to-white matter ratios in the range of 0.98–29.10 (37). The above studies indicate that 18F-FCH in the radiation injury of our study is generally lower than in tumors. However, more studies using 18F-FCH in tumors are needed to settle the issue.

18F-FDG

In our study, accumulation of 18F-FDG in radiation injury was generally on the same order as accumulation in normal cortex (mean L/B = 1.07 ± 0.19, average regions). For comparison, a rat study of Takeda et al. showed a maximum 14C-FDG L/B of approximately 1.2 in intracerebral C6 gliomas (38). This is in the same range as the 18F-FDG uptake in our study and leads to the conclusion that 18F-FDG is of questionable suitability for separating radiation necrosis from tumor.

General Remarks

Some differences between our model and human studies are important to mention. The dose and type of irradiation (single dose, 150–250 Gy) used in our study differ from those used on humans. In addition, our model represents acute radiation injury. In humans, a more chronic phase of radiation injury is seen, referred to in the clinical literature as radiation necrosis. In radiation necrosis, the accumulation of inflammatory cells and degree of BBB disruption is probably less pronounced than in acute radiation injury. Typical alterations include wall thickening, fibrinoid necrosis, hyalinization of the vessel walls, and extensive gliosis adjacent to the necrotic focus (39). Therefore, uptake of all investigated tracers in such lesions is likely to be smaller. The low 18F-FET uptake found by Weber et al. (11) for 2 cases of human radiation necrosis points in this direction. A lower uptake would increase the specificity for diagnosing radiation necrosis, especially for 18F-FET and 18F-FCH. However, more studies on 18F-FCH and 18F-FET uptake in chronic radiation lesions are needed to settle this issue.

CONCLUSION

The presented data elucidate the mechanism of 18F-FET and 18F-FCH uptake by acute radiation injuries and acute cryolesions. 18F-FET uptake is determined mainly by disruption of the BBB, whereas 18F-FCH is additionally trapped by inflammatory cells. Uptake of both tracers in radiation injuries was generally lower than published uptake values in tumors, suggesting that 18F-FET and 18F-FCH are promising for separating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence. However, the comparability of our data with the literature is limited by factors such as differences in species and acquisition protocols and modalities. Thus, more studies are needed to settle this issue. Nevertheless, 18F-FCH and 18F-FET seem superior to 18F-FDG for this purpose.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Radium-Stiftung and the OPO Stiftung in Zurich. The authors thank Hans Blattmann and Gustav K. von Schulthess for valuable discussions, Emanuel Egger for support with the proton gantry, Kerstin Goepfert for assistance with MRI, Susanne Hess for superb photographic work, and Tibor Cservenyak and Rolf Hesselmann for tracer production.

Footnotes

  • Received Mar. 10, 2004; revision accepted May 21, 2004.

    For correspondence or reprints contact: Alfred Buck, MD, Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.

    E-mail: fred.buck{at}usz.ch

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Di Chiro G, DeLaPaz RL, Brooks RA, et al. Glucose utilization of cerebral gliomas measured by [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography. Neurology. 1982;32:1323–1329.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Chao ST, Suh JH, Raja S, Lee SY, Barnett G. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET in distinguishing recurrent brain tumor from radionecrosis in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Cancer. 2001;96:191–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. Kahn D, Follett KA, Bushnell DL, et al. Diagnosis of recurrent brain tumor: value of 201Tl SPECT vs 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. AJR. 1994;163:1459–1465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. Ricci PE, Karis JP, Heiserman JE, Fram EK, Bice AN, Drayer BP. Differentiating recurrent tumor from radiation necrosis: time for re-evaluation of positron emission tomography? AJNR. 1998;19:407–413.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. ↵
    Thompson TP, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D. Distinguishing recurrent tumor and radiation necrosis with positron emission tomography versus stereotactic biopsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1999;73:9–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Del Sole A, Falini A, Ravasi L, et al. Anatomical and biochemical investigation of primary brain tumours. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1851–1872.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. Dooms GC, Hecht S, Brant-Zawadzki M, Berthiaume Y, Norman D, Newton TH. Brain radiation lesions: MR imaging. Radiology. 1986;158:149–155.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    Mikhael MA. Radiation necrosis of the brain: correlation between computed tomography, pathology, and dose distribution. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1978;2:71–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Hara T. 11C-Choline and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose in tumor imaging with positron emission tomography. Mol Imaging Biol. 2002;4:267–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Hara T, Kondo T, Kosaka N. Use of 18F-choline and 11C-choline as contrast agents in positron emission tomography imaging-guided stereotactic biopsy sampling of gliomas. J Neurosurg. 2003;99:474–479.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Weber WA, Wester HJ, Grosu AL, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine and L-[methyl-11C]methionine uptake in brain tumours: initial results of a comparative study. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:542–549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Heiss P, Mayer S, Herz M, Wester HJ, Schwaiger M, Senekowitsch-Schmidtke R. Investigation of transport mechanism and uptake kinetics of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine in vitro and in vivo. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1367–1373.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Wester HJ, Herz M, Weber W, et al. Synthesis and radiopharmacology of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine for tumor imaging. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:205–212.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Baum RP, Calcagni M, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG. Pharmakokinetic analysis of O-2-[18F]fluorethyl-L-tyrosin (18F-FET) by dynamic PET in the differential diagnosis of malignant gliomas [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(suppl):63P.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Cheon GJ, Ahn SH, Cho YS, et al. Correlation of 18F-FET uptake and histologic grades of primary brain tumors [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(suppl):367P.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Kaim AH, Weber B, Kurrer MO, et al. (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FET uptake in experimental soft tissue infection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:648–654.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Rau FC, Weber WA, Wester HJ, et al. O-(2-[(18)F]Fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET): a tracer for differentiation of tumour from inflammation in murine lymph nodes. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:1039–1046.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Kennedy EP, Weiss SB. The function of cytidine coenzymes in the biosynthesis of phospholipids. J Biol Chem. 1956;222:193–214.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Zeisel SH. Dietary choline: biochemistry, physiology, and pharmacology. Annu Rev Nutr. 1981;1:95–121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Haeffner EW. Studies on choline permeation through the plasma membrane and its incorporation into phosphatidyl choline of Ehrlich-Lettre-ascites tumor cells in vitro. Eur J Biochem. 1975;51:219–228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Katz-Brull R, Degani H. Kinetics of choline transport and phosphorylation in human breast cancer cells: NMR application of the zero trans method. Anticancer Res. 1996;16:1375–1380.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Hara T, Inagaki K, Kosaka N, Morita T. Sensitive detection of mediastinal lymph node metastasis of lung cancer with 11C-choline PET. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1507–1513.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. Hara T, Kosaka N, Kishi H. PET imaging of prostate cancer using carbon-11-choline. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:990–995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. Hara T, Kosaka N, Shinoura N, Kondo T. PET imaging of brain tumor with [methyl-11C]choline. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:842–847.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. Kobori O, Kirihara Y, Kosaka N, Hara T. Positron emission tomography of esophageal carcinoma using (11)C-choline and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose: a novel method of preoperative lymph node staging. Cancer. 1999;86:1638–1648.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Shinoura N, Nishijima M, Hara T, et al. Brain tumors: detection with C-11 choline PET. Radiology. 1997;202:497–503.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    DeGrado TR, Baldwin SW, Wang S, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of (18)F-labeled choline analogs as oncologic PET tracers. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1805–1814.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Wyss MT, Weber B, Honer M, et al. 18F-choline in experimental soft tissue infection assessed with autoradiography and high-resolution PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:312–316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Bergman J, Eskola O, Lehikoinen P, Solin O. Automated synthesis and purification of [18F]bromofluoromethane at high specific radioactivity. Appl Radiat Isot. 2001;54:927–933.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Vassiliev D, Krasikova R, Kuznetsova O, Fedorova O, Nader M. Simple HPLC method for the detection of N,N-dimethylaminoethanol in the preparation of [N-methyl-11C]choline. Eur J Nucl Med. 2003;30(suppl):S311.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    Egger E, Zografos L, Perret C. Proton beam irradiation of choroidal melanomas at PSI: technique and results. In: Sagerman RH, Alberti WE, eds. Medical Radiology: Diagnostic Imaging and Radiation Oncology—Radiotherapy of Intraocular and Orbital Tumors. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1993:57–72.
  32. ↵
    Hermann DM, Kilic E, Kugler S, Isenmann S, Bahr M. Adenovirus-mediated glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) expression protects against subsequent cortical cold injury in rats. Neurobiol Dis. 2001;8:964–973.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Hermann DM, Mies G, Hossmann KA. Effects of a traumatic neocortical lesion on cerebral metabolism and gene expression of rats. Neuroreport. 1998;9:1917–1921.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    Langen KJ, Jarosch M, Muhlensiepen H, et al. Comparison of fluorotyrosines and methionine uptake in F98 rat gliomas. Nucl Med Biol. 2003;30:501–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Pauleit DO, Floeth F, Hamacher K, et al. Influence of blood-brain barrier disruption on FET uptake in cerebral gliomas [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(suppl):244P.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    Poepperl G, Goetz C, Rachinger W, et al. Value of [18F]fluoroethyltyrosine PET for the diagnosis of recurrent malignant astrocytomas [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(suppl):166P.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Ohtani T, Kurihara H, Ishiuchi S, et al. Brain tumour imaging with carbon-11 choline: comparison with FDG PET and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1664–1670.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Takeda A, Tamano H, Enomoto S, Oku N. Zinc-65 imaging of rat brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2001;61:5065–5069.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    The pathology of central nervous system radiation injury. In: Gutin PH, Leibel SA, Sheline GE, eds. Radiation Injury to the Nervous System. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1991:191–208.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 45 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 45, Issue 11
November 1, 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Uptake of 18F-Fluorocholine, 18F-Fluoroethyl-l-Tyrosine, and 18F-FDG in Acute Cerebral Radiation Injury in the Rat: Implications for Separation of Radiation Necrosis from Tumor Recurrence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Uptake of 18F-Fluorocholine, 18F-Fluoroethyl-l-Tyrosine, and 18F-FDG in Acute Cerebral Radiation Injury in the Rat: Implications for Separation of Radiation Necrosis from Tumor Recurrence
Nicolas Spaeth, Matthias T. Wyss, Bruno Weber, Stephan Scheidegger, Amelie Lutz, Jorn Verwey, Ivan Radovanovic, Jens Pahnke, Damian Wild, Gerrit Westera, Dominik Weishaupt, Dirk M. Hermann, Barbara Kaser-Hotz, Adriano Aguzzi, Alfred Buck
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2004, 45 (11) 1931-1938;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Uptake of 18F-Fluorocholine, 18F-Fluoroethyl-l-Tyrosine, and 18F-FDG in Acute Cerebral Radiation Injury in the Rat: Implications for Separation of Radiation Necrosis from Tumor Recurrence
Nicolas Spaeth, Matthias T. Wyss, Bruno Weber, Stephan Scheidegger, Amelie Lutz, Jorn Verwey, Ivan Radovanovic, Jens Pahnke, Damian Wild, Gerrit Westera, Dominik Weishaupt, Dirk M. Hermann, Barbara Kaser-Hotz, Adriano Aguzzi, Alfred Buck
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2004, 45 (11) 1931-1938;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • THIS MONTH IN JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of Amino Acid and FDG-PET in Differentiating Brain Metastasis Recurrence from Radionecrosis after Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Epileptic Activity Increases Cerebral Amino Acid Transport Assessed by 18F-Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine Amino Acid PET: A Potential Brain Tumor Mimic
  • TSPO Imaging in Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Direct Comparison Between 123I-CLINDE SPECT, 18F-FET PET, and Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Imaging
  • Pituitary Incidentaloma Found on O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET
  • Treatment Response Evaluation Using 18F-FDOPA PET in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Glioma on Bevacizumab Therapy
  • Performance of 18F-Fluoro-Ethyl-Tyrosine (18F-FET) PET for the Differential Diagnosis of Primary Brain Tumor: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
  • Tumor Cell Metabolism Imaging
  • Metabolic Imaging of Cerebral Gliomas: Spatial Correlation of Changes in O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET and Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging
  • Differential Uptake of O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine, L-3H-Methionine, and 3H-Deoxyglucose in Brain Abscesses
  • Clinical Applications of PET in Brain Tumors
  • PET/CT of Skull Base Meningiomas Using 2-18F-Fluoro-L-Tyrosine: Initial Report
  • Uptake of 18F-Fluorocholine, 18F-FET, and 18F-FDG in C6 Gliomas and Correlation with 131I-SIP(L19), a Marker of Angiogenesis
  • Differential Roles of 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Locoregional Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma After Primary Curative Therapy: Response Evaluation and Impact on Management
  • 18F-Choline Images Murine Atherosclerotic Plaques Ex Vivo
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire