|
|
||||||||
Basic Science Investigations |
1 PET Center, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Center for Radiopharmaceutical Science of ETH, PSI, and USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, und University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
3 Section of Diagnostic Imaging and Radio-Oncology, Veterinary Hospital, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
4 Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
5 Division of Radiation Medicine, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
6 Institute of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
7 Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: radiation necrosis 18F-fluorocholine 18F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine 18F-FDG autoradiography
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Therefore, the development of more specific radiotracers is a major aim of nuclear medicine research. Radiolabeled choline or amino acid analogs such as 18F-fluorocholine (N,N-dimethyl-N-18F-fluoromethyl-2-hydroxyethylammonium [FCH]) and 18F-fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine (FET) seem promising for separating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence (911). The ideal tracer for this purpose would reproducibly demonstrate a different accumulation pattern in radiation necrosis from that in tumor, such as no accumulation in radiation necrosis and high accumulation in tumora pattern that has been demonstrated for 18F-FET and 18F-FCH.
18F-FET is an amino acid analog that is not metabolized or incorporated into proteins. A specific Na+-independent amino acid transport system, the L-system, is responsible for high 18F-FET accumulation in tumor cells (12). Wester et al. introduced this tracer to clinical research (13). Further studies have demonstrated increased uptake of 18F-FET in various brain tumors (11,14,15) and lack of uptake by inflammatory tissue (16,17). This is important, since radiation necrosis may contain inflammatory cells.
Choline is transported into mammalian cells by specific mechanisms and then phosphorylated by choline kinase. In a further step, choline is metabolized to phosphatidylcholine and incorporated into the cell membrane (18,19). The increased choline uptake in tumor cells is explained by upregulation of choline kinase (20,21). Initial studies with 11C-choline demonstrated the diagnostic potential of this substance in different tumors (2226). Degrado et al. introduced 18F-FCH for brain tumor imaging (27). The major advantage of 18F-labeled compounds, especially in clinical use, is the longer physical half-life of 18F (110 min) than of 11C (20 min). The tumor uptake patterns of 11C-choline and 18F-substituted choline analogs are very similar (9). Contrary to 18F-FET, 18F-FCH is accumulated by inflammatory cells (28).
The purposes of this study were, first, to assess uptake of 18F-FET, 18F-FCH, and, for comparison, 18F-FDG in experimentally induced acute radiation injury in the rat brain. The tracer uptake pattern was assessed by autoradiography and correlated with histologic findings and disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) as assessed with Evans blue. A second purpose was to evaluate the effect of BBB disruption alone on uptake of 18F-FET and 18F-FCH. For this purpose, 18F-FET and 18F-FCH accumulation was determined in cryolesions, which are characterized by a heavily disrupted BBB but, in contrast to radiation injury, absence of inflammatory cells. Finally, this study assessed the pattern of blood flow in radiation injuries and cryolesions. To this end, perfusion was determined in another group of animals using 14C-iodoantipyrine autoradiography.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Radiopharmaceuticals
4-Iodo-N-methyl-14C-antipyrine was obtained from American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc. 18F-FDG was obtained from the commercial 18F-FDG production of the University Hospital Zurich. 18F-FET was produced using a method analogous to that of Wester et al. (13). 18F-Fluoride (azeotropically dried with 0.7 mL of acetonitrile) was reacted with 10 mg of ethylene glycol-1,2-ditosylate in acetonitrile in the presence of Kryptofix(2.2.2) (Merck) at 110° to give 18F-fluoroethyltosylate, which was purified by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (LiChrospher 100 RP-18 [Merck], 250 x 10 mm, MeOH/H2O = 60/40). The product fraction was trapped on a polystyrene cartridge (LiChrolut EN; Merck), dried with nitrogen, and eluted with 0.7 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide into a second vial containing 10 mg of L-tyrosine and 7.5 mg of potassium methylate, where it was reacted for 5 min at 120°. The product was purified by reversed-phase HPLC (LiChrospher 100 RP-18, 10 µm, 250 x 10 mm, EtOH/H2O/HAc = 8/89.5/2.5, 2.5 g of ammonium acetate per liter). The product peak was sterile filtered into a bottle containing 1 mL of saline and 0.1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (0.6 mol/L, pH 4). Quality control was by reversed-phase HPLC over LiChrospher 100 RP-18, 5 µm, 250 x 4 mm, eluting with EtOH/H2O/HAc = 8/89.5/2.5, with 2.5 g of ammonium acetate per liter. Radiochemical purity was >99%. In the ultraviolet trace, 18F-FET was not visible and no quantifiable impurities were visible. Enantiomeric purity was determined by chiral ligand exchange HPLC over a Luna C18 column (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 µm) coated with L-penicillamine chiral selector, eluting with 30% methanol in 5 mmol of aqueous CuSO4 per liter. Starting from L-tyrosine as the substrate, no D-(R)-O-18F-fluoroethyltyrosine was detected.
18F-FCH was produced by the reaction of 18F-fluoromethyltriflate with diaminoethanol. 18F-Fluoride (azeotropically dried with 2 x 0.7 mL of acetonitrile) was reacted with dibromomethane in acetonitrile in the presence of Kryptofix(2.2.2) at 110° to give 18F-fluorobromomethane (29), which was purified over a series of 4 Sep-Pak Plus silica cartridges (Waters). 18F-Fluoromethyltriflate was made by passing 18F-bromofluoromethane over a silver triflate/Graphpac GC column (Alltech Associates Inc.) at 180°. 18F-Fluoromethyltriflate was then used for the N-alkylation of 2-dimethylaminoethanol immobilized on a Sep-Pak Plus C-18 cartridge (a solution of 2-dimethylaminoethanol in ethanol [200 µL in 600 µL] was put on the cartridge), to quantitatively yield the desired product. For purification, 18F-FCH was selectively trapped on a Sep-Pak Accel CM cartridge (Waters), washed with water, removed with saline, and, via a sterile filter, added to a patient bottle with 4 mL of saline, 0.5 mL of 10% NaCl, and 70 µL of NaHCO3. Quality control was by HPLC over a cation exchange column (30). Supelcosil LC-SCX (Supelco, Inc.), 250 x 4.6 mm, 5 µm, eluting with a 0.15 mol/L concentration of NaH2PO4 in water/pyridine (1,000/0.08 v/v), was adjusted to pH 2.37 by 70% H3PO4. Radiochemical purity was >99%. In the ultraviolet trace, 18F-FCH was not visible and no quantifiable impurities were visible.
Proton Irradiation
The rats were irradiated with a thin, collimated proton beam of 3-mm diameter at the Facility for Ocular Tumor Treatment (31) of the Paul Scherrer Institute. The energy of the protons was adapted to the required penetration depth of the beams or to the Bragg peak position. This position was evaluated using radiographs and CT scans of rats that were of a size typical of the irradiated animals. To ensure that the Bragg peak was at the same location for each animal, a special holder was constructed. This holder was placed on the patient chair, which could be positioned with high precision. A laser beam, which marked the proton beam, guided the position of the irradiation point. The radiation was delivered as a single dose of 250 (n = 18) or 150 (n = 5) Gy.
MRI
Weekly sequential MRI examinations after the radiation treatment served for detection of radiation necrosis. MRI was performed on a 1.5-T system (Signa CV/i; General Electric Medical Systems). To maximize signal-to-noise ratio, animals were placed with their heads centrally located in a dedicated wrist coil. This coil was chosen because its design provides an optimal signal-to-noise ratio in relation to the relatively small diameter of a rats skull. The imaging protocol included the following sequences: an unenhanced transaxial T1-weighted spin-echo sequence (repetition time [TR]/echo time [TE], 300 ms/13 ms; slice thickness, 3 mm, without an interslice gap) and a transaxial T2-weighted 3-dimensional fast spin-echo sequence (TR/TE, 3,000/128; slice thickness, 1.5 mm). In addition, the T1-weighted sequence was acquired in the transaxial plane after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist [Schering AG], 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight) through a tail vein.
Cryolesions
Cryolesions (n = 12) were used as a model of pure BBB disruption without an inflammatory component. They were induced according to the method described by Hermann et al. (32,33). A liquid-nitrogen-cooled copper probe with a tip diameter of 2.5 mm and a tip temperature of 150°C was placed stereotactically through a burr hole onto the right parietal dura mater. Then, the probe was lowered another 200 µm to ensure contact with the cortical tissue and was left for 2 min. 18F-FET and 18F-FCH injections followed 30 min later.
Autoradiography with 18F-FET, 18F-FCH, and 18F-FDG
After detection of radiation injuries on MRI, autoradiography was performed (1220 d after irradiation in the 250-Gy group, 7080 d in the 150-Gy group). Two hours before tracer injection, Evans blue was injected into a tail vein. Catheters were then placed in the right femoral artery to monitor blood pressure and in the femoral vein to allow intravenous application of the tracers. Fifteen (18F-FCH and 18F-FET) or 45 (18F-FDG) minutes after injection of 150200 MBq of tracer, the animals were sacrificed using an overdose of pentobarbital. The brain was removed and instantly frozen in cooled isopentane. For quantification, 10-µm brain slices (100-µm slice distance) were placed on a phosphor imaging screen together with 14C standards and left for 240 min. Tritium-sensitive screens (TR2025; Fuji) were used, as their uncoated, thin, sensitive layer yields higher-resolution 18F autoradiographs than do ordinary screens. The data were scanned (BAS 1800 II [Fuji]; pixel size, 50 µm) and converted to kBq/cm3. For this conversion, the 14C standards had previously been recalibrated using data from a 4-h exposure of 10-µm slices of brain homogenate containing a defined amount of 18F activity.
For quantitative analysis, the activities were then decay corrected to the time of injection. Dividing these values by the amount of injected activity per gram of body weight yielded standardized uptake values (SUVs). Regions of interest were subsequently placed over the areas with highest and average tracer uptake in the lesions and over contralateral cortex.
4-Iodo-N-Methyl-14C-Antipyrine Autoradiography for Evaluation of Perfusion
Two rats of each lesion model (n = 4) were injected with 1.852.0 MBq of 14C-iodoantipyrine in 1 mL of saline and sacrificed 1 min later. The brain was removed and instantly frozen in chilled isopentane. Brain slices of 10-µm thickness (100-µm slice distance), together with 14C standards, were placed on a phosphor-imaging screen for 24 h.
Histologic Examination and Evans Blue Fluorescence Imaging
Frozen sections 10 µm thick were fixed with 4% formalin and stained with hematoxylin-eosin for morphologic analysis. For Evans blue visualization, slices were fixed with 4% formalin and stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Molecular Probes). Images of the Evans blue distribution were then obtained using a fluorescence microscope. To assess the grade of gliosis, the brain slides were immunohistochemically stained with anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (DAKO) and developed with the EnVision horseradish peroxidase rabbit system (DAKO).
Statistics
Differences in 18F-FCH and 18F-FET uptake in radiation injury and cryolesions were assessed using the Student 2-tailed unpaired t test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Radiation Injury
Development of Radiation Injury.
Intracerebral lesions were detected on the MRI scans 12 and 70 d after irradiation in the 250- and 150-Gy groups, respectively. The diameter of the lesions ranged from 2 to 6 mm independent of the radiation dose.
Typical examples of MRI scans are demonstrated in Figure 1. The lesion was within the cortex of the right frontoparietal region and extended into white matter. It presented as a hyperintense parenchymal signal alteration on the T2-weighted image. On the enhanced T1-weighted image after intravenous administration of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Magnevist; Schering AG), the entire lesion enhanced slightly, indicating leakage of the BBB.
|
|
|
Uptake of 18F-FET, 18F-FCH, and 18F-FDG.
An autoradiograph demonstrating 18F-FCH uptake is shown in Figure 2E. The highest degree of tracer accumulation was in the inflammatory layer (area 2) surrounding the central necrosis. Examples of 18F-FET and 18F-FDG autoradiographs are shown in Figure 3. 18F-FET accumulation (Fig. 3A) was highest in the inflammatory layer (area 2). In the 18F-FDG example (Fig. 3C), histologic examination revealed no clear necrotic center. The area with the highest 18F-FDG uptake (area 3) was histologically characterized by increased macrophage density.
The SUVs of the various tracers are summarized in Table 1. 18F-FDG displayed by far the highest uptake in the lesions. The SUVs for 18F-FCH and 18F-FET were similar and considerably smaller than for 18F-FDG. The value of L/B (ratio of uptake in lesion to that in contralateral cortex) was highest for 18F-FCH, followed by 18F-FET and 18F-FDG. This ratio to a high degree reflects the differing amounts of tracer accumulation in healthy cortex: least for 18F-FCH, followed by 18F-FET and 18F-FDG.
|
|
Uptake of 18F-FET and 18F-FCH.
Typical 18F-FCH and 18F-FET autoradiographs are shown in Figures 3C and 3D. Accumulation of both tracers was homogeneously increased in the cryolesion, compared with the adjacent and contralateral normal brain tissue.
Table 2 summarizes the SUVs of 18F-FCH and 18F-FET. In lesions, 18F-FET SUVs were on the order of 85% higher than 18F-FCH SUVs. Compared with uptake in radiation injury, 18F-FCH uptake was significantly lower in cryolesions (0.99 ± 0.18 vs. 1.50 ± 0.33, P = 0.006). In contrast, 18F-FET accumulation was similar in both types of lesions (1.85 ± 0.34 vs. 1.63 ± 0.34, P = 0.14).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The situation is different for 18F-FCH, which displayed significantly higher uptake in radiation injury than in cryolesions. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that 18F-FCH uptake in radiation injury is determined by leakage across the BBB and incorporation mainly in macrophages. Because macrophages are missing from cryolesions, 18F-FCH probably diffuses back from tissue into blood in cryolesions but is incorporated into macrophages in radiation injury. That 18F-FCH is indeed incorporated mainly into macrophages and not other cells is suggested by the finding that the areas with highest 18F-FCH uptake coincided with the areas of densest macrophage infiltration. Furthermore, we already demonstrated in a previous study that 18F-FCH is taken up by macrophages (28).
There remains the important question of the suitability of the investigated tracers for differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor tissue. We address this question by comparing our data with published data on uptake of 18F-FET, 18F-FCH, and 18F-FDG in brain tumors. However, a direct comparison of our data with the literature is limited by factors such as different acquisition protocols and modalities and interspecies differences.
18F-FET
A direct comparison is possible of our 18F-FET data with the tumor data of Langen et al., who inoculated F98 glioma cells into the brains of 13 CDF Fisher rats and evaluated 18F-FET uptake by autoradiography. They reported a mean L/B of 5.26 ± 1.30 (34). This L/B is markedly higher than the values for radiation injury (1.19 ± 0.29, average areas) found by our study.
Weber et al. investigated 18F-FET uptake in 16 patients with various tumors and radiation necrosis (11). SUV in the 2 patients with radiation necrosis was 1.1 and 0.8, and L/B was 1.2 and 1.1. These values are smaller than in our study. A possible reason is that radiation necrosis in the human study was of a more chronic type. Furthermore, SUVs measured with PET tend to underestimate the true values because of the limited resolution of PET. In the 14 patients with tumors, the L/B was 2.27 ± 0.65. In other studies, this value ranged from 2.0 to 3.3 (1315,35,36). These values are higher than those found by our study, but there is some overlap. With regard to SUV, Weber et al. reported values of 2.67 ± 0.91 and 1.17 ± 0.16 in tumor lesions and normal cortex, respectively. Direct comparison of SUVs in humans and rats is limited, since the magnitude of the SUV depends on the distribution in all tissues that accumulate the tracer, and this distribution may differ between species. In addition, PET SUVs tend to be too small. These factors may be why SUVs in normal cortex were 18% smaller in the human study of Weber et al. than in our animal study. Considering all the available data, and especially the rat study by Langen et al. (34), 18F-FET seems promising for separating radiation necrosis from tumor tissue.
Radiolabeled Choline Analogs
For 18F-FCH, the comparison of our data with the literature is less conclusive, since no data are available on 18F-FCH uptake in a rat model of brain tumor. Shinoura et al. measured 11C-choline uptake in C6 glioma cells implanted under the skin of rats. Tumor uptake was 3- to 4-fold higher than brain uptake (26). This is higher than the L/B ratio of 2.50 ± 0.44 found by our study. Although Shinoura et al. used 11C-choline, the data should at least in part be comparable, since Hara described similar uptake characteristics for 11C-choline and 18F-labeled choline compounds (9). Some data are available from human studies. Degrado et al. also used 18F-FCH and reported an L/B of 10.0 in a single patient with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (27). Using another 18F-labeled choline analog, 18F-fluoroethyl-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethylammonium, Hara et al. found an L/B in the range of 1221 for high-grade gliomas (n = 8) and 04.8 for grade II astrocytomas (n = 2) (10). Ohtani et al. investigated 11C-choline uptake in 20 patients with different brain tumors and calculated tumor-to-white matter ratios in the range of 0.9829.10 (37). The above studies indicate that 18F-FCH in the radiation injury of our study is generally lower than in tumors. However, more studies using 18F-FCH in tumors are needed to settle the issue.
18F-FDG
In our study, accumulation of 18F-FDG in radiation injury was generally on the same order as accumulation in normal cortex (mean L/B = 1.07 ± 0.19, average regions). For comparison, a rat study of Takeda et al. showed a maximum 14C-FDG L/B of approximately 1.2 in intracerebral C6 gliomas (38). This is in the same range as the 18F-FDG uptake in our study and leads to the conclusion that 18F-FDG is of questionable suitability for separating radiation necrosis from tumor.
General Remarks
Some differences between our model and human studies are important to mention. The dose and type of irradiation (single dose, 150250 Gy) used in our study differ from those used on humans. In addition, our model represents acute radiation injury. In humans, a more chronic phase of radiation injury is seen, referred to in the clinical literature as radiation necrosis. In radiation necrosis, the accumulation of inflammatory cells and degree of BBB disruption is probably less pronounced than in acute radiation injury. Typical alterations include wall thickening, fibrinoid necrosis, hyalinization of the vessel walls, and extensive gliosis adjacent to the necrotic focus (39). Therefore, uptake of all investigated tracers in such lesions is likely to be smaller. The low 18F-FET uptake found by Weber et al. (11) for 2 cases of human radiation necrosis points in this direction. A lower uptake would increase the specificity for diagnosing radiation necrosis, especially for 18F-FET and 18F-FCH. However, more studies on 18F-FCH and 18F-FET uptake in chronic radiation lesions are needed to settle this issue.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
For correspondence or reprints contact: Alfred Buck, MD, Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
E-mail: fred.buck{at}usz.ch
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related articles in JNM:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Plathow and W. A. Weber Tumor Cell Metabolism Imaging J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2008; 49(Suppl_2): 43S - 63S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Stadlbauer, O. Prante, C. Nimsky, E. Salomonowitz, M. Buchfelder, T. Kuwert, R. Linke, and O. Ganslandt Metabolic Imaging of Cerebral Gliomas: Spatial Correlation of Changes in O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET and Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 721 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Salber, G. Stoffels, D. Pauleit, A.-M. Oros-Peusquens, N. J. Shah, P. Klauth, K. Hamacher, H. H. Coenen, and K.-J. Langen Differential Uptake of O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine, L-3H-Methionine, and 3H-Deoxyglucose in Brain Abscesses J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 2056 - 2062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Chen Clinical Applications of PET in Brain Tumors J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1468 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Kwee, J. P. Ko, C. S. Jiang, M. R. Watters, and M. N. Coel Solitary Brain Lesions Enhancing at MR Imaging: Evaluation with Fluorine 18 Fluorocholine PET Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 557 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Rutten, J.-E. Cabay, N. Withofs, C. Lemaire, J. Aerts, V. Baart, and R. Hustinx PET/CT of Skull Base Meningiomas Using 2-18F-Fluoro-L-Tyrosine: Initial Report J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 720 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Wyss, N. Spaeth, G. Biollaz, J. Pahnke, P. Alessi, E. Trachsel, V. Treyer, B. Weber, D. Neri, and A. Buck Uptake of 18F-Fluorocholine, 18F-FET, and 18F-FDG in C6 Gliomas and Correlation with 131I-SIP(L19), a Marker of Angiogenesis J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 608 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-C. Chan, T.-C. Yen, S.-H. Ng, C.-Y. Lin, H.-M. Wang, C.-T. Liao, K.-H. Fan, and J. T.-C. Chang Differential Roles of 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Locoregional Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma After Primary Curative Therapy: Response Evaluation and Impact on Management J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 1447 - 1454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Matter, M. T. Wyss, P. Meier, N. Spath, T. von Lukowicz, C. Lohmann, B. Weber, A. R. de Molina, J. C. Lacal, S. M. Ametamey, et al. 18F-Choline Images Murine Atherosclerotic Plaques Ex Vivo Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 26(3): 584 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY | THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE |