HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Related articles in JNM Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martinez-Möller, A. Articles by Nekolla, S. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Martinez-Möller, A. Articles by Nekolla, S. G.

Artifacts from Misaligned CT in Cardiac Perfusion PET/CT Studies: Frequency, Effects, and Potential Solutions

¹ Nuklearmedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany; and ² Computer Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

Correspondence: For correspondence or reprints contact: Axel Martinez-Möller, MSc, Nuklearmedizinische Klinik der Technischen Universität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, D81675 München, Germany. E-mail: a.martinez-moller{at}lrz.tu-muenchen.de

CT-based attenuation correction is a widely used option in commercial PET/CT scanners. However, as a result of a nonsimultaneous acquisition and differences in temporal resolution between both modalities, a potential misregistration between the PET and CT, especially in the thorax and the upper abdomen, can be found. We observed a substantial number of apparent perfusion defects in spatial coincidence with the misregistered segments of the heart and assumed these defects were related to an incorrect attenuation correction. The purpose of this work was to assess the clinical impact of emission–transmission misalignment in myocardial perfusion imaging with PET/CT and to investigate potential solutions. Methods: Twenty-eight coronary artery disease patients underwent PET/CT ¹³NH₃ rest/stress examinations. The emission–transmission misalignment was corrected by manual registration and the PET studies were reconstructed again using the realigned CT images for attenuation correction. The effects of the registration were evaluated by quantitative analysis of the local tracer uptake on a polar map basis. In addition to manual registration, 2 alternative realignment methods were evaluated: mutual information–based image registration and emission-driven correction based on the outline of the heart in the PET image. Results: Manual realignment resulted in a change in the defect size of >10% of the left ventricle in 6 of 28 studies (21.4%); in 5 of the studies, this resulted in the disappearance of large apparent perfusion defects (15%–46% of the left ventricle), which were fully due to emission–transmission misregistration. Automatic image registration was unable to realign the datasets, whereas the emission-driven correction showed a good agreement with manual registration. Conclusion: Misregistration of PET and CT images is common in cardiac PET/CT studies and results in artifacts on the attenuation-corrected PET images, which appear to be corrected by repeating the PET reconstruction after manual realignment of the CT image data. In contrast to manual realignment, an automated emission-driven correction appears to be a promising approach.

Key Words: PET/CT • cardiology • attenuation correction • image registration • myocardial perfusion imaging

COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Related articles in JNM:

This Month in JNM

JNM 2007 48: 11a-12a. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. M. Bengel, T. Higuchi, M. S. Javadi, and R. Lautamaki Cardiac positron emission tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1): 1 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Martinez-Moller, M. Souvatzoglou, G. Delso, R. A. Bundschuh, C. Chefd'hotel, S. I. Ziegler, N. Navab, M. Schwaiger, and S. G. Nekolla Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2009; 50(4): 520 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Slomka, L. Le Meunier, S. W. Hayes, W. Acampa, M. Oba, G. G. Haemer, D. S. Berman, and G. Germano Comparison of Myocardial Perfusion 82Rb PET Performed with CT- and Transmission CT-Based Attenuation Correction J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2008; 49(12): 1992 - 1998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Buck, S. Nekolla, S. Ziegler, A. Beer, B. J. Krause, K. Herrmann, K. Scheidhauer, H.-J. Wester, E. J. Rummeny, M. Schwaiger, et al. SPECT/CT J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1305 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Higuchi and F. M Bengel Cardiovascular nuclear imaging: from perfusion to molecular function Heart, June 1, 2008; 94(6): 809 - 816. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, and S. Sdringola Reducing Radiation Dose in Rest-Stress Cardiac PET/CT by Single Poststress Cine CT for Attenuation Correction: Quantitative Validation J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 738 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Goetze, T. L. Brown, W. C. Lavely, Z. Zhang, and F. M. Bengel Attenuation Correction in Myocardial Perfusion SPECT/CT: Effects of Misregistration and Value of Reregistration J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1090 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, A. Guha, and S. Sdringola Frequent Diagnostic Errors in Cardiac PET/CT Due to Misregistration of CT Attenuation and Emission PET Images: A Definitive Analysis of Causes, Consequences, and Corrections J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 1112 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]