Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBrief Communications

Toward (Hybrid) Navigation of a Fluorescence Camera in an Open Surgery Setting

Gijs H. KleinJan, Nynke S. van den Berg, Matthias N. van Oosterom, Thomas Wendler, Mitsuharu Miwa, Axel Bex, Kees Hendricksen, Simon Horenblas and Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2016, 57 (10) 1650-1653; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.171645
Gijs H. KleinJan
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nynke S. van den Berg
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
3Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias N. van Oosterom
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Wendler
4Institut für Informatik, Computer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP), Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
5SurgicEye GmbH, Munich, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitsuharu Miwa
6Business Incubator, Development Center, Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu City, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Axel Bex
3Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kees Hendricksen
3Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Horenblas
3Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
3Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

With the introduction of the hybrid tracer indocyanine green (ICG)-99mTc-nanocolloid, a direct relation between preoperative imaging and intraoperative fluorescence guidance was established. However, fluorescence guidance remains limited by its superficial nature. This study evaluated the feasibility of a nuclear medicine–based navigation concept that allowed intraoperative positioning of a fluorescence camera (FC) in the vicinity of preoperatively defined ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid containing sentinel nodes (SNs). Methods: Five patients with penile cancer scheduled for SN biopsy were injected with ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid followed by preoperative SPECT/CT imaging. The navigation device was used to provide a real-time augmented reality overlay of the SPECT/CT images and video output of the FC. This overlay was then used for FC navigation. Results: SPECT/CT identified 13 SNs in 9 groins. FC navigation was successful for all 12 intraoperatively evaluated SNs (average error, 8.8 mm; range, 0–20 mm). Conclusion: This study reveals the potential benefits of FC navigation during open surgery procedures.

  • augmented reality
  • sentinel node biopsy
  • navigation
  • fluorescence imaging
  • SPECT/CT

Although interventional guidance can be provided using multiple modalities, because of its ability to provide detailed and real-time guidance, fluorescence imaging (FI) is receiving increasing interest. FI is highly effective in superficial applications at known locations but has a limited in-depth potential (1). Radioguidance technologies on the other hand have been shown to have a great in-depth potential and even allow for preoperative confirmation of tracer uptake using, for example, SPECT combined with CT (2).

When separate approaches are used to provide pre- and intraoperative guidance, information may get lost between diagnostic imaging and the operation theater. Discrepancies in findings may subsequently result in over- or undertreatment of the patient. To solve these translational issues, and to enable a best-of-both-worlds scenario, a hybrid surgical guidance concept is advocated. This concept is based on integrating multiple complementary features that are of value for preoperative imaging (nuclear medicine) and intraoperative (fluorescence) image-guided surgery (3). This can, in part, be realized using a hybrid tracer that contains 2 distinct signals, for example, the sentinel node (SN) tracer indocyanine green (ICG)-99mTc-nanocolloid (1). Recently, this hybrid concept was expanded beyond the field of tracer development to hardware-based integration of radioguidance and FI modalities (4,5).

Surgical navigation using 3-dimensional (3D) nuclear medicine findings has been used to provide directional movement to the lesion of interest, in the form of in-depth information. This technology was considered particularly valuable during SN biopsy procedures (6–8). Apart from navigation of a γ-probe, the navigation setup has also been used for laparoscope (4), γ-camera (7), and ultrasound probe (9) positioning. We thus reasoned it should be possible to also navigate a fluorescence camera (FC) in an open surgery setting (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Navigation setup. (A) Setup in the operation theater. (B) A reference tracker is placed on both the patient and the FC. Consequently, the navigation device is able to localize the FC with respect to the position of the patient and the overlayed SPECT/CT images.

For penile cancer SN biopsy, we have previously demonstrated that ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid provides superior optical guidance toward SNs compared with blue dye (10). However, in patients with increased fatty tissue surrounding the SNs, the limited tissue penetration of the fluorescent signal was not always sufficient to optically identify the SNs via fluorescence guidance (10). Although the conventional radioguided approach was effective in identifying these SNs, these modalities provided no depth information to the target. By integrating navigation into the procedure, we made an attempt to overcome these shortcomings for penile cancer patients who were to undergo a SN biopsy procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Five patients with cT1–2N0Mx penile cancer (11) scheduled for SN biopsy and subsequent treatment of the primary tumor were prospectively included. All included groins were clinically node-negative (10).

The institutional review board of The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek approved this study, and all subjects signed a written informed consent form. Procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Hybrid Tracer Preparation, Injection, and Preoperative SN Mapping and Histopathology

The hybrid tracer is formed by mixing 99mTc-nanocolloid with a small amount of ICG. Briefly, 2 mL of pertechnetate (∼1,400 MBq) in saline was added to a commercial vial of nanocolloid (containing 0.5 mg of albumin colloid [GE Healthcare]). After incubation at room temperature (30 min) and removal of any excess reactive elements, to the 99mTc-nanocolloid solution (pH 6–7) 0.25 mg of ICG was added to form ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid (12, 13).

For the SN biopsy procedure of penile cancer, the hybrid tracer injection procedure, preoperative SN mapping, and histopathologic tissue analysis have been previously described in detail by Brouwer et al. (10). On average 96.7 MBq of ICG-99mTc-nancolloid was injected in 4 depots around the tumor (Supplemental Table 1 [supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org]).

Specifications of Navigation Device and FC (Software and Hardware)

Hardware and Reference Trackers

As navigation device, the declipseSPECT (SurgicEye), in which DICOM files of the preoperatively acquired SPECT/CT datasets can be loaded, was used (4,8).

Preoperative images were acquired with a reference tracker containing three fiducials (hereafter referred to as RTpatient) placed on the patient (Fig. 1). In 4 patients, the patient reference tracker (RTpatient) was placed on the pubic bone, whereas in 1 patient (patient 2) this was impossible because of the patient’s obesity; here the tracker was placed on the superior anterior iliac bone.

The preoperative RTpatient location was marked (with ink), and during the operation a sterile RTpatient was placed on the same skin-marked location, allowing the navigation system to spatially merge the preoperative acquired SPECT/CT with the position of the patient in the operating theater (registration). When fused with the real-time white light video-feed generated by the navigation device–embedded overhead camera, different on-screen mixed/augmented-reality views could be created. Intraoperative replacement of the sterile RTpatient did not negatively affect the surgical workflow.

A second 3-fiducial reference tracker (hereafter referred to as RTfluorescence) was attached to the modified PhotoDynamicEye (m-PDE; Hamamatsu Photonics KK) FC to allow for its tracking by the navigation system (Fig. 1). This FC has the ability to switch between white light and near-infrared FI mode and works under ambient light conditions (15). For easy differentiation between the RTfluorescence and the RTpatient, the trackers were geometrically differently shaped.

Incorporation of Imaging Information of FC into Navigation Device

To import the video-feed of the FC into the navigation system, the Bayonet-Neill-Concelman connector (BNC) video output of the FC was taken and converted with a BNC to video graphics array converter (Ligawo), after which the signal was recorded in a Epiphan DVI2PCIe framegrabber (Epiphan Systems Inc.) that was integrated in the navigation device. Customized declipseSPECT 6.0 software (SurgicEye) was used to incorporate the external FC video-feed in both the calibration and the navigation workflow.

Calibration of the FC was performed in the following 2 steps. For intrinsic (e.g., focal length, principle point, lens distortions) and extrinsic camera parameters (translation and rotation with respect to the navigation device reference coordinate system), calibrations were performed using a tracked 7 × 8 checkerboard and an open source computer vision library for camera calibration based on the work as described by Zhang (14). These calibrations were performed to allow the augmented projection of the preoperative SPECT/CT data in the FC video image. In the second step, calibration of the transformation between the camera lenses and the RTfluorescence on the FC was performed using a dedicated calibrator reference target. This calibration makes it possible to show the distance from the camera lenses relative to the designated navigation targets found in the SPECT imaging data, in this case the SNs.

To allow the FC to be tracked and navigated in the preoperative SPECT/CT images, a navigation display similar to the one generated for the conventional γ-probe was used (8). Herein, an overlay of the 3D SPECT/CT images onto the patient was displayed in the video-feed of the FC. This same view also showed the distance from the tip of the FC to the designated targets (SNs).

Integration of the SPECT/CT images with the real-time fluorescence images of the FC could be switched on and off at will. Moreover, because the FC allows for both white light and near-infrared FI, navigation could be performed in both imaging modes. When sudden movements were made with the FC during the navigation procedure, the SPECT/CT overlay followed with a slight lag (∼20–40 ms). This could be corrected easily by holding the FC still for a fraction of a second.

Surgical Procedure: Intraoperative Navigation to SNs

Before incision, the FC was navigated in the preoperatively acquired SPECT/CT images toward the SNs in the groin. During this process, the distance between the FC and the center of the SN was provided. If the SN was not visible through the skin via FI, the γ-probe (Neoprobe; Johnson & Johnson Medical) was used to determine the site for incision.

After incision, alternating γ-tracing and FI allowed localization of the SNs in the groin. On localization of the SN, the FC was again navigated to determine the correlation between the acquired fluorescence image and the projected SPECT/CT image. The error of navigation (in the coronal plane) was determined by measuring the distance between the center of the radioactive hotspot and the center of the fluorescence hotspot as seen on-screen from the perspective of the FC.

Light Spectra Measurements

Light spectra of the FC and the optical tracking device of the navigation device were measured using a Jobin Yvon VS140 linear array fiber spectrometer (Horiba) in the 300- to 1,200-nm range, with an integration time of 0.1 ms. The fiber was held at an approximate 2-m distance from the head of the device of which the light spectra were measured.

RESULTS

Preoperative SN Mapping

Preoperative imaging revealed bilateral drainage in 4 of the 5 included patients. In the remaining patient, only unilateral drainage was seen. With SPECT/CT imaging, 13 SNs, dispersed over 9 groins, were identified, of which 30.8% could already be visualized on the lymphoscintigrams acquired 15 min after injection of the hybrid tracer (Supplemental Table 1).

Navigation

In the navigation setup, the overlay of the SPECT/CT images and the FC video-feed was displayed on-screen (Figs. 2 and 3). Intraoperatively, 12 of the 13 SNs seen on preoperative imaging were navigated to with the FC (Supplemental Video 1) with an average navigation error of 8.8 ± 9.1 mm (median, 7.5 mm; range, 0–20 mm). The 1 SN that was resected without using navigation was omitted because of logistical reasons.

Intraoperative repositioning of the RTpatient directly resulted in a large navigation error (Supplemental Table 1, patients 3 and 4). In patient 4 only, we were able to correct this RTpatient placement using the preoperative placed skin markings, thereby reducing the navigation error for the other SNs of this patient to 0 mm (Supplemental Table 1).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Navigation of the FC. Video signal of the overhead camera of navigation system allows projection of SPECT/CT (A) or SPECT (B) onto the patient. Bony structures (low-dose CT) and SNs/injection site (SPECT) are shown. (C) Overlay of the SPECT on near-infrared video signal of the FC showing 2 SNs. (D) Fluorescence imaging optically visualized the SN and thus allowed confirmation of FC navigation accuracy.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Fluorescence imaging with integrated overlay. (A) Preoperative overlay of the SPECT onto the patient from the perspective of the FC (white light imaging mode) showing the primary injected tumor and, close to the reference tracker, the SN. (B) Preoperative overlay of the SPECT onto the patient from the perspective of the FC (fluorescence imaging mode) illustrating the influence the flickering, caused by the tracking signal of the navigation device, has on the ability to visualize the fluorescence signal in the SN (C and D, in black-and-white or pseudocolored green, respectively).

In 2 patients (patients 2 and 3), on localization of the SN we experienced that the hotspot in the preoperative images contained multiple (clustered) SNs, resulting in the intraoperative identification of 2 additional SNs.

Overall, the navigation procedure was not found to be of influence on the length of the operation (average operation time, 91 min, including the primary tumor treatment).

Spectral Overlap Between Near-Infrared Camera and Fluorescence Emission of ICG

Optical tracking by the navigation device occurred via reflection of pulsed near-infrared light (20 Hz) emitted by the tracking head of the declipseSPECT system. Following light reflection on the fiducials present on the RTpatient and RTfluorescence, it can be selectively detected by the tracking head and used for position tracking. Unfortunately, the wavelength of this near-infrared light (800- to 900-nm range with a peak at 863 nm) overlapped with the emission spectrum of ICG (the only Food and Drug Administration clinically approved near-infrared fluorescent dye; peak, 810 nm). This meant that the tracking signal was also detected by the FC, causing a flickering interference when FI was performed in the near-infrared FI mode of the FC (Supplemental Fig. 1). Yet, this did not hinder navigation of the FC in the white-light setting. This flickering could be blocked efficiently by manually covering the tracking light sources. However, it did mean that the in-depth navigation information was temporarily lost. When the FC remained at the exact same distance, FI could be performed to evaluate if the sentinel node was fluorescent.

The spectral overlap between the tracking device and the fluorescent emission of ICG did not prevent us from demonstrating the potential of the hybrid navigation concept (Supplemental Fig. 1). However, for more routine use, the flickering issue needs to be solved. Here, the clinical availability of a spectrally different tracking light source or fluorescence tracer may provide outcome.

Because tracker placement appears to be a critical component for the navigation accuracy, much can be gained when this part of the procedure is improved. The RTpatient used in this study had to be removed and replaced during the transfer from the Department of Nuclear Medicine to the operation theater. To overcome this shortcoming, one might use a different method of coregistration, for example, by using multiple small metal balls that are not susceptible to deformation or by implementing the concept of intraoperative freehandSPECT (6–8). FreehandSPECT may help to correct for errors caused by tissue deformation as a result of surgical manipulation.

DISCUSSION

In this proof-of-concept study during open surgical SN biopsy procedures we demonstrated the feasibility of the hybrid navigator concept. This integrated approach provides an important step in the evolution of hybrid surgical guidance because it allows preoperative imaging information to be physically linked to FI in the intraoperative setting. Merging of modalities not only helps prevent a mismatch in findings, it also provides a step toward reducing space (e.g., in m2 they take up in the operation theater).

A fairly ideal evaluation setup was found in penile cancer patients as SNs were rather easy to locate because of their superficial location. The main advantage of adding navigation in the hybrid surgical guidance concept was the improved directional feedback including depth estimation. As demonstrated in the current study, with the FC the accuracy of the navigation process could be confirmed or corrected. Similar to findings previously reported, the navigation error strongly depended on the accuracy with which we could replace the RTpatient during the surgical procedure (7,8).

By including patients who undergo SN biopsy procedures in other anatomies, for example, in the head and neck or axilla, the value of this technique can be further evaluated. Alternative to navigating toward an SN, one may also think of using this approach for hybrid tracer-based radioguided occult lesion localization (or for a seed-localization setup wherein hybrid marker seeds are applied) (16,17). PET-based navigation in combination with intraoperative Cerenkov imaging could also provide an interesting extension (18).

CONCLUSION

Navigation-based integration of preoperative 3D SPECT/CT information with real-time FI provides an interesting next step in the hybrid surgical guidance concept. If the technology evolves further, its implementation may be extended to other (hybrid) tracers and anatomies.

DISCLOSURE

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. This work was partially supported by a Eurostars grant (Hybrid Navigator; grant E! 7555), an NWO-STW-VIDI grant (grant STW BGT11272), and a European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) grant (grant 2012-306890). The m-PDE FC used in this study was provided by Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. (Hamamatsu, Japan). SurgicEye (Munich, Germany) provided the prototype software for the navigation device. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the surgical staff and the Department of Nuclear Medicine of the Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital for their support and assistance.

Footnotes

  • Published online May 26, 2016.

  • © 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. van Leeuwen FWB,
    2. Hardwick JCH,
    3. van Erkel AR
    . Luminescence-based imaging approaches in the field of interventional molecular imaging. Radiology. 2015;276:12–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Maurer T,
    2. Weirich G,
    3. Schottelius M,
    4. et al
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen-radioguided surgery for metastatic lymph nodes in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:530–534.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. van den Berg NS
    . Valdés-Olmos R a, van der Poel HG, van Leeuwen FWB. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for prostate cancer: a hybrid approach. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:493–496.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Brouwer OR,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. Bunschoten A,
    4. et al
    . Image navigation as a means to expand the boundaries of fluorescence-guided surgery. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:3123–3136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. van den Berg NS,
    2. Simon H,
    3. Kleinjan GH,
    4. et al
    . First-in-human evaluation of a hybrid modality that allows combined radio- and (near-infrared) fluorescence tracing during surgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1639–1647.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bluemel C,
    2. Schnelzer A,
    3. Okur A,
    4. et al
    . Freehand SPECT for image-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:1656–1661.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Engelen T,
    2. Winkel BM,
    3. Rietbergen DD,
    4. et al
    . The next evolution in radioguided surgery: breast cancer related sentinel node localization using a freehandSPECT-mobile gamma camera combination. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;5:233–245.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Brouwer OR,
    2. van den Berg NS,
    3. Mathéron HM,
    4. et al
    . Feasibility of intraoperative navigation to the sentinel node in the groin using preoperatively acquired single photon emission computerized tomography data: transferring functional imaging to the operating room. J Urol. 2014;192:1810–1816.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Freesmeyer M,
    2. Opfermann T,
    3. Winkens T
    . Hybrid integration of real-time US and freehand SPECT: proof of concept in patients with thyroid diseases. Radiology. 2014;271:856–861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Brouwer OR,
    2. van den Berg NS,
    3. Mathéron HM,
    4. et al
    . A hybrid radioactive and fluorescent tracer for sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma as a potential replacement for blue dye. Eur Urol. 2014;65:600–609.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sobin LH,
    2. Gospodarowicz MK,
    3. Wittekind C
    . TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 2009.
  12. 12.↵
    1. KleinJan GH,
    2. Bunschoten A,
    3. van den Berg NS,
    4. et al
    . Fluorescence guided surgery and tracer-dose, fact or fiction? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. In press.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bunschoten A,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. Kuil J,
    4. et al
    . Targeted non-covalent self-assembled nanoparticles based on human serum albumin. Biomaterials. 2012;33:867–875.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Zhang Z
    . A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2000;22:1330–1334.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. van den Berg NS,
    2. Miwa M,
    3. Kleinjan GH,
    4. et al
    . (Near-infrared) fluorescence guided surgery under ambient light conditions, a next step to embedment of the technology in clinical routine. Ann Surg Oncol. In press.
  16. 16.↵
    1. van den Berg NS,
    2. Brouwer OR,
    3. Klop WMC,
    4. et al
    . Concomitant radio- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity using ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1128–1136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Buckle T,
    2. Chin PTK,
    3. van den Berg NS,
    4. et al
    . Tumor bracketing and safety margin estimation using multimodal marker seeds: a proof of concept. J Biomed Opt. 2010;15:056021.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Thorek DLJ,
    2. Riedl CC,
    3. Grimm J
    . Clinical Cerenkov luminescence imaging of 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:95–98.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication December 22, 2015.
  • Accepted for publication April 11, 2016.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 10
October 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Toward (Hybrid) Navigation of a Fluorescence Camera in an Open Surgery Setting
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Toward (Hybrid) Navigation of a Fluorescence Camera in an Open Surgery Setting
Gijs H. KleinJan, Nynke S. van den Berg, Matthias N. van Oosterom, Thomas Wendler, Mitsuharu Miwa, Axel Bex, Kees Hendricksen, Simon Horenblas, Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2016, 57 (10) 1650-1653; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.171645

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Toward (Hybrid) Navigation of a Fluorescence Camera in an Open Surgery Setting
Gijs H. KleinJan, Nynke S. van den Berg, Matthias N. van Oosterom, Thomas Wendler, Mitsuharu Miwa, Axel Bex, Kees Hendricksen, Simon Horenblas, Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2016, 57 (10) 1650-1653; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.171645
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Hybrid Surgical Guidance: Does Hardware Integration of {gamma}- and Fluorescence Imaging Modalities Make Sense?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Intraarterial Administration Boosts 177Lu-HA-DOTATATE Accumulation in Salvage Meningioma Patients
  • Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-NOTA (68Ga-NGUL) and 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study
  • Assessment of P-Glycoprotein Transport Activity at the Human Blood–Retina Barrier with (R)‐11C-Verapamil PET
Show more Brief Communications

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • augmented reality
  • sentinel node biopsy
  • Navigation
  • fluorescence imaging
  • SPECT/CT
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire