Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigation

212Pb-Pretargeted Theranostics for Pancreatic Cancer

David Bauer, Lukas M. Carter, Mohamed I. Atmane, Roberto De Gregorio, Alexa Michel, Spencer Kaminsky, Sebastien Monette, Mengshi Li, Michael K. Schultz and Jason S. Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2023, jnumed.123.266388; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266388
David Bauer
1Department of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lukas M. Carter
2Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohamed I. Atmane
3Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, and Rockefeller University, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto De Gregorio
1Department of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexa Michel
1Department of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spencer Kaminsky
1Department of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastien Monette
3Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, and Rockefeller University, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mengshi Li
4Perspective Therapeutics, Inc., Coralville, Iowa; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael K. Schultz
4Perspective Therapeutics, Inc., Coralville, Iowa; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason S. Lewis
1Department of Radiology and Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
5Department of Radiology and Pharmacology Program, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Although pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with limited treatment options and poor patient outcomes, targeted α-particle therapy (TAT) represents a promising development in the field. TAT shows potential in treating metastatic cancers, including those that have become resistant to conventional treatments. Among the most auspicious radionuclides stands the in vivo α-generator 212Pb. Combined with the imaging-compatible radionuclide 203Pb, this theranostic match is a promising modality rapidly translating into the clinic. Methods: Using the pretargeting approach between a radiolabeled 1,2,4,5-tetrazine (Tz) tracer and a trans-cyclooctene (TCO) modified antibody, imaging and therapy with radiolead were performed on a PDAC tumor xenograft mouse model. For therapy, 3 cohorts received a single administration of 1.1, 2.2, or 3.7 MBq of the pretargeting agent, [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz, whereby administered activity levels were guided by dosimetric analysis. Results: The treated mice were holistically evaluated; minimal-to-mild renal tubular necrosis was observed. At the same time, median survival doubled for the highest-dose cohort (10.7 wk) compared with the control cohort (5.1 wk). Conclusion: This foundational study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of pretargeted TAT with 212Pb in PDAC while considering dose limitations and potential adverse effects.

  • targeted α-therapy
  • pretargeting
  • lead-212
  • progeny release
  • lead-203

Recent advances in oncology have led to marked improvements in the standard of care for cancer patients. Nevertheless, metastatic relapse remains the principal cause of cancer mortality (1).

Targeted α-particle therapy (TAT) is thought to provide optimal properties for treating disseminated micrometastatic diseases and exhibits significant potential, especially for tackling rapidly progressing cancers (2–4). TAT aims to selectively deliver α radiation to cancer cells while minimizing treatment-related toxicities. The direct cell-killing effect of α-particles is related to the induction of double-stranded DNA ruptures caused by the impact of the massive particles combined with their high linear energy transfer (50–230 keV/μm). Because of their relatively short effective range (<100 μm), α-emitters minimally cross-irradiate surrounding healthy tissue (5).

One increasingly popular radionuclide is the in vivo α-particle generator 212Pb, which emits 1 (net) α-particle and 2 β–-particles within its decay chain (Fig. 1; Supplemental Fig. 1; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org). An isotopic theranostic match can be found in 203Pb, which has a half-life of 2.1 d and is suitable for SPECT imaging. Because of the pair’s suitable chemical and physical properties, 203Pb and 212Pb are ideal for clinical translation (6). However, with a relatively short physical half-life (10.6 h), 212Pb-bearing radiopharmaceuticals require fast pharmacokinetics. Thus, pretargeted radionuclide therapy (PRT) is an especially promising strategy for using 212Pb (7).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Pretargeting with theranostic pair 203Pb and 212Pb. (Left) Decay scheme of in vivo α-generator 212Pb and SPECT-compatible nuclide 203Pb. (Right) Illustration of theranostic pretargeting approach, following concept of reference 9. This figure was created with BioRender. EC = electron capture; t1/2 = half-life.

Our laboratories previously reported the inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder ligation’s potential for PRT (8–11). In this work, we investigated the pretargeting strategy between the trans-cyclooctene (TCO)–conjugated monoclonal antibody (mAb) 5B1 and 212Pb-radiolabeled Tz conjugates. 5B1 targets the carbohydrate cell surface antigen 19-9, which is overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)—a uniformly lethal cancer form with limited treatment options (12). The pretargeting approach decouples the relatively short physical half-life of the radionuclide from the long biologic half-life of antibodies, promising both high specific binding to the tumor marker and fast clearance of the radiotracer. In a preclinical model, we aimed to prove that this strategy rapidly and safely delivers 212Pb to the tumor. A further advantage of pretargeting is that multiple Tz radiotracers can be subsequently administered with almost identical tumor uptake, as previously reported (9). This allows for delivering a diagnostic Tz tracer first and calculating dosimetry estimates, followed by administering the therapeutic one without reinjecting the mAb (Fig. 1). This approach will enable clinicians to better anticipate the outcome of therapy preceded by predictive imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Information about laboratory equipment, biology, dosimetry, and additional studies can be found in the supplemental materials, as well as the synthesis of the Tz precursors modified with a polyethylene glycol 7 (PEG7) linker and attached to one of the 4 chelators: TCMC (2-[4,7,10-tris(2-amino-2-oxoethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetrazacyclododec-1-yl]acetamide), PSC (2-[4,10-bis(carboxymethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetrazacyclododec-1-yl]acetamide), DO3A (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7-triacetic acid), or DOTA (2,2′,2′′,2′′′-(1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetrayl)tetraacetic acid).

All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

General Information for In Vivo Studies

For pharmacokinetic assessments, the 203Pb- or 64Cu-labeled Tz was intravenously injected (tail vain) into 8 healthy female athymic nude mice, and the radiotracer distribution was determined in selected organs at 1 and 4 h after injection (n = 4 per time point). The mice were intravenously injected with the 5B1-TCO conjugate (100 μg in sterile filtered phosphate-buffered saline) for pretargeting. Three to 4 d later, the mice received the radiolabeled tracer (2 nmol in phosphate-buffered saline).

Imaging

The mice were anesthetized using 2% isoflurane for imaging. SPECT/CT images with 203Pb (11–37 MBq per mouse) were obtained on a Mediso nanoScan SPECT/CT device equipped with a high-resolution, low-energy, multipinhole collimator detecting the 203Pb characteristic x-rays between 70 and 90 keV. All SPECT images were analyzed using VivoQuant (Invicro) reconstruction software (2020patch1hf2). PET/CT images with 64Cu (∼7.4 MBq per mouse) were obtained on an Inveon PET/CT (Siemens) rodent scanner. All PET/CT images were analyzed using the Inveon software suite. The counting rates in the reconstructed images were converted to the mean percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) by applying a system-specific calibration factor. Cerenkov luminescence imaging with 212Pb (recording time, 5 min) was performed with an IVIS Spectrum (PerkinElmer).

For biodistribution studies, the mice were euthanized (CO2 asphyxiation followed by cervical dislocation), and the tissues of interest were harvested for γ-counting or histologic analyses.

Therapy

A 212Pb PRT dose escalation study was performed to evaluate therapeutic potential and identify potential adverse effects. Sixty mice were implanted with subcutaneous tumor xenografts 5 wk before the study commenced. The width and length of the tumors were determined using a caliper, and the tumor volume was calculated via Equation 1 as described in the literature (13).Embedded Image Eq. 1

Mice with tumor volumes of 100–300 mm3 were selected and randomized into 5 cohorts (n = 8 per cohort). Two cohorts served as controls and 3 received administered activities of 1.1, 2.2, and 3.7 MBq; the choice of these administered activities was guided by dosimetry estimates and accepted dosimetry thresholds for tumor response and toxicity (14,15). The mice received the 5B1-TCO conjugate 1 d after randomization and the 212Pb-labeled Tz 3 d later. Wellness was monitored daily, and tumor volume and body weight were monitored biweekly until the endpoint. The endpoint was defined as a tumor volume of more than 2,000 mm3, weight loss of more than 20% (compared with initial measurement), or a concerning health condition (e.g., necrotic or ulcerating tumor). After reaching their endpoints, the mice were euthanized, and selected tissues, including tumors, livers, and kidneys, were collected. Selected mice (n = 14 in total) from each cohort were submitted alive to a board-certified veterinary pathologist at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, and the Rockefeller University Laboratory of Comparative Pathology for a holistic evaluation. Blood samples (3 per cohort) were collected weekly via retroorbital blood draws and analyzed with a Hemavet 950 (Drew Scientific).

All data are represented as mean value ± standard error of the mean. The sample sizes were selected regarding statistical considerations, ethical guidelines, and exigencies of funding. The significance analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software 9.0, using unpaired 2-tailed t, multiple t, and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Chemical Evaluation of Tz-Based Radiotracers

The pharmacokinetic properties of Tz-based radiopharmaceutical systems are essential factors for the success of PRT. Ideally, Tz-based radiopharmaceuticals exhibit short blood retention times and demonstrate low off-target uptake; usually, renal elimination is preferable. For this study, we investigated the previously developed precursor DOTA-PEG7-Tz (8) and 3 additional precursors differing in the attached chelator (Fig. 2A). The 4 precursors are distinct in their theoretic charge (from +2 to −2, when lead-labeled), which might have a substantial influence on their pharmacokinetics (16,17). To visualize their relative ionic behavior under physiologic conditions, we performed paper electrophoresis with the 212Pb-labeled radiotracers using phosphate-buffered saline at a pH of 7.4 (18), followed by phosphor imaging (Fig. 2B). Worthy of mentioning, the charges are not sharply defined but are a function of the pH and concentration of other coordinating anions and cations. Free Pb2+ hydrolyzes under physiologic conditions and predominately forms the Pb(OH)+ species, thus explaining the minimal migration (19). The 4 radiotracers showed a clear charge tendency, with DO3A-PEG7-Tz and PSC-PEG7-Tz being close to their isoelectric point. It has been previously reported that a slight negative charge facilitates a beneficial pharmacokinetic behavior (17,20). These results suggest that DO3A-PEG7-Tz might show superior performance in vivo, with a relatively short plasma retention time, fast renal clearance, and minimal hepatic clearance.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Chemical evaluation of Tz compounds. (A) Chemical structures of 4 Tz precursors. (B) Autoradiogram of paper electrophoresis performed with 212Pb-labeled Tz precursors and [212Pb]PbCl2 at pH 7.4. (C) Normalized high-performance liquid chromatography diagrams of free and natPb-labeled Tz compounds (ultraviolet/visible light signal recorded at 254 nm). (D) Radiochemical conversion of Tz precursors (concentration of Tz = 10−6 mol/L, at 37°C) with 203Pb measured via radio–instant thin-layer chromatography.

The radiotracers’ lipophilicity was investigated by analytic high-performance liquid chromatography and confirmed by the 1-octanol/phosphate-buffered saline distribution coefficient at pH 7.4 (log D7.4) (21). The data (Fig. 2C; Supplemental Table 1) affirm that all compounds are susceptible to high aqueous solubility and poor membrane permeability—desirable properties for a pretargeting tracer. The reason for the relatively similar behavior is that the lipophilicity is predominately regulated by the Tz-PEG7 unit, which all compounds have in common.

All precursors (at a concentration of 10−6 M) demonstrated lead incorporation greater than 90% within 15 min at 37°C (Fig. 2D). Further experiments (Supplemental Fig. 2) revealed that a chelator concentration greater than 10−6 M and a chelator:metal ratio greater than 50:1 is required to approach quantitative labeling yield. The tracer stability of all 203Pb-labeled tracers was investigated in human serum at 37°C via radio–instant thin-layer chromatography and revealed a release of less than 5% 203Pb over 5 d, indicating that all lead chelates possess excellent stability.

Pharmacokinetics of Radiotracers

The 203Pb-labeled and purified radiotracers (Supplemental Fig. 3) were administered to healthy mice, and their pharmacokinetic behavior was investigated (Fig. 3A). All tracers showed a predominantly renal clearance (>90 %ID/g, Supplemental Fig. 4). The TCMC-based tracer, with the highest positive relative charge in the paper electrophoresis, revealed slightly higher blood retention (0.71 ± 0.05 %ID/g at 1 h), possibly because of increased binding to the negatively charged albumin. Additionally, an increased uptake in kidneys (3.0 ± 0.1 %ID/g at 4 h) and liver (3.5 ± 0.1 %ID/g at 4 h) was observed. The radiotracer with the highest relative negative charge, DOTA, showed partial hepatic clearance, as indicated by intestinal uptake (3.9 ± 0.3 %ID/g at 4 h). This clearance path is unfavorable because of the high radiosensitivity of the intestinal tract. The DO3A derivative showed the best pharmacokinetics, with fast clearance and low uptake in healthy tissue. Interestingly, this outcome could not have been predicted by relying solely on logD7.4 values or in vitro stability tests. However, investigating the overall charge (visualized via paper electrophoresis) indicated which radiotracer could provide desirable pharmacokinetics; a slight negative charge (at pH 7.4) was confirmed to be beneficial for fast renal clearance.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Pretargeting study with [203Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz. (A) Biodistribution data of 4 203Pb-labeled Tz tracers (2 nmol, 0.7 MBq) in healthy female nude mice. (B) Results of initial pretargeting study, with study design shown at top and, at bottom, biodistribution data of [203Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz (2 nmol, 0.7 MBq) in mice pretargeted with 5B1-TCO (100 μg, 0.7 nmol), accompanied by SPECT maximum-intensity projections (2 nmol, 18.5 MBq). Bl = bladder uptake; T = tumor uptake.

Moving forward, the lead candidate, DO3A-PEG7-Tz, radiolabeled with 203Pb was investigated in a murine xenografted PDAC model pretargeted with 5B1-TCO (Fig. 3B). SPECT imaging and a multiple-time-point biodistribution study revealed a tumor uptake of 9.9 ± 1.4 %ID/g at 24 h after Tz injection. The tumor-to-blood ratio was 3.8 ± 1.0, and the tumor-to-muscle ratio at the same time was 27.2 ± 8.4. The increased blood retention (2.6 ± 0.4 %ID/g) can be attributed to still-circulating 5B1-TCO, which reacted with the Tz tracer and slowly accumulated at the tumor site. Within the 48-h interval, no release of 203Pb was observed. These results reflect previously published pretargeting data (9,22).

212Bi Release and Dosimetry Estimations

It is essential to underline that 212Pb itself is not the α-emitter but its progeny. Since 212Po has a short half-life of 0.3 μs, its redistribution can be neglected. However, the first daughter—212Bi (half-life, 61 min)—has the potential to redistribute in the body. The conversion from 212Pb to 212Bi happens via low-energy β-decay, and the average recoil energy is approximately 0.52 eV. Hence, the 212Bi release is unlikely to be driven by the recoil, assuming a bond energy of around 3 eV (23). However, the yield of conversion electrons from 212Pb is relatively high (38%) and is followed by a cascade of Auger electrons resulting in highly ionized states for the daughter nuclides (Bi4+ to Bi7+), which are postulated to destroy the chelate (24,25). If 212Bi is released from the tumor environment, it will localize predominantly in the kidneys (Supplemental Fig. 5) (8,26).

Using radiochemical separation methods (Supplemental Fig. 6), we determined via γ-spectroscopy (Supplemental Fig. 7) that on average 40% ± 5% of 212Bi is eliminated from the chelators (Supplemental Table 2). This reflects values previously reported in the literature (24,27–29). However, when we were investigating the 212Bi release in a cell assay using the BxPC-3 cell line (Supplemental Fig. 6B), instead of 40% ± 5% only 26% ± 5% unbound 212Bi was detected in the cell medium. When we repeated this experiment but incubated the cells at 4°C, an increased fraction of 34% ± 5% 212Bi was released. We hypothesize that biologic processes such as mitosis, membrane turnover, and endocytosis of the radiotracer facilitate the retention of unbound 212Bi. The possibility of an active bismuth transport mechanism was ruled out by incubating the cells with [212Bi]BiCl3; no 212Bi uptake was detected.

Finally, we investigated the release of 212Bi in vivo using the pretargeting strategy with [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz in our PDAC xenograft mouse model. The mice were euthanized individually 24 h after injection of the radiotracer, and the tissues of interest were measured via γ-counting. We determined that merely 14.6% ± 0.7% of the intratumorally generated 212Bi activity was redistributed. As expected, an additional relative uptake of 58.3% ± 6.4% 212Bi activity (compared with 212Pb) was measured in the kidneys (Fig. 4), reflecting the 212Bi elimination from the tumor.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

212Bi release and dosimetry estimations. (Top) Biodistribution data of 212Bi, measured 15 min after death, and of 212Pb. (Bottom) Estimated relative biological effectiveness–weighted absorbed dose coefficients for [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz (in Gy-equivalent per MBq administered) estimated for different assumptions regarding redistribution of 212Pb’s progeny.

Summarizing, even though we determined an elimination of 40% ± 5% 212Bi from the chelator, the release of intratumorally generated 212Bi was reduced to 14.6% ± 0.7% in vivo, because of the retention of the progeny within the tumor environment.

Pretargeting dosimetry estimates for murine administration of [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz were determined according to the literature (Fig. 4) (30–33). When no daughter redistribution was assumed, the critical organs were the kidneys (6.9 Gy-equivalent/MBq of [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz administered), red marrow (9.5 Gy-equivalent/MBq), and urinary bladder (7.5 Gy-equivalent/MBq) (Supplemental Table 3). When using a conservative organ-level release estimate of 40% 212Bi (highly overestimated as confirmed by the in vivo 212Bi release study showing only 14.6% ± 0.7% release), which is followed by rapid redistribution and kidney accumulation, we calculated that the kidney dose coefficient could increase by nearly an order of magnitude (62 Gy-equivalent/MBq) (Supplemental Table 4). In contrast, dose coefficients for the tumor and other organs consequently decrease by 40%. In either case, myelotoxicity and renal toxicity are determining dose limitations.

Therapy Study with [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz

A therapy study was conducted with [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz (single administration) comprising 5 arms (n = 8 per cohort) with 2 control and 3 therapeutic groups. The 2 control arms consisted of one group that received only 5B1-TCO and one that received an unspecific IgG-TCO mAb followed by administration of 1.1 MBq of [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz 3 d later. For PRT, the pretargeted mice received 1.1, 2.2, or 3.7 MBq of [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz. For these activities, the estimated relative biological effectiveness–weighted dose to the tumor tissue would be expected to induce a response (∼20–100 Gy-equivalent) without producing excessive toxicity (Supplemental Fig. 8). The 4 groups that received a radioactive payload (3 d after mAb administration) were imaged 1 d after injection via Cerenkov luminescence imaging (Fig. 5A). The 4 therapeutic arms revealed that the Cerenkov luminescence imaging signal increased between the 3 dose levels. The IgG control arm showed unspecific accumulation in the liver, spleen, and kidneys.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Therapy study: pretargeting with [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz. (A) Cerenkov luminescence imaging of 4 arms that received [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz (2 nmol) via pretargeting 24 h after injection. (B) Maximum-intensity projections (24 h after injection) of 4 mice (3.7-MBq cohort) injected with [64Cu]Cu-DO3A-PEG7-Tz 1 d after therapy to demonstrate complementary PET imaging. (C) Waterfall plot of fold change of tumor volume for each cohort. (D) Survival probability as function of time after Tz injection (n = 8 per cohort). Bl = bladder uptake; K = kidney uptake; T = tumor uptake.

The therapy study was accompanied by complementary imaging via PET using [64Cu]Cu-DO3A-PEG7-Tz (Fig. 5A) instead of relying on SPECT imaging with [203Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz. This was a practical consideration since PET imaging allows for easily quantifiable images, higher output, and shorter imaging times. We confirmed that the radiolabeling (Supplemental Fig. 2C) and pharmacokinetics (Supplemental Fig. 9) are similar between the 64Cu- and 203Pb-labeled precursors. Consequently, dosimetry estimates and therapy monitoring can be pursued via either SPECT or PET imaging using 203Pb or 64Cu, respectively, greatly expanding the toolbox. Here, the mice were injected with the PET agent 1 d after receiving the therapeutic dose (4 d after 5B1-TCO administration) to circumvent interference with the Cerenkov luminescence imaging.

Three criteria were established requiring euthanasia of the mice: a tumor burden of more than 2,000 mm3, weight loss of more than 20%, or a severe health condition (e.g., lethargy, petechiae, or infections). In the first week, the white blood cell count decreased for the 4 cohorts that received activity. The 3.7-MBq cohort was most affected, revealing a count of roughly 0.2 × 103 white blood cells per microliter. The population of platelets and red blood cells decreased minimally within the first 2 wk. By the third week, all cohorts had recovered from the initial impairment, as indicated by the normalized blood panel (Supplemental Fig. 10).

Compared with the 5B1-TCO control group, the PRT cohorts revealed a particular duration of tumor growth retardation, and the effect depended on the received activity. The delayed onset for tumor progression was roughly 5 wk for the 3.7-MBq cohort, 3.5 wk for the 2.2-MBq cohort, and 2.5 wk for the 1.1-MBq cohort (Fig. 5B; Supplemental Fig. 11). A growth suppression of almost 2 wk was observed for the IgG (+1.1 MBq of 212Pb) control cohort; this finding can be attributed to the enhanced permeability and retention effect and stimulated immune response, as previously reported (34). After the onset of tumor progression, each cohort reached the endpoint in approximately 5 wk. On average, the median survival was 5.1 wk for the 5B1-TCO cohort and 6.5 wk for the IgG-TCO control cohort. The 1.1-, 2.2-, and 3.7-MBq [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz cohorts showed a median survival of 8.3, 9.7, and 10.7 wk, respectively. These data include mice euthanized before reaching the maximum tumor volume. Three mice of the 1.1-MBq cohort, 2 of the 2.2-MBq cohort, and 2 of the 3.7-MBq cohort developed ulcerating tumors. One mouse of the 3.7-MBq cohort and 2 of the IgG-TCO 1.1-MBq cohort showed lethargic behavior. One mouse of the 2.2-MBq cohort died on day 58 due to unidentified causes.

To investigate possible adverse effects of PRT, randomly selected mice from each cohort—after they reached their endpoint—were submitted alive for a comprehensive assessment by board-certified veterinary pathologists. This included a gross examination, a histopathologic examination of selected tissues of interest, and blood work (hematology and serum chemistry) analysis. The only significant changes that could be attributed to the treatment (i.e., radiation injury) in these mice were seen in the kidneys and ovaries (Fig. 6). The other macroscopic, microscopic, hematology, and serum chemistry changes observed in the evaluated mice were not considered treatment-related.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Representative histology results. Representative histology of hematoxylin- and eosin-stained kidney (top) and ovarian (bottom) sections of BxPC-3 tumor–bearing female athymic nude mice. (Left) Mice treated with 212Pb. (Right) Control group. Histopathology of kidneys revealed multifocal, minimal-to-mild tubular injury (arrows) affecting approximately 1%–10% of tubules. Control animals showed histologically normal kidneys. Histopathology of treated ovaries revealed diffuse marked ovarian atrophy with complete loss of follicles and corpora lutea.

All the microscopically examined treated mice (n = 8) exhibited a bilateral minimal-to-mild tubulonephropathy with tubular epithelial degeneration and necrosis (cellular sloughing, cytoplasmic swelling, pallor, condensation or hypereosinophilia, karyorrhexis, karyolysis or karyomegaly, or attenuation). These changes affected a minimal to mild portion (≈1%–≤10%) of the renal tubules—mainly those found at the corticomedullary junction. These lesions were not observed in the microscopically examined 5B1-TCO control mice (n = 3). These findings resemble renal injuries previously associated with α-emitter treatments in mice, including mice administered 212Pb and 225Ac (35,36). Although some mice were slightly more affected than others, the treatment dosage did not seem to have significantly affected the severity of the kidney lesions. These lesions also did not seem to substantially affect the renal function of these animals, as there were no apparent signs of renal toxicity in the serum chemistry results.

All microscopically examined ovaries from the treated mice (n = 9) exhibited marked atrophy. These ovarian changes were not observed in the microscopically examined 5B1-TCO control mice (n = 6). Ovarian atrophy can be caused by radiation because of nonreversible injury to germ cells (37). Ovaries are radiosensitive organs, and their atrophy has been described as an effect of some radioimmunotherapies in mice (38). As all examined ovaries were markedly affected, the treatment dose did not seem to have substantially affected the severity of the ovarian lesions.

The pathology report further highlights that fractionated dosing of [212Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz at 1- to 2-wk intervals could decrease toxicity while possibly increasing the therapeutic response. Reimaging of selected mice 10 wk after receiving the therapeutic dose confirmed that their tumors still highly express the carbohydrate cell surface antigen 19-9 (Supplemental Fig. 12), indicating the feasibility of fractionated dosing.

CONCLUSION

The elementary match pair 212Pb and 203Pb has demonstrated great potential to advance theranostics and promote the translation of TAT. For the relatively short-lived therapeutic nuclide 212Pb, PRT appears to be a promising strategy because of its rapid delivery of the radioactive payload and minimal off-targeting.

Here, we used a xenografted PDAC mouse model and the TCO-modified mAb 5B1 to enable pretargeting with the Tz-based radiotracer [203Pb]Pb-DO3A-PEG7-Tz.

In a single administration study, the efficiency and safety of PRT with 212Pb were evaluated. With the highest administered dose of 3.7 MBq, the average survival time could be doubled compared with the control cohort while maintaining radiotoxicity within acceptable limits. Furthermore, we demonstrated that even when using a noninternalizing vector, the limited redistribution of the daughter nuclide 212Bi does not lead to marked reduction in antitumor potency and does not lead to marked increases in normal-organ toxicity.

The short half-life of 212Pb (10.6 h) would allow for a controlled dose fractionation and weekly-to-biweekly injections. On this regimen, side effects can be minimized, therapy progress can be monitored exactly, and the tumor burden can be further reduced until eventually eliminated. Recently, Keinänen et al. reported on a pretargeting strategy harnessing 64/67Cu in a colorectal cancer mouse model. They revealed that fractionated dosing with the therapeutic nuclide resulted in prolonged tumor suppression (9). Studies with 212Pb administration in biweekly cycles (fractionated dosing) are under way.

This foundational study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of pretargeted TAT with 212Pb in PDAC while considering dose limitations and potential adverse effects.

DISCLOSURE

This work was supported by the donation of Diane and James Rowen (David Bauer and Jason Lewis), the Tow Foundation Fellowship Program (David Bauer), and NCI R35 CA232130 (Jason Lewis). The MSK Small-Animal Imaging Core Facility’s technical services were partly funded through NIH Cancer Center support grant P30 CA008748 and NIH Shared Instrumentation grants S10 RR02892-01 and S10 OD016207-01. Technical services provided by the MSK Analytic NMR Core Facility were funded in part through NIH/NCI Cancer Center support grant P30 CA008748. Jason Lewis holds intellectual property related to the application of click and radiopharmaceutical chemistry (patent US11135320B2). This work was supported by Perspective Therapeutics Inc. (Mengshi Li and Michael Schultz are employees). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Is pretargeting a feasible strategy for the theranostic matched pair 203/212Pb to enable combined imaging and therapy in an adenocarcinoma mouse model?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: Pretargeting is a suitable delivery approach for the short-lived radionuclide 212Pb. This foundational study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of pretargeting TAT with 212Pb—accompanied by complementary imaging with 203Pb (and 64Cu)—in PDAC while considering dose limitations and potential adverse effects.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Pretargeting with radiolead is a promising strategy to improve patient care, especially for cancer entities with currently limited treatment options, such as PDAC. Upcoming studies will elucidate the benefit of dose fractionation, which will minimize side effects while the tumor burden is further reduced until eventually eliminated.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the U.S. Department of Energy Isotope Program (Isotope R&D Production) and Perspective Therapeutics, Inc. for providing the 224Ra/212Pb lead generators as well as Suzanne E. Lapi and Shefali Saini (both at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Radiology) and John S. Wilson (University of Alberta, Department of Oncology) for providing 203Pb. Furthermore, we thank George Sukenick and Rong Wang (MSK Analytical NMR Core Facility) for supporting NMR and mass spectrometry; the Laboratory of Comparative Pathology (MSK Core Facility) for evaluating the therapy data; and Kishore Pillarsetty, Edwin C. Pratt, Garon Scott (MSK Radiology), and Lawson Spare (ANSTO) for providing advice and support.

Footnotes

  • Published online Nov. 9, 2023.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ganesh K,
    2. Massague J
    . Targeting metastatic cancer. Nat Med. 2021;27:34–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Juzeniene A,
    2. Stenberg VY,
    3. Bruland OS,
    4. Larsen RH
    . Preclinical and clinical status of PSMA-targeted alpha therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:779.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.
    1. Raja C,
    2. Graham P,
    3. Abbas Rizvi SM,
    4. et al
    . Interim analysis of toxicity and response in phase 1 trial of systemic targeted alpha therapy for metastatic melanoma. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6:846–852.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jurcic JG,
    2. Rosenblat TL
    . Targeted alpha-particle immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:e126–e131.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kim YS,
    2. Brechbiel MW
    . An overview of targeted alpha therapy. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:573–590.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. McNeil BL,
    2. Robertson AKH,
    3. Fu W,
    4. et al
    . Production, purification, and radiolabeling of the 203Pb/212Pb theranostic pair. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2021;6:6.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kokov KV,
    2. Egorova BV,
    3. German MN,
    4. et al
    . 212Pb: production approaches and targeted therapy applications. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:189.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Poty S,
    2. Carter LM,
    3. Mandleywala K,
    4. et al
    . Leveraging bioorthogonal click chemistry to improve 225Ac-radioimmunotherapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:868–880.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Keinänen O,
    2. Fung K,
    3. Brennan JM,
    4. et al
    . Harnessing 64Cu/67Cu for a theranostic approach to pretargeted radioimmunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:28316–28327.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.
    1. Sarrett SM,
    2. Keinanen O,
    3. Dayts EJ,
    4. et al
    . Inverse electron demand Diels-Alder click chemistry for pretargeted PET imaging and radioimmunotherapy. Nat Protoc. 2021;16:3348–3381.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Houghton JL,
    2. Zeglis BM,
    3. Abdel-Atti D,
    4. Sawada R,
    5. Scholz WW,
    6. Lewis JS
    . Pretargeted immuno-PET of pancreatic cancer: overcoming circulating antigen and internalized antibody to reduce radiation doses. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:453–459.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Sarantis P,
    2. Koustas E,
    3. Papadimitropoulou A,
    4. Papavassiliou AG,
    5. Karamouzis MV
    . Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: treatment hurdles, tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;12:173–181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Faustino-Rocha A,
    2. Oliveira PA,
    3. Pinho-Oliveira J,
    4. et al
    . Estimation of rat mammary tumor volume using caliper and ultrasonography measurements. Lab Anim (NY). 2013;42:217–224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Larson SM,
    2. Carrasquillo JA,
    3. Cheung NK,
    4. Press OW
    . Radioimmunotherapy of human tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:347–360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Emami B,
    2. Lyman J,
    3. Brown A,
    4. et al
    . Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:109–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yoo J,
    2. Reichert DE,
    3. Welch MJ
    . Comparative in vivo behavior studies of cyclen-based copper-64 complexes: regioselective synthesis, x-ray structure, radiochemistry, log P, and biodistribution. J Med Chem. 2004;47:6625–6637.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Jones-Wilson TM,
    2. Deal KA,
    3. Anderson CJ,
    4. et al
    . The in vivo behavior of copper-64-labeled azamacrocyclic complexes. Nucl Med Biol. 1998;25:523–530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Koźmiński P,
    2. Gaweda W,
    3. Rzewuska M,
    4. et al
    . Physicochemical and biological study of 99mTc and 68Ga radiolabelled ciprofloxacin and evaluation of [99mTc]Tc-CIP as potential diagnostic radiopharmaceutical for diabetic foot syndrome imaging. Tomography. 2021;7:829–842.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Nikolaychuk PA
    . The revised potential-pH diagram for Pb-H2O system. Ovidius University Annals of Chemistry. 2018;29:55–67.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Lipowska M,
    2. Klenc J,
    3. Marzilli LG,
    4. Taylor AT
    . Preclinical evaluation of 99mTc(CO)3-aspartic-N-monoacetic acid, a renal radiotracer with pharmacokinetic properties comparable to 131I-o-iodohippurate. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1277–1283.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Imberti C,
    2. Chen YL,
    3. Foley CA,
    4. et al
    . Tuning the properties of tris(hydroxypyridinone) ligands: efficient 68Ga chelators for PET imaging. Dalton Trans. 2019;48:4299–4313.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Membreno R,
    2. Cook BE,
    3. Zeglis BM
    . Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy based on the inverse electron demand Diels-Alder reaction. J Vis Exp. 2019;143:10.3791/59041.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Szucs Z,
    2. van Rooyen J,
    3. Zeevaart JR
    . Recoil effect on beta-decaying in vivo generators, interpreted for 103Pd/103mRh. Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67:1401–1404.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Bartoś B,
    2. Lyczko K,
    3. Kasperek A,
    4. Krajewski S,
    5. Bilewicz A
    . Search of ligands suitable for 212Pb/212Bi in vivo generators. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2013;295:205–209.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Auranen K,
    2. McCutchan EA
    . Nuclear data sheets for A=212. Nucl Data Sheets (NY NY). 2020;168:117–267.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Schwartz J,
    2. Jaggi JS,
    3. O’Donoghue JA,
    4. et al
    . Renal uptake of bismuth-213 and its contribution to kidney radiation dose following administration of actinium-225-labeled antibody. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:721–733.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Su FM,
    2. Beaumier P,
    3. Axworthy D,
    4. Atcher R,
    5. Fritzberg A
    . Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy in tumored mice using an in vivo 212Pb/212Bi generator. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:741–747.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.
    1. Ruble G,
    2. Wu C,
    3. Squire RA,
    4. Ganswo OA,
    5. Strand M
    . The use of 212Pb-labeled monoclonal antibody in the treatment of murine erythroleukemia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;34:609–616.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Mirzadeh S,
    2. Kumar K,
    3. Gansow OA
    . The chemical fate of 212Bi-DOTA formed by β-decay of 212Pb(DOTA)2− . Radiochim Acta. 1993;60:1–10.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Keenan MA,
    2. Stabin MG,
    3. Segars WP,
    4. Fernald MJ
    . RADAR realistic animal model series for dose assessment. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:471–476.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.
    1. Carter LM,
    2. Crawford TM,
    3. Sato T,
    4. et al
    . PARaDIM: a PHITS-based Monte Carlo tool for internal dosimetry with tetrahedral mesh computational phantoms. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1802–1811.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.
    1. Bartlett RM,
    2. Bolch WE,
    3. Brill AB,
    4. et al
    . MIRD Primer 2022: A Complete Guide to Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry. Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging; 2022.
  33. 33.↵
    1. Cloutier RJ,
    2. Smith SA,
    3. Watson EE,
    4. Snyder WS,
    5. Warner GG
    . Dose to the fetus from radionuclides in the bladder. Health Phys. 1973;25:147–161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Heneweer C,
    2. Holland JP,
    3. Divilov V,
    4. Carlin S,
    5. Lewis JS
    . Magnitude of enhanced permeability and retention effect in tumors with different phenotypes: 89Zr-albumin as a model system. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:625–633.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Milenic DE,
    2. Molinolo AA,
    3. Solivella MS,
    4. et al
    . Toxicological studies of 212Pb intravenously or intraperitoneally injected into mice for a phase 1 trial. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2015;8:416–434.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Cheal SM,
    2. McDevitt MR,
    3. Santich BH,
    4. et al
    . Alpha radioimmunotherapy using 225Ac-proteus-DOTA for solid tumors: safety at curative doses. Theranostics. 2020;10:11359–11375.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Dixon D,
    2. Alison R,
    3. Bach U,
    4. et al
    . Nonproliferative and proliferative lesions of the rat and mouse female reproductive system. J Toxicol Pathol. 2014;27(suppl):1S–107S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Santich BH,
    2. Cheal SM,
    3. Ahmed M,
    4. et al
    . A self-assembling and disassembling (SADA) bispecific antibody (BsAb) platform for curative two-step pretargeted radioimmunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:532–541.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication July 24, 2023.
  • Revision received September 28, 2023.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
212Pb-Pretargeted Theranostics for Pancreatic Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
212Pb-Pretargeted Theranostics for Pancreatic Cancer
David Bauer, Lukas M. Carter, Mohamed I. Atmane, Roberto De Gregorio, Alexa Michel, Spencer Kaminsky, Sebastien Monette, Mengshi Li, Michael K. Schultz, Jason S. Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2023, jnumed.123.266388; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266388

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
212Pb-Pretargeted Theranostics for Pancreatic Cancer
David Bauer, Lukas M. Carter, Mohamed I. Atmane, Roberto De Gregorio, Alexa Michel, Spencer Kaminsky, Sebastien Monette, Mengshi Li, Michael K. Schultz, Jason S. Lewis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2023, jnumed.123.266388; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266388
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 212Bi-Macroaggregated Albumin Inhibited Mouse Melanoma Growth by Regulating Cell Cycle Checkpoint Markers Without Promoting Living Cell Repopulation
  • Exploring the PET in vivo generator 134Ce as a theranostic match for 225Ac
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • [11C]ZTP-1: An Effective Short-Lived Radioligand for PET of Rat and Monkey Brain Phosphodiesterase Type 4 Subtype B
  • Reduced Renal Uptake of Various Radiopharmaceuticals with Sodium Paraaminohippurate Coadministration in a Rat Model
  • In Vivo Visualization and Quantification of Brain Heat Shock Protein 90 with [11C]HSP990 in Healthy Aging and Neurodegeneration
Show more Basic Science Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • targeted α-therapy
  • pretargeting
  • lead-212
  • progeny release
  • lead-203
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire