Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

First Total-Body Kinetic Modeling and Parametric Imaging of Dynamic 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET in Pancreatic and Gastric Cancer

Ruohua Chen, Xinlan Yang, Yee Ling Ng, Xiaofeng Yu, Yanmiao Huo, Xiuying Xiao, Chenpeng Zhang, Yumei Chen, Chaojie Zheng, Lianghua Li, Gang Huang, Yun Zhou and Jianjun Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2023, 64 (6) 960-967; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264988
Ruohua Chen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
2Institute of Clinical Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinlan Yang
4Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yee Ling Ng
4Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaofeng Yu
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
2Institute of Clinical Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yanmiao Huo
5Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiuying Xiao
6Department of Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chenpeng Zhang
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
2Institute of Clinical Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yumei Chen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
2Institute of Clinical Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chaojie Zheng
4Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lianghua Li
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
2Institute of Clinical Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gang Huang
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
2Institute of Clinical Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yun Zhou
4Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianjun Liu
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
2Institute of Clinical Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China;
3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) is an ideal diagnostic and therapeutic target in malignant tumors. However, the knowledge of kinetic modeling and parametric imaging of 68Ga-FAPI is limited. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in pancreatic cancer and gastric cancer and to conduct parametric imaging of dynamic total-body data compared with SUV imaging. Methods: Dynamic total-body 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was performed on 13 patients. The lesion time–activity curves were fitted by 3-compartment models and multigraphical models. The kinetics parameters derived from the 2-tissue reversible compartment model (2T4K) and multigraphical models were analyzed. Parametric Embedded Image imaging was generated using the 2T4K and Logan models, and their performances were evaluated compared with SUV images. Results: 2T4K had the lowest Akaike information criterion value, and its fitting curves matched excellently with the origin time–activity curves. Visual assessment revealed that the Embedded Image(2T4K) images and Embedded Image(Logan with spatial constraint [SC]) images both showed less image noise and higher lesion conspicuity compared with SUV images. Objective image quality assessment demonstrated that parametric Embedded Image(2T4K) images and parametric Embedded Image(Logan with SC) images had a 5.0-fold and 5.0-fold higher average signal-to-noise ratio and 3.6-fold and 4.1-fold higher average contrast-to-noise ratio compared with conventional SUV images, respectively. In addition, no significant differences in signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise of pathologic lesions were observed between parametric Embedded Image(2T4K) images and parametric Embedded Image(Logan with SC) images (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: The 2T4K model was the preferred compartment model. Total-body parametric imaging of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET yielded superior quantification beyond SUV with enhanced lesion contrast, which may serve as a promising imaging method to make an early diagnosis, to better reflect tumor characterization, or to allow evaluation of treatment response. Embedded Image(2T4K) images are comparable in image quality and consistent to Embedded Image(Logan with SC) images in lesions conspicuity; however, Embedded Image(Logan with SC) images presented an appealing alternative to Embedded Image(2T4K) images because of their simplicity.

  • pancreatic cancer
  • 68Ga-FAPI-04
  • parametric imaging
  • kinetic modeling
  • total-body dynamic PET imaging

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), specifically binding on cancer-associated fibroblasts, is overexpressed on stromal fibroblasts in more than 90% of epithelial cancers, which makes the FAP inhibitor (FAPI) an excellent molecular probe for tumor diagnosis (1). 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT significantly improved the imaging sensitivity compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT in many malignant tumors including pancreatic cancer (2) and gastric cancer (3). Although FAPI plays an important role in clinical diagnosis, its therapeutic value in clinical work is more concerning. In the study of Lindner et al., 2 patients with metastasized breast cancer were treated with 90Y-FAPI-04, which improved clinical symptoms without side effects (1). Baum et al. reported that 177Lu-FAP-2286 was performed in 11 patients with diverse advanced adenocarcinomas and showed high uptake and long retention in lesions with no observed side effects (4).

To achieve optimal oncologic diagnostics and satisfactory therapy assessment, we need to explore more about the biologic characteristic of the receptor-binding agents in the human body. Dynamic PET with kinetic modeling was reported to potentially provide superior information compared with static PET acquisitions (5). However, the knowledge of kinetic modeling in 68Ga-FAPI-04 is limited. Geist et al. evaluated the kinetic parameters of 68Ga-FAPI for hepatocellular carcinoma using a reversible 2-tissue compartment model in traditional PET/CT (6). However, the kinetic analysis was restricted to the liver region, and whether this kinetic model was also suitable for other pathologic lesions and normal organs entirely was still unknown.

SUV is commonly used in PET quantification analysis. SUV reflects the total activity concentration including the uptake of specific and nonspecific signals and can be easily affected by many factors (7). In contrast, multiparametric dynamic PET analysis via pharmacokinetic modeling and parametric imaging is a powerful absolute quantitation approach offering excess data, which is the more elaborate and robust method for quantification of tracer uptake (5). Early work regarding kinetic modeling and parametric imaging have made great achievements in enhancing parametric image quality (8–10). However, because of limited temporal resolution, sensitivity, and axial field of view coverage in the traditional PET scan, parametric imaging was not feasible, and the pharmacokinetic analysis was restricted to only 1 or 2 regions (8). Uniquely different from the traditional PET scan, the total-body PET/CT scanner provides an opportunity to simultaneously assess the radiotracer distribution in the entire human body with high sensitivity (11), thus tempo-spatially synchronizing the metabolic process of the radiotracer, which would have great prospect in the field of radiotheranostics (5). Recently, the kinetic metrics and parametric imaging has been acquired by 18F-FDG total-body PET (12). However, parametric imaging has not been conducted in 68Ga-FAPI thus far.

Thus, this study has 2 major goals: to investigate the kinetics of 68Ga-FAPI-04 by PET in normal organs and lesions and to evaluate the feasibility and superiority of parametric imaging compared with conventional SUV imaging in pancreatic cancer and gastric cancer by dynamic total-body 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET. This study performed total-body kinetic modeling and evaluated the clinical significance of parametric imaging in 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

A total of 13 patients (9 pancreatic cancer patients and 4 gastric cancer patients) who were referred to Renji Hospital for 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT from October 2020 to December 2021 were included. The institutional review board of Renji Hospital approved this study, and all subjects signed written informed consent.

Imaging Data Acquisition and Reconstruction

68Ga-FAPI-04 was synthesized by the Renji Nuclear Medicine Laboratory using a procedure as previously described (1). The injected dose was 96.2–163.5 MBq. A low-dose CT scan was conducted for attenuation correction. Patients then underwent a 60-min dynamic PET scanning on a total-body PET/CT (uEXPLORER; United Imaging Health Care) with a bolus injection of 68Ga-FAPI-04 into a vein near the ankle simultaneously as recommended in the expert consensus (13).

The images were corrected for radioactive decay, scatter, attenuation, and random and were reconstructed with an image matrix of 360 × 360 pixels, 4 iterations, and 20 subsets by list-mode ordered-subset expectation maximization algorithm incorporating time-of-flight and point-spread function modeling. The PET data were reconstructed into a total of 92 dynamic frames: 30 × 2 s, 12 × 5 s, 6 × 10 s, 4 × 30 s, 25 × 60 s, and 15 × 120 s (Fig. 1A). The representative maximum intensity projection of the reconstructed PET images is shown in Figure 1B.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Dynamic PET/CT acquisition protocol and schematic representation of compartmental model for 68Ga-FAPI-04. (A) Total-body dynamic 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT acquisition protocol. (B) Reconstructed dynamic total-body PET/CT maximum intensity projection images of 68Ga-FAPI-04 (12 frames). (C) Schematic representation of compartmental model for 68Ga-FAPI-04.

Image Postprocessing

The postprocessing of the dynamic PET images was analyzed using PMOD 4.2 software (version 4.206; PMOD Technologies Ltd.). Two experts (J.L. and R.C.) in PET/CT interpretation assessed the pathologic lesions. Differences of opinion between them were resolved by reaching a consensus. The volume of interest was drawn manually over normal organs and pathologic lesions. Pathologic lesions were classified as primary tumors (PT), lymph node metastases (LNM), and other metastases (OM). The volumes of interest were drawn on at least 7 consecutive slices of dynamic PET images, and the time–activity curves were extracted at each frame. Because the previous study showed that patients could achieve perfect image quality when the acquisition time on the uEXPLORER scanner was 2 or 3 min (11), in our study, 5-min acquisition time (55–60 min after injection) was used to evaluate the image quality of SUV images.

The volume of interest was drawn manually over 4 blood pools using an averaged early PET image (0–2 min), including descending aorta (DA), ascending aorta, left ventricle, and right ventricle. Previous study showed that the FAPI-04 is stable for up to 24 h in the blood (1,14,15), exemplifying that metabolic correction can be neglected. Hence, we did not perform metabolic correction in the present study. DA time–activity curve was used as the image-derived input function (IDIF) for kinetic modeling and parametric imaging because it contains a large blood pool (16), and the partial-volume effect on the IDIF is further minimized by ordered-subset expectation maximization with a point-spread function imaging reconstruction algorithm used in the total-body uEXPLORER of high spatial resolution (17–19).

Kinetic Compartmental Model

Three compartment models were fitted to the time–activity curves: a reversible 1-tissue compartment model (Supplemental Data; supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org), an irreversible 2-tissue compartment model, and 2-tissue reversible compartment model (2T4K). In the 2-tissue compartment model, the tracer in tissue is attributed to 2 different compartments: Embedded Image represents unspecific bound and free tracer components in tissue, and Embedded Image represents the specifically bound tracer components (Fig. 1C). Embedded Image, and Embedded Image were derived from compartment models. The meaning of Embedded Image, and Embedded Image is provided in the Supplemental Data. The fractional blood volume Embedded Image was fitted along with the rate constants. The total distribution volume Embedded Image and the net influx rate Embedded Image were also calculated.

The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used as an assessment of the goodness-of-fit; the more appropriate model is the one with the smaller AIC value.

Multigraphical Analysis

In addition to compartment modeling, time–activity curves were analyzed using multigraphical analysis (20). Generally, a Logan plot (21) is applied to reversible tracer kinetics, and a Patlak plot is applied to irreversible tracer kinetics (22). Zhou et al. proposed the relative-equilibrium (RE) plot (23) and the RE plot with the Patlak plot (20) to reduce the bias. The graphic analysis will approach a straight line after sufficient equilibration time; the slope represents the net influx rate Embedded Image for the Patlak plot and represents the total distribution volume Embedded Image for the Logan plot, RE plot, and RE plot with the Patlak plot. Time–activity curves were applied to multigraphical analysis, and Embedded Image was derived over all normal organs and lesions. The linear phase Embedded Image was fixed at 15 min.

Parametric Imaging

Total-body parametric images of 68Ga-FAPI-04 were generated by 2T4K and the Logan plot using linear regression with the spatial constraint (SC) algorithm with 3-dimensional gaussian filters, with 6- and 9-mm full width at half maximum, respectively. The modified linear least square fitting method incorporated with clustering-based SC was applied (24). DA is used as the input function. The volumes of interest of the liver, muscle, and pathologic lesions were masked over parametric images, and then the voxel-based mean values and SD values were extracted. Those values were used to calculate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).

The SNR was calculated asEmbedded Image

The CNR was calculated asEmbedded Image

Statistical Analysis

The statistical evaluation was performed using software R (version 4.2.0; R Core Team 2021). Descriptive data are presented as mean (SD). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the difference between SUV images and parametric images among SNR and CNR. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients’ Characteristics

Thirteen patients were included in this study. A total of 46 lesions (10 PT, 26 LNM, and 10 OM) were included in this study. The PT and LNM were verified by histology and enhanced CT, and OM was confirmed by enhanced CT, MRI, or 18F-FDG PET/CT. The detailed characteristics are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Patient Characteristics (n = 13)

Compartment Model Selection

Figure 2 shows representative IDIFs derived from the DA, ascending aorta, left ventricle, and right ventricle. Generally, the IDIF curves are analogous to each other. The right ventricle has a slightly earlier peak than the others; apart from this, it shows good agreement between the trends of the IDIFs.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

IDIFs derived from 4 different blood pools. Full IDIFs and peaks of curves are displayed separately. AA = ascending aorta; LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle.

The results for evaluating compartment model fitting quality based on the AIC are displayed in Table 2. 2T4K has the lowest mean AIC in most normal organs, except the lung (1-tissue compartment model is the lowest). For pathologic lesions, 2T4K was preferred with the lowest mean AIC. In general, 2T4K provided the best fitting of time–activity curves among the 3-compartment models, and it was the most appropriate model. An example of fitting curves was displayed in Figure 3. The fitted curves generated by 2T4K matched excellently with the origin time–activity curves.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Model Validation Among 3 Compartmental Models Based on AIC for Different ROIs

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Time courses and 2-tissue compartmental model fitting of 68Ga-FAPI-04 concentrations in a patient with pancreatic cancer. Lines represent fitted curves, and dots represent origin time–activity curves.

Pharmacokinetics Analyses in Normal Organs and Pathologic Lesions

The kinetic parameters Embedded Image, and Embedded Image from 2T4K, the parameter Embedded Image from the Patlak plot, and parameter Embedded Image from the Logan plot and RE plot are presented in Table 3. Supplemental Figure 1 is the Logan plot, Patlak plot, and RE plot fitting of 68Ga-FAPI-04 concentrations in the lesions of patients with pancreatic cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Kinetic Parameters of 68Ga-FAPI-04 Using 2T4K and Multigraphical Analysis Based on 60-Minute Acquisition

The kinetic parameters varied among organs and lesions. All 3 types of pathologic lesions showed comparable mean Embedded Image values, with the highest in LNM (0.328 mL/cm3/min), followed by PT (0.285 mL/cm3/min) and OM (0.203 mL/cm3/min). The highest Embedded Image values for normal organs were observed in the spleen (1.488 mL/cm3/min). Among all pathologic lesions, LNM had the greatest Embedded Image values (0.900/min) followed by PT (0.325/min), and OM (0.252/min). The kidney demonstrated the highest Embedded Image value (3.242/min) among all organs. For Embedded Image, PT has the greatest Embedded Image value of 0.377/min among all lesions, followed by LNM (0.299/min) and OM (0.133/min). The kidney demonstrated the highest Embedded Image value (0.588/min) among all organs. For Embedded Image, PT had the greatest Embedded Image value of 0.039/min among all lesions, followed by LNM (0.028/min) and OM (0.020/min). The kidney demonstrated the highest Embedded Image value (0.280/min) among all organs.

Noticeably, for 2T4K, the Embedded Image values was significantly higher in pathologic lesions than in all healthy organs, with the highest in PT (10.502 mL/cm3), followed by OM (7.275 mL/cm3) and LNM (6.181 mL/cm3). The highest Embedded Image values for normal organs were observed in the normal pancreas (2.282 mL/cm3). Similar results were also observed in Embedded Image derived from the Logan plot, RE plot with the Patlak plot, and RE plot.

For parameter Embedded Image from the Patlak plot, PT had the greatest Embedded Image value of 0.0661 mL/cm3/min among all lesions, followed by OM (0.0351 mL/cm3/min) and LNM (0.0310 mL/cm3/min). Muscle demonstrated the highest Embedded Image value (0.0038 mL/cm3/min) among all organs.

Parametric Imaging

Figure 4 shows parametric images of the Embedded Image obtained using 2T4K (2T4K image), the Logan plot with SC (Logan with SC image), and the Logan plot (Logan image), together with the corresponding SUV image (55–60 min) of a representative patient with pancreatic cancer. For visual assessment, the 2T4K images and the Logan plot with SC images showed less image noise and higher lesion conspicuity compared with SUV images. Compared with SUV images and Logan images, 2T4K images and the Logan plot with SC images showed less nonspecific signal in typical background regions, such as the blood pool, liver, and kidney. Furthermore, no significant difference in image noise and lesion conspicuity was observed between 2T4K images and the Logan plot with SC images in visual assessment.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Representative SUV images, Embedded Image(2T4K) images, Embedded Image(Logan plot with SC) images, and Embedded Image(Logan plot) images of 58-y-old man with pancreatic cancer. (A) Maximum-intensity projection images of SUV and axial fusion diagram combining Embedded Image images and CT. (B) Embedded Image(2T4K) images. (C) Embedded Image(Logan plot with SC) images. (D) Embedded Image(Logan plot) images. SNR and CNR of lesions are illustrated below corresponding image.

To evaluate the objective image quality, the comparisons of SNR and CNR among SUV images, 2T4K images, and the Logan plot with SC images (labeled as Logan) are displayed in Figure 5. Consistent with the visual assessment, no significant differences in SNR and CNR of pathologic lesions were observed (all P > 0.05) between the 2T4K images and Logan images.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Comparison of objective image quality between SUV and parametric Embedded Image images from 2T4K and Logan methods. Comparison of SNR (A) and CNR (B) between SUV images and parametric Embedded Image images in PT, LNM, and OM, respectively.

The Embedded Image from PT showed a significant 5.0-fold higher value compared with the Embedded Image from PT (90.20 vs. 18.11, P < 0.001), and the Embedded Image from PT showed a significant 5.0-fold higher value than Embedded Image (90.91 vs. 18.11, P < 0.001). The Embedded Image and Embedded Image from LNM were significantly 4.1-fold (41.52 vs. 10.07, P < 0.001) and 4.4-fold (44.57 vs. 10.07, P < 0.001) higher than Embedded Image, respectively. The Embedded Image and Embedded Image from OM were significantly 5.1-fold (78.96 vs. 15.54, P < 0.001) and 5.1-fold (78.56 vs. 15.54, P = 0.001) higher than Embedded Image (Fig. 5A).

The Embedded Image and Embedded Image from PT were significantly 3.6-fold (149.29 vs. 40.94, P = 0.007) and 4.1-fold (169.89 vs. 40.94, P = 0.001) higher than Embedded Image, respectively. The Embedded Image and Embedded Image from LNM were significantly 3.2-fold (62.28 vs. 19.33, P = 0.008) and 3.9-fold (74.81 vs. 19.33, P < 0.001) higher than Embedded Image. The Embedded Image and Embedded Image from OM were significantly 3.4-fold (100.03 vs. 29.24, P = 0.004) and 3.7-fold (109.54 vs. 29.24, P = 0.003) higher than Embedded Image (Fig. 5B).

DISCUSSION

This work describes our initial findings with kinetic modeling and parametric imaging of total-body 68Ga-FAPI-04 images using the uEXPLORER scanner. The long-axial PET systems enable capturing rapid kinetics of all normal organs and pathologic lesions with high temporal resolution. Thus, we were able to evaluate the kinetic parameters both in the 2T4K and Logan models and to find the potential clinical applications of parametric imaging in pancreatic cancer and gastric cancer. This study evaluated total-body kinetic modeling and provided clinical significance for parametric imaging in 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET.

Kinetic modeling in 68Ga-FAPI has been evaluated by Geist et al. in traditional PET/CT (6). They suggested that a reversible 2-tissue compartment model was the preferred model to describe the kinetics of 68Ga-FAPI-04 in liver lesions (6). However, whether this kinetic model was also suitable for other pathologic lesions and normal organs was unknown. In this study, we investigated the kinetic metrics using 3 compartmental models on total-body PET/CT. We found that the 2T4K model showed the best model-fitting curves, and the fitted curves generated by 2T4K matched well with the origin time–activity curves. Furthermore, Embedded Image/min in both healthy organs and lesions also provided evidence to strengthen the selection of 2T4K. To summarize, the 2T4K could be considered the most appropriate model of the kinetics of 68Ga-FAPI-04 in whole-body normal organs and pathologic lesions. Logan plot is a linear method to estimate the Embedded Image. The fitting curve of Logan shows better results than Patlak, which is more evidence to support reversible modeling. Therefore, we further compared the image quality and lesion conspicuity between the 2T4K images, the Logan plot, and the SUV image.

Our study demonstrated that the 2T4K Embedded Image value was significantly higher in all pathologic lesions compared with normal organs. In addition, PT had the highest Embedded Image and Embedded Image among all pathologic lesions, indicating the high receptor binding and internalization rate, as well as total distribution volume. The normal pancreas showed the highest Embedded Image compared with other all normal organs, but the Embedded Image and Embedded Image values for the normal pancreas were lower than many other normal organs, indicating that the transfer rate of FAP ligand binding to the receptor and the internalization rate in the normal pancreas were lower compared with many other normal organs. The kidney showed the highest Embedded Image, and Embedded Image compared with other all normal organs; the Embedded Image value of kidney is second only to that of the spleen; and the Embedded Image value of kidney is in the middle of all normal organs. This meant that the kidney not only had a high transfer rate from plasma to the reversible compartment and a high transfer rate of FAP ligand binding to the receptor and internalization rate, but it also had a high reverse transfer rate.

Parametric imaging of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT has not been performed in previous studies because of limited temporal resolution and low SNR in traditional PET/CT. In this study, we investigated whether parametric imaging could be used as one of the diagnostic methods in clinical routine practice. For visual assessment, the Embedded Image(2T4K) images and Embedded Image(Logan plot with SC) images both showed less image noise and higher lesion conspicuity compared with SUV images. Although some lesions were equivocal in SUV images, the lesion conspicuity and detectability were obviously higher on Embedded Image(2T4K) images. The Embedded Image(2T4K) images and Embedded Image(Logan plot with SC) images both showed less nonspecific signals in typical background regions. The liver, spleen, blood pool, and muscle were typical backgrounds that may interfere with the lesion visualization in SUV images. The Embedded Image(2T4K) images and Embedded Image(Logan plot with SC) images had greatly weakened the influence of background reference. This is the main reason why the Embedded Image(2T4K) images and Embedded Image(Logan plot with SC) images both showed less image noise and lesion conspicuity compared with SUV images. Overall, the Logan plot with SC images have somehow higher SNR and CNR values, but no significant differences were detected. The Embedded Image(Logan plot with SC) images are vastly superior to the Embedded Image(Logan plot) image because of the low noise levels of the spatially smoothed dynamic PET images (24), which illuminates the importance and necessity of spatial constraint in the parametric image. In line with the results of the visual assessment, 2T4K images and Logan plot images had higher SNR and CNR compared with conventional SUV images in pathologic lesions, thus confirming the visual impression that 2T4K images and Logan plot images were both superior to SUV images. No significant differences were observed in visual assessment and objective quality evaluation between 2T4K images and Logan plot images; thus, 2T4K images and Logan plot images were comparable in image quality and lesion conspicuity. Taken together, our results demonstrate that parametric imaging by total-body 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT yielded a substantial increase in sensitivity that makes whole-body parametric imaging feasible and meets the requirements of reading imaging systems in clinical practice. Considering the computational burden of compartmental models, the Logan plot presented an appealing alternative to 2T4K because of its simplicity (21), making it appropriate for parametric imaging.

This study has several limitations. First, DA was used as an input function in our study, which was not equally applicable for all tissue types. For example, in the case of the liver, kinetic analysis best entails the use of both hepatic artery and portal vein input (6). We acknowledge that the total-body motion correction and partial volume correction for small tissue or lesions are still challenging; the accuracy of the estimated model parameters might be reduced by partial volume and motion effects on our measured dynamic PET data, and it is also fully recognized and discussed in a previous FAPI PET study (6). In addition, the sample was small, and it was a retrospective study. Although all primary lesions were confirmed by pathology, several metastases could not be confirmed by pathology because they were difficult to reach anatomically. These lesions may also be combined with inflammation and whether inflammation affects kinetic modeling remain unclear. A prospective study with more samples and histopathologic investigations is needed to confirm our results. Furthermore, although parametric images showed enhanced lesion contrast over SUV images, their influence on patients' clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions should be further elaborated in the future.

CONCLUSION

The 2T4K model is the most appropriate model to describe the dynamic kinetics of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET. Total-body parametric imaging of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET yielded superior quantification beyond SUV with enhanced lesion contrast, which may serve as a more accurate imaging method for early diagnosis to better reflect tumor characterization or to allow evaluation of treatment response. Embedded Image(2T4K) images are comparable to Embedded Image(Logan plot with SC) images in image quality; however, Embedded Image(Logan plot with SC) images presented an appealing alternative to Embedded Image(2T4K) images because of their simplicity.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Should parametric imaging of dynamic 68Ga-FAPI-04 datasets from total-body PET/CT in pancreatic cancer and gastric cancer be used?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: The 2T4K was the preferred compartment model for 68Ga-FAPI-04. Embedded Image images (2T4K) of 68Ga-FAPI-04 showed enhanced lesion contrast and less image noise compared with conventional SUV images in visual assessment and objective quantitative analysis.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Total-body parametric imaging of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET yielded superior quantification beyond SUV with enhanced lesion contrast, which may serve as a promising imaging method for early diagnosis to better reflect tumor characterization or to allow evaluation of treatment response.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant 2021YFA0910004), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 82171972), Clinical Research Project of Health Industry of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Grant 20214Y0438), and nurture projects for the Youth Medical Talents-Medical Imaging Practitioners Program (Grant SHWRS(2021)_099).

Footnotes

  • Published online Jan. 5, 2023.

  • © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lindner T,
    2. Loktev A,
    3. Altmann A,
    4. et al
    . Development of quinoline-based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1415–1422.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Dendl K,
    2. Finck R,
    3. Giesel FL,
    4. et al
    . FAP imaging in rare cancer entities-first clinical experience in a broad spectrum of malignancies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:721–731.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kuten J,
    2. Levine C,
    3. Shamni O,
    4. et al
    . Head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [(18)F]-FDG PET/CT in evaluating the extent of disease in gastric adenocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:743–750.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Baum RP,
    2. Schuchardt C,
    3. Singh A,
    4. et al
    . Feasibility, biodistribution, and preliminary dosimetry in peptide-targeted radionuclide therapy of diverse adenocarcinomas using (177)Lu-FAP-2286: first-in-humans results. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:415–423.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A,
    2. Pan L,
    3. Sachpekidis C
    . Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:21–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Geist BK,
    2. Xing H,
    3. Wang J,
    4. et al
    . A methodological investigation of healthy tissue, hepatocellular carcinoma, and other lesions with dynamic (68)Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging. EJNMMI Phys. 2021;8:8.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Adams MC,
    2. Turkington TG,
    3. Wilson JM,
    4. Wong TZ
    . A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. AJR. 2010;195:310–320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Rahmim A,
    2. Lodge MA,
    3. Karakatsanis NA,
    4. et al
    . Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:501–518.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Huang SC,
    3. Bergsneider M,
    4. Wong DF
    . Improved parametric image generation using spatial-temporal analysis of dynamic PET studies. Neuroimage. 2002;15:697–707.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Endres CJ,
    3. Brasic JR,
    4. Huang SC,
    5. Wong DF
    . Linear regression with spatial constraint to generate parametric images of ligand-receptor dynamic PET studies with a simplified reference tissue model. Neuroimage. 2003;18:975–989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Zhang YQ,
    2. Hu PC,
    3. Wu RZ,
    4. et al
    . The image quality, lesion detectability, and acquisition time of (18)F-FDG total-body PET/CT in oncological patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:2507–2515.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Wang G,
    2. Nardo L,
    3. Parikh M,
    4. et al
    . Total-body PET multiparametric imaging of cancer using a voxel-wise strategy of compartmental modeling. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:1274–1281.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Yu H,
    2. Gu Y,
    3. Fan W,
    4. et al
    . Expert consensus on oncological [(18)F]FDG total-body PET/CT imaging (version 1). Eur Radiol. 2023;33:615–626.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Xing H,
    2. Shi X,
    3. Dong C,
    4. et al
    . Preclinical and clinical translation research of (68)Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor for PET imaging. Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;40:480–485.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Xiang Y,
    2. Zhong X,
    3. Fu J,
    4. et al
    . The glioma model micro-PET imaging and biodistribution of (68)Ga labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor. J Isotopes. 2022;35:368–375.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Li E,
    3. Cherry SR,
    4. Wang G
    . Total-body PET kinetic modeling and potential opportunities using deep learning. PET Clin. 2021;16:613–625.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yang J,
    2. Hu C,
    3. Guo N,
    4. et al
    . Partial volume correction for PET quantification and its impact on brain network in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7:13035.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.
    1. Ibaraki M,
    2. Matsubara K,
    3. Shinohara Y,
    4. et al
    . Brain partial volume correction with point spreading function reconstruction in high-resolution digital PET: comparison with an MR-based method in FDG imaging. Ann Nucl Med. 2022;36:717–727.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Xie Z,
    3. Berg E,
    4. et al
    . Total-body dynamic reconstruction and parametric imaging on the uEXPLORER. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:285–291.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Ye W,
    3. Brasic JR,
    4. Wong DF
    . Multi-graphical analysis of dynamic PET. Neuroimage. 2010;49:2947–2957.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Logan J,
    2. Fowler JS,
    3. Volkow ND,
    4. et al
    . Graphical analysis of reversible radioligand binding from time-activity measurements applied to [N-11C-methyl]-(-)-cocaine PET studies in human subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1990;10:740–747.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Logan J
    . A review of graphical methods for tracer studies and strategies to reduce bias. Nucl Med Biol. 2003;30:833–844.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Zhou Y,
    2. Ye W,
    3. Brasic JR,
    4. Crabb AH,
    5. Hilton J,
    6. Wong DF
    . A consistent and efficient graphical analysis method to improve the quantification of reversible tracer binding in radioligand receptor dynamic PET studies. Neuroimage. 2009;44:661–670.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Huang X,
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Bao S,
    4. Huang SC
    . Clustering-based linear least square fitting method for generation of parametric images in dynamic FDG PET studies. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2007;2007:65641.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  • Received for publication October 4, 2022.
  • Revision received December 27, 2022.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 6
June 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
First Total-Body Kinetic Modeling and Parametric Imaging of Dynamic 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET in Pancreatic and Gastric Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
First Total-Body Kinetic Modeling and Parametric Imaging of Dynamic 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET in Pancreatic and Gastric Cancer
Ruohua Chen, Xinlan Yang, Yee Ling Ng, Xiaofeng Yu, Yanmiao Huo, Xiuying Xiao, Chenpeng Zhang, Yumei Chen, Chaojie Zheng, Lianghua Li, Gang Huang, Yun Zhou, Jianjun Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (6) 960-967; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264988

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
First Total-Body Kinetic Modeling and Parametric Imaging of Dynamic 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET in Pancreatic and Gastric Cancer
Ruohua Chen, Xinlan Yang, Yee Ling Ng, Xiaofeng Yu, Yanmiao Huo, Xiuying Xiao, Chenpeng Zhang, Yumei Chen, Chaojie Zheng, Lianghua Li, Gang Huang, Yun Zhou, Jianjun Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (6) 960-967; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264988
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Role of Total-Body PET in Drug Development and Evaluation: Status and Outlook
  • Clinical Implementation of Total-Body PET in China
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • pancreatic cancer
  • 68Ga-FAPI-04
  • parametric imaging
  • kinetic modeling
  • total-body dynamic PET imaging
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire