Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Prevalence and Medium-Term Outcomes of Patients with Biopsy-Proven Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Adenocarcinoma with Low Intraprostatic Uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the proPSMA Study

David C. Chen, James P. Buteau, Louise Emmett, Ramin Alipour, Felipe de Galiza Barbosa, Matthew J. Roberts, Aoife McVey, Jonathan O’Brien, Sidney Levy, Roslyn J. Francis, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Declan G. Murphy and Michael S. Hofman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2025, 66 (5) 713-718; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268901
David C. Chen
1Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
2Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James P. Buteau
1Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
3Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise Emmett
4Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
5Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
6St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramin Alipour
1Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
3Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felipe de Galiza Barbosa
7Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew J. Roberts
8Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aoife McVey
9Department of Radiology, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan O’Brien
2Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sidney Levy
1Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
3Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roslyn J. Francis
10Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan Lawrentschuk
2Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
3Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
11Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; and
12EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Declan G. Murphy
2Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
3Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Hofman
1Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
3Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

The current prevalence of low intraprostatic uptake for staging prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET ranges between 4.4% and 17% in retrospective studies. We aimed to define the prevalence and describe the outcomes of patients with low intraprostatic uptake on PSMA PET/CT in the prospective proPSMA study. Methods: We identified patients with an SUVmax of 4 or less on PSMA PET/CT in the proPSMA study. Patients were followed up until 42 mo after randomization. The PRIMARY score was evaluated by 3 nuclear medicine physicians, with the result determined by consensus. Treatment failure was defined as new metastatic disease, biochemical recurrence, or initiation of salvage therapy. Results: Ten of 302 (3.3%; 95% CI, 1.6%–6.0%) patients had low intraprostatic uptake on PSMA PET/CT and normal findings on conventional imaging (CT and whole-body bone scanning). The median age was 66 y (interquartile range, 60.5–70.3 y). International Society of Urological Pathologists biopsy grade group was 3 in 5 patients and 5 in 5 patients, with no atypical histology identified. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 5.1 ng/nL (interquartile range, 2.3–8.3 ng/nL). The median follow-up interval was 30 mo (interquartile range, 24–39 mo). Multiparametric MRI was performed on 5 patients, with Prostate Imaging–Reporting and Data System score 5 in 2 patients, 4 in 1 patient, and 2 in 2 patients. The PRIMARY score was positive in 5 of 10 (50%) patients. Five (50%), 4 (30%), and 2 (20%) of 10 patients received radical prostatectomy, definitive radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy alone, respectively. Of the 9 (90%) patients who received definitive treatment, 1 (11%) experienced treatment failure at 18 mo after radical prostatectomy and received metastasis-directed therapy. Biochemical recurrence was nonevaluable in the single patient who received androgen deprivation therapy alone. At the 42-mo follow-up after randomization, 4 of 9 (44%) patients who received definitive therapy remained on trial—none of whom had evidence of treatment failure. No other patients had new metastatic disease or initiation of salvage therapy during follow-up. Conclusion: In the proPSMA trial, there was a low prevalence (3.3%) of low intraprostatic uptake on PSMA PET/CT in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer, and treatment failure was infrequent.

  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen
  • PET/CT

Footnotes

  • Published online Mar. 27, 2025.

  • © 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 5
May 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prevalence and Medium-Term Outcomes of Patients with Biopsy-Proven Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Adenocarcinoma with Low Intraprostatic Uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the proPSMA Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Prevalence and Medium-Term Outcomes of Patients with Biopsy-Proven Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Adenocarcinoma with Low Intraprostatic Uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the proPSMA Study
David C. Chen, James P. Buteau, Louise Emmett, Ramin Alipour, Felipe de Galiza Barbosa, Matthew J. Roberts, Aoife McVey, Jonathan O’Brien, Sidney Levy, Roslyn J. Francis, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Declan G. Murphy, Michael S. Hofman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2025, 66 (5) 713-718; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268901

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prevalence and Medium-Term Outcomes of Patients with Biopsy-Proven Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Adenocarcinoma with Low Intraprostatic Uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the proPSMA Study
David C. Chen, James P. Buteau, Louise Emmett, Ramin Alipour, Felipe de Galiza Barbosa, Matthew J. Roberts, Aoife McVey, Jonathan O’Brien, Sidney Levy, Roslyn J. Francis, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Declan G. Murphy, Michael S. Hofman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2025, 66 (5) 713-718; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268901
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0
  • Imaging Efficacy of [18F]CTT1057 PET for the Detection of PSMA-Positive Tumors Using Histopathology as Standard of Truth: Results from the GuideView Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study
  • Meeting Upcoming Clinical and Diagnostic Needs in Oncologic Imaging: A Structured Reporting System for Fibroblast-Activation-Protein–Targeted Imaging—FAP-RADS Version 1.0
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen
  • PET/CT
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire