Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleContinung Education

Brain Trauma Imaging

Gérard N. Bischof and Donna J. Cross
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2023, 64 (1) 20-29; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.263293
Gérard N. Bischof
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
2Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine II–Molecular Organization of the Brain, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donna J. Cross
3Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    MRI vs. CT for imaging acute mTBI: Example from mTBI patient in which CT was read as normal. However, subsequent MRI showed multiple small, elliptic lesions in white matter on gradient-echo image and callosal hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image, indicating diffuse axonal injury. FLAIR = fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; GRE = gradient echo.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    In patients with AD and dementia with Lewy bodies, typical hypometabolic patterns vs. randomly selected cases of repeated mTBI from exposure to blasts. (A) Representative 3-dimensional stereotactic surface projection (3D-SSP) z score map from patient clinically diagnosed with AD shows typical AD pattern of hypometabolism in posterior cingulate cortex and in parietal, temporal, and frontal lobes, with relative sparing of sensorimotor cortex. Diffuse Lewy body dementia is generally characterized by hypometabolism in occipital regions on 18F-FDG PET imaging. (B) Selected examples of 3D-SSP maps from veterans with multiple blast TBI exposures indicate pattern heterogeneity across subjects. Rows are single-subject 3D-SSP z score maps of hypometabolic voxels compared with reference database of age-matched community controls (n = 9). ANT = anterior; DLB = dementia with Lewy bodies; INF = inferior; LT. LAT = left lateral; LT. MED = left medial; POST = posterior; RT. LAT = right lateral; RT. MED = right medial; SUP = superior.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Longitudinal 18F-FDG PET in individuals with repeated mTBI from blast. Subjectively, one can appreciate that 18F-FDG PET from case 1 appears to be recovering; that is, there are fewer apparent hypometabolic pixels in scan 2 than in scan 1 (arrows indicate some regional differences). This subject had 44% decrease in number of hypometabolic voxels globally from scan 1 to scan 2. However case 2 indicates the opposite, with 46% increase in number of hypometabolic voxels globally. Not all cases are this clear-cut; some showed clear evidence of reorganization, with some regions increasing and others decreasing in total number of hypometabolic pixels (Fig. 4). Initial scans were 3–5 y after last blast, with 1–2 y interval between scans. ANT = anterior; INF = inferior; LT. LAT = left lateral; LT. MED = left medial; POST = posterior; RT. LAT = right lateral; RT. MED = right medial; SUP = superior.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Three-dimensional stereotactic surface projection maps showing example of reorganization in single mTBI subject from scan 1 to scan 2. Casual visual inspection may conclude that subject’s scans have improved because severely hypometabolic region of inferior medial frontal lobe on scan 1 has improved subjectively by scan 2. This was supported in thresholding analysis (second and bottom rows), which indicated 40% decrease in number of voxels with z score ≥ 1.64 (hypometabolic voxels) for that region. However, analysis of 26 regions covering entire brain indicated that other regions, such as right lateral frontal region, actually became more hypometabolic (50% increase in hypometabolic voxels)—likely a result of reorganization and compensation over time. This subject also showed an 8% increase in hypometabolic voxels globally from scan 1 to scan 2. ANT = anterior; INF = inferior; LT. LAT = left lateral; LT. MED = left medial; POST = posterior; RT. LAT = right lateral; RT. MED = right medial; SUP = superior.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Terminology for Head Trauma in TBI

    GCSTerminologyClinical definitions and backgroundMost reported symptoms
    ≤8Severe brain injuryLOC > 6 h, PTA > 24 hMobility problems, spasticity, weakness or paralysis, ataxia, sensory impairment, fatigue, speech difficulties, epilepsy
    9–12Moderate brain injuryLOC between 15 min and 6 h or PTA for up to 24 hTiredness; headaches; dizziness; difficulties with thinking, planning, organizing, memory, concentration, and word finding; irritability; anxiety
    13–15Mild brain injury (concussion)LOC < 15 min PTA < 1 hDizziness, nausea, confusion, inability to process or retain information, sensitivity to light, vision distortion
    Subconcussive impactsShort LOC or no LOC, Short PTA, or no PTAAsymptomatic
    • LOC = loss of consciousness; PTA = posttraumatic amnesia.

    • Adapted from “Advanced Trauma Life Support: Course for Physicians,” American College of Surgeons, 1993. There is no overall consensus on optimal definitions for brain injury with varying levels of severity. Most studies integrated in this review adhered to listed definitions.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 1
January 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Brain Trauma Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Brain Trauma Imaging
Gérard N. Bischof, Donna J. Cross
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2023, 64 (1) 20-29; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263293

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Brain Trauma Imaging
Gérard N. Bischof, Donna J. Cross
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2023, 64 (1) 20-29; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263293
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ACUTE AND SECONDARY FEATURES OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
    • IMAGING IN TBI RESEARCH
    • IMAGE ANALYSIS AND CHALLENGES
    • FUTURE DIRECTIONS
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • traumatic brain injury
  • Molecular Imaging
  • chronic traumatic encephalopathy
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire