Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleFeatured Article of the Month

177Lu-PSMA-617 and Idronoxil in Men with End-Stage Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (LuPIN): Patient Outcomes and Predictors of Treatment Response in a Phase I/II Trial

Sarennya Pathmanandavel, Megan Crumbaker, Andrew O. Yam, Andrew Nguyen, Christopher Rofe, Elizabeth Hovey, Craig Gedye, Edmond M. Kwan, Christine Hauser, Arun A. Azad, Peter Eu, Andrew J. Martin, Anthony M. Joshua and Louise Emmett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2022, 63 (4) 560-566; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262552
Sarennya Pathmanandavel
1Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
2Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
3Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Crumbaker
2Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
3Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
4St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew O. Yam
2Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
3Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
4St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Nguyen
1Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Rofe
2Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Hovey
5Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
6Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Craig Gedye
7Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia;
8Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edmond M. Kwan
9Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
10Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Hauser
11Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
12Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arun A. Azad
11Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Eu
11Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Martin
13NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony M. Joshua
2Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
3Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
4St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
6Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise Emmett
1Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
3Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
4St. Vincent’s Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
6Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    (A–D) Patient who was eligible on the basis of imaging with PSMA-avid disease (A) and no sites of discordant 18F-FDG (B). Quantitative PSMA tumor volume (C) and 18F-FDG tumor volume (D) are also shown. (E–H) Patient who was ineligible on the basis of imaging showing 2 sites (arrows) with higher 18F-FDG avidity (F) than PSMA avidity (E). Quantitative PSMA tumor volume (G) and 18F-FDG tumor volume (H) are also shown.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Waterfall plot of best PSA responses as indicated by maximum percentage change from baseline at any time point. NOX = NOX66.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Kaplan–Meier curves for PSA progression-free survival (A) and OS (B).

  • FIGURE 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4

    Graphical representation of important markers of OS. (Right) Swimmer plot showing individual-patient PFS and OS. (Left) Graph showing corresponding baseline tumor volume for each patient.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Characteristics (n = 56)

    CharacteristicData
    Age (y)69 (64–74)
    Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status
     0 or 149 (88)
     27 (12)
     PSA at C1 (μg/L)115 (46–476)
     Hemoglobin (reference range  [RR], 130–180 g/L)122 (110–131)
     Alkaline phosphatase  (RR, 30–100 U/L)113 (86–231)
     Albumin (RR, 36–52 g/L)38 (34–41)
     De novo metastatic disease29 (52)
    Gleason score
     ≤79 (16)
     8–1035 (63)
     Unknown/not available12 (21)
    Prior systemic treatments
     Luteinizing hormone–releasing  hormone agonist or antagonist56 (100)
     Chemotherapy56 (100)
     Docetaxel56 (100)
     Cabazitaxel53 (91)
     Other chemotherapy5 (9)
     ASI56 (100)
     Enzalutamide only27 (48)
     Abiraterone only13 (23)
     Abiraterone + enzalutamide16 (29)
     Clinical trial medication4 (7)
    PSMA PET
     SUVmean8 (7–10)
     SUVmax39 (29–61)
     Volume (L)0.64 (0.19–1.21)
    18F-FDG PET
     SUVmean4 (3–5)
     SUVmax8 (5–10)
     Volume (L)0.07 (0.02–0.31)
    Disease volume
     <20 metastases19 (33)
     ≥ 0 metastases37 (66)
    Sites of disease on PSMA PET
     Bone49 (88)
     Lymph node31 (55)
     Viscera12 (21)
    • Qualitative data are absolute counts and percentage; continuous data are median and interquartile range.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Summary of Common and Therapeutically Relevant Adverse Events (n = 56)

    Adverse eventGrade 1Grade 2Grade 3All grades
    Anemia31 (55)16 (29)4 (7)51 (91)
    Xerostomia30 (54)3 (5)0 (0)33 (59)
    Fatigue27 (48)     8 (14)0 (0)35 (63)
    Anal inflammation18 (32)3 (5)0 (0)21 (38)
    Nausea15 (27)0 (0)0 (0)15 (27)
    Thrombocytopenia12 (21)3 (5)0 (0)15 (27)
    Constipation11 (20)1 (2)0 (0)12 (21)
    Neutropenia5 (9)0 (0)0 (0)5 (9)
    Pneumonitis*0 (0)1 (3)0 (0)1 (3)
    • *Attributed to radiation therapy prior to enrollment. Data are number followed by percentage.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Final Multivariable Model for Association of Baseline Markers with PSA50

    LASSO ORMultivariable logistic regressionBackward elimination model
    VariableOR95% CIPOR95% CIP
    PSMA TV0.730.470.20–1.090.080.420.18–0.940.04
    PSMA SUVmean1.201.611.10–2.340.011.611.12–2.32
    Hemoglobin1.021.040.99–1.100.12NANANA
    • TV = tumor volume; NA = not applicable.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Final Multivariable Model for Association of Baseline Markers with OS

    LASSO ORMultivariable Cox regressionBackward elimination model
    VariableHR95% CIPHR95% CIP
    PSMA TV1.672.051.19–3.530.0092.191.381–3.4630.001
    ASI > 12 mo0.700.560.24–1.310.560.420.202–0.8690.02
    18F-FDG tumor volume (L)NA0.990.25–3.980.99NANANA
    Hemoglobin0.990.980.95–1.020.30NANANA
    Presence of visceral disease1.4992.010.89–4.530.09NANANA
    • TV = tumor volume; NA = not applicable.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 4
April 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
177Lu-PSMA-617 and Idronoxil in Men with End-Stage Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (LuPIN): Patient Outcomes and Predictors of Treatment Response in a Phase I/II Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
177Lu-PSMA-617 and Idronoxil in Men with End-Stage Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (LuPIN): Patient Outcomes and Predictors of Treatment Response in a Phase I/II Trial
Sarennya Pathmanandavel, Megan Crumbaker, Andrew O. Yam, Andrew Nguyen, Christopher Rofe, Elizabeth Hovey, Craig Gedye, Edmond M. Kwan, Christine Hauser, Arun A. Azad, Peter Eu, Andrew J. Martin, Anthony M. Joshua, Louise Emmett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 560-566; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262552

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
177Lu-PSMA-617 and Idronoxil in Men with End-Stage Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (LuPIN): Patient Outcomes and Predictors of Treatment Response in a Phase I/II Trial
Sarennya Pathmanandavel, Megan Crumbaker, Andrew O. Yam, Andrew Nguyen, Christopher Rofe, Elizabeth Hovey, Craig Gedye, Edmond M. Kwan, Christine Hauser, Arun A. Azad, Peter Eu, Andrew J. Martin, Anthony M. Joshua, Louise Emmett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 560-566; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262552
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinical Trial Protocol for LuCAB: A Phase I-II Trial Evaluating Cabazitaxel in Combination with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • Development of a Visually Calculated SUVmean (HIT Score) on Screening PSMA PET/CT to Predict Treatment Response to 177Lu-PSMA Therapy: Comparison with Quantitative SUVmean and Patient Outcomes
  • A Single-Arm, Low-Dose, Prospective Study of 177Lu-EB-PSMA Radioligand Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
  • 177Lu-PSMA SPECT Quantitation at 6 Weeks (Dose 2) Predicts Short Progression-Free Survival for Patients Undergoing 177Lu-PSMA-I&T Therapy
  • Evaluation of 177Lu-PSMA-617 SPECT/CT Quantitation as a Response Biomarker Within a Prospective 177Lu-PSMA-617 and NOX66 Combination Trial (LuPIN)
  • The Prognostic Value of Posttreatment 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 and NOX66 in a Phase I/II Trial (LuPIN)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • CD70-Targeted [18F]RCCB6 Immuno-PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Proof-of-Concept Study
  • MHC-I–Driven Antitumor Immunity Counterbalances Low Absorbed Doses of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • IL13Rα2-Targeting Antibodies for Immuno-PET in Solid Malignancies
Show more FEATURED ARTICLE OF THE MONTH

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • metastatic prostate cancer
  • theranostics
  • lutetium-PSMA
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire