Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Continuing Education
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

A Comprehensive Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Study on 2,005 Patients

Monica Abghari-Gerst, Wesley R. Armstrong, Kathleen Nguyen, Jeremie Calais, Johannes Czernin, David Lin, Namasvi Jariwala, Melissa Rodnick, Thomas A. Hope, Jason Hearn, Jeffrey S. Montgomery, Ajjai Alva, Zachery R. Reichert, Daniel E. Spratt, Timothy D. Johnson, Peter J.H. Scott and Morand Piert
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2022, 63 (4) 567-572; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262412
Monica Abghari-Gerst
1Radiology Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wesley R. Armstrong
2Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen Nguyen
2Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremie Calais
2Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Czernin
2Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Lin
3Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Namasvi Jariwala
3Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa Rodnick
1Radiology Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas A. Hope
3Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason Hearn
4Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey S. Montgomery
5Urology Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ajjai Alva
6Internal Medicine Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zachery R. Reichert
6Internal Medicine Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel E. Spratt
4Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy D. Johnson
7Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter J.H. Scott
1Radiology Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Morand Piert
1Radiology Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

We prospectively investigated the performance of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand 68Ga-PSMA-11 for detecting prostate adenocarcinoma in patients with elevated levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after initial therapy. Methods: 68Ga-PSMA-11 hybrid PET was performed on 2,005 patients at the time of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) (50.8%), definitive radiation therapy (RT) (19.7%), or RP with postoperative RT (PORT) (29.6%). The presence of prostate cancer was assessed qualitatively (detection rate = positivity rate) and quantitatively on a per-patient and per-region basis, creating a disease burden estimate from the presence or absence of local (prostate/prostate bed), nodal (N1: pelvis), and distant metastatic (M1: distant soft tissue and bone) disease. The primary study endpoint was the positive predictive value (PPV) of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT confirmed by histopathology. Results: After RP, the scan detection rate increased significantly with rising PSA level (44.8% at PSA < 0.25%–96.2% at PSA > 10 ng/mL; P < 0.001). The detection rate significantly increased with rising PSA level in each individual region, overall disease burden, prior androgen deprivation, clinical T-stage, and Gleason grading from the RP specimen (P < 0.001). After RT, the detection rate for in-gland prostate recurrence was 64.0%, compared with 20.6% prostate bed recurrence after RP and 13.3% after PORT. PSMA-positive pelvic nodal disease was detected in 42.7% after RP, 40.8% after PORT, and 38.8% after RT. In patients with histopathologic validation, the PPV per patient was 0.82 (146/179). The SUVmax of histologically proven true-positive lesions was significantly higher than that of false-positive lesions (median, 11.0 [interquartile range, 6.3–22.2] vs. 5.1 [interquartile range, 2.2–7.4]; P < 0.001). Conclusion: We confirmed a high PPV for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in biochemical recurrence and the PSA level as the main predictor of scan positivity.

  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen
  • PSMA
  • disease pattern
  • hybrid PET

Footnotes

  • Guest Editor: Barry Siegel, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology

  • Published online July 29, 2021.

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 4
April 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Comprehensive Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Study on 2,005 Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
A Comprehensive Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Study on 2,005 Patients
Monica Abghari-Gerst, Wesley R. Armstrong, Kathleen Nguyen, Jeremie Calais, Johannes Czernin, David Lin, Namasvi Jariwala, Melissa Rodnick, Thomas A. Hope, Jason Hearn, Jeffrey S. Montgomery, Ajjai Alva, Zachery R. Reichert, Daniel E. Spratt, Timothy D. Johnson, Peter J.H. Scott, Morand Piert
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 567-572; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262412

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Comprehensive Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Study on 2,005 Patients
Monica Abghari-Gerst, Wesley R. Armstrong, Kathleen Nguyen, Jeremie Calais, Johannes Czernin, David Lin, Namasvi Jariwala, Melissa Rodnick, Thomas A. Hope, Jason Hearn, Jeffrey S. Montgomery, Ajjai Alva, Zachery R. Reichert, Daniel E. Spratt, Timothy D. Johnson, Peter J.H. Scott, Morand Piert
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 567-572; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262412
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 18F-FDG PET Improves Baseline Clinical Predictors of Response in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The HOVON-84 Study
  • Neuropsychologic Profiles and Cerebral Glucose Metabolism in Neurocognitive Long COVID Syndrome
  • The Quest for an Accurate Functional Tumor Volume with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen
  • PSMA
  • disease pattern
  • hybrid PET
SNMMI

© 2022 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire