Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigation

18F-AraG PET for CD8 Profiling of Tumors and Assessment of Immunomodulation by Chemotherapy

Jelena Levi, Samuel Goth, Lyna Huynh, Tina Lam, Tony L. Huynh, Brailee Schulte and Juliet A. Packiasamy
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2021, 62 (6) 802-807; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.249078
Jelena Levi
1CellSight Technologies Incorporated, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel Goth
1CellSight Technologies Incorporated, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lyna Huynh
1CellSight Technologies Incorporated, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tina Lam
1CellSight Technologies Incorporated, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tony L. Huynh
2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brailee Schulte
2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juliet A. Packiasamy
1CellSight Technologies Incorporated, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    18F-AraG imaging of different syngeneic tumor models. (A) Both intratumoral (arrowheads) and intranodal (encircled) signal varied among different tumor types. Location of intratumoral signal showed several patterns, from signal present in core (MC38 and A9F1) through halolike (CT26) to signal present only at margin (LLC, B16F10). Ring effect as observed in bladder signifies saturated signal. (B) Intratumoral signal intensity showed variation among different tumor types and among individual mice of same tumor type. Signal in TDLNs was higher than signal in tumors and showed variability among different tumor types and individual mice (n = 4 for each tumor type; error bars represent SD). LN = lymph node; T = tumor; %ID = percentage injected dose.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Evaluation of different syngeneic tumor models. (A) Highest density of total lymphocytes, CD4+, and CD8+ cells was found in smallest tumors, A9F1. (B) Highest number of lymphocytes was isolated from largest tumors, 4T1. (C) Percentage of CD8 cells that expressed PD-1 varied among different tumor types. In LLC and A9F1 tumors, over 97% of CD8 cells were found to be PD-1–positive, whereas in 4T1 tumors less than 30% of CD8 cells were positive for PD-1 (n = 4 for each tumor type; error bars represent SD); symbols within bars represent individual mice).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Correlation of 18F-AraG signal with number of CD8 cells present in TME. (A) 18F-AraG signal showed no correlation with number of intratumoral CD8+ cells. (B) 18F-AraG signal showed statistically significant correlation with number of CD8+PD-1+ cells. (C) Exclusion of 4T1 cells for which PD-1 expression indicated dysfunction led to statistically significant correlation between 18F-AraG signal and number of CD8+ cells. %ID = percentage injected dose.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    18F-AraG longitudinal imaging of MC38-bearing mice undergoing chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was administered once weekly for 2 wk. Mice were imaged 1 d before start of therapy (Pre Tx) and then 3 d (P1) and 6 d (P2) after first chemotherapy administration and 3 d after second chemotherapy administration (Post Tx). (A) Paclitaxel/carboplatin treatment did not lead to appreciable changes in signal intensity. Dramatic increase in signal intensity was detected after 2 oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide injections. Encircled areas are TDLNs; arrowheads point to tumors. (B) 18F-AraG signal detected after oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide treatment was significantly different from pretherapy signal as well as signal after paclitaxel-carboplatin treatment (n = 4 for each group; error bars represent SD). LN = lymph node; T = tumor; %ID = percentage injected dose. *P < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    18F-AraG imaging of A9F1-bearing mice undergoing chemotherapy. (A) Paclitaxel/carboplatin treatment showed trend toward increase in signal. Oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide treatment led to increase in intratumoral signal. Encircled areas are TDLNs; arrowheads point to tumors. (B) Signal detected after oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide treatment was significantly different from pretherapy signal but not from signal after paclitaxel-carboplatin treatment (n = 4 for each group; error bars represent SD). LN = lymph node; T = tumor; %ID = percentage injected dose. *P < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Lymphocyte profile of MC38 and A9F1 tumors after chemotherapy. (A) In MC38 tumors, oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide treatment led to increase in total lymphocytes and number of CD8+ cells. In A9F1 tumors, oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide treatment led to increase in total lymphocytes and number of CD4+ cells. (B) In MC38 tumors, ratio of CD8+ to CD4+FOXP3+ cells in oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide group was 27 times higher than in paclitaxel/carboplatin-treated mice. (n = 4 for each group; error bars represent SD). *P < 0.05.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 62 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue 6
June 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-AraG PET for CD8 Profiling of Tumors and Assessment of Immunomodulation by Chemotherapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-AraG PET for CD8 Profiling of Tumors and Assessment of Immunomodulation by Chemotherapy
Jelena Levi, Samuel Goth, Lyna Huynh, Tina Lam, Tony L. Huynh, Brailee Schulte, Juliet A. Packiasamy
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2021, 62 (6) 802-807; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.249078

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-AraG PET for CD8 Profiling of Tumors and Assessment of Immunomodulation by Chemotherapy
Jelena Levi, Samuel Goth, Lyna Huynh, Tina Lam, Tony L. Huynh, Brailee Schulte, Juliet A. Packiasamy
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2021, 62 (6) 802-807; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.249078
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Approaches to Imaging Immune Activation Using PET
  • [18F]F-AraG Uptake in Vertebral Bone Marrow May Predict Survival in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy
  • Total-Body Dynamic Imaging and Kinetic Modeling of [18F]F-AraG in Healthy Individuals and a Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient Undergoing Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy
  • Total-body Dynamic Imaging and Kinetic Modeling of 18F-AraG in Healthy Individuals and a Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient Undergoing Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy
  • Imaging of Activated T Cells
  • Longitudinal Imaging of T Cells and Inflammatory Demyelination in a Preclinical Model of Multiple Sclerosis Using 18F-FAraG PET and MRI
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • [11C]ZTP-1: An Effective Short-Lived Radioligand for PET of Rat and Monkey Brain Phosphodiesterase Type 4 Subtype B
  • Reduced Renal Uptake of Various Radiopharmaceuticals with Sodium Paraaminohippurate Coadministration in a Rat Model
  • In Vivo Visualization and Quantification of Brain Heat Shock Protein 90 with [11C]HSP990 in Healthy Aging and Neurodegeneration
Show more Basic Science Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • CD8 T cells
  • chemotherapy
  • immunomodulation
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire