Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigation

The Synthesis and Structural Requirements for Measuring Glucocorticoid Receptor Expression In Vivo with (±)-11C-YJH08 PET

Yangjie Huang, Ning Zhao, Yung-hua Wang, Charles Truillet, Junnian Wei, Matthew F.L. Parker, Joseph E. Blecha, Christopher R. Drake, Henry F. VanBrocklin, Diego Garrido-Ruiz, Matthew P. Jacobson, Rahul Aggarwal, Spencer C. Behr, Robert R. Flavell, David M. Wilson, Youngho Seo and Michael J. Evans
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (5) 723-731; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.249755
Yangjie Huang
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ning Zhao
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yung-hua Wang
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Truillet
2Imagerie Moleculaire in Vivo, INSERM, CEA, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Universite Paris Saclay, CEA-Service Hospitalier Frederic Joliot, Orsay, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junnian Wei
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew F.L. Parker
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph E. Blecha
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher R. Drake
3Sofie Biosciences, Culver City, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry F. VanBrocklin
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
4Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diego Garrido-Ruiz
5Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew P. Jacobson
5Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rahul Aggarwal
4Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
6Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spencer C. Behr
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert R. Flavell
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
4Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Wilson
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Youngho Seo
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
4Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Evans
1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
4Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
5Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Summary of synthesis and in vivo assessment of (±)-11C-YJH08 biodistribution. (A) Summary of radiosynthesis of (±)-11C-YJH08. (B) Semipreparative ultraviolet HPLC traces showing retention of phenol precursor (7) and cold (±)-YJH08 (8). Below is shown ultraviolet trace of complex reaction mixture at 10 min and corresponding radioactive trace. Major peak at 10.12 min corresponds to product, (±)-11C-YJH08. (C) Time–activity curve from dynamic PET scan in wild-type male C57BL6/J mouse shows that (±)-11C-YJH08 rapidly cleared from serum, as expected, and primary mode of clearance appeared to be hepatobiliary. Data also show saturable radiotracer accumulation in brain and brown fat, 2 GR-rich tissues. At right are shown representative sagittal and coronal slices of mouse injected with (±)-11C-YJH08 PET/CT. DMF = dimethylformamide; ID = injected dose; RAD = radioactive; UV = ultraviolet.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    In vivo blocking studies reveal that (±)-11C-YJH08 specifically binds GR in vivo. (A) Biodistribution data collected 20 min after injection showing suppression of (±)-11C-YJH08 uptake in several mouse tissues by dexamethasone (Dex., n = 5/arm). Dexamethasone was administered via 2 routes involving oral gavage of 50 mg/kg for 3 d before radiotracer injection or administration of water-soluble dexamethasone–cyclodextrin complex via intraperitoneal injection at 10 mg/kg 1 h before radiotracer injection. *P < 0.05. At right are shown blocking data observed in brain. *P < 0.01. (B) Percentage changes in radiotracer uptake per tissue among mice exposed to dexamethasone or dexamethasone–cyclodextrin versus vehicle. (C) Representative CT and PET/CT images showing suppression of (±)-11C-YJH08 binding in selected organs in vivo by dexamethasone treatment. Dex. = dexamethasone; Dex-CD = dexamethasone–cyclodextrin complex; ID = injected dose.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Resolution and analysis of (R)/(S) YJH08 enantiomers reveals similar affinity for GR in vitro and biodistribution patterns in vivo. (A) HPLC trace over chiral stationary phase shows separation of racemic YJH08 to provide (R) and (S) isomers. Starred peak at 29.1 min was isolated in and recrystallized in hexanes to give single crystal. (B) Oak Ridge thermal ellipsoid plot showing absolute conformation of crystal, which was (R) enantiomer of YJH08. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 40% probability. (C) 3H-dexamethasone displacement curves on DU145 cells showing relative affinities of (R)-YJH08, (S)-YJH08, and dexamethasone. Each ligand has affinity of less than 5 nM, and all are equipotent. R 2 values for curve fitting were 0.99 (R), 0.94 (S), and 0.97 (dexamethasone). (D) Mouse biodistribution data showing tissue uptake of (R)- and (S)-11C-YJH08. Data were acquired 20 min after injection in male C57BL6/J mice. (E) Structures of (S) and (R) enantiomers of YJH08. Bonds are colored-coded to enable distinction of small-molecule structure in ligand-binding domain of GR. Below each enantiomer are results of molecular dynamics simulation to identify lowest-energy interaction between ligand binding domain of GR and respective enantiomer. Receptor side chains within 5 Å of respective YJH08 enantiomer are shown. For clarity, 2 docked poses are shown for each ligand–receptor complex. At bottom is shown schematic representation of docked pose for each enantiomer within GR ligand binding domain, to highlight amino acids within 5 Å of respective enantiomer. ID = injected dose.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Summary of Ki, 95% CIs, and coefficient of determination for YJH08. Data were calculated from 3H-dexamethasone displacement assay on cells. Ki was calculated using 1-site Ki fit nonlinear regression with Prism. Data are representative of 2 independent assays.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Biodistribution studies with analog 11C-YJH02 show importance of 4-fluoro-benzyl motif to specific GR binding in vivo. (A) Schematic of synthesis of 11C-YJH02. (B) Biodistribution data showing tissue uptake of 11C-YJH02 in mice. Data show tracer distribution in mice that received vehicle or dexamethasone-cyclodextrin at 10 mg/kg via intraperitoneal injection 1 h before radiotracer injection. Radiotracer uptake was evaluated 20 min after injection. *P < 0.01. (C) Comparison of 11C-YJH02 and (±)-11C-YJH08 uptake among tissues in normal mice. Uptake of 11C-YJH02 was generally lower than uptake of (±)-11C-YJH08. *P < 0.05. Dex-CD = dexamethasone–cyclodextrin complex; DMF = dimethylformamide; ID = injected dose; rt = room temperature.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Biodistribution Data for (±)-11C-YJH08 Vs. (±)-18F-YJH08

    Tissue(±)-11C-YJH08(±)-18F-YJH08
    Blood2.25 ± 0.212.22 ± 0.14
    Brain1.81 ± 0.171.93 ± 0.07
    Heart4.47 ± 0.434.15 ± 0.31
    Liver12.19 ± 1.2211.08 ± 0.92
    Spleen2.22 ± 0.332.46 ± 0.53
    Kidneys5.82 ± 0.285.79 ± 1.07
    Supraspinal brown fat depot9.8 ± 2.839.01 ± 2.07
    Adrenal gland13.88 ± 7.1512.19 ± 6.46
    Muscle1.53 ± 0.131.53 ± 0.12
    Bone1.19 ± 0.131.3 ± 0.23
    • Data are percentage injected dose per gram of tissue and were collected in intact male C57BL6/J mice at 20 min after injection. Data for (±)-18F-YJH08 were previously reported (6).

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Mouse Dosimetry Data for (±)-11C-YJH08

    OrganAdult male (73 kg)Adult female (60 kg)
    Absorbed dose (mGy/MBq)
     Adrenals0.00533 ± 0.0007480.00578 ± 0.000156
     Brain0.00140 ± 0.0000220.00229 ± 0.000078
     Breasts0.00286 ± 0.000129
     Esophagus0.00831 ± 0.0042490.00544 ± 0.000439
     Eyes0.00194 ± 0.0000920.00223 ± 0.000061
     Gallbladder wall0.00602 ± 0.0008760.00459 ± 0.000041
     Left colon0.00374 ± 0.0007690.00437 ± 0.000314
     Small intestine0.00325 ± 0.0004460.00325 ± 0.000114
     Stomach wall0.01628 ± 0.0059620.01925 ± 0.002944
     Right colon0.00367 ± 0.0005480.00339 ± 0.000070
     Rectum0.00249 ± 0.0000930.00280 ± 0.000087
     Heart wall0.06753 ± 0.0507250.02570 ± 0.005677
     Kidneys0.00714 ± 0.0001740.00785 ± 0.001344
     Liver0.01568 ± 0.0013770.01863 ± 0.001258
     Lungs0.01350 ± 0.0111320.00909 ± 0.000339
     Pancreas0.00665 ± 0.0023740.00545 ± 0.000182
     Ovaries0.00288 ± 0.000090
     Prostate0.00250 ± 0.000105
     Salivary glands0.00226 ± 0.0001560.00241 ± 0.000068
     Red marrow0.00310 ± 0.0007710.00289 ± 0.000101
     Osteogenic cells0.00223 ± 0.0003910.00217 ± 0.000069
     Spleen0.00378 ± 0.0008280.00432 ± 0.000300
     Testes0.00204 ± 0.000046
     Thymus0.01004 ± 0.0059990.00498 ± 0.000454
     Thyroid0.00355 ± 0.0010700.00297 ± 0.000118
     Urinary bladder wall0.00247 ± 0.0001360.00288 ± 0.000114
     Uterus0.00284 ± 0.000085
     Total body0.00355 ± 0.0008560.00366 ± 0.000121
    Effective dose (mSv/MBq)0.00673 ± 0.0027570.00649 ± 0.000433
    • Data were calculated from 90-min dynamic PET acquisition in intact male or female C57BL6/J mice.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 62 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue 5
May 10, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Synthesis and Structural Requirements for Measuring Glucocorticoid Receptor Expression In Vivo with (±)-11C-YJH08 PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
The Synthesis and Structural Requirements for Measuring Glucocorticoid Receptor Expression In Vivo with (±)-11C-YJH08 PET
Yangjie Huang, Ning Zhao, Yung-hua Wang, Charles Truillet, Junnian Wei, Matthew F.L. Parker, Joseph E. Blecha, Christopher R. Drake, Henry F. VanBrocklin, Diego Garrido-Ruiz, Matthew P. Jacobson, Rahul Aggarwal, Spencer C. Behr, Robert R. Flavell, David M. Wilson, Youngho Seo, Michael J. Evans
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (5) 723-731; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.249755

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Synthesis and Structural Requirements for Measuring Glucocorticoid Receptor Expression In Vivo with (±)-11C-YJH08 PET
Yangjie Huang, Ning Zhao, Yung-hua Wang, Charles Truillet, Junnian Wei, Matthew F.L. Parker, Joseph E. Blecha, Christopher R. Drake, Henry F. VanBrocklin, Diego Garrido-Ruiz, Matthew P. Jacobson, Rahul Aggarwal, Spencer C. Behr, Robert R. Flavell, David M. Wilson, Youngho Seo, Michael J. Evans
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (5) 723-731; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.249755
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • In Vivo Visualization and Quantification of Brain Heat Shock Protein 90 with [11C]HSP990 in Healthy Aging and Neurodegeneration
  • 161Tb Radioimmunotherapy as a Treatment for CD30-Positive Lymphomas
  • 212Bi-Macroaggregated Albumin Inhibited Mouse Melanoma Growth by Regulating Cell Cycle Checkpoint Markers Without Promoting Living Cell Repopulation
Show more Basic Science Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • glucocorticoid receptor (GR)
  • carbon‐11
  • Molecular imaging
  • dosimetry study
  • PET
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire