Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleNeurology

18F-FDG PET Identifies Altered Brain Metabolism in Patients with Cri du Chat Syndrome

Angelina Cistaro, Natale Quartuccio, Arnoldo Piccardo, Piercarlo Fania, Marianna Spunton, Alexandra Liava, Cesare Danesino, Giovanni Albani and Andrea Guala
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2020, 61 (8) 1195-1199; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.236893
Angelina Cistaro
1Nuclear Medicine Department, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy
2AIMN Pediatric Study Group, Milan, Italy
3Scientific Committee of ABC Associazione Nazionale Bambini Cri du Chat, San Casciano in Val di Pesa (Firenze), Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natale Quartuccio
2AIMN Pediatric Study Group, Milan, Italy
4Nuclear Medicine Unit, ARNAS Ospedali Civico, Di Cristina e Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnoldo Piccardo
1Nuclear Medicine Department, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy
2AIMN Pediatric Study Group, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Piercarlo Fania
5Independent Data Scientist, Turin, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marianna Spunton
3Scientific Committee of ABC Associazione Nazionale Bambini Cri du Chat, San Casciano in Val di Pesa (Firenze), Italy
6Paediatric Unit, Castelli Hospital, Verbania, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra Liava
3Scientific Committee of ABC Associazione Nazionale Bambini Cri du Chat, San Casciano in Val di Pesa (Firenze), Italy
7Child Neuropsychiatric Unit, Castelli Hospital, Verbania, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cesare Danesino
3Scientific Committee of ABC Associazione Nazionale Bambini Cri du Chat, San Casciano in Val di Pesa (Firenze), Italy
8Department of Molecular Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giovanni Albani
3Scientific Committee of ABC Associazione Nazionale Bambini Cri du Chat, San Casciano in Val di Pesa (Firenze), Italy
9Department of Neurology, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Piancavallo-Verbania, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Guala
3Scientific Committee of ABC Associazione Nazionale Bambini Cri du Chat, San Casciano in Val di Pesa (Firenze), Italy
6Paediatric Unit, Castelli Hospital, Verbania, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cri du chat syndrome (CDCS) is a rare genetic disease that is caused by a deletion in the short arm of chromosome 5 (5p) and has a variable clinical spectrum. To our knowledge, no study in the literature has ever applied 18F-FDG PET/CT to investigate alterations in brain glucose metabolism in these subjects. The aims of this study were to detect differences in brain 18F-FDG metabolism in CDCS patients with different clinical presentations and identify possible brain metabolic phenotypes of this syndrome. Methods: Six patients (5 male and 1 female; age range, 10–27 y) with CDCS were assessed for the presence of cognitive and behavioral symptoms using a battery of neuropsychologic tests and then classified as having either a severe or a mild phenotype. The patients then underwent brain 18F-FDG PET/CT. The PET/CT findings were compared with an age- and sex-matched control group using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Whether there was an association between different clinical phenotypes and 18F-FDG PET/CT findings was investigated. Results: Four patients had the severe phenotype, and 2 patients demonstrated the mild phenotype. SPM single-subject analysis, and a group analysis in comparison with the control cohort, revealed significant hypometabolism in the left temporal lobe (Brodmann areas [BAs] 20, 36, and 38), in the right frontal subcallosal gyrus (BA 34) and caudate body, and in the cerebellar tonsils (P < 0.001). Hypermetabolism (P = 0.001) was revealed in the right superior and precentral frontal gyrus (BA 6) in the patient group, compared with the control cohort. In SPM single-subject analysis, the hypermetabolic areas were detected only in patients with the severe phenotype. Conclusion: This study revealed different patterns of brain glucose metabolism in patients with the severe and mild phenotypes, compared with control subjects. In particular, abnormal hypermetabolism in the brain, as evaluated by18F-FDG PET/CT, seems to correlate with the severe CDCS phenotype.

  • cri du chat syndrome
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • statistical parametric mapping
  • brain
  • hypometabolism

Cri du chat syndrome (CDCS) is a rare genetic disease with an incidence ranging from 1 in 15,000 to 1 in 50,000 live births, caused by either a partial or a complete deletion of chromosome 5p (1). The clinical phenotype depends on the location and extent of the genomic region involved in the 5p deletion, with the breakpoint location varying from p13 (D5S763) to p15.2 (D5S18) (2–5). The various phenotypes are characterized by different degrees of severity in the developmental and behavioral problems associated with the disease. Physical and behavioral characteristics include a high-pitched cry, microcephaly, a broad nasal bridge, epicanthal folds, micrognathia, and severe psychomotor retardation (2). Diagnosis is based on clinical manifestations and requires karyotyping, array comparative genomic hybridization, and, eventually, fluorescence in situ hybridization for doubtful cases (1,2). The most frequent structural brain abnormalities, as shown by the few studies available in the literature using MRI, include brain stem hypoplasia (with predominantly pontine involvement), thinning or agenesis of the corpus callosum, cerebellar vermian atrophy (or agenesis), cerebellar cortical thickening, and incomplete arborization of the white matter (6,7).

It is well established that 18F-FDG PET/CT is an important tool for the assessment of cerebral metabolism in several neurologic diseases, showing different metabolic patterns that support both an early diagnosis and a neurologic disability evaluation (8–10). To our knowledge, no study has ever correlated brain glucose metabolism with phenotypical presentation in patients with CDCS. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the distribution of brain glucose metabolism in CDCS patients to identify possible brain metabolic phenotypes of this syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively and consecutively evaluated 6 CDCS patients (1 female and 5 male; age range, 10–27 y) having different deletion sizes in the 5p region. Patients 5 and 6 were monozygotic twins with mosaic 46,XY,del(5)(p14)/46,XY. All 6 patients underwent a complete neurologic and neuropsychiatric clinical assessment, including Vineland adaptive behavior scales. According to the various levels of severity deficits in intellectual and adaptive functioning, as defined in DSM V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition) (11), each patient was classified as having either a mild or a severe clinical phenotype.

Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, an inability to lie still for the duration of the PET scan (15 min), and a previous diagnosis of oncologic or other neurologic disease in the medical history.

The study was proposed by the Scientific Committee and approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Associazione Bambini Cri du Chat. Each patient, or the parents of those less than 18 y old, provided written informed consent after receiving a detailed description of the study’s aims.

18F-FDG Brain PET/CT

All brain PET/CT was performed after the subject had fasted for at least 6 h and blood glucose level had been measured (maximum, 130 mg/dL). The patients were positioned comfortably in a quiet and darkened room at least 20 min before 18F-FDG administration and during the uptake phase. They received a fixed activity (185 MBq) of 18F-FDG through an intravenous cannula according to European Association of Nuclear Medicine procedural guidelines (12). The PET/CT scans started approximately 60 min after the injection and lasted 15 min. A polycarbonate head holder was applied to avoid head movement during the scan. The PET scans were acquired using a Discovery STE PET/CT system (GE Healthcare) in 3-dimensional mode with a total axial field of view of 30 cm and no interplane gap. 18F-FDG PET/CT brain data were collected through sequential scans: CT data were used for attenuation correction of the PET data, with a thickness of 3.75 mm, 140 kV, and 60–80 mA/s. The PET brain scan had 1 field of view of 30 transaxial centimeters. The PET data were reconstructed using 3-dimensional iterative ordered-subsets expectation maximization with corrections for random, scatter, and attenuation (VUE-point; GE Healthcare) (28 subsets and 4 iterations). Data were collected in 128 × 128 matrices with a reconstructed voxel size of 1.33 × 1.33 × 2.00 mm.

Statistical Analysis

The patient-group and single-subject analyses compared the 18F-FDG PET brain scans with those of a neurologically normal group of healthy subjects matched for age and sex, extracted from a control cohort of 40 individuals previously used in another research study (13). Preprocessing and statistical analyses were performed by statistical parametric mapping (SPM, version 2; Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology) implemented in MATLAB (version 7.9; MathWorks). The spatially normalized set of images was smoothed using an 8-mm isotropic gaussian filter. The resulting statistical parametric maps, SPM{tdc}, were transformed into normal distribution (SPM{z}) units. The SPM coordinates were corrected to match the Talairach coordinates by a subroutine implemented by Matthew Brett (http://brainmap.org/index.html). Brodmann areas (BAs) were then identified at a range of 0–3 mm from the corrected Talairach coordinates of the SPM output isocenters, after the corrected coordinates had been imported by the Talairach client (http://www.talairach.org/index.html) using SPM. To test the overall statistical significance of metabolic differences, 1-way ANOVA was performed using the SPM f-contrast routine between the patient and control groups. A 2-sample unpaired t test was used to identify areas of relative hypo- and hypermetabolism in both the patient group and the single patients. Age and sex were included as nuisance variables in all SPM analyses. We used a P value threshold of 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons with the false-discovery-rate option, to explore SPM t-maps at the cluster and voxel levels, considering clusters with more than 100 voxels to be significant. If statistical significance was not reached, the threshold at the voxel level was explored at a P value of less than 0.001 uncorrected for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Patient Clinical Characteristics

According to the DSM V criteria, each subject was classified as having either a mild (patients 4 and 6) or a severe (patients 1, 2, 3, and 5) clinical phenotype. The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. All patients with the severe phenotype had speaking and socialization problems. Impairment in the execution of daily activities was the most frequent clinical characteristic (3 of the 4 patients with the severe phenotype), along with microcephaly (3 of 4 patients) and reduced pain sensibility (3 of 4 patients). Movement disorders were present in 3 of the 4 patients with the severe phenotype. Skin picking was documented in 1 patient with the severe phenotype. A patient with the mild phenotype had socialization problems and movement disorders. Hashimoto thyroiditis was present in both twin patients (patients 5 and 6).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Summary of Patient Characteristics with Main Clinical Manifestations

Patient Genetic Abnormalities

The patients with the severe phenotype had the following genetic mutations: 46,XY,del(5)(p14.3→pter) in patients 1 and 2, 46,XY,del(5)(p15.1→pter) in patient 3, and 46,XY,ish del(5)(p14)/46,XY in patient 5. The genetic mutations in the patients with the mild phenotype were 46XX,del(5)(p15.2→pter) and 46,XY,ish del(5)(p14)/46,XY in patients 4 and 6, respectively. The karyotype found in the twin patients (patients 5 and 6) was 46,XY,ish del(5)(p14).

SPM Analysis

SPM group analysis revealed a statistically significant relative hypometabolism in the left temporal lobe (BAs 20, 36, and 38) in the patient group, compared with the control cohort (P < 0.001). Furthermore, hypometabolism was also detected in the right frontal subcallosal gyrus (BA 34) and caudate body and in the cerebellar tonsils (Fig. 1; Table 2).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Brain 3-dimensional rendering showing regions in which 18F-FDG uptake significantly differed between CDCS patients (n = 6) and controls (threshold P < 0.001, uncorrected for multiple comparisons at voxel level). Shown are left medial view (first row, left image), right medial view (first row, right image), left posterior view (second row, left image), right frontal view (second row, right image), right-side view (third row, left image), left-side view (third row, right image), view from below (fourth row, left image), and view from above (fourth row, right image). Images are color-graded in terms of z values. (Left) Controls vs. patient group. Relative hypometabolism is seen in left temporal lobe (BAs 20, 36, and 38). (Right) Patient group vs. controls. Relative hypermetabolism is seen in right middle frontal gyrus (BA 6). Talairach coordinate and regional details are provided in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Talairach Coordinate and Regional Details

Statistically significant relative hypermetabolism (P = 0.001) was found in the right premotor cortex (BA 6) in the patient group, in comparison with the controls (Fig. 1). In SPM single-subject analysis, the hypermetabolic areas were detected only in patients with the severe phenotype (Fig. 2).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Brain 3-dimensional rendering showing regions in which 18F-FDG uptake significantly differed between single patient with CDCS and reference database (threshold P < 0.001, uncorrected for multiple comparisons at voxel level). Images are color-graded in terms of z values. (A and B) Relative hypometabolism (A) and hypermetabolism (B) in patient with mild phenotype. Relative hypometabolism (C) and hypermetabolism (D) in patient with severe phenotype. Patient with mild phenotype does not show any hypermetabolic finding (B).

DISCUSSION

The diagnostic work-up of CDCS includes clinical assessment and genetic evaluation to detect deletion of 5p. Brain MRI is used to uncover structural brain abnormalities such as marked atrophy in the brain stem, a small cerebellum, and small middle cerebellar peduncles (6,7,14,15).

To the best of our knowledge, the present report is the first describing the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of brain glucose metabolism in patients with CDCS. All patients demonstrated several hypometabolic brain areas at the SPM analysis. 18F-FDG hypometabolism is a common feature in many neurologic diseases (16), and characteristic spatial patterns reflecting several possible causes have been identified, such as brain atrophy, decreased cerebral metabolic rate of glucose, regional synaptic dysfunction or deafferentation, and transneural metabolic depression (17–19).

The main hypometabolic region detected in our patients was the left inferior temporal and homolateral temporal pole cortex (BAs 20, 34 36, and 38), which is involved in verbal production and comprehension, working memory, and selective attention to speech (20–22). Furthermore, the left BA 20 is involved in language associations and perceptual skills (20–23), whereas the left BAs 34 and 36 are associated with the ability to experience and process emotion; these areas also contribute to novelty discrimination (24,25). Although the hypometabolism in these areas can be related to the altered cognition and the disturbances in emotion, memory, and language in our CDCS patients (26–29), these defects alone are not sufficient to explain all the clinical features of patients with the severe phenotype. Interestingly, in our patients, significant hypometabolism was also found in the cerebellar tonsils. These structures belong to the neocerebellum, which receives input from the cerebral cortex and helps in planning movement of the distal limbs (30). The reduced glucose metabolism in the cerebellar tonsils may reflect reduced inhibition of the circuits directed to the vestibular nuclei and can help explain the movement disorders documented in our patients. This hypothesis finds support in a few studies reporting reduced glucose metabolism in the cerebellar tonsils in congenital ocular motor apraxia (31) and downbeat nystagmus (32).

In the scarce available literature, MRI studies have shown vermian hypoplasia to be a hallmark of CDCS patients (33). However, our study found only a trend toward hypometabolism in this structure. We hypothesize that future larger studies may be able to clarify the significance of this result.

The phenomenon of skin picking was documented in only 1 subject in our patient cohort (34,35). Vogt et al. evaluated regional cerebral blood flow by means of 15OH2 PET in 7 healthy subjects receiving neuropsychologic and pain threshold testing (36). They found that 6 of 7 subjects had a reduced flow in BA 30 (in the right, left, or both hemispheres) during noxious stimulation. In a further 2 functional MRI studies, a reduced signal in BAs 30 and 5 was found to be related to noxious stimuli (37,38). All this evidence suggests that BAs 5 and 30 are involved in some aspects of the pain experience. However, in our cohort, the only patient presenting with skin picking did not show metabolic alterations in these areas but demonstrated hypometabolism in the right caudate body. That finding could be in keeping with the findings of previous researchers who documented functional underactivation bilaterally in the striatum (maximal in the right caudatum) in a small group of patients with skin-picking disorder (39). However, because of our limited number of patients and the lack of literature describing PET or functional MRI findings in CDCS patients with skin picking, it is not possible to make a definitive conclusion.

We could not establish whether patients with the mild phenotype had less severe hypometabolism than patients with the severe phenotype or vice versa, because of the limited number of subjects in the 2 groups. Nevertheless, at the single-subject analysis, the 2 patients with the mild phenotype, despite showing the same hypometabolic brain regions as patients with the severe phenotype, did not show the same symptoms. The main differences between the 2 clinical phenotypes in our study were in the hypermetabolic findings. In fact, hypermetabolic areas were not identified in patients with the mild phenotype. The role of the 18F-FDG hypermetabolic regions in disease progression is unclear. In other diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 18F-FDG hypermetabolism has been linked to increased astrocytosis, a hallmark of microglial activation (4). However, we know of no study that has ever elucidated the association between microglia and disease expression in CDCS patients. In our opinion, hypermetabolic alterations may play a role in determining phenotype expression, since in the single-subject analysis, patients without hypermetabolic abnormalities did not present the severe clinical phenotype. In severe-phenotype patients, the hypermetabolic alteration involved the right premotor cortex (BA 6). This alteration could be important in explaining at least some of the movement symptoms, because this region is connected to the spinal cord via the corticopontocerebellar pathway (40). The endpoint of our next study will be to establish the correlation between the hypermetabolism in the premotor cortex and the hypometabolism in the cerebellum in a larger population of CDCS patients.

Limitations of our study were the low number of patients due to the relative rarity of the disease, the heterogeneous distribution of the genetic alterations within the patient group, and the lack of morphologic imaging examinations, such as MRI, to enable comparison of 18F-FDG uptake with anatomic alterations. Finally, some of the results could have been influenced by the heterogeneous age group of the patients; such heterogeneity may be linked to the differences in the behavioral and educational stages of the patients. Future studies should try to collect a larger number of patients to confirm our PET findings and, specifically, to confirm whether hypermetabolic alterations are typical in patients with the severe phenotype.

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET/CT identified differences in brain glucose metabolism between CDCS patients with severe and mild phenotypes of the disease, in comparison with control subjects. In particular, bilaterally hypometabolic areas were found in the left temporal lobe, right frontal subcallosal gyrus, right caudate body, and cerebellar tonsils of all patients, whereas hypermetabolic findings were identified only in patients with the severe phenotype. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these results and to evaluate the influence of different 5p deletion sites on brain glucose metabolism.

DISCLOSURE

The work received financial support from Associazione Bambini Cri du Chat. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

  • QUESTION: Is brain metabolism altered in patients with mild and severe CDCS phenotypes?

  • PERTINENT FINDINGS: In a small cohort of 6 patients, 18F-FDG PET found significant hypometabolism (P < 0.001) in the left temporal lobe (BAs 20, 36, and 38), right frontal subcallosal gyrus (BA 34), right caudate body, and cerebellar tonsils. Significant hypermetabolism (P = 0.001) was detected in the right superior and precentral frontal gyrus (BA 6) in patients with the severe phenotype.

  • IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: 18F-FDG PET imaging may highlight altered brain metabolism in CDCS patients and help differentiate the severe phenotype from the mild phenotype.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and parents for their collaboration in this study, and we especially thank Sylvia Teresa Del Testa for inspiring the start of the study.

Footnotes

  • Published online Dec. 13, 2019.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cerruti Mainardi P
    . Cri du chat syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1:33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Guala A,
    2. Spunton M,
    3. Tognon F,
    4. et al
    . Psychomotor development in cri du chat syndrome: comparison in two Italian cohorts with different rehabilitation methods. ScientificWorldJournal. 2016;2016:3125283.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.
    1. Mainardi PC,
    2. Perfumo C,
    3. Calì A,
    4. et al
    . Clinical and molecular characterisation of 80 patients with 5p deletion: genotype-phenotype correlation. J Med Genet. 2001;38:151–158.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nguyen JM,
    2. Qualmann KJ,
    3. Okashah R,
    4. Reilly A,
    5. Alexeyev MF,
    6. Campbell DJ
    . 5p deletions: current knowledge and future directions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2015;169:224–238.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Corréa T,
    2. Feltes BC,
    3. Riegel M
    . Integrated analysis of the critical region 5p15.3-p15.2 associated with cri-du-chat syndrome. Genet Mol Biol. 2019;42:186–196.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Nandhagopal R,
    2. Udayakumar AM
    . Cri-du-chat syndrome. Indian J Med Res. 2014;140:570–571.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hong JH,
    2. Lee HY,
    3. Lim MK,
    4. et al
    . Brain stem hypoplasia associated with cri-du-chat syndrome. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14:960–962.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cistaro A,
    2. Caobelli F,
    3. Quartuccio N,
    4. Fania P,
    5. Pagani M
    . Uncommon 18F-FDG-PET/CT findings in patients affected by limbic encephalitis: hyper-hypometabolic pattern with double antibody positivity and migrating foci of hypermetabolism. Clin Imaging. 2015;39:329–333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Cistaro A,
    2. Cuccurullo V,
    3. Quartuccio N,
    4. Pagani M,
    5. Valentini MC,
    6. Mansi L
    . Role of PET and SPECT in the study of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:237437.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Politis M,
    2. Piccini P
    . Positron emission tomography imaging in neurological disorders. J Neurol. 2012;259:1769–1780.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Vahia VN
    . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5: a quick glance. Indian J Psychiatry. 2013;55:220–223.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Varrone A,
    2. Asenbaum S,
    3. Vander Borght T,
    4. et al
    . EANM procedure guidelines for PET brain imaging using [18F]FDG, version 2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:2103–2110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Cistaro A,
    2. Valentini MC,
    3. Chio A,
    4. et al
    . Brain hypermetabolism in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a FDG PET study in ALS of spinal and bulbar onset. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:251–259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Tamraz J,
    2. Rethore MO,
    3. Lejeune J,
    4. et al
    . Brain morphometry using MRI in cri-du-chat syndrome: report of seven cases with review of the literature. Ann Genet. 1993;36:75–87.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. De Michele G,
    2. Presta M,
    3. Di Salle F,
    4. et al
    . Cerebellar vermis hypoplasia in a case of cri-du-chat syndrome. Acta Neurol (Napoli). 1993;15:92–96.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Zilberter Y,
    2. Zilberter M
    . The vicious circle of hypometabolism in neurodegenerative diseases: ways and mechanisms of metabolic correction. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95:2217–2235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Agrawal KL,
    2. Mittal BR,
    3. Bhattacharya A,
    4. Khandelwal N,
    5. Prabhakar S
    . Crossed cerebellar diaschisis on F-18 FDG PET/CT. Indian J Nucl Med. 2011;26:102–103.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.
    1. Berti V,
    2. Mosconi L,
    3. Pupi A
    . Brain: normal variations and benign findings in fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography imaging. PET Clin. 2014;9:129–140.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Shivamurthy VK,
    2. Tahari AK,
    3. Marcus C,
    4. Subramaniam RM
    . Brain FDG PET and the diagnosis of dementia. AJR. 2015;204:W76–W85.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ardila A,
    2. Bernal B,
    3. Rosselli M
    . How localized are language brain areas? A review of Brodmann areas involvement in oral language. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31:112–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.
    1. Papathanassiou D,
    2. Etard O,
    3. Mellet E,
    4. Zago L,
    5. Mazoyer B,
    6. Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    . A common language network for comprehension and production: a contribution to the definition of language epicenters with PET. Neuroimage. 2000;11:347–357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Yoo SS,
    2. Paralkar G,
    3. Panych LP
    . Neural substrates associated with the concurrent performance of dual working memory tasks. Int J Neurosci. 2004;114:613–631.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Perobelli S,
    2. Alessandrini F,
    3. Zoccatelli G,
    4. et al
    . Diffuse alterations in grey and white matter associated with cognitive impairment in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome: evidence from a multimodal approach. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;7:721–731.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Habib R,
    2. McIntosh AR,
    3. Wheeler MA,
    4. Tulving E
    . Memory encoding and hippocampally-based novelty/familiarity discrimination networks. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:271–279.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Vorobyev VA,
    2. Alho K,
    3. Medvedev SV,
    4. et al
    . Linguistic processing in visual and modality-nonspecific brain areas: PET recordings during selective attention. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004;20:309–322.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hermann BP,
    2. Wyler AR,
    3. Richey ET,
    4. Rea JM
    . Memory function and verbal learning ability in patients with complex partial seizures of temporal lobe origin. Epilepsia. 1987;28:547–554.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.
    1. Hoon AH Jr.,
    2. Reiss AL Jr.
    . The mesial-temporal lobe and autism: case report and review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992;34:252–259.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.
    1. Lansdell H
    . Effect of extent of temporal lobe ablations on two lateralized deficits. Physiol Behav. 1968;3:271–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lee TMC,
    2. Yip JTH,
    3. Jones-Gotman M
    . Memory deficits after resection from left or right anterior temporal lobe in humans: a meta-analytic review. Epilepsia. 2002;43:283–291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Mavridis I
    . Gross and neurosurgical anatomy of the cerebellar tonsil. OA Anatomy. 2014;2:8.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Jang SJ,
    2. Kim YK,
    3. Oh YM,
    4. Kim JS,
    5. Lee WW,
    6. Kim SE
    . Cerebellar vermian hypometabolism in children with congenital ocular motor apraxia [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(suppl 2):171P.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Bense S,
    2. Best C,
    3. Buchholz HG,
    4. et al
    . 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose hypometabolism in cerebellar tonsil and flocculus in downbeat nystagmus. Neuroreport. 2006;17:599–603.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Rolls ET,
    2. Grabenhorst F
    . The orbitofrontal cortex and beyond: from affect to decision-making. Prog Neurobiol. 2008;86:216–244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Spunton M,
    2. Guala A,
    3. Liverani ME,
    4. et al
    . Skin picking disorder in 97 Italian and Spanish cri du chat patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179:1525–1530.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Fergnani VGC,
    2. Guala A,
    3. Danesino C,
    4. et al
    . Genetic and neuroradiological clinical correlations in Cri Du Chat syndrome. Paper presented at: ESHG, European Human Genetics Conference; June 16–19, 2018; Milan, Italy.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Vogt BA,
    2. Derbyshire S,
    3. Jones AK
    . Pain processing in four regions of human cingulate cortex localized with co-registered PET and MR imaging. Eur J Neurosci. 1996;8:1461–1473.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Kong J,
    2. Loggia ML,
    3. Zyloney C,
    4. Tu P,
    5. Laviolette P,
    6. Gollub RL
    . Exploring the brain in pain: activations, deactivations and their relation. Pain. 2010;148:257–267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Apkarian AV,
    2. Darbar A,
    3. Krauss BR,
    4. Gelnar PA,
    5. Szeverenyi NM
    . Differentiating cortical areas related to pain perception from stimulus identification: temporal analysis of fMRI activity. J Neurophysiol. 1999;81:2956–2963.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Odlaug BL,
    2. Hampshire A,
    3. Chamberlain SR,
    4. Grant JE
    . Abnormal brain activation in excoriation (skin-picking) disorder: evidence from an executive planning fMRI study. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208:168–174.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Palesi F,
    2. De Rinaldis A,
    3. Castellazzi G,
    4. et al
    . Contralateral cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathways reconstruction in humans in vivo: implications for reciprocal cerebro-cerebellar structural connectivity in motor and non-motor areas. Sci Rep. 2017;7:12841.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication September 23, 2019.
  • Accepted for publication December 2, 2019.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue 8
August 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-FDG PET Identifies Altered Brain Metabolism in Patients with Cri du Chat Syndrome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-FDG PET Identifies Altered Brain Metabolism in Patients with Cri du Chat Syndrome
Angelina Cistaro, Natale Quartuccio, Arnoldo Piccardo, Piercarlo Fania, Marianna Spunton, Alexandra Liava, Cesare Danesino, Giovanni Albani, Andrea Guala
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2020, 61 (8) 1195-1199; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236893

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-FDG PET Identifies Altered Brain Metabolism in Patients with Cri du Chat Syndrome
Angelina Cistaro, Natale Quartuccio, Arnoldo Piccardo, Piercarlo Fania, Marianna Spunton, Alexandra Liava, Cesare Danesino, Giovanni Albani, Andrea Guala
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2020, 61 (8) 1195-1199; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236893
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Neurology

  • Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonist PET Tracer Development: Assessment in Nonhuman Primates
  • Hypermetabolism on Pediatric PET Scans of Brain Glucose Metabolism: What Does It Signify?
  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
Show more Neurology

Clinical

  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cri du chat syndrome
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • Statistical Parametric Mapping
  • brain
  • Hypometabolism
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire