Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleOncology

Can Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging Identify All Lesions While the Road Map Created by Preoperative Nuclear Imaging Is Masked?

Phillipa Meershoek, Tessa Buckle, Matthias N. van Oosterom, Gijs H. KleinJan, Henk G. van der Poel and Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2020, 61 (6) 834-841; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.235234
Phillipa Meershoek
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tessa Buckle
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and
2Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Center and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias N. van Oosterom
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and
2Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Center and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gijs H. KleinJan
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and
2Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Center and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henk G. van der Poel
2Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Center and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
1Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and
2Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Center and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Tracers can help visualize the lymphatic drainage patterns and sentinel nodes (SNs) of individual prostate cancer patients. To determine the role of nuclear medicine in surgical guidance, in particular the positional guidance of a SPECT/CT-based 3-dimensional imaging road map, in this process we studied to what extent fluorescence guidance underestimated the number of target lesions relative to radioguidance. Methods: SPECT/CT imaging was performed after intraprostatic tracer administration of either indocyanine green (ICG)-99mTc-nanocolloid (hybrid-tracer group) or 99mTc-nanocolloid to create a road map that depicted all SNs. Patients who received 99mTc-nanocolloid were injected with “free” ICG immediately before surgery. Before unmasking, fluorescence guidance was used for intraoperative SN identification. This was followed by extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). After unmasking of the SPECT/CT images, the number of missed SNs was recorded and their resection was pursued when there was no risk of intraoperative complications. Results: Preoperative SPECT/CT revealed no differences in the SN identification rate between ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid and 99mTc-nanocolloid. However, fluorescence guidance allowed intraoperative removal of all SNs in only 40% of patients in the hybrid-tracer group and 20% of patients in the free-ICG group. Overall, 75.9% of the intraoperatively resected SNs in the hybrid-tracer group and 51.8% of the SNs in the free-ICG group were removed solely under fluorescence guidance. During ePLND, 22 additional SNs were resected (7 in the hybrid-tracer group and 15 in the free-ICG group). After unmasking, 18 remaining SNs were identified (6 in the hybrid group and 12 in the free-ICG group). In the free-ICG group, ex vivo evaluation of the excised specimens revealed that 14 SNs removed under ePLND or after unmasking contained radioactivity but no fluorescence. Conclusion: The preoperative imaging road map provided by SPECT/CT enhanced the detection of prostate SNs in more ectopic locations in 17 of the 25 patients, and the hybrid tracer ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid was shown to outperform free ICG. Overall, fluorescence-guided pelvic nodal surgery underestimated the number of SNs in 60%–80% of patients.

  • image-guided surgery
  • prostate cancer
  • sentinel node biopsy
  • SPECT/CT
  • robot-assisted surgery
  • fluorescence

In radioguided surgery, preoperative imaging findings support lesion identification during the intervention. The value that preoperative imaging provides is underlined by the impact that 3-dimensional imaging road maps have had on known radioguidance procedures such as sentinel node (SN) resections (SPECT/CT-based identification of aberrant tracer uptake) and PSMA-expression–targeted resections (PET/CT- and SPECT/CT-based target definition) (1–3). The value of knowing where lesions are located during surgical procedures in relation to the patient’s anatomic context is especially eminent when resections are performed in complex anatomies (e.g., the pelvic area).

The success of radioguidance during surgical procedures, fueled by calls for radioactivity-free alternatives, has sparked the revival of fluorescence-guided surgery (4). For instance, the near-infrared fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) has been applied for fluorescence-based lymphangiography in prostate cancer patients (5,6). The clinical growth of fluorescence-guided surgery has been further accommodated by the commercial availability of near-infrared fluorescence cameras that depict fluorescence images in anatomic context (7,8). Unfortunately, fundamental photophysical limitations such as the tissue attenuation of light limit the use of intraoperative fluorescence guidance to superficially located lesions (<1.0 cm), in surgically exposed tissues (9,10). In patients for whom lesion locations are not accurately defined, this limitation could possibly result in underestimation of the number of lesions.

In an attempt to combine the strengths of radioguidance and fluorescence guidance and to overcome the limitation of light attenuation, in prostate cancer patients “free” ICG has been used in combination with radioguidance (preoperative imaging, such as SPECT/CT, and intraoperative γ-tracing) provided by traditional nanocolloids (e.g., 99mTc-nanocolloid) (11). A limiting factor in the use of such a cocktail of tracers is that the individual tracers have different pharmacokinetic properties (12), which can yield a mismatch in radioactive and fluorescence findings (13). To prevent such a mismatch and to provide fully integrated radioguidance and fluorescence guidance toward the identical lesions, bimodal, or rather hybrid, tracers such as ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid have been introduced (2,14,15).

The clinical use of ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid has in the past allowed us to study the concentration-dependent detection sensitivity of the individual modalities (14) but can also be used to determine to what extent fluorescence guidance underestimates the number of target lesions in a patient. This effect was studied in a masked, randomized controlled trial wherein prostate cancer patients received either ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid or 99mTc-nanocolloid and free ICG before robot-assisted SN biopsy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). SN resection and ePLND were initially performed under fluorescence guidance alone, and the SNs identified on SPECT/CT became available after unmasking. A comparison of the outcomes of intraoperative fluorescence imaging, ePLND, and SPECT/CT-guided resection provided insight into the reliability of relying on fluorescence guidance during surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

The study included 25 patients with histopathologically proven PCa, clinically N0M0 on preoperative imaging, and with a risk of nodal metastases of more than 5% according to the Briganti nomogram, who were scheduled for a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (16). Patients participating in a clinical trial comparing 2 methods of multimodal SN tracing were asked to participate in a substudy on the value of preoperative SPECT/CT (trial M13PSN). Patients were randomly allocated to receive either a preoperative injection into the prostate of the hybrid tracer ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid (15 patients) or a preoperative injection of 99mTc-nanocolloid followed by an intraoperative injection of free ICG (10 patients). The exclusion criteria were a history of iodine allergy, hyperthyroid or thyroidal adenoma, kidney insufficiency, surgical inaccessibility, or incorrect implementation of the procedure.

All procedures were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards and were performed after approval was obtained by the local ethics committee of The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (approval NL46580.031.13). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before inclusion in the study.

Tracer Administration and Preoperative Imaging

The radiotracers were injected either as a hybrid tracer (ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid) (500 μg of human serum albumin in 2 mL) or as a monomodal tracer (99mTc-nanocolloid) with a second injection of free ICG into the prostate minutes before the ePLND. ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid contained 0,25 mg of ICG (total volume), whereas a free-ICG injection meant 5 mg of ICG were administered (20-fold more) to the patient, also constituting a 2-fold increase in injected volume (4 mL total). No difference in the amount of radioactivity used could be detected between the 2 groups (administered doses of 205.1 ± 17.4 MBq and 207.0 ± 15.3 MBq, respectively, P = 0.793).

After radiotracer administration, lymphatic mapping, including SPECT/CT, was performed as previously described (15,17). On the basis of the reproducibility of lymphatic drainage for 99mTc-nanocolloid and ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid (17), SNs identified on SPECT/CT were considered to be the gold standard.

Patients in the free-ICG group received an additional 4 transrectal intraprostatic injections of ICG 5–10 min before initiation of the procedure, while under full anesthesia.

Surgical Procedure

Approximately 4 h after preoperative injection of the hybrid or radioactive tracer, patients were transferred to the operation room. All procedures were performed by 2 experienced robotic surgeons using a da Vinci Si surgical system (Intuitive Surgical). Initially, the operating surgeon was masked to the SPECT/CT imaging data and pursued the SNs intraoperatively with near-infrared fluorescence imaging only. This was done using the ICG-tuned Firefly camera integrated in the da Vinci Si surgical system. Fluorescence-based SN resection was followed by resection of the extended pelvic lymph node template (ePLND) (obturator fossa and external iliac vessels, both up to the ureter vessel crossing on both sides). To identify 99mTc- and ICG-containing nodes ex vivo, additional measurements were performed on the surgical specimens using a modified PDE-mod near-infrared fluorescence camera system (Hamamatsu Photonics (7)) and a γ-probe (Neoprobe; Johnson and Johnson Medical). SNs removed in the ePLND template but not primarily detected by fluorescence guidance intraoperatively were labeled SN when containing an ex vivo γ-signal above background level.

Subsequently, the surgeon was unmasked to the preoperative SPECT/CT images. These images were then consulted to confirm removal of all SNs under fluorescence guidance and or during ePLND. SNs that had been missed were pursued with the positional guidance of SPECT/CT. In vivo detection using an intraoperative γ-probe was used only after unmasking. Excised specimens were evaluated ex vivo to validate their fluorescent and radioactive content.

Quantification Lesion Underestimation Under Fluorescence Guidance

The number and location of the SNs identified using fluorescence guidance alone, both within and outside the ePLND template, were noted for the 2 groups. After unmasking, the number and location of the intraoperatively identified SNs were compared with the number and location of SNs identified on preoperative imaging. Correlation between the radioactive and fluorescent content of the excised specimens was included to identify SNs that were radioactive but not fluorescent.

Pathology

The excised lymph nodes were pathologically examined for the presence of macro- or micrometastases or isolated tumor cells, according to previously described protocols (8,18). The resected prostatectomy specimens were examined and classified for pathologic tumor stage (8).

Complications

Intraoperative and postoperative complications were scored. Postoperative complications were included when occurring within 90 d after surgery and were divided according to the Clavien Dindo (CD) score.

Follow-up

Biochemical recurrence was defined as a PSA level of at least 0.2 ng/mL after prostatectomy and ePLND. Patients were screened (watch-and-wait principle) for biochemical recurrence every 6 mo postoperatively for up to 57 mo after surgery. No adjuvant radiotherapy or androgen ablation therapy was used in the absence of biochemical recurrence. When PSA levels over 0.2 ng/mL were detected after prostatectomy, 68Ga-PSMA PET imaging was performed to detect the location of disease recurrence.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 22 (IBM). χ2 and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the distributions of patient characteristics. The endpoint of the study was the number of patients with missed SNs apparent on unmasking of the SPECT/CT results. Use of the hybrid tracer was considered necessary when in at least 1 of 25 men additional nodes were found after unmasking.

RESULTS

Patients

Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. All patients had cancer with a clinical Gleason score of 7 or higher before surgery, and the clinical stages ranged between cT1c and cT3b. The mean Briganti risk score for nodal metastases was 16.6% (13%). No significant differences were seen between patients in the hybrid-tracer and free-ICG groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Patient Characteristics

Preoperative Imaging Findings

In total, 111 SNs were identified on preoperative SPECT/CT (Table 2), with a mean of 4.4 ± 2.5 SNs identified per patient in the complete patient group. Of these SNs, 57 (3.8 ± 1.8 per patient) were in the hybrid-tracer group and 54 (5.4 ± 3.0 per patient) were in the free-ICG group. Of the 82 SNs identified within the eLNPD template, 50 were in the hybrid-tracer group (87.7% of SNs within this group) and 32 (59.3% of SNs within this group) were in the free-ICG group. Overall, the most prevalent nodal location was the obturator fossa (31.5% of all SNs; Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Results for Identified and Removed SNs and LNs: SPECT/CT and Ex Vivo Imaging

Intraoperative Findings

Intraoperatively, the hybrid-tracer group allowed visualization of the exact same lesions as identified on preoperative SPECT, whereas the literature indicates there could be discrepancy between SNs detected with 99mTc-nanocolloid and those detected with free ICG (13). In total, 114 SNs were resected (Table 3; Fig. 1). The fact that fluorescence imaging was able to discriminate between cluster nodes that were seen as a single hotspot on SPECT/CT helps explain why the number was slightly higher than the SNs defined at preoperative imaging (19). In 8 patients (6/15 [40%] in the hybrid-tracer group and 2/10 [20%] in the free-ICG group), all SNs could be removed under fluorescence guidance alone. In the remaining 17 patients, one or more SNs were missed. Overall, 75.9% of the SNs in the hybrid-tracer group (44/58) were removed under fluorescence guidance, compared with 51.8% (29/56) in the free-ICG group (Table 3). In addition, 24% more fluorescent non-SNs were removed in the free-ICG group than in the hybrid-tracer group (13 non-SNs [62%] vs. 8 non-SNs [38%], respectively).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Results for Identified and Removed SNs and LNs: Surgery

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Overview of intraoperative SN removal and tumor-positive SNs.

Of the 58 fluorescent SNs found in the hybrid-tracer group, 75.9% (44 SNs) were located within the ePLND template (Table 3; Fig. 1). In agreement with the preoperative findings, only 51.8% (29 SNs) of the 56 fluorescent SNs in the free-ICG group were located within the ePLND template. This finding underlines the difference in drainage kinetic between free ICG and radiocolloids (12).

After unmasking of the SPECT/CT images to the surgeon, 18 SNs (in 11 patients) were identified that had not yet been resected (6 SNs [10.3%] in the hybrid-tracer group and 12 SNs [21.4%] in the free-ICG group [Table 3; Fig. 1]). Of these initially missed SNs, only 1 was located within the ePLND template (external iliac region; Fig. 2); the remaining nodes were located outside the ePLND template (Table 3). To avoid damage to healthy tissue, only the SN located within the ePLND template was surgically removed.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Location of iliac SN resected after unmasking of surgeon to SPECT/CT.

Ex vivo evaluation of the radioactive and fluorescent content of the excised specimens revealed that of the 27 SNs that had been removed under ePLND or after unmasking of the preoperative SPECT images in the free-ICG group, 14 (in 7/10 [70%] of patients) contained radioactivity but no fluorescence (Table 2; Fig. 1). This mismatch was not seen in the hybrid-tracer group.

Pathology

Pathologic analysis yielded nonradical resection margins after prostatectomy in 8 patients and LN metastases in 6 patients (24%; Table 4). Of the 13 metastases found, 10 were identified in nodes specified as SNs on preoperative imaging. Nine of these SNs were in the hybrid-tracer group, and 1 was in the free-ICG group (Fig. 1). In 4 patients (66.7%), more than 1 (range, 2–4) positive node was found. In 3 of these patients, additional metastases were found in non-SN nodes (1 per patient). In 1 patient in the free-ICG group, a false-negative but tumor-positive SN was found in the ePLND specimens but was missed on SPECT/CT; the preoperatively specified SNs and fluorescent nodes in this patient were all tumor-negative. Although displaying 1,600 counts with the γ-probe ex vivo, this SN was not classified as an SN on preoperative imaging. This finding indicates that in some cases (1/111 SNs; 1%) the sensitivity of SPECT/CT may limit nodal identification.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Results for Identified and Removed SNs and LNs: Pathology

Complications

The overall complication rate within 90 d after surgery was 16.0%, which is in line with previously reported complication rates (20). No intraoperative complications were recorded, and no substantial difference in postsurgical complications was seen between the hybrid-tracer group and the free-ICG group; in the hybrid-tracer group, 1 CD type 2 complication (pulmonary embolism) and 1 CD type 3b complication (cicatricial port site hernia) were registered. In the free-ICG group, 1 CD type 1 complication (incontinence) and 1 CD type 2 complication (urinary tract infection) were recorded.

Follow-up

A mean follow-up of 23.3 mo (range, 7–57 mo) was available for 23 patients (13 in the hybrid-tracer group and 10 in the free-ICG group). Of the patients with a follow-up of less than 12 mo (n = 10), 90% had PSA levels of less than 0.01 ng/mL. No differences in biochemical recurrence were seen between the hybrid-tracer group and the free-ICG group.

Of the 8 patients whose resection margins were deemed to be nonradical at pathology, 4 had PSA levels of less than 0.01 ng/mL (mean follow-up, 7.2 mo; range, 7–8 mo) and 4 had PSA levels of 0.03–7.56 ng/mL (mean follow-up, 49 mo; range, 48–50 mo). Three of the 4 patients with a biochemical recurrence had nodal metastasis. All 4 underwent additional radiotherapy. One patient (PSA < 0.01 ng/mL) died of lung carcinoma within a year after prostate cancer surgery.

The 6 patients for whom lymph node metastases were found were subjected to watch-and-wait follow-up (mean follow-up, 47,7 mo; range to date, 33–57 mo). Four received additional therapies after surgery (radiotherapy [n = 4] and further LN dissection of the pelvis [n = 1]), additional chemotherapy (n = 2) after a rise in PSA level, and subsequent 68Ga-PSMA PET imaging.

DISCUSSION

Procedural cost savings would warrant simplification of image-guided surgery approaches. Hence, insight into the value of fluorescence guidance and omission of the use of relatively costly road maps based on preoperative imaging findings is in demand. By demonstrating that masking surgeons to SPECT/CT data underestimates the number of SNs using fluorescence guidance alone, our study helps elucidate to what extent fluorescence light attenuation influences the process of image-guided surgery.

In conformation with a previous reproducibility study by Brouwer et al., no difference in the overall preoperative SN identification rate (radioactivity-based) was seen between ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid and 99mTc-nanocolloid (17). To our surprise, the 2 groups—although patient selection was identical and patient inclusion was randomized—SPECT/CT yielded different numbers of SNs beyond the ePLND template. When comparing the intraoperative SN identification rate of ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid and free ICG (fluorescence-based), we saw clear differences; 24.1% of SNs the hybrid-tracer group and 49.2% of SNs in the free-ICG group were missed when resection was pursued with fluorescence guidance alone. Moreover, ex vivo assessment of excised specimens in the free-ICG group revealed a mismatch between the radioactive and fluorescent content of the SNs in 70% of patients. This finding indicates a discrepancy in the distribution pattern between 99mTc-nanocolloid and free ICG and supports the arguments behind using a hybrid tracer for image guidance rather than relying on a combination of a radioactive and fluorescent tracers. Important to note is that the 20-times-higher dose of ICG in the free-ICG group did not lead to increased intensities that subsequently led to better in vivo SN identification; rather, a substantial higher number (24%) of fluorescent non-SNs were stained and removed in the free-ICG group. These non-SNs could be considered false-positives.

The findings presented here indicate that, similar to what has been reported for radioguided surgery (2,7,21), the accuracy of fluorescence-guided surgery regarding lesions in unknown locations is related to the availability of accurate surgical road maps in the form of preoperative imaging data. This indication not only supports the concept of using hybrid tracers for surgical guidance (22) but also strengthens the suggested use of intraoperative augmented and virtual-reality–based navigation to improve the position of the fluorescence camera relative to the lesion location (23).

In prostate cancer, lymphatic metastases often occur in unexpected locations (24). In line with these reports, a substantial number of SNs were found outside the ePLND template (17/73 SNs [23.3%] in 8/25 patients [32%]). The fact that fluorescence guidance structurally misses lesions in unexpected locations means that receptor-targeted fluorescence-guided surgery performed without accompanying preoperative imaging data could translate to a poor oncologic outcome. Assuming that the use of tracers in image-guided surgery has the purpose of enabling radical surgical excision of lesions, this paints an alarming picture of the future of the field. Follow-up data from large, randomized studies that apply tumor-specific tracers will be needed to confirm if this is indeed the case. Given the superior detection sensitivity of radiotracers, this potential risk can be easily mitigated through the implementation of corresponding preoperative imaging data through the use of hybrid tracers, an exponentially growing field of research. Current efforts in hybrid-tracer developments include, for example, Cerenkov imaging (25), small molecules (26), peptides (27), mAbs (28), and nanoparticles (29).

A strength of this study was the possibility of removing the SNs that were missed under fluorescence guidance alone after unmasking of the surgeon to the preoperative SPECT images. The additional value of SPECT/CT imaging was evident despite the small sample size and was relevant for both tracer formulations, strengthening the observation. However, this setup does not allow evaluation of the complication rate or possible differences in follow-up based solely on intraoperative fluorescence guidance results. Also, the small sample size complicates a head-to-head comparison of the 2 different tracer formulations used—an issue that is currently being addressed in a follow-up study with a larger sample size.

In prostate cancer, the SN procedure is applied to identify micrometastases. In so doing, the procedure positively impacts recurrence values. Recently, this concept proved to be of value in PSMA PET–negative patients (30). Because not all SNs will contain metastases, the operating surgeon always has to balance the benefit of the resection against the potential harm to the patient (e.g., lymphedema, thromboembolic events, ureteral injury, and neurovascular injuries). In this study, that balancing meant that some SNs (14.9%) were not surgically resected. Compared with indications that would have relied on receptor-targeted tracers for surgical guidance, using SN procedures to study the accuracy of fluorescence guidance limits the negative impact that miss rates could have had on the final patient outcome.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative comparison between the hybrid tracer ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid and free ICG revealed that accurate surgical guidance to ectopic SNs could not be achieved when solely relying on fluorescence guidance in 17 of the 25 patients included in this study. The preoperative imaging road map provided by SPECT/CT enhanced the detection of prostate SNs in more ectopic locations, and the hybrid tracer ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid was shown to outperform free ICG.

DISCLOSURE

This research was supported by an NWO-STW-VICI grant (STW TTW 16141). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

  • QUESTION: Can fluorescence-guided surgery help identify all lesions in unknown locations, or is the integrated use of a road map created by preoperative imaging mandatory?

  • PERTINENT FINDINGS: In a cohort study evaluating the extent to which fluorescence guidance underestimated the number of target lesions in 25 prostate cancer patients, the preoperative imaging road map provided by SPECT/CT was shown to enhance the detection of prostate SNs in more ectopic locations. The hybrid tracer ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid was shown to outperform free ICG.

  • IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Accurate surgical guidance to ectopic SNs benefits from a hybrid approach wherein fluorescence guidance is complemented by a preoperative imaging road map provided by SPECT/CT.

Acknowledgments

We thank all participating patients, the entire surgical staff, and the departments of pathology and nuclear medicine of the Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital for their contribution. We also thank Nynke van den Berg for her help in archiving the findings in the database.

Footnotes

  • Published online Nov. 11, 2019.

  • © 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Robu S,
    2. Schottelius M,
    3. Eiber M,
    4. et al
    . Preclinical evaluation and first patient application of 99mTc-PSMA-I&S for SPECT imaging and radioguided surgery in prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:235–242.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. van Leeuwen FWB,
    2. Winter A,
    3. van Der Poel HG,
    4. et al
    . Technologies for image-guided surgery for managing lymphatic metastases in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2019;16:159–171.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Vermeeren L,
    2. van der Ploeg IM,
    3. Olmos RA,
    4. et al
    . SPECT/CT for preoperative sentinel node localization. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:184–190.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. van Leeuwen FW,
    2. Hardwick JC,
    3. van Erkel AR
    . Luminescence-based imaging approaches in the field of interventional molecular imaging. Radiology. 2015;276:12–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Manny TB,
    2. Patel M,
    3. Hemal AK
    . Fluorescence-enhanced robotic radical prostatectomy using real-time lymphangiography and tissue marking with percutaneous injection of unconjugated indocyanine green: the initial clinical experience in 50 patients. Eur Urol. 2014;65:1162–1168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wit EM,
    2. Acar C,
    3. Grivas N,
    4. et al
    . Sentinel node procedure in prostate cancer: a systematic review to assess diagnostic accuracy. Eur Urol. 2017;71:596–605.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. van den Berg NS,
    2. Miwa M,
    3. KleinJan GH,
    4. et al
    . (Near-infrared) fluorescence-guided surgery under ambient light conditions: a next step to embedment of the technology in clinical routine. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2586–2595.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. KleinJan GH,
    2. van den Berg NS,
    3. Brouwer OR,
    4. et al
    . Optimisation of fluorescence guidance during robot-assisted laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;66:991–998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Stammes MA,
    2. Bugby SL,
    3. Porta T,
    4. et al
    . Modalities for image- and molecular-guided cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2018;105:e69–e83.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Teraphongphom N,
    2. Kong CS,
    3. Warram JM,
    4. Rosenthal EL
    . Specimen mapping in head and neck cancer using fluorescence imaging. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017;2:447–452.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Jeschke S,
    2. Lusuardi L,
    3. Myatt A,
    4. et al
    . Visualisation of the lymph node pathway in real time by laparoscopic radioisotope- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer staging. Urology. 2012;80:1080–1086.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Van Den Berg NS,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. Kleinjan GI,
    4. et al
    . Hybrid tracers for sentinel node biopsy. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;58:193–206.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Soergel P,
    2. Kirschke J,
    3. Klapdor R,
    4. et al
    . Sentinel lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer using near infrared fluorescence from indocyanine green combined with technetium-99m-nanocolloid. Lasers Surg Med. 2018;50:994–1001.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. KleinJan GH,
    2. Bunschoten A,
    3. van den Berg NS,
    4. et al
    . Fluorescence guided surgery and tracer-dose, fact or fiction? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1857–1867.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. van der Poel HG,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. Brouwer OR,
    4. Valdes Olmos RA,
    5. van Leeuwen FW
    . Intraoperative laparoscopic fluorescence guidance to the sentinel lymph node in prostate cancer patients: clinical proof of concept of an integrated functional imaging approach using a multimodal tracer. Eur Urol. 2011;60:826–833.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Briganti A,
    2. Larcher A,
    3. Abdollah F,
    4. et al
    . Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol. 2012;61:480–487.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Brouwer OR,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. Vermeeren L,
    4. et al
    . Comparing the hybrid fluorescent-radioactive tracer indocyanine green-99mTc-nanocolloid with 99mTc-nanocolloid for sentinel node identification: a validation study using lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1034–1040.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. KleinJan GH,
    2. van den Berg NS,
    3. de Jong J,
    4. et al
    . Multimodal hybrid imaging agents for sentinel node mapping as a means to (re)connect nuclear medicine to advances made in robot-assisted surgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1278–1287.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. KleinJan GH,
    2. van Werkhoven E,
    3. van den Berg NS,
    4. et al
    . The best of both worlds: a hybrid approach for optimal pre- and intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1915–1925.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Liss MA,
    2. Palazzi K,
    3. Stroup SP,
    4. et al
    . Outcomes and complications of pelvic lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2013;31:481–488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. van Leeuwen FW,
    2. Valdes-Olmos R,
    3. Buckle T,
    4. Vidal-Sicart S
    . Hybrid surgical guidance based on the integration of radionuclear and optical technologies. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150797.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bugby SL,
    2. Lees JE,
    3. Perkins AC
    . Hybrid intraoperative imaging techniques in radioguided surgery: present clinical applications and future outlook. Clin Transl Imaging. 2017;5:323–341.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Van Oosterom MN,
    2. Rietbergen DDD,
    3. Welling MM,
    4. et al
    . Recent advances in nuclear and hybrid detection modalities for image-guided surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16:711–734.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Van den Bergh L,
    2. Joniau S,
    3. Haustermans K,
    4. et al
    . Reliability of sentinel node procedure for lymph node staging in prostate cancer patients at high risk for lymph node involvement. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:896–902.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Tamura R,
    2. Pratt EC,
    3. Grimm J
    . Innovations in nuclear imaging instrumentation: Cerenkov imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2018;48:359–366.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hensbergen AWB,
    2. Buckle T,
    3. van Willigen DM,
    4. et al
    . Hybrid tracers based on cyanine backbones targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen: tuning pharmacokinetic properties and exploring dye–protein interaction. J Nucl Med. September 3, 2019 [Epub ahead of print].
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kuil J,
    2. Velders AH,
    3. van Leeuwen FW
    . Multimodal tumor-targeting peptides functionalized with both a radio- and a fluorescent label. Bioconjug Chem. 2010;21:1709–1719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Lütje S,
    2. Heskamp S,
    3. Franssen GM,
    4. et al
    . Development and characterization of a theranostic multimodal anti-PSMA targeting agent for imaging, surgical guidance, and targeted photodynamic therapy of PSMA-expressing tumors. Theranostics. 2019;9:2924–2938.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Smith BR,
    2. Gambhir SS
    . Nanomaterials for in vivo imaging. Chem Rev. 2017;117:901–986.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hinsenveld FJW,
    2. Wit EMK,
    3. van Leeuwen PJ,
    4. et al
    . Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography combined with sentinel node biopsy for primary lymph node staging in prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. September 27, 2019 [Epub ahead of print].
  • Received for publication August 16, 2019.
  • Accepted for publication October 7, 2019.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 61 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue 6
June 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Can Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging Identify All Lesions While the Road Map Created by Preoperative Nuclear Imaging Is Masked?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Can Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging Identify All Lesions While the Road Map Created by Preoperative Nuclear Imaging Is Masked?
Phillipa Meershoek, Tessa Buckle, Matthias N. van Oosterom, Gijs H. KleinJan, Henk G. van der Poel, Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2020, 61 (6) 834-841; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.235234

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Can Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging Identify All Lesions While the Road Map Created by Preoperative Nuclear Imaging Is Masked?
Phillipa Meershoek, Tessa Buckle, Matthias N. van Oosterom, Gijs H. KleinJan, Henk G. van der Poel, Fijs W.B. van Leeuwen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2020, 61 (6) 834-841; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.235234
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Optical Navigation of the Drop-In {gamma}-Probe as a Means to Strengthen the Connection Between Robot-Assisted and Radioguided Surgery
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology

  • The diagnostic role of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in the detection of neuroendocrine tumors
  • Utility of bone scans in patients with RCC
  • Disseminated xanthogranulomatous oophoritis mimicking malignancy on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Show more Oncology

Clinical

  • Detection of Early Progression with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Bipolar Androgen Therapy
  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • image-guided surgery
  • prostate cancer
  • sentinel node biopsy
  • SPECT/CT
  • robot-assisted surgery
  • fluorescence
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire