Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone-PET: A Pilot Study

Heather Jacene, Jiani Hu, Sasha Kravets, Su-Chun Cheng, Amanda Abbott, SHipra Dubey, Keisha McCall, Diane Young, Mayzie Johnston, Annick D. Van Den Abbeele and Beth Overmoyer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 595;
Heather Jacene
2Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiani Hu
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
5Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sasha Kravets
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
5Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Su-Chun Cheng
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
5Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Abbott
4Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Ashland MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHipra Dubey
1Brigham and Womens Hospital Boston MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keisha McCall
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
5Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diane Young
6GTx, Inc Memphis TN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mayzie Johnston
6GTx, Inc Memphis TN United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annick D. Van Den Abbeele
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
5Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth Overmoyer
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
5Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

595

Objectives: 18F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone (FDHT) is a novel radiotracer for imaging the androgen receptor (AR) with PET. Most primary and metastatic breast cancer tumors express AR, and modulating AR signaling has become recognized as a potentially important therapeutic target for metastatic breast cancer. As part of a phase II clinical trial investigating a selective AR modulator (SARM), enobosarm, for estrogen receptor positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (G200802, GTx, Inc, NCT02463032) , a prospective imaging sub-study was designed to: 1) demonstrate the proof-of-principle that FDHT-PET can be used to non-invasively image the presence of AR expression in breast cancer; and, 2) to explore the potential of FDHT-PET as an imaging biomarker for evaluating response to SARM therapy. Methods: 11 post-menopausal women with ER+ metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in the imaging sub-study and underwent FDHT-PET/CT at baseline, and at 6 and 12 weeks after starting SARM therapy (n=10, 9 mg orally daily; n=1, 18 mg orally daily). PET/CT scans were obtained from the skull vertex to mid-thighs 45 minutes after the intravenous administration of 333 MBq (9 mCi) of FDHT. All FDHT-PET/CT scans were obtained on the same scanner for individual participants. Abnormal FDHT uptake in the tumor was qualitatively defined as uptake greater than background in a pattern consistent with metastatic breast cancer and quantified using SUVmax at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks after starting SARM therapy. Archival or fresh tumor biopsy specimens underwent central review for AR status (qualitative: positive/negative; quantitative: % positive nuclei). Percent change of FDHT-SUVmax of the hottest lesion was calculated between baseline, week 6 and week 12 scans. Tumor response was assessed every 12 weeks according to RECIST 1.1. Patients were grouped according to their best overall response as having clinical benefit (CB: complete/partial response or stable disease), or progressive disease (PD). Statistical analyses are primarily descriptive due to the pilot nature of study.

Results: 9 patients completed all 3 FDHT-PET/CT scans; 2 came off study prior to week 12. For 9 patients with tumor AR status available, baseline FDHT-SUVmax was higher for AR positive (n=7) versus AR negative (n=2) tumors (Figure 1A). A trend for higher baseline FDHT SUVmax was seen with higher quantitative AR expression levels (Spearman rho=0.57, p=0.12), and when excluding one outlier, Spearman rho=0.81, p=0.02, (Figure 1B). Within 12 weeks after treatment, 7 patients had clinical benefit and 4 had progressive disease. Median baseline FDHT-SUVmax was 2.93 (range 1-4.38) for 7 patients with CB within 12 weeks after therapy and 2.15 (0.96-3.77) for 4 patients with PD (Figure 2A). Those with CB within 12 weeks had decline in FDHT uptake whereas those with PD did not (Figure 2B). Conclusions: This hypothesis-generating data supports the proof-of-principle that FDHT uptake in metastatic breast cancer correlates with tumor AR expression. The data also supports a potential role for FDHT-PET/CT as a whole-body non-invasive imaging biomarker that can be used in larger, well-designed clinical trials to optimize strategies modulating AR signaling to treat metastatic breast cancer and other AR-expressing malignancies.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone-PET: A Pilot Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone-PET: A Pilot Study
Heather Jacene, Jiani Hu, Sasha Kravets, Su-Chun Cheng, Amanda Abbott, SHipra Dubey, Keisha McCall, Diane Young, Mayzie Johnston, Annick D. Van Den Abbeele, Beth Overmoyer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 595;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone-PET: A Pilot Study
Heather Jacene, Jiani Hu, Sasha Kravets, Su-Chun Cheng, Amanda Abbott, SHipra Dubey, Keisha McCall, Diane Young, Mayzie Johnston, Annick D. Van Den Abbeele, Beth Overmoyer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 595;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

  • Added value of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) / Computed Tomography (CT) with radioiodine whole body scan in follow up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer
  • Prognostic value of tumor metabolic imaging phenotype using FDG PET radiomics in HNSCC
  • The value of 18F-FDG PET / MR in skull-base bone invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Show more Oncology: Clinical Therapy and Diagnosis

Breast Cancer: Novel Tracer and Practice Advances

  • On the usefulness of the 18F-FDG PET radiome of triple negative breast tumor to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • 18F-FES PET/CT influences the staging and management of newly diagnosed Oestrogen Receptor‑positive Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Comparative Study with 18F-FDG PET/CT
Show more Breast Cancer: Novel Tracer and Practice Advances

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire