Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Less invasive quantification of positron emission tomography data using simultaneous estimation of the input function

Elizabeth Bartlett, Mala Ananth, Samantha Rossano, Shu-fei Lin, Nabeel Nabulsi, Yiyun Huang, Francesca Zanderigo, Ramin Parsey and Christine DeLorenzo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1722;
Elizabeth Bartlett
5Biomedical Engineering Stony Brook University Stony Brook NY United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mala Ananth
2Stony Brook NY United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samantha Rossano
1New Haven CT United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shu-fei Lin
8Yale University PET Center New Haven CT United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nabeel Nabulsi
6Yale PET Center New Haven CT United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yiyun Huang
7Yale University New Haven CT United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesca Zanderigo
3New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia New York NY United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramin Parsey
4Stony Brook University Stony Brook NY United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine DeLorenzo
2Stony Brook NY United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1722

Objectives: Full quantification of positron emission tomography (PET) data requires arterial blood sampling throughout the scan to determine an arterial input function (AIF), adding cost and risk to PET studies. Simultaneous estimation (SIME) is a less-invasive PET quantification method that recovers the AIF, requiring only a single arterial blood sample. The goal of this study is to determine if a single venous sample can be used instead of the arterial sample used in SIME for the tracers [11C]-ABP688, [11C]-CUMI-101, and [11C]-DASB. Methods: In addition to automated blood sampling, manual venous and arterial plasma activities, parent fractions, and metabolite-corrected plasma activities were acquired for venous-to-arterial comparison at the time-points: 4, 12, 30, 60 minutes for [11C]-ABP688 (N=10 60-minute scans); 30, 60, 90 minutes for [11C]-CUMI-101 (N=19 120-minute scans); and 50, 80, and 100 minutes for [11C]-DASB (N=18 100-minute scans). A two-tissue compartment model was fit for [11C]-ABP688 and likelihood estimation graphical analysis (LEGA) was fit for [11C]-CUMI-101 and [11C]-DASB to generate total distribution volume (VT) estimates with an AIF and arterial- and venous-SIME generated input functions. Results: In this dataset, venous and arterial metabolite-corrected plasma activities approximated each other at varying times post-injection across the tracers ([11C]-ABP688: 12 minutes; [11C]-CUMI-101: 90 minutes; [11C]-DASB: 100 minutes). Arterial-SIME and venous-SIME derived estimates of VT closely agreed with AIF estimates for at least one venous and one arterial time-point post injection. The optimal sampling times post injection (defined based on percentage differences from AIF-based VT) were: [11C]-ABP688: 12 minutes for arterial-SIME and venous-SIME (-8.4 ± 7.4% and -6.1 ± 7.0%), [11C]-CUMI-101: 30 minutes for arterial-SIME and venous-SIME (3.9 ± 7.6% and -14.2 ± 10.4%), and [11C]-DASB: 80 minutes for arterial-SIME and 100-minute venous-SIME (-6.8 ± 8.9% and -9.3 ± 6.5%). Conclusions: A single venous sample with SIME may be an alternative for quantification of [11C]-ABP688, [11C]-CUMI-101, and [11C]-DASB.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 59, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Less invasive quantification of positron emission tomography data using simultaneous estimation of the input function
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Less invasive quantification of positron emission tomography data using simultaneous estimation of the input function
Elizabeth Bartlett, Mala Ananth, Samantha Rossano, Shu-fei Lin, Nabeel Nabulsi, Yiyun Huang, Francesca Zanderigo, Ramin Parsey, Christine DeLorenzo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1722;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Less invasive quantification of positron emission tomography data using simultaneous estimation of the input function
Elizabeth Bartlett, Mala Ananth, Samantha Rossano, Shu-fei Lin, Nabeel Nabulsi, Yiyun Huang, Francesca Zanderigo, Ramin Parsey, Christine DeLorenzo
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2018, 59 (supplement 1) 1722;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

  • Deep Learning Based Kidney Segmentation for Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement Using Quantitative SPECT/CT
  • The Benefit of Time-of-Flight in Digital Photon Counting PET Imaging: Physics and Clinical Evaluation
  • Preclinical validation of a single-scan rest/stress imaging technique for 13NH3 cardiac perfusion studies
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Data Analysis & Management Posters

  • Evaluation of Quantitative Whole Body Dynamic FDG-PET Using Block Sequence Regularized Expectation Maximization (BSREM) Reconstruction
  • Feasibility of 18F-THK5351 PET quantitation using the Centiloid scale
  • NaF-PET/CT for assessment of temporomandibular joint osseous activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy subjects
Show more Data Analysis & Management Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire