Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleRadiation Biology

Recombinant Human Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Versus Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal in 124I PET/CT–Based Dosimetry for 131I Therapy of Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Donika Plyku, Robert F. Hobbs, Kevin Huang, Frank Atkins, Carlos Garcia, George Sgouros and Douglas Van Nostrand
Journal of Nuclear Medicine July 2017, 58 (7) 1146-1154; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.179366
Donika Plyku
1Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert F. Hobbs
1Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore Maryland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Huang
1Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Atkins
3Medstar Health Research Institute and Division of Nuclear Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlos Garcia
3Medstar Health Research Institute and Division of Nuclear Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Sgouros
1Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore Maryland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas Van Nostrand
3Medstar Health Research Institute and Division of Nuclear Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Transverse and sagittal views of patients’ CT and PET images (superimposed) and drawn VOIs covering lungs (A), heart (B), liver (C), kidneys (D), bone marrow (E), and tumor (F).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Activity measurement method in tumors.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Normal organ %IA/cm3 vs. time (hr) after injection of 124I for rhTSH and THW for patient 1 (A), patient 2 (B), patient 3 (C), and patient 4 (D). Pt = patient.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Difference in time-integrated activity coefficient (THW − rhTSH)/THW.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Aggregate tumor and bone marrow 124I activity concentration (%IA/cm3), rhTSH (dotted) and THW (solid) study for patient 1 (A), patient 2 (B), and patient 3 (C).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Demographics

    CharacteristicPatient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4
    Age (y)47306351
    SexMMMM
    Thyroglobulin level (ng/mL)170*; 324†NA*; 1,527†3,735*; 2,480†86*; 58†
    TSH level (μIU/mL)98*; 82.9†139*; 142†89*; 124†64*; 72†
    Urine iodine level (μg/L)182‡; 85†75‡; 630†99‡; NA†28‡; 21†
    Thyroxine dose before and during rhTSH stimulation (μg)125125139200
    • ↵* Under rhTSH.

    • ↵† Under THW.

    • ↵‡ Before rhTSH.

    • NA = not applicable.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    124I and 131I Administered Activities

    124I activity (MBq)131I activity
    Patient no.rhTSHTHWmCiMBq
    1302931911,803
    2616539814,726
    336331987,326
    4373332612,062
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Absorbed Dose per Unit Administered Activity of 131I for Each Study (rhTSH and THW) and Ratio in Absorbed Dose per Unit Administered Activity (THW/rhTSH)

    Organ VOI
    PatientLungsHeartLiverKidneysBone marrow
    1
     Absorbed dose per unit administered activity for rhTSH (mGy/MBq)0.210.150.150.190.13
     Absorbed dose per unit administered activity for THW (mGy/MBq)0.580.210.190.170.11
     THW/rhTSH ratio2.81.41.30.90.85
    2
     Absorbed dose per unit administered activity for rhTSH (mGy/MBq)0.110.270.110.110.086
     Absorbed dose per unit administered activity for THW (mGy/MBq)0.660.330.200.230.14
     THW/rhTSH ratio6.01.21.82.11.6
    3
     Absorbed dose per unit administered activity for rhTSH (mGy/MBq)0.440.460.400.440.33
     Absorbed dose per unit administered activity for THW (mGy/MBq)0.250.280.240.320.22
     THW/rhTSH ratio0.570.610.600.730.67
    4
     Absorbed dose per unit administered activity for rhTSH (mGy/MBq)0.100.11NANA0.068
     Absorbed dose per unit administered activity for THW (mGy/MBq)0.110.10NANA0.080
     THW/rhTSH ratio1.10.91NANA1.2
    • NA = not applicable.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Calculated Tumor Absorbed Dose per Unit Administered Activity of 131I and Ratio in Tumor-Absorbed Dose (THW/rhTSH)

    Tumor no.Tumor volume (cm3)Absorbed dose per unit administered activity (mGy/MBq) for rhTSHAbsorbed dose per unit administered activity (mGy/MBq) for THWTHW/rhTSH ratio
    Patient 1
     11.52.88.63.1
     20.9811181.6
     30.463.8205.3
     40.872.6187.0
     50.5017824.9
     61.29.7272.7
     71.121401.9
     81.70.844.65.5
     90.893.8123.3
    Patient 2
     10.670.0451.328
     20.380.0892.225
    Patient 3
     12.25.2203.9
     2110.661.11.7
     32.90.360.561.5
     43.81.91.60.83
     5344.84.81.0
     6125.40.920.17
     71.519211.1
     81.70.340.421.2
     94.30.200.120.63
     10471.92.11.1
     119.00.360.651.8

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 58 (7)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue 7
July 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recombinant Human Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Versus Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal in 124I PET/CT–Based Dosimetry for 131I Therapy of Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Recombinant Human Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Versus Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal in 124I PET/CT–Based Dosimetry for 131I Therapy of Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Donika Plyku, Robert F. Hobbs, Kevin Huang, Frank Atkins, Carlos Garcia, George Sgouros, Douglas Van Nostrand
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2017, 58 (7) 1146-1154; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.179366

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Recombinant Human Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Versus Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal in 124I PET/CT–Based Dosimetry for 131I Therapy of Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Donika Plyku, Robert F. Hobbs, Kevin Huang, Frank Atkins, Carlos Garcia, George Sgouros, Douglas Van Nostrand
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jul 2017, 58 (7) 1146-1154; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.179366
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Analysis of Residence Time, Effective Half-Life, and Internal Dosimetry Before Radioiodine Therapy
  • Diagnostic Performance of 124I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine PET/CT in Patients with Pheochromocytoma
  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Nuclear Medicine Evaluation and Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Abbreviated Version
  • Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The Standard of Care
  • Dosimetry in Clinical Radiopharmaceutical Therapy of Cancer: Practicality Versus Perfection in Current Practice
  • Comparative Dosimetry for 68Ga-DOTATATE: Impact of Using Updated ICRP Phantoms, S Values, and Tissue-Weighting Factors
  • Treatment of refractory thyroid cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Radiation Biology

  • Three-Dimensional Dosimetry for Radiation Safety Estimates from Intrathecal Administration
  • Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry for the Tau Tracer 18F-THK-5351 in Healthy Human Subjects
  • Human Dosimetry of the N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Ligand 11C-GMOM
Show more Radiation Biology

Clinical

  • TauIQ: A Canonical Image Based Algorithm to Quantify Tau PET Scans
  • Dual PET Imaging in Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: The NETPET Score as a Prognostic Biomarker
  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • dosimetry
  • imaging
  • differentiated thyroid cancer
  • radionuclide therapy
  • radiopharmaceuticals
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire