Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleStandard of Care

Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The Standard of Care

Anca M. Avram, Katherine Zukotynski, Helen Ruth Nadel and Luca Giovanella
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2022, 63 (2) 189-195; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262402
Anca M. Avram
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
2Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Zukotynski
3Departments of Medicine and Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada;
4Department of Medical Imaging, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada;
5Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Ruth Nadel
6Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luca Giovanella
7Clinic for Nuclear Medicine and Competence Center for Thyroid Diseases, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; and
8Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In the past decade, the management of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) underwent a paradigm shift toward the use of risk stratification with the goal of maximizing the benefit and minimizing the morbidity of radioiodine (131I) therapy. 131I therapy is guided by information derived from surgical histopathology, molecular markers, postoperative diagnostic radioiodine scintigraphy, and thyroglobulin levels. 131I is used for diagnostic imaging and therapy of DTC based on physiologic sodium-iodine symporter expression in normal and neoplastic thyroid tissue. We summarize the essential information at the core of multidisciplinary DTC management, which emphasizes individualization of 131I therapy according to the patient’s risk for tumor recurrence.

  • differentiated thyroid cancer
  • state of the art
  • guidelines
  • clinical management

Standard-of-care management for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is risk-adapted and typically includes surgery, 131I therapy, and thyroid hormone therapy. In rare cases of radioiodine-refractory disease, symptomatic relief and slowing of metastatic disease progression may be provided by external radiotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, and multikinase or tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION

Thyroid neoplasms are the most common endocrine tumors (annual incidence, 8–9 cases/100,000 people), and DTC accounts for more than 90% of cases. The rising DTC incidence in recent years may reflect a combination of increased imaging and a concomitant true rise in incidence (1). DTC is biologically and functionally heterogeneous, with different molecular pathways impacting cancer cell biology. In particular, BRAF V600E mutation is associated with reduced expression of all thyroid-specific genes involved in iodine metabolism, resulting in variable decreased responsiveness to 131I therapy (2). The clinical, pathologic, and molecular characteristics of DTC are summarized in Supplemental Table 1 (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) (3).

DIAGNOSIS

The most common clinical presentation of DTC is as an incidental thyroid nodule. Neck ultrasound, serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and thyroid scintigraphy are used to select high-risk nodules for fine-needle aspiration. Sonomorphologic nodule features are used in the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System, a standardized risk assessment for thyroid malignancy. In the absence of suggestive cervical lymph nodes, fine-needle aspiration is discouraged for nodules smaller than 1 cm, and the decision to aspirate larger nodules is guided by the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System score in the context of nodule size.

SURGICAL TREATMENT

Traditionally, total or near-total thyroidectomy was performed on most DTC patients, with lobectomy reserved for cytologically indeterminate nodules or patients with unifocal microcarcinoma (i.e., papillary thyroid carcinoma ≤ 1 cm). Currently, lobectomy is suggested for patients with unifocal intrathyroidal low-risk DTC up to 4 cm in the absence of additional risk factors (i.e., no clinical evidence of nodal metastases, cN0) (4). The management of low-risk DTC between 2 and 4 cm remains a topic of debate, and total thyroidectomy is still frequently advised (5). Active surveillance is an alternative to lobectomy for unifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma with no extracapsular extension or lymph node metastases (6). The decision for active surveillance is based primarily on age-related risk of progression, individual surgical risk factors, and patient preference (7).

Cervical lymph nodal metastases occur in 20%–60% of patients with DTC, and this nodal involvement varies from clinically relevant macrometastases to seemingly clinically irrelevant micrometastases (8,9). When lymph nodal metastases are diagnosed preoperatively, central or lateral neck compartment dissection reduces the risk of locoregional recurrence. Prophylactic central neck dissection may improve regional control for invasive tumors (T3–T4) but is discouraged for low-risk DTC because potentially associated morbidities (i.e., hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve damage) are not justified by a significant clinical benefit (10).

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Postoperative evaluation includes thyroglobulin measurement, neck ultrasound, and diagnostic radioiodine (131I or 123I) whole-body scanning (WBS), which is helpful to identify persistent disease and characterize tumor 131I avidity. Tumor biology information encrypted in the molecular profile may also help determine indications for 131I treatment and modulate treatment intensity; however, further studies are required before molecular profiling can be incorporated into clinical practice. Institutional management protocols are established by multidisciplinary teams based on the local availability and expertise of the surgical, pathology, radiology, and laboratory components integral to the DTC treatment algorithm (11).

Postoperative 131I Therapy

The goal of 131I therapy is determined on integration of clinical–pathologic, laboratory, and imaging information, using standardized definitions as follows (12).

Remnant Ablation

Remnant ablation is intended to eliminate postoperative normal thyroid tissue remnants in low-risk DTC in order to achieve an undetectable serum thyroglobulin level, facilitating follow-up and early detection of relapse. Thyroid remnant ablation also enables high-sensitivity posttherapy WBS for diagnosis and localization of any residual disease after surgery, such as unsuspected regional cervical metastases or distant metastatic disease.

Adjuvant Treatment

Adjuvant 131I treatment in patients with suspected microscopic metastatic disease is based on histopathologic risk factors that predict tumor spread beyond the thyroid gland, with the intention of irradiating and eliminating occult infraradiologic residual disease in the neck or other occult micrometastases to improve recurrence-free survival.

Treatment of Known Disease

131I treatment in patients with known residual or metastatic disease has the goal of eliminating iodine-avid regional or distant metastases in order to achieve cure or remission, reduce persistent or recurrent disease, and improve overall prognosis.

Preparation for 131I Therapy

Evaluation with radioiodine scintigraphy and 131I therapy is scheduled to take place at a minimum of 4 wk after surgery, which allows time to prepare the patient and reach the necessary postoperative thyroglobulin plateau levels, used as a marker for residual thyroid tissue or metastatic thyroid cancer after total thyroidectomy. Thyroglobulin levels must always be interpreted in the context of concomitant TSH level (unstimulated vs. stimulated thyroglobulin) and type of TSH stimulation (endogenous vs. exogenous) (13). Patient preparation for optimal 131I uptake by residual thyroid tissue and metastatic disease includes 1–2 wk of a low-iodine diet (Supplemental Table 2) and adequate TSH stimulation (TSH ≥ 30 mIU/L, measured 1–3 d before 131I administration) by either thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) or recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) stimulation (14). For female patients of childbearing age (12–50 y), a negative pregnancy test is required within 72 h of 131I administration or before the first rhTSH injection (if used), unless the patient has undergone hysterectomy or is postmenopausal.

There are 2 main approaches to TSH stimulation, which is necessary for increasing Na-I symporter expression and function in metastatic lesions (and residual thyroid tissue), with the goal of increasing the diagnostic sensitivity of 131I scintigraphy and absorbed radiation dose to target lesions.

Endogenous TSH Stimulation

Endogenous TSH stimulation is through thyroid hormone deprivation after total thyroidectomy, thus inducing a hypothyroid state: the hypothyroid stimulation protocol (THW) has 2 variants: levothyroxine withdrawal for 4 wk or levothyroxine/liothyronine substitution for the first 2 wk.

Exogenous TSH Stimulation

For exogenous TSH stimulation, the patient continues levothyroxine treatment, and TSH is elevated through administration of rhTSH (thyrotropin alfa [Thyrogen; Genzyme] stimulation protocol): 0.9 mg of rhTSH administered intramuscularly on 2 consecutive days, followed by 131I therapy administered at 48–72 h.

The choice of preparation method (THW vs. rhTSH) needs to be individualized for each patient. There is general agreement that for normal thyroid tissue (i.e., thyroid remnant), rhTSH and THW stimulation are equivalent, because normal thyroid tissue has constitutive high expression of highly functional Na-I symporter and does not require prolonged TSH stimulation for adequate 131I uptake and retention. However, metastatic thyroid cancer is less dense and has poorer functionality of the Na-I symporter; therefore, TSH elevation over time (area under the curve of TSH stimulation) is important to promote increased 131I uptake and retention in tumors (15,16). In the setting of distant metastases, THW preparation and dosimetry-guided 131I therapy are favored, when clinically safe and feasible (17–19).

131I THERAPY

There are 2 approaches to delivering 131I therapy: the theranostic approach, which integrates the information obtained with postoperative diagnostic radioiodine (123I or 131I) scans in the management algorithm, and the risk-based approach based on clinical–pathologic factors and institutional protocols. Which of these 2 approaches is chosen depends on local factors, including the quality of surgery; the availability of, and expertise with, various imaging modalities; and physician and patient preferences. Each approach has strengths and limitations, and no conclusive evidence regarding primary outcome measures is available for recommending one strategy over the other.

Management of the Integration of Functional Diagnostic Radioiodine Imaging

This theranostic approach to 131I administration involves the acquisition of a postoperative diagnostic radioiodine (123I, 131I, or 124I) scan for planning 131I therapy. Diagnostic WBS is performed to identify and localize regional and distant metastatic disease and to determine the capacity of metastatic deposits to concentrate 131I. Depending on institutional protocols, the findings on diagnostic WBS may alter management, such as providing guidance for additional surgery; altering the prescribed 131I therapy, either by adjusting conventional 131I activity or by performing dosimetry calculations to determine the maximum tolerated therapeutic 131I activity for treatment of distant metastases; and avoiding unnecessary 131I therapy when diagnostic WBS finds no evidence of residual thyroid tissue or metastatic disease and the stimulated thyroglobulin is less than 1 ng/mL in the absence of interfering antithyroglobulin antibodies (the thyroglobulin cutoff should be adapted locally depending on the stimulation protocol and thyroglobulin assay) (17). Information acquired from the diagnostic WBS may also lead to additional functional metabolic imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT when non–iodine-avid metastatic disease is suspected (on the basis of thyroglobulin elevation out of proportion to the findings on the diagnostic WBS). It is preferable for postoperative diagnostic scanning to be performed using integrated multimodality imaging (i.e., SPECT/CT), whenever available. SPECT/CT is relevant for assessing focal radioiodine uptake in the neck, for differentiating thyroid remnant from nodal metastasis, and for detecting metastases in normal-sized cervical lymph nodes (not appreciated on postoperative neck ultrasound). Scintigraphic evaluation with diagnostic WBS can identify pulmonary micrometastases (which are too small to be detected on routine chest radiographs and may remain undetected on CT; Fig. 1) and bone metastases at an early stage (i.e., before cortical disruption is visible on bone radiographs or CT; Fig. 2). Most importantly, since 131I therapy is most effective for smaller metastatic deposits, early identification of regional and distant metastases is important for successful therapy (20,21). In a group of 320 thyroid cancer patients referred for postoperative 131I therapy, diagnostic WBS with SPECT/CT detected regional metastases in 35% of patients and distant metastases in 8% of patients. This scintigraphy information changed staging in 4% of younger, and 25% of older, patients (22). Clinical management was changed in 29% of patients when information from diagnostic WBS and stimulated thyroglobulin was integrated into the decision algorithm, as compared with a management strategy based on clinical and histopathology information alone (23). In 350 patients at intermediate and high risk of recurrence, a single 131I therapeutic administration guided by postoperative diagnostic WBS information resulted in a complete response in 88% of patients with locoregional disease and 42% of patients with distant metastases (median follow-up of 3 y) (24). The information obtained with the diagnostic WBS reasonably predicts 131I therapeutic localization and can be used for 131I therapy planning in the paradigm of thyroid cancer radiotheranostics (22,25,26).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Radioiodine theranostics for 63-y-old man with 2.2-cm regionally advanced papillary thyroid carcinoma and of 11 lymph nodes dissected, all 11 were positive for metastasis, in surgical specimen of total thyroidectomy. (A) Diagnostic 37-MBq (1 mCi) 131I WBS, anterior projection, depicts multifocal neck activity and diffuse lung activity. (B and C, different anatomic levels within the neck, depicting lymph nodal metastases located in different cervical compartments) Neck SPECT/CT demonstrates iodine-avid soft-tissue nodules consistent with cervical nodal metastases. (D) Chest SPECT/CT demonstrates diffuse lung activity and branching pulmonary vasculature without definite lung nodules identified. Patient received dosimetry-guided 12.6-GBq (340 mCi) 131I treatment. (E) On posttherapy WBS at 3 d, anterior projection demonstrates therapeutic 131I localization to cervical lymph nodal metastases and diffuse miliary pulmonary metastatic disease.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Radioiodine theranostics for 66-y-old woman with 2.5-cm widely invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma with osseous metastatic disease. (A–F) Diagnostic 37-MBq (1 mCi) 131I WBS, anterior projection (A), depicts multifocal skeletal activity, which is further characterized on SPECT/CT as iodine-avid lytic osseous metastases involving right humerus (B), vertebrae (C), pelvis (D) left femoral neck (E), and left femoral diaphysis (F). Patient received dosimetry-guided 12-GBq (325 mCi) 131I treatment. (G) Posttherapy WBS, anterior projection, obtained at 2 d demonstrates therapeutic 131I targeting of extensive iodine-avid multifocal osseous metastatic disease involving axial and proximal appendicular skeleton, with increased lesion conspicuity and numerous new foci detected as compared with diagnostic scan.

124I is a positron emitter isotope with a 4.2-d half-life that has imaging characteristics superior to those of 123I and 131I scintigraphy. 124I is expensive, with limited accessibility, and is not widely available; however, on the basis of its PET imaging capability, 124I is the ideal agent for pretherapy tumor and organ dosimetry calculations (27). A standardized protocol for 124I PET/CT acquisition, analysis, and quantification remains to be established.

Risk-Adapted 131I Therapy Followed by 131I Scans with Diagnostic Intent

The conventional approach, in which the nuclear medicine physician chooses an 131I activity based on local protocols, availability, experience with various imaging modalities, and patient-related parameters, is widely used for thyroid remnant ablation, adjuvant treatment, and curative therapy of known structural disease. With this therapeutic approach, the prescribed 131I activity depends on the goal of 131I therapy as determined by the estimated risk for persistent or recurrent disease. Thyroid remnant ablation in low-risk patients is typically performed with a low 131I activity (i.e., 1.1–1.85 GBq [30–50 mCi]). Adjuvant 131I therapy is performed with a slightly higher activity (i.e., 1.85–3.7 GBq [50–100 mCi], with some institutions extending this range to 5.55 GBq [150 mCi]). Treatment of known disease is performed by administering a high activity (i.e., 3.7–5.56 GBq [100–150 mCi] for advanced locoregional disease and 5.6 −7.4 GBq [150–200 mCi] for distant metastatic disease) (28). However, when diagnostic scintigraphy demonstrates diffuse homogeneous uptake throughout the lungs, simplified whole-body dosimetry should be performed to adjust the prescribed 131I activity so that pulmonary 131I retention does not exceed 3 GBq (80 mCi) after 48 h, with the goal of minimizing the risk of radiation-induced lung toxicity (29). Administration of therapeutic 131I activities of at least 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) for treatment of diffuse distant metastatic disease requires full whole-body or blood dosimetry calculations (24). Table 1 shows a suggested 131I therapy framework in DTC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Suggested Framework for 131I Therapy for DTC (28)

Posttherapy WBS is performed at 2–7 d after 131I administration to localize the therapeutic 131I and assess for regional and distant metastases. Campenni et al. reported in a cohort of 570 DTC patients at low risk or low-to-intermediate risk (pT1–pT3) that posttherapy WBS with SPECT/CT demonstrated metastases in 82 (14.4%), of whom 73 (90.2%) had a postsurgical nonstimulated thyroglobulin level of no more than 1 ng/mL (30). Furthermore, in 44 patients (54%), stimulated thyroglobulin remained at no more than 1 ng/mL, despite the presence of metastases on posttreatment scans (30). Therefore, postsurgical nonstimulated thyroglobulin levels cannot be used independently in deciding whether to pursue therapeutic 131I administration, mainly in patients assigned as low risk on the basis of surgical pathology alone.

THYROID HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY

After thyroidectomy, DTC patients require thyroid hormone (levothyroxine) replacement. The TSH target for levothyroxine therapy is based on a dynamic risk classification, thyroglobulin level, thyroglobulin trend over time, antithyroglobulin antibodies, and potential adverse effects of TSH suppression. For patients with a structurally incomplete response, the serum TSH is suppressed to less than 0.1 mU/L. In the excellent treatment response category, the serum TSH is maintained at 0.5–2 mUI/L for intermediate-risk patients and at 0.1–0.5 mUI/L for high-risk patients. For patients with biochemically indeterminate or incomplete responses, the recommended serum TSH target is 0.1–0.5 mU/L (6).

DTC MANAGEMENT IN CHILDREN

DTC represents 1.8% of all cases of cancer in individuals less than 20 y old. The incidence of pediatric thyroid cancer has increased, in part because of better techniques for diagnosis. A 4.43% increase in all stages of primarily papillary histology in 10- to 19-y-old non-Hispanic white patients, non-Hispanic black patients, and Hispanic patients was reported in a study that included 39 U.S. cancer registries (31).

Although 50% of adults older than 60 y have thyroid nodules, only 5%–7% of children and young adults are diagnosed with thyroid nodules. However, thyroid cancer is diagnosed in 25% of thyroid nodules in the pediatric population (as compared with 10%–15% of thyroid nodules in adults). Assessment using the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System is not applied in pediatric patients, as one study of 314 patients younger than 18 y showed that 22% of cancers would be missed (32). Children with thyroid cancer have an increased incidence of regional and distant metastatic disease at presentation, as compared with adults, with cervical lymph nodal metastases diagnosed in 50% of cases and lung metastases in 20%.

The recommended treatment for pediatric thyroid cancer is total thyroidectomy because of the higher incidence of bilateral and multifocal disease (30% and 65%, respectively) than in adults, as well as the greater likelihood for regional and distant metastasis at presentation (33). Central node dissection is recommended in the presence of locoregional cervical disease diagnosed by imaging and confirmed on fine-needle aspiration or identified during surgery. Although some have approached disease in a single lobe with lobectomy or a phased approach, a recent study by Zong et al. suggested that because of large lesions often involving both thyroid lobes in the pediatric age group, there is increased morbidity in staged resection (34). Lobectomy may be indicated in cases of follicular thyroid carcinoma that have certain characteristics, including a size of less than 4 cm and invasion of fewer than 3 vessels (minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma).

The American Thyroid Association pediatric guidelines identify 3 risk categories dependent on risk of persistent disease: low risk, or disease confined to the thyroid with few central nodes and no macroscopic metastases; medium risk, or significant central and minimal lateral node involvement; and high risk, or either distant metastases or locally invasive tumor with extensive involvement of lateral neck lymph nodes (33).

Postoperatively, the use of diagnostic WBS and 24-h neck uptake at 6–12 wk after surgery and thyroglobulin testing is recommended. Although the American Thyroid Association guidelines suggest this for intermediate- and high-risk groups, many pediatric centers extend it to all risk groups. Apart from the fact that low-risk disease is less common in children, children have a higher risk of recurrence of DTC (35). Diagnostic WBS is now routinely performed with SPECT/CT (unenhanced CT) to evaluate for cervical, upper mediastinal, and pulmonary metastatic disease. Depending on the diagnostic WBS findings, the child may be referred back to surgery for resection of unsuspected bulky residual nodal metastases in unexplored neck compartments or may proceed with 131I therapy for remnant ablation or treatment of locoregional or pulmonary metastatic disease, if present.

There is controversy as to how the 131I treatment activity is determined. Some suggest an empiric dosing for initial 131I therapy in pediatrics, with dosimetry possibly relegated if follow-up 131I therapy is needed. A weight-based dose calculated by multiplying a 70-kg adult by a 1–1.5 mCi/kg (37–56 MBq/kg) activity has been used (36). American Thyroid Association guidelines do not specify recommended therapeutic 131I activities. Parisi et al. presented this algorithm: low-risk disease, 1.1–1.85 GBq (30–50 mCi); higher-risk locoregional disease, 5.6–6.5 GBq (150–175 mCi); and known or suspected pulmonary metastatic disease, 6.5–7.4 GBq (175–200 mCi). All these therapeutic 131I activities are adjusted for body weight based on a 70-kg adult weight (Table 1) (35). As with adults, routine posttherapy WBS is performed at 5–7 d after therapy.

The overall prognosis for pediatric DTC is good, with greater than a 98% 10-y survival rate (37). In the small subset of children with refractory disease or disease that is not responsive to 131I treatment, newer molecular therapies that target the known genetic alterations and molecular mutations may be used (38).

RESPONSE ASSESSMENT AFTER PRIMARY TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP

The combination of thyroglobulin measurement, neck ultrasound, and follow-up diagnostic WBS performed at 1–2 y after primary therapy is used to restratify the risk of recurrence according to the patient’s response to initial therapy. This process of risk reassignment is called dynamic risk stratification and is predictive of long-term clinical outcome. The criteria for treatment response evaluation are summarized in Table 2 (4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Response to Treatment in DTC Patients: Assessment Criteria (4)

In patients with an excellent (complete) response, the risk of disease recurrence is 1%–4%, which for intermediate-risk patients (whose initial recurrence risk is 36%–43%) and for high-risk patients (whose initial recurrence risk is 68%–70%) represents a major change in risk. The clinical outcome in patients with a biochemically incomplete response is usually good: approximately 60% of patients have no evidence of disease over long-term follow-up; 20% of patients have persistently abnormal thyroglobulin without a structural correlate, and 20% of patients develop structurally identifiable disease over 5–10 y of follow-up. Patients with a biochemically indeterminate response generally do well: in 80%–90% of patients, nonspecific biochemical findings either remain stable or resolve over time with levothyroxine suppression therapy alone; however, up to 20% of these patients will eventually develop functional or structural evidence of disease progression and require additional therapy. Patients with a structurally incomplete response require multidisciplinary management tailored to their disease status (e.g., regional vs. distant metastases and iodine-avid vs. non–iodine-avid disease) (4); depending on the results of additional treatment, patients are restratified according to the criteria above.

TREATMENT OF ADVANCED DISEASE

Distant metastases develop in about 10% of DTC patients, commonly in the lungs, bone, brain, liver, and skin, and are the main cause of death (i.e., overall mortality of 65% at 5 y and 75% at 10 years) (39).

The prognosis of metastatic DTC is variable, with 2 distinct phenotypes identified: indolent and aggressive (40). Patients with iodine-avid metastatic DTC tend to have a better prognosis, with 10-y survival greater than 90%, whereas non–iodine-avid metastatic DTC has a dire 10-y survival of 10% (41). Younger patients and those with single-organ metastases and a low disease burden have the best outcome. The mainstay of treatment is TSH suppression and 131I therapy as long as the disease remains radioiodine-avid. About two thirds of patients have radioiodine-avid distant metastases, and one third of them will achieve remission after multiple radioiodine treatments (20). Approximately 15%–20% of patients with metastatic DTC and most patients with Hürthle cell thyroid cancer are refractory to radioiodine, and overall survival for these patients ranges between 2.5 and 4.5 y (20,42).

Determining when a patient no longer responds to 131I can be challenging. Factors impacting the specific clinical situation such as age, tumor histology, stage, residual radioiodine avidity, and 18F-FDG avidity should be evaluated (43). 18F-FDG PET/CT is particularly useful for identifying and localizing non–iodine-avid metastases and is used to evaluate patients with elevated thyroglobulin along with negative results on diagnostic WBS (44). In this setting, if lack of 131I uptake has already been established on diagnostic WBS, a positive 18F-FDG PET/CT result strongly supports the suspicion of 131I-negative or 131I-refractory disease, leading to changes in management by identifying patients who are unlikely to benefit from additional 131I therapy and instead qualify for alternative therapy (45). In addition, 18F-FDG PET/CT has shown prognostic value in metastatic DTC, predicting the course of disease as aggressive or indolent (46). In radioiodine-refractory metastatic DTC, there is a survival disadvantage for patients with positive PET results as compared with those with negative PET results (42).

Ablative treatment for locoregional disease control (i.e., resection, vertebroplasty, external-beam radiation therapy, and thermal ablation) can provide symptomatic relief and delay the initiation of systemic therapy, whereas bisphosphonate or denosumab can delay the time to skeleton-related events (47). In cases of confirmed radioiodine-resistant metastatic disease progression, treatment with multikinase inhibitors (e.g., lenvatinib, sorafenib, vandetanib, cabozantinib, vemurafenib, dabrafenib/trametinib, and others) may induce periods of progression-free survival (rarely remission) without evidence of increased cancer-specific survival, and these drugs may be associated with side effects, such as hypertension, diarrhea, hand or foot skin reactions, rash, fatigue, mucositis, loss of appetite, and weight loss (48). The optimal time to start therapy, especially in asymptomatic patients, is unclear, nor is it clear which patients are likely to benefit in terms of increased quality-adjusted life years. As a rule, the decision to start molecular targeted therapies is based on a multidisciplinary team discussion. Such therapies are more likely to be used in patients who have negative findings on diagnostic WBS and symptoms that are not amenable to local therapy or who have progression of measurable lesions as defined by RECIST over the previous 12 mo, taking into consideration the tumor burden and the risk of local complications (49). The biologic mechanisms implicated in radioiodine refractoriness involve gain-of-function mutations in the MAPK signaling pathway, resulting in reduced Na-I symporter and other iodine-metabolizing gene expression. Experimental data showed that MAPK signaling pathway inhibition using MEK or BRAF inhibitors restored radioiodine avidity. Subsequent clinical studies demonstrated that mutation-guided treatment using selective MEK inhibitors (selumetinib, trametinib), BRAF inhibitors (dabrafenib, vemurafenib), or a combination of BRAF inhibitor and MEK inhibitor is feasible and promising for redifferentiating radioiodine-refractory DTC, thereby permitting reapplication of 131I therapy. Preliminary data obtained on a small clinical series of 13 patients demonstrated restoration of 131I avidity in 62% of patients who subsequently received 131I treatment (median activity, 7.6 GBq [204.4 mCi]; range, 5.5–9.4 GBq [150–253 mCi]), resulting in durable disease control (median duration > 1 y) while not receiving chronic, expensive multikinase inhibitor therapy (50). 131I therapy remains the only known cure for metastatic radioiodine-sensitive DTC, and the use of a redifferentiating strategy to permit additional 131I treatment for patients with radioiodine-refractory metastatic disease represents a promising therapeutic approach while minimizing exposure to kinase inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSION

DTC is the most common endocrine malignancy. Although standard management including surgery and radioiodine therapy is successful in most cases, therapy should be tailored according to a risk stratification integrating the information from histopathology, molecular markers, postoperative thyroglobulin levels, and imaging studies. Ultimately, local multidisciplinary teams consider the availability of surgical, pathologic, nuclear medicine, and laboratory expertise and take into account individual patient preferences to guide appropriate therapy.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank Vanessa Allen for preparing composite figures for this article.

Footnotes

  • Published online August 19, 2021.

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Davies L,
    2. Morris LG,
    3. Haymart M,
    4. et al
    . American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology disease state clinical review: the increasing incidence of thyroid cancer. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:686–696.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gulec SA,
    2. Ahuja S,
    3. Avram A,
    4. et al
    . A joint statement from the American Thyroid Association, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the European Thyroid Association, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging on current diagnostic and theranostic approaches in the management of thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2021;31:1009–1019.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rossi ED,
    2. Fadda G.
    Pathology and immunohistochemistry in thyroid tumors. In: Atlas of Thyroid and Neuroendocrine Tumor Markers. Giovanella L, ed. Springer; 2018:3–12.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Haugen BR,
    2. Alexander EK,
    3. Bible KC,
    4. et al
    . 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26:1–133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bilimoria KY,
    2. Bentrem DJ,
    3. Ko CY,
    4. et al
    . Extent of surgery affects survival for papillary thyroid cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;246:375–381.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ito Y,
    2. Miyauchi A,
    3. Oda H.
    Low-risk papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid: a review of active surveillance trials. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:307–315.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Davies L,
    2. Roman BR,
    3. Fukushima M,
    4. Ito Y,
    5. Miyauchi A.
    Patient experience of thyroid cancer active surveillance in Japan. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145:363–370.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Miller JE,
    2. Al-Attar NC,
    3. Brown OH,
    4. et al
    . Location and causation of residual lymph node metastasis after surgical treatment of regionally advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2018;28:593–600.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Roh JL,
    2. Park JY,
    3. Park CI.
    Total thyroidectomy plus neck dissection in differentiated papillary thyroid carcinoma patients: pattern of nodal metastasis, morbidity, recurrence, and postoperative levels of serum parathyroid hormone. Ann Surg. 2007;245:604–610.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Barczyński M,
    2. Konturek A,
    3. Stopa M,
    4. Nowak W.
    Prophylactic central neck dissection for papillary thyroid cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:410–418.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Tuttle RM,
    2. Ahuja S,
    3. Avram AM,
    4. et al
    . Controversies, consensus, and collaboration in the use of 131I therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer: a joint statement from the American Thyroid Association, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the European Thyroid Association. Thyroid. 2019;29:461–470.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Van Nostrand D.
    The benefits and risks of I-131 therapy in patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19:1381–1391.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Mazzaferri EL,
    2. Kloos RT.
    Clinical review 128: current approaches to primary therapy for papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:1447–1463.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Xiao J,
    2. Yun C,
    3. Cao J,
    4. et al
    . A pre-ablative thyroid-stimulating hormone with 30-70 mIU/L achieves better response to initial radioiodine remnant ablation in differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1348.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Pötzi C,
    2. Moameni A,
    3. Karanikas G,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of iodine uptake in tumour and nontumour tissue under thyroid hormone deprivation and with recombinant human thyrotropin in thyroid cancer patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006;65:519–523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Freudenberg LS,
    2. Jentzen W,
    3. Petrich T,
    4. et al
    . Lesion dose in differentiated thyroid carcinoma metastases after rhTSH or thyroid hormone withdrawal: 124I PET/CT dosimetric comparisons. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:2267–2276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Giovanella L,
    2. Duntas LH.
    Management of endocrine disease: the role of rhTSH in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer—pros and cons. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;181:R133–R145.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.
    1. Zanotti-Fregonara P,
    2. Hindie E.
    On the effectiveness of recombinant human TSH as a stimulating agent for 131I treatment of metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:2264–2266.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Plyku D,
    2. Hobbs RF,
    3. Huang K,
    4. et al
    . Recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone versus thyroid hormone withdrawal in 124I PET/CT-based dosimetry for 131I therapy of metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1146–1154.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Durante C,
    2. Haddy N,
    3. Baudin E,
    4. et al
    . Long-term outcome of 444 patients with distant metastases from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma: benefits and limits of radioiodine therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:2892–2899.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Schmidt D,
    2. Linke R,
    3. Uder M,
    4. Kuwert T.
    Five months’ follow-up of patients with and without iodine-positive lymph node metastases of thyroid carcinoma as disclosed by 131I-SPECT/CT at the first radioablation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:699–705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Avram AM,
    2. Fig LM,
    3. Frey KA,
    4. Gross MD,
    5. Wong KK.
    Preablation 131-I scans with SPECT/CT in postoperative thyroid cancer patients: what is the impact on staging? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:1163–1171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Avram AM,
    2. Esfandiari NH,
    3. Wong KK.
    Preablation 131-I scans with SPECT/CT contribute to thyroid cancer risk stratification and 131-I therapy planning. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:1895–1902.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Avram AM,
    2. Rosculet N,
    3. Esfandiari NH,
    4. et al
    . Differentiated thyroid cancer outcomes after surgery and activity-adjusted 131I theragnostics. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44:11–20.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. McDougall IR.
    74 MBq radioiodine 131I does not prevent uptake of therapeutic doses of 131I (i.e. it does not cause stunning) in differentiated thyroid cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 1997;18:505–512.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Avram AM,
    2. Dewaraja YK.
    Thyroid cancer radiotheragnostics: the case for activity adjusted 131I therapy. Clin Transl Imaging. 2018;6:335–346.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Jentzen W,
    2. Freudenberg L,
    3. Bockisch A.
    Quantitative imaging of 124I with PET/CT in pretherapy lesion dosimetry: effects impairing image quantification and their corrections. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;55:21–43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Luster M,
    2. Clarke SE,
    3. Dietlein M,
    4. et al
    . Guidelines for radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1941–1959.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sisson JC.
    Practical dosimetry of 131I in patients with thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2002;17:101–105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Campennì A,
    2. Giovanella L,
    3. Pignata SA,
    4. et al
    . Undetectable or low (<1 ng/ml) postsurgical thyroglobulin values do not rule out metastases in early stage differentiated thyroid cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2018;9:17491–17500.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Bernier MO,
    2. Withrow DR,
    3. Berrington de Gonzalez A,
    4. et al
    . Trends in pediatric thyroid cancer incidence in the United States, 1998-2013. Cancer. 2019;125:2497–2505.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Richman DM,
    2. Benson CB,
    3. Doubilet PM,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) for pediatric thyroid nodules. Radiology. 2020;294:415–420.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Francis GL,
    2. Waguespack SG,
    3. Bauer AJ,
    4. et al
    . Management guidelines for children with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2015;25:716–759.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Zong Y,
    2. Li K,
    3. Dong K,
    4. Yao W,
    5. Liu G,
    6. Xiao X.
    The surgical choice for unilateral thyroid carcinoma in pediatrics: lobectomy or total thyroidectomy? J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53:2449–2453.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Parisi MT,
    2. Eslamy H,
    3. Mankoff D.
    Management of differentiated thyroid cancer in children: focus on the American Thyroid Association pediatric guidelines. Semin Nucl Med. 2016;46:147–164.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Machac J.
    Thyroid cancer in pediatrics. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2016;45:359–404.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Sugino K,
    2. Nagahama M,
    3. Kitagawa W,
    4. et al
    . Papillary thyroid carcinoma in children and adolescents: long-term follow-up and clinical characteristics. World J Surg. 2015;39:2259–2265.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Remiker AS,
    2. Chuang J,
    3. Corathers S,
    4. et al
    . Differentiated thyroid cancer in the pediatric/adolescent population: evolution of treatment. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2019;41:532–536.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    1. Cabanillas ME,
    2. McFadden DG,
    3. Durante C.
    Thyroid cancer. Lancet. 2016;388:2783–2795.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Ain KB.
    Papillary thyroid carcinoma: etiology, assessment, and therapy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1995;24:711–760.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Xing M,
    2. Haugen BR,
    3. Schlumberger M.
    Progress in molecular-based management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Lancet. 2013;381:1058–1069.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Robbins RJ,
    2. Wan Q,
    3. Grewal RK,
    4. et al
    . Real-time prognosis for metastatic thyroid carcinoma based on 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography scanning. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:498–505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Giovanella L,
    2. van Nostrand D.
    Advanced differentiated thyroid cancer: when to stop radioiodine? Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;63:267–270.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    1. Silberstein EB.
    The problem of the patient with thyroglobulin elevation but negative iodine scintigraphy: the TENIS syndrome. Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41:113–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Schleupner MC,
    2. Riemann B,
    3. Schafers M,
    4. Backhaus P,
    5. Vrachimis A.
    Impact of FDG-PET on therapy management and outcome of differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients with elevated thyroglobulin despite negative iodine scintigraphy. Nuklearmedizin. 2020;59:356–364.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    1. Wang W,
    2. Larson SM,
    3. Fazzari M,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic scanning in patients with thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:1107–1113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Giovanella L,
    2. Scappaticcio L.
    Radioiodine therapy of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer: clinical considerations and multidisciplinary approach. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;63:229–234.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    1. Porter A,
    2. Wong DJ.
    Perspectives on the treatment of advanced thyroid cancer: approved therapies, resistance mechanisms, and future directions. Front Oncol. 2021;10:592202.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    1. Sabra MM,
    2. Sherman EJ,
    3. Tuttle RM.
    Tumor volume doubling time of pulmonary metastases predicts overall survival and can guide the initiation of multikinase inhibitor therapy in patients with metastatic, follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 2017;123:2955–2964.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Jaber T,
    2. Waguespack SG,
    3. Cabanillas ME,
    4. et al
    . Targeted therapy in advanced thyroid cancer to resensitize tumors to radioactive iodine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:3698–3705.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication April 4, 2021.
  • Revision received August 5, 2021.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 2
February 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The Standard of Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The Standard of Care
Anca M. Avram, Katherine Zukotynski, Helen Ruth Nadel, Luca Giovanella
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2022, 63 (2) 189-195; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262402

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The Standard of Care
Anca M. Avram, Katherine Zukotynski, Helen Ruth Nadel, Luca Giovanella
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2022, 63 (2) 189-195; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262402
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION
    • DIAGNOSIS
    • SURGICAL TREATMENT
    • POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
    • 131I THERAPY
    • THYROID HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY
    • DTC MANAGEMENT IN CHILDREN
    • RESPONSE ASSESSMENT AFTER PRIMARY TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP
    • TREATMENT OF ADVANCED DISEASE
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Alzheimer Disease: Standard of Diagnosis, Treatment, Care, and Prevention
Show more Standard of Care

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • differentiated thyroid cancer
  • state of the art
  • guidelines
  • clinical management
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire