Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Infrastructure for efficient multi-component uncertainty estimation of SUVR values in amyloid PET imaging

Pawel Markiewicz, Jonathan Schott, David Atkinson, Simon Arridge, Brian Hutton and Sebastien Ourselin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 480;
Pawel Markiewicz
5Translational Imaging Group, CMIC University College London London United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Schott
3Dementia Research Centre University College London London United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Atkinson
2Centre for Medical Imaging University College London London United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Arridge
1Centre for Medical Image Computing University College London London United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Hutton
4Institute of Nuclear Medicine University College London London United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastien Ourselin
5Translational Imaging Group, CMIC University College London London United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

480

Objectives In PET imaging, any statistic derived from a measurement, like the standardised uptake value ratios (SUVR), is subject to uncertainty due to limited statistics. This work addresses the problem of efficient uncertainty estimation of any PET image statistic in the presence of a highly complex chain of image reconstruction and processing. This is particularly useful in the study of longitudinal SUVR changes, which are subtle and sensitive to noise.

Methods The uncertainty estimation is achieved through the development of an innovative, self-contained and efficient GPU-based infrastructure with all the necessary components such as: (1) histogramming, which rapidly generates bootstrap resampled sinograms from raw PET list mode datasets; (2) detector normalisation and attenuation correction using pseudo-CT mu-maps for the PET/MR scanner used; (3) novel 3D scatter estimation for large axial field of views; (4) variance-reduced random events estimation; (5) fast matched forward and back projectors, adapted for accelerated image reconstruction using 14 ordered projection subsets. (6) robust MR-PET image registration which uses symmetric affine scheme based on block-matching approach; (7) MR-based image parcellation into 144 brain regions using multi-atlas segmentation propagation strategy. The estimated uncertainties are found by accounting for random errors as they propagate through all the above components. The components can be considered jointly or individually to study their influence on the final noise properties of any given image statistic (here the SUVR). The above pipeline was applied to the list-mode data of a 50 minute dynamic PET scan with F-18 florbetapir injected to a patient with a probable Alzheimer's disease and acquired using the Siemens Biograph mMR. Two time frames were considered: (1) an early 15 second time frame with low count level and (2) 10 minute time frame at the end of the scan. 100 bootstrap realisations were generated for both time frames based on which the distributions of uncertainties were formed.

Results The whole processing time for each bootstrap sample with all the above components takes approximately 4 minutes. Voxels in such areas like the cerebellum and brain stem had higher variance than the posterior or anterior cingulate gyrus, however, when mean regional values were considered, cerebellum grey matter was one of the least variable due to its bigger size. The SUVR value for the 10 minute time frame and the whole cingulate gyrus was 1.127 and the estimated standard deviation (SD) was +/- 0.014 with all the components of the pipeline being accounted for. The SD was reduced to +/- 0.006 when the estimated uncertainty was affected by only the random correction component. The regional and voxel SD was approximately 10 times higher in the 15 second time frame, which had a significant impact on the stability of the PET-MR co-registration, causing an isotropic registration wobble of up to 4 mm. This can have a considerable impact on the performance of partial volume correction which uses MR-based tissue segmentation as input.

Conclusions It was demonstrated, that the devised framework of highly complex processing components used for generating and processing bootstrap samples from PET list mode data is feasible. It enables joint and individual estimation of uncertainties for any component within a reasonable time. This multi-component uncertainty estimation can prove very useful in finding optimal image reconstruction and processing algorithms. Such an infrastructure can help in robust estimation and comparison of SUVR values especially in longitudinal studies of neurodegenerative disease.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue supplement 2
May 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Infrastructure for efficient multi-component uncertainty estimation of SUVR values in amyloid PET imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Infrastructure for efficient multi-component uncertainty estimation of SUVR values in amyloid PET imaging
Pawel Markiewicz, Jonathan Schott, David Atkinson, Simon Arridge, Brian Hutton, Sebastien Ourselin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 480;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Infrastructure for efficient multi-component uncertainty estimation of SUVR values in amyloid PET imaging
Pawel Markiewicz, Jonathan Schott, David Atkinson, Simon Arridge, Brian Hutton, Sebastien Ourselin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2016, 57 (supplement 2) 480;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

  • Deep Learning Based Kidney Segmentation for Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement Using Quantitative SPECT/CT
  • The Benefit of Time-of-Flight in Digital Photon Counting PET Imaging: Physics and Clinical Evaluation
  • Preclinical validation of a single-scan rest/stress imaging technique for 13NH3 cardiac perfusion studies
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Image Generation: Quantitation topics in PET

  • Adaptive PSF Modeling for Enhanced Heterogeneity Quantification in Oncologic PET Imaging
  • TOF reconstruction for improved quantitative accuracy in PET/CT studies with misalignment
  • A fast dynamic PET simulator for improved kinetic modeling estimation
Show more Image Generation: Quantitation topics in PET

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire