Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Value of 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET for the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence: Comparison with Histopathology After Salvage Lymphadenectomy

Isabel Rauscher, Tobias Maurer, Ambros J. Beer, Frank-Philipp Graner, Bernhard Haller, Gregor Weirich, Alan Doherty, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Markus Schwaiger and Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2016, 57 (11) 1713-1719; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.173492
Isabel Rauscher
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Maurer
2Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ambros J. Beer
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank-Philipp Graner
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernhard Haller
4Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregor Weirich
5Department of Pathology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Doherty
6Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jürgen E. Gschwend
2Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Schwaiger
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Eiber
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    ROC curves for 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET imaging (red) and morphologic imaging (CT/MR) (blue) for detection of LNM on a field-based analysis (P values: comparison to AUC = 0.5).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Example of a 55-y-old patient with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (Gleason score, 7; PSA level at PET examination, 0.77 ng/mL) and a correctly classified LNM by 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET imaging: a 6-mm LN is visible in right obturator fossa on CT imaging (A, arrow) that shows intense, focal and thus suspicious tracer uptake on 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET (B) and PET/CT fusion imaging (C). Salvage lymphadenectomy with histologic evaluation confirmed a single LNM.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET imaging of a 55-y-old patient with recurrent PC (Gleason score, 8; PSA level at PET examination, 5.1 ng/mL). Patient presented with 2 correctly classified LNM (5 and 6 mm) behind left common iliac artery with intense, focal uptake on 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/CT fusion (B, arrow) and on maximum-intensity-projection images (C, arrow). However, paraaortal/interaortocaval LN field was negative on 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET, showing no increased uptake either on maximum-intensity-projection images (C) or on axial 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/CT (E). In conventional CT imaging, only small, unsuspicious LNs could be found (D, arrow). Histopathology revealed overall 9 further LNM in this anatomic field (paraaortic).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Total Number and Location of Resected LN Fields and Histopathologically Proven LNM

    LN fieldsNo. of resected fieldsNo. of histopathologically proven LNM% of histopathologically proven LNM
    Level 1 right common iliac vessel18633.3
    Level 2 left common iliac vessel22731.8
    Level 3 right internal iliac vessel16425
    Level 4 left internal iliac vessel20945
    Level 5 right external iliac vessel17635.3
    Level 6 left external iliac vessel19947.4
    Level 7 right obturator fossa18738.9
    Level 8 left obturator fossa18316.7
    Level 9 presacral13969.2
    Level 10 others18844.4
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Results and Diagnostic Values for Detection of LNM on Field-Based Analysis

    Histology: LNM
    ResultsPositiveNegativeDiagnostic accuracy
    68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET rating
     Positive533PPV, 94.6%
     Negative15108NPV, 87.8%
     Total68111179
    Sensitivity, 77.9%Specificity, 97.3%Accuracy, 89.9%
    Morphologic rating (CT/MR)
     Positive181PPV, 94.7%
     Negative49110NPV, 69.2%
     Total67111178
    Sensitivity, 26.9%Specificity, 99.1%Accuracy, 71.9%
    • PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Results and Diagnostic Values for Detection of LNM Using Patient-Based Analysis

    Histology: LNM
    ResultsPositiveNegativeDiagnostic accuracy
    68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET rating
     Positive423PPV, 93.3%
     Negative03NPV, 100%
     Total42648
    Sensitivity, 100%Specificity, 50%Accuracy, 93.8%
    Morphologic rating (CT/MR)
     Positive141PPV, 93.3%
     Negative275NPV, 84.3%
     Total41647
    Sensitivity, 34.1%Specificity, 83.3%Accuracy, 40.4%
    • PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 57 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 57, Issue 11
November 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Value of 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET for the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence: Comparison with Histopathology After Salvage Lymphadenectomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Value of 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET for the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence: Comparison with Histopathology After Salvage Lymphadenectomy
Isabel Rauscher, Tobias Maurer, Ambros J. Beer, Frank-Philipp Graner, Bernhard Haller, Gregor Weirich, Alan Doherty, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Markus Schwaiger, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2016, 57 (11) 1713-1719; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.173492

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Value of 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET for the Assessment of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence: Comparison with Histopathology After Salvage Lymphadenectomy
Isabel Rauscher, Tobias Maurer, Ambros J. Beer, Frank-Philipp Graner, Bernhard Haller, Gregor Weirich, Alan Doherty, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Markus Schwaiger, Matthias Eiber
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2016, 57 (11) 1713-1719; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.173492
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Validation of 18F-rhPSMA-7 and 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET Imaging Results with Histopathology from Salvage Surgery in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer
  • Detection Efficacy of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET/CT and Impact on Management in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy and Before Potential Salvage Treatment
  • Matched-Pair Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT in Patients with Primary and Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Frequency of Non-Tumor-Related Uptake and Tumor Positivity
  • Imaging the Distribution of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptors in Cancer
  • 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET for the Detection of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy
  • Evaluation of an Automated Module Synthesis and a Sterile Cold Kit-Based Preparation of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Patients with Prostate Cancer
  • Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in Staging Prostate Cancer Using Histopathology and Immunohistochemical Analysis as a Reference Standard
  • Can the Injected Dose Be Reduced in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT While Maintaining High Image Quality for Lesion Detection?
  • Matched-Pair Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT: Frequency of Pitfalls and Detection Efficacy in Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
  • Detection Rate of 18F-Choline PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT for Prostate Cancer Lymph Node Metastases with Direct Link from PET to Histopathology: Dependence on the Size of Tumor Deposits in Lymph Nodes
  • Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Validated by Histopathology
  • 68Gallium-labelled PSMA-PET/CT as a diagnostic and clinical decision-making tool in Asian prostate cancer patients following prostatectomy
  • 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC Uptake in Cervical, Celiac, and Sacral Ganglia as an Important Pitfall in Prostate Cancer PET Imaging
  • Effects of Fasting on 18F-DCFPyL Uptake in Prostate Cancer Lesions and Tissues with Known High Physiologic Uptake
  • Reply: Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in a Case Series of 10 Patients with Prostate Cancer Recurrence: Prospective Trial Is on Its Way
  • Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): Proposed miTNM Classification for the Interpretation of PSMA-Ligand PET/CT
  • Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on the Management of Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence
  • 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Mapping of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in 270 Patients with a PSA Level of Less Than 1.0 ng/mL: Impact on Salvage Radiotherapy Planning
  • PSMA-targeted polyinosine/polycytosine vector induces prostate tumor regression and invokes an antitumor immune response in mice
  • Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET on Management in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
  • Seduction by Sensitivity: Reality, Illusion, or Delusion? The Challenge of Assessing Outcomes after PSMA Imaging Selection of Patients for Treatment
  • 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and Volumetric Morphology of PET-Positive Lymph Nodes Stratified by Tumor Differentiation of Prostate Cancer
  • Initial Experience with Volumetric 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for Assessment of Whole-Body Tumor Burden as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Patients with Prostate Cancer
  • 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in the Detection of Prostate Cancer at 60 and 120 Minutes: Detection Rate, Image Quality, Activity Kinetics, and Biodistribution
  • PSMA Ligands for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer
  • Detection Efficacy of Hybrid 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Primary Radiation Therapy Defined by Phoenix Criteria
  • The Clinical Impact of Additional Late PET/CT Imaging with 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
  • 68Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT-based Radiotherapy for Lymph Node Relapse of Prostate Cancer After Primary Therapy Delays Initiation of Systemic Therapy
  • PET-Guided Stereotactic Irradiation of Prostate Cancer Lymph Node Metastases
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Left Ventricular Strain from Myocardial Perfusion PET Imaging: Method Development and Comparison to 2-Dimensional Echocardiography
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • positron emission tomography
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • computed tomography
  • hybrid imaging
  • 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC
  • prostate cancer
  • salvage lymphadenectomy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire