Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Predictive Value of Intratumoral 99mTc-Macroaggregated Albumin Uptake in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Scheduled for Radioembolization with 90Y-Microspheres

Gerhard Ulrich, Oliver Dudeck, Christian Furth, Juri Ruf, Oliver S. Grosser, Daniela Adolf, Marvin Stiebler, Jens Ricke and Holger Amthauer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2013, 54 (4) 516-522; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.112508
Gerhard Ulrich
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver Dudeck
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Furth
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juri Ruf
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oliver S. Grosser
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Adolf
2Department of Biometrics and Medical Informatics, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marvin Stiebler
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Ricke
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holger Amthauer
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Sixty-six-year-old patient with hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma. Pretherapeutic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of liver (A) revealed in this axial slice intrahepatic lesion in segment 5 (arrow) and larger one in segment 4 (*). Perfusion scintigraphy using nonselective application of 99mTc-MAA by proper hepatic artery (B) revealed heterogeneous intrahepatic distribution of administered nuclide without intratumoral accumulation in both hepatic metastases (B). After selective 90Y radioembolization in right hepatic artery in sequential treatment plan, Bremsstrahlung scintigraphy was performed and fused with MR imaging. Pattern of 90Y-labeled microspheres showed relatively homogeneous distribution in right liver lobe with accumulation in metastasis in segment 5 (arrow) and no accumulation in metastasis in segment 4 (*) (C). On follow-up MR image (D), 6 wk after 90Y radioembolization there was clear decrease in size of treated metastasis in segment 5 (arrow) and stable situation of metastasis in segment 4 (*).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    99mTc-MAA Uptake and Catheter Position in Relation to Lesion-Based Therapy Response

    Tumor diameter after 6 wk (lesion total, n = 377)Tumor diameter after 3 mo (lesion total, n = 290)
    ParameterRL (n = 211)NRL (n = 166)RL (n = 144)NRL (n = 146)
    99mTc-MAA uptake
     Low
      Group 153 (14.1)33 (8.8)29 (10.0)45 (15.5)
      Group 248 (12.7)34 (9.0)32 (11.0)38 (13.1)
     High MAA
      Group 351 (13.5)66 (17.5)35 (12.1)49 (16.9)
      Group 459 (15.6)33 (8.8)48 (16.6)14 (4.8)
    Catheter position
     Identical134 (35.5)115 (30.5)87 (30.0)100 (34.5)
     Different77 (20.4)51 (13.5)57 (19.7)46 (15.9)
    • Data in parentheses are percentages.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    99mTc-MAA Uptake and Catheter Position in Relation to Lesion-Based Therapy Response According to RECIST 1.1 After 6 Weeks and 3 Months

    RECIST 1.1 after 6 wk (lesion total, n = 377)RECIST 1.1 after 3 mo (lesion total, n = 290)
    ParameterPR (n = 28)SD (n = 278)PD (n = 71)PR (n = 32)SD (n = 164)PD (n = 94)
    99mTc-MAA uptake
     Low
      Group 16 (1.6)65 (17.2)14 (3.7)2 (0.7)44 (15.2)28 (9.7)
      Group 24 (1.1)65 (17.2)14 (3.7)8 (2.8)36 (12.4)26 (9.0)
     High
      Group 310 (2.7)72 (19.1)35 (9.3)9 (3.1)44 (15.2)31 (10.7)
      Group 48 (2.1)76 (20.2)8 (2.1)13 (4.5)40 (13.8)9 (3.1)
    Catheter position
     Identical22 (5.8)176 (46.7)51 (13.5)22 (7.6)104 (35.9)61 (21.0)
     Different6 (1.6)102 (27.1)20 (5.3)10 (3.4)60 (20.7)33 (11.4)
    • Data in parentheses are percentages.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Patient Demographics and Tumor Response Are Assessed by MR Imaging in Previously Treated Liver Lobe 6 Weeks After 90Y Radioembolization

    RECIST 1.1
    DemographicPR (n = 3)Stable disease (n = 49)PD (n = 6)
    Age (y)65.7 ± 1.260.4 ± 11.059.5 ± 11.2
    Sex
     Female (n)2 (3.4)19 (32.8)2 (3.4)
     Male (n)1 (1.7)30 (51.7)4 (6.9)
    Dose of 99mTc-MAA given (MBq)153.3 ± 7.6152.4 ± 34.1158.0 ± 32.3
    Liver-to-lung shunt (%)6.2 ± 4.56.6 ± 3.47.7 ± 3.7
    Dose of 90Y given (MBq)1,266.7 ± 208.21,144.6 ± 203.71,000.0 ± 298.3
    Low 99mTc-MAA
     Group 105 (8.6)0
     Group 21 (1.7)17 (29.3)2 (3.4)
    High 99mTc-MAA
     Group 31 (1.7)20 (34.5)3 (5.2)
     Group 41 (1.7)7 (12.1)1 (1.7)
    Catheter position
     Identical3 (5.2)30 (51.7)3 (5.2)
     Different019 (32.8)3 (5.2)
    • Data are mean ± SD or n, with percentages in parentheses. Total number of patients was 58.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Patient Demographics and Tumor Response Are Assessed by MR Imaging in Previously Treated Liver Lobe 3 Months After 90Y Radioembolization

    RECIST 1.1
    DemographicPR (n = 5)Stable disease (n = 26)PD (n = 17)
    Age (y)59.6 ± 7.961.0 ± 12.558.8 ± 9.7
    Sex
     Female (n)2 (4.2)10 (20.8)8 (16.7)
     Male (n)3 (6.3)16 (33.3)9 (18.8)
    Dose of 99mTc-MAA given (MBq)131.4 ± 31.1152.6 ± 29.2153.9 ± 30.9
    Liver-to-lung shunt (%)7.0 ± 2.45.9 ± 2.76.1 ± 2.4
    Dose of 90Y given (MBq)1,242.0 ± 181.21,179.2 ± 175.31,132.9 ± 278.3
    Low MAA
     Group 104 (8.3)1 (2.1)
     Group 209 (18.8)9 (18.8)
    High MAA
     Group 33 (6.3)9 (18.8)4 (8.3)
     Group 42 (4.2)4 (8.3)3 (6.3)
    Catheter position
     Identical3 (6.3)14 (29.2)10 (20.8)
     Different2 (4.2)12 (25.0)7 (14.6)
    • Data are mean ± SD or n, with percentages in parentheses. Total number of patients was 48.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 54 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 54, Issue 4
April 1, 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predictive Value of Intratumoral 99mTc-Macroaggregated Albumin Uptake in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Scheduled for Radioembolization with 90Y-Microspheres
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Predictive Value of Intratumoral 99mTc-Macroaggregated Albumin Uptake in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Scheduled for Radioembolization with 90Y-Microspheres
Gerhard Ulrich, Oliver Dudeck, Christian Furth, Juri Ruf, Oliver S. Grosser, Daniela Adolf, Marvin Stiebler, Jens Ricke, Holger Amthauer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2013, 54 (4) 516-522; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.112508

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Predictive Value of Intratumoral 99mTc-Macroaggregated Albumin Uptake in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Scheduled for Radioembolization with 90Y-Microspheres
Gerhard Ulrich, Oliver Dudeck, Christian Furth, Juri Ruf, Oliver S. Grosser, Daniela Adolf, Marvin Stiebler, Jens Ricke, Holger Amthauer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2013, 54 (4) 516-522; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.112508
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Reply: High Impact of Preferential Flow on 99mTc-MAA and 90Y-Loaded Microsphere Uptake Correlation
  • Partition Model-Based 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Predictive Dosimetry Compared with 90Y TOF PET/CT Posttreatment Dosimetry in Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Quantitative Agreement Comparison
  • Predictive Value of 99mTc-MAA SPECT for 90Y-Labeled Resin Microsphere Distribution in Radioembolization of Primary and Secondary Hepatic Tumors
  • Systematic Evaluation of Tumoral 99mTc-MAA Uptake Using SPECT and SPECT/CT in 502 Patients Before 90Y Radioembolization
  • Reply: Pretreatment Dosimetry in HCC Radioembolization with 90Y Glass Microspheres Cannot Be Invalidated with a Bare Visual Evaluation of 99mTc-MAA Uptake of Colorectal Metastases Treated with Resin Microspheres
  • Pretreatment Dosimetry in HCC Radioembolization with 90Y Glass Microspheres Cannot Be Invalidated with a Bare Visual Evaluation of 99mTc-MAA Uptake of Colorectal Metastases Treated with Resin Microspheres
  • Reply: Results Confounded by a Disregard for Basic Dose-Response Radiobiology
  • Value of 99mTc-Macroaggregated Albumin SPECT for Radioembolization Treatment Planning
  • Results Confounded by a Disregard for Basic Dose-Response Radiobiology
  • Reply: Value of 99mTc-Macroaggregated Albumin SPECT for Radioembolization Treatment Planning
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • radioembolization
  • perfusion scintigraphy
  • SIR-spheres
  • response prediction
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire